raw:
1
The image is completely black, indicating no discernible content or details, which is the lowest possible quality on the given scale.


raw:
1
The image is heavily degraded, with significant noise and a lack of discernible details, making it difficult to identify any specific content or features.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern any clear details or content. The lack of focus and clarity significantly degrades the perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern any details or content. The lack of clarity and sharpness indicates a very low perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily degraded with significant noise, compression artifacts, and blur, making it difficult to discern any clear details or content.


raw:
1
The image is heavily degraded, with significant noise and a lack of sharpness, making it difficult to discern details.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred and lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern specific features or objects. The lack of sharpness and clarity suggests a low perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily distorted, with a warped and fragmented appearance, making it difficult to discern any clear details or content. The lack of sharpness and the presence of artifacts suggest a very low perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern any clear details or features. The lack of sharpness and the presence of motion blur suggest a very low perceptual quality.


raw:
2

The image appears to have a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which affects its overall quality. The details are not very clear, and there seems to be some distortion or blurring, which is not ideal for a high-quality image.


raw: 2. The image is somewhat blurry and lacks detail, which is typical for low-resolution or compressed images. The lack of sharpness and detail suggests it is not of high quality.


raw:
3

The image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the details are still discernible, and there are no severe artifacts or blurring present.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred and lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern specific features or content. The overall quality is severely degraded.


raw:
3

The image has a somewhat abstract and painterly quality, which might be intentional, but it also appears to have some level of noise or distortion, particularly in the background and the details of the figure. The overall clarity and sharpness are not high, which is why it doesn't reach a 5.


raw:
2

The image appears to have a high level of distortion and lacks clarity, which is evident from the unnatural shapes and the lack of distinct features. The colors are vibrant but the overall structure is not coherent, indicating a low perceptual quality.


raw: 2. The image appears to have a high level of noise and blurriness, which significantly degrades the overall quality. The details are not clear, and the texture is not well-defined, indicating a lower perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily distorted, with a blurred and indistinct face, and the overall quality is very low.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, but there are some visible artifacts and a lack of sharpness, which prevents it from being rated higher. The colors are somewhat muted, and the overall composition is somewhat abstract, which might be intentional but still affects the perceived quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern specific details or features, which significantly degrades its perceptual quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with vibrant colors and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the flower's structure are well-defined, indicating a high perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern details, and the overall quality is very low.


raw:
2

The image is blurry and lacks sharpness, which affects its overall quality. The details are not clear, and the edges are not well-defined, indicating a lower perceptual quality.


raw:
3

The image has a soft focus and a warm, painterly quality, which gives it a certain charm but also indicates it is not sharp or clean. There are no obvious compression artifacts or noise, but the lack of sharpness and detail brings it down from a higher rating.


raw:
3

The image is somewhat blurry and the details are not very sharp, which affects the overall quality. However, the colors are vibrant and the subject is recognizable, which slightly elevates the rating above a 1.


raw:
3

The image has a high level of detail and clarity, with a clean and sharp appearance. However, the subject matter is highly stylized and surreal, which may not be indicative of the image's technical quality. The color palette and composition are well-executed, but the subject's expression and the blood splatter effect add a layer of artistic interpretation that can be subjective. The image does not exhibit any visible noise, compression artifacts, or blur, which are common issues that


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the overall structure and details are still discernible, indicating it is not severely degraded.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, but there is a slight blur and the edges are not perfectly sharp, which slightly reduces its quality from a perfect 5.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, with some softness in the edges and a slightly blurred background, which is common in digital art. There are no obvious signs of heavy noise, compression artifacts, or blurriness that would significantly degrade the quality. However, the lack of sharpness and the presence of some softness suggest it is not in the highest quality category.


raw:
3

The image is somewhat blurry and lacks sharpness, which affects its overall quality. The details are not very clear, and there is a noticeable lack of focus, which is why it doesn't reach the higher quality rating.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and detailed, with a high level of color saturation and clarity. The stars and nebulae are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or blurriness. However, the image appears to be a composite or a heavily processed photograph, which might slightly reduce the score.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the character's outfit and the weapon are well-defined, indicating a high-quality render.


raw:
3

The image has a soft focus and a dreamy quality, which might be intentional for artistic effect. However, the lack of sharpness and the presence of some noise suggest it is not of high quality. The lighting and color are well-balanced, but the overall clarity is not as high as it could be.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with good detail in the feathers and the bird's features. The background is a gradient of yellow, which does not detract from the main subject. There are no visible artifacts or compression issues, indicating a high perceptual quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and detailed, with vibrant colors and smooth lines. However, there is a slight softness in the edges, which prevents it from being rated as a perfect 5.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the character's face and hair are well-defined, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 2. The image is blurry, which affects the overall clarity and detail, but the colors and shapes are still distinguishable. There is some noise present, which slightly degrades the quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the mirror frame and the reflection are sharp, indicating a high-quality image.


