Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,42 @@
|
|
| 2 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
---
|
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
# Experiment 1:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Total collapse. The three models did not conform and the patchwork did not learn. The objectives are not correct.
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
---
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
+
# Experiment 2:
|
| 6 |
+
95/256 anchors survive, emergent geometric structure formed.
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
R@1= 97.1%, not quite but getting there. Experiment 2 was successful enough to push harder in this direction.
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
```
|
| 11 |
+
=================================================================
|
| 12 |
+
PHASE 5: TRAINING
|
| 13 |
+
20 epochs, lr=0.001, CV target=0.2731
|
| 14 |
+
=================================================================
|
| 15 |
+
E 1: mAP=0.788 F1=0.731 R@1=0.971 cos=0.806 cv=0.1213 anchors=226/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1676 β
|
| 16 |
+
E 2: mAP=0.803 F1=0.742 R@1=0.971 cos=0.809 cv=0.1178 anchors=200/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1459 β
|
| 17 |
+
E 3: mAP=0.810 F1=0.735 R@1=0.973 cos=0.808 cv=0.1197 anchors=161/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1431 β
|
| 18 |
+
E 4: mAP=0.817 F1=0.752 R@1=0.971 cos=0.811 cv=0.1262 anchors=131/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1404 β
|
| 19 |
+
E 5: mAP=0.823 F1=0.755 R@1=0.971 cos=0.812 cv=0.1232 anchors=113/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1389 β
|
| 20 |
+
E 6: mAP=0.825 F1=0.755 R@1=0.972 cos=0.815 cv=0.1105 anchors=104/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1379 β
|
| 21 |
+
E 7: mAP=0.827 F1=0.767 R@1=0.970 cos=0.814 cv=0.1125 anchors=101/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1369 β
|
| 22 |
+
E 8: mAP=0.829 F1=0.763 R@1=0.971 cos=0.815 cv=0.1239 anchors=99/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1361 β
|
| 23 |
+
E 9: mAP=0.832 F1=0.764 R@1=0.972 cos=0.815 cv=0.1164 anchors=98/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1355 β
|
| 24 |
+
E10: mAP=0.833 F1=0.765 R@1=0.968 cos=0.814 cv=0.1166 anchors=99/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1345 β
|
| 25 |
+
E11: mAP=0.834 F1=0.763 R@1=0.971 cos=0.814 cv=0.1214 anchors=98/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1346 β
|
| 26 |
+
E12: mAP=0.833 F1=0.764 R@1=0.973 cos=0.813 cv=0.1200 anchors=95/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1343
|
| 27 |
+
E13: mAP=0.836 F1=0.761 R@1=0.972 cos=0.813 cv=0.1081 anchors=94/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1338 β
|
| 28 |
+
E14: mAP=0.836 F1=0.772 R@1=0.973 cos=0.812 cv=0.1170 anchors=95/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1334
|
| 29 |
+
E15: mAP=0.835 F1=0.774 R@1=0.970 cos=0.812 cv=0.1223 anchors=95/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1338
|
| 30 |
+
E16: mAP=0.837 F1=0.777 R@1=0.968 cos=0.812 cv=0.1225 anchors=96/256 nce=1.000 loss=0.1339 β
|
| 31 |
+
E17: mAP=0.834 F1=0.772 R@1=0.973 cos=0.811 cv=0.1089 anchors=95/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1327
|
| 32 |
+
E18: mAP=0.834 F1=0.770 R@1=0.973 cos=0.812 cv=0.1156 anchors=95/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1321
|
| 33 |
+
E19: mAP=0.834 F1=0.773 R@1=0.970 cos=0.811 cv=0.1224 anchors=96/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1328
|
| 34 |
+
E20: mAP=0.835 F1=0.770 R@1=0.971 cos=0.812 cv=0.1159 anchors=96/256 nce=0.999 loss=0.1328
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
Best mAP: 0.837
|
| 37 |
+
CV target: 0.2731
|
| 38 |
+
```
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
# Experiment 1:
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Total collapse. The three models did not conform and the patchwork did not learn. The objectives are not correct.
|