raw:
3

The image has a moderate level of blur and lacks sharpness, which affects the overall quality. The lighting and color are somewhat muted, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be present in a high-quality image. However, the subject is still recognizable, and the composition is clear enough to understand the scene.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a soft focus and a somewhat muted color palette, which gives it a painterly quality. While the details are not sharp, the overall composition and the interplay of light and shadow are well-executed, suggesting a moderate level of perceptual quality.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a soft focus, which is intentional for artistic effect, but it does result in a lack of sharpness and detail. The colors are vibrant, but the overall clarity is compromised, making it difficult to discern fine details. The lighting is even, and there are no obvious compression artifacts or noise, but the soft focus detracts from the image's quality.


raw:
3

The image is clear and the details are visible, but there is a slight blur and the lighting is not optimal, which slightly reduces the quality.


raw: 3 The image is somewhat clear but has a slightly grainy texture and the text appears to be distorted, which affects the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and clarity, with a clean and sharp appearance. The lighting and colors are well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or distortions. The composition is also well-executed, making it a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the person's skin texture and clothing are sharp, indicating a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and clear, with no visible noise, compression artifacts, or blur. The colors are well-defined, and the details in the clouds and waves are sharp, indicating a high perceptual quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with good detail on the subject and the background. The colors are vibrant, and there are no visible artifacts or blurriness. However, the image appears to be slightly compressed, as indicated by the subtle loss of detail in the feathers of the goose and the texture of the man's clothing. This slight compression reduces the image quality to a 4.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of distortion, with the person's body and the object they are holding appearing to be unnaturally deformed and stretched. This suggests that the image may have been manipulated or is of low quality, resulting in a perceptual quality of 3.


raw:
3

The image has a moderate level of detail and clarity, with some areas appearing slightly blurred or distorted, particularly around the edges of the central window-like structure. The colors are vibrant, but the overall sharpness and definition are not at the highest quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-defined, with good lighting and color saturation. The details in the clothing and facial features are sharp, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. However, the image appears to be a painting, which may not be considered as high quality as a photograph due to the artistic style and potential for intentional brushstrokes or artistic effects.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, but there are some minor artifacts and a slightly grainy texture that detract from its overall quality. The composition is interesting, but the image could benefit from being cleaner and sharper.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with clean details, sharp edges, and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting is well-balanced, and the textures on the armor are rendered with good fidelity.


raw:
4

The image is visually striking with a clear and vibrant depiction of a dragon silhouette against a fiery background. The colors are well-defined, and the overall composition is sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The contrast between the dark dragon and the bright background enhances the visual impact, making it a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with a high level of detail visible in the subject's clothing and the instrument. The lighting and composition are effective, creating a dramatic and professional appearance. However, there is a slight softness to the image that prevents it from being a perfect 5, but it is still of high perceptual quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with good detail visible on the equipment and the individuals. The colors are vibrant, and there are no noticeable artifacts or compression issues. However, the image could be slightly sharper, which would elevate the quality to a perfect 5.


raw:
4

The image is relatively clean and sharp, with a clear distinction between the mountain, the water, and the sky. The lighting is even, and there are no visible compression artifacts or noise. However, the image appears to be a digital creation or a highly stylized photograph, which might not be considered "high quality" in the traditional sense of a photograph taken with a high-end camera.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with good focus on the subject. The lighting is even, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject, but the overall quality is high.


raw:
3

The image has a soft focus and a painterly quality, which gives it a certain artistic appeal but also results in a lack of sharpness and detail that would be expected in a high-quality image. The colors are muted and the overall composition is somewhat abstract, which might be intentional but contributes to the lower quality rating.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and clarity, with smooth gradients and a lack of visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and color are well-balanced, contributing to a visually appealing and high-quality appearance.


raw:
3

The image has a moderate level of noise and graininess, which slightly degrades the overall quality. The lighting is uneven, and the details are not very sharp, but the composition and elements are discernible.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and detailed, with a high level of clarity and sharpness. The colors are vivid, and the structure of the galaxy is well-defined, indicating a high-quality image with minimal noise or artifacts.


raw:
3

The image has a clear and sharp appearance with no visible noise or compression artifacts. However, the lighting and reflections create a somewhat surreal and artificial look, which might be considered a stylistic choice rather than a flaw in quality. The overall composition is well-defined, but the stylized nature of the image might not align with the expectations of high-quality photography in a traditional sense.


raw:
3

The image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the details are still discernible, and the colors are vibrant, which is a positive aspect.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The character and background are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or blurriness. The lighting and shading are also well-executed, contributing to the overall high-quality appearance.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with smooth skin texture and natural lighting. The details in the hair and clothing are visible, and there are no noticeable artifacts or compression issues. The overall quality is high, but it could be slightly sharper to achieve a perfect 5.


raw:
4

The image is clear and detailed, with good color saturation and sharpness. However, there is a slight softness in the edges, which prevents it from being rated as a perfect 5.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with good detail visible in the vehicle and the surrounding environment. The colors are vibrant, and there is no noticeable noise or compression artifacts. The sharpness is good, and the overall composition is pleasing.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and clear, with well-defined colors and details. The trees, flowers, and the beehive are all sharp and distinct, indicating a high-quality image. However, there is a slight softness to the edges, which might be due to the artistic style rather than degradation.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and clarity, with a smooth gradient and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and color are well-balanced, contributing to a visually appealing and high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The lighting is well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. The character and background elements are rendered with a high level of detail, contributing to the overall high perceptual quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and detailed, with a high level of sharpness and a lack of visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and color are well-balanced, contributing to a high-quality visual experience.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with the flowers in focus and the background providing a clean, neutral backdrop. There are no visible noise, compression artifacts, or blur that would detract from the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and clarity, with smooth gradients and a well-defined subject. The lighting and color are well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or distortions. However, the background is somewhat blurred, which might be intentional to emphasize the subject, but it slightly reduces the overall sharpness.


raw:
3

The image has a stylized, artistic quality with a clear focus on the Eiffel Tower. The red splatter effect adds a dramatic element, but the overall image is not blurry or noisy. However, the artistic style and the use of color might be considered a form of degradation in terms of realism, which is why it doesn't quite reach a 5.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with good detail on the frog and the hat. The background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject. There are no visible noise or compression artifacts, and the colors are vibrant. The lighting is even, and the overall composition is pleasing.


raw:
4

The image is clear and detailed, with vibrant colors and smooth lines. There are no visible artifacts or blurriness, indicating a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-defined, with no visible noise, compression artifacts, or blur. The lines are sharp, and the colors are vibrant, indicating a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with good detail and sharpness. The subject is in focus, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. The lighting is even, and the colors are natural, contributing to a high-quality appearance.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The lighting and shading are well-executed, contributing to a visually appealing and realistic appearance. There are no visible artifacts or compression issues that would detract from the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image is quite clear and sharp, with good lighting and color saturation. The underwater scene is well-composed, and the details of the coral and the water's texture are visible. However, there is a slight haze or blur, which might be due to the underwater environment, but it doesn't significantly degrade the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and detailed, with vibrant colors and sharp lines. The texture of the fur and the leaves is well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or blurriness. However, the image appears to be a digital illustration rather than a photograph, which might slightly lower the quality compared to a high-resolution photo.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and detailed, with a clear and sharp depiction of the landscape. The colors are rich and the lines are well-defined, indicating a high-quality digital illustration. However, there are no visible artifacts or noise, which slightly reduces the score to 4.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with good focus on the donut and the small pastry. The details are sharp, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The composition is also pleasing, with the donut and pastry placed attractively on the plate.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-lit, with a good level of detail visible in the subject's features and clothing. The colors are natural and the composition is pleasing, indicating a high-quality photograph. However, there is a slight softness to the image, which prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw:
4

The image is very clear and sharp, with vibrant colors and fine details visible on the gecko's skin. There are no noticeable artifacts or compression issues, indicating a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image is clear and well-composed, with good lighting and sharp details in the architecture and garden. The colors are vibrant, and there are no visible artifacts or distortions. The only slight deduction from a perfect score is the presence of a watermark, which is not ideal but does not significantly impact the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and detailed, with no visible noise, compression artifacts, or blur. The texture of the brain is well-defined, and the lighting is even, contributing to a high-quality appearance.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with a clean and sharp appearance. The details in the subject's face and clothing are well-defined, and there are no visible compression artifacts or noise. The lighting is even, and the colors are vibrant, contributing to the overall high-quality perception of the image.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with good color saturation and contrast. The details of the train car and the surrounding environment are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The composition is also well-balanced, contributing to the overall high quality of the image.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The lion's fur texture and facial features are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. The lighting is well-balanced, enhancing the overall perception of the image.


raw:
4

The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the furniture and the reflections in the windows are clear, indicating a high-quality render.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, with some visible noise and artifacts, particularly around the edges of the astronaut and the background. The text is somewhat legible, but the overall quality is not high due to these imperfections.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with good detail in the cat's fur and the leaf. The colors are vibrant, and there is no visible noise or compression artifacts. The background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject, but it does not detract from the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and detailed, with a high level of sharpness and a clean appearance. The textures and colors are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. The contrast is high, which enhances the visual impact of the image.


raw:
3

The image is clear and well-lit, but it appears to be a black and white photograph, which inherently limits the detail and color accuracy. There are no visible compression artifacts or blurring, and the subject is in focus, making it a decent quality image. However, the lack of color and the potential for graininess in black and white photography prevent it from being rated higher.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with good lighting and a clean background. The details in the subject's face are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, but there is a slight blur and some noise, which slightly reduces its quality. The composition is visually appealing, but the imperfections prevent it from being a perfect 5.


raw: ERROR (after 3 attempts): HTTPError: HTTP Error 503: Service Unavailable


raw: 4. The image is clear and sharp, with good contrast and detail, but there is a slight graininess which might be due to the black and white format or the artistic choice. It does not have any obvious compression artifacts or blurring.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with good lighting and a well-composed subject. The details in the hair and the texture of the dress are visible, and there are no noticeable artifacts or compression issues. The background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject, but the overall quality is high.