raw: 1. The image is completely black, indicating no discernible content or detail. This suggests severe degradation, with no visual information to assess quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily degraded, with low visibility and a lack of discernible details, indicating severe noise and possible compression artifacts.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern any clear details or content. The lack of focus and clarity significantly degrades the perceptual quality.


raw: 1. The image is heavily blurred and lacks any discernible details, making it impossible to identify the subject or any other elements within the image.


raw:
1
The image is heavily degraded with significant noise, compression artifacts, and blur, making it difficult to discern any clear content or details.


raw: 1. The image is heavily degraded with significant noise, compression artifacts, and blurriness, making it difficult to discern any clear details or content.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred and lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern specific features or content. The lack of sharpness and clarity indicates a low perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily distorted, with severe blurring and a lack of recognizable features, making it difficult to discern any details or content.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which is why it is not rated as high quality. However, the content is still somewhat discernible, which prevents it from being rated as severely degraded.


raw:
3

The image appears to be a low-resolution or compressed version of a cartoon character, likely a mouse, with some artifacts visible in the lines and shapes. The details are not very sharp, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be present in a high-quality image.


raw: 3 The image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which is common in images with high levels of detail and texture, but it is not severely degraded.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred and lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern specific features or content. The overall quality is severely degraded.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which is typical for images that have been heavily compressed or are of low resolution. The details are not very clear, and there is a noticeable lack of fine texture, which is indicative of a lower perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily distorted with visible artifacts, blurring, and a lack of clear details, indicating a severely degraded quality.


raw:
3

The image appears to have some level of distortion or blurring, which affects the clarity and detail, but it is not heavily degraded. The colors and shapes are somewhat recognizable, indicating a moderate level of perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily degraded with visible noise, compression artifacts, and a lack of sharpness, making it difficult to discern details.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, with some visible artifacts and a lack of sharpness that prevents it from being rated higher. The colors are somewhat muted, and there is a noticeable lack of fine detail that suggests it may not be of the highest quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern specific details or features, which significantly degrades its perceptual quality.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with vibrant colors and clear details, but there is a slight lack of sharpness in the petals, which prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern details, which significantly degrades its perceptual quality.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of blur, which affects the overall sharpness and detail. The lighting and colors are somewhat muted, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be expected in a high-quality image. The subject is recognizable, but the lack of clarity detracts from the quality.


raw: 3 The image has a soft, painterly quality with a warm color palette, but the details are not very sharp and there is a slight blur, which prevents it from being rated higher.


raw:
3

The image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which is why it doesn't qualify for a higher rating. However, the main subject is still recognizable, and the colors are vibrant, which is better than a severely degraded image.


raw: 3 The image has a high level of detail and clarity, but the subject matter is highly stylized and surreal, which may affect the perception of quality. The colors are vibrant and the lines are sharp, but the subject's expression and the blood splatter are intentionally exaggerated for artistic effect.


raw: 3 The image appears to have a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which is typical for images that are heavily compressed or have been processed to a high degree of abstraction. The details are not very clear, and the overall quality is not high.


raw: 4 The image is vibrant and clear, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The colors are well-defined and the details are sharp, indicating a high perceptual quality.


raw: 3 The image appears to be a digital painting with a stylized, somewhat abstract quality. The colors are vibrant, and the lines are smooth, but there is a lack of fine detail and the image seems to have a soft, painterly texture rather than a crisp, high-resolution look. This gives it a certain charm but also means it doesn't quite reach the level of high quality.


raw: 3 The image is clear and the details of the painting are distinguishable, but there is a slight blur and the lighting is not optimal, which slightly reduces the quality.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with vibrant colors and clear details, but there is a slight lack of sharpness and some areas that could be more defined, which prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the character's outfit and the weapon are well-defined, indicating a high-quality render.


raw: 3 The image has a soft focus and some noise, which slightly degrades the quality, but the subject is still recognizable and the lighting is well-balanced.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, but there is a slight yellow tint that might be considered a minor imperfection.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and vibrant colors, but there is a slight blur around the edges which slightly reduces the score.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the character's face and hair are well-defined, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 2. The image is blurry and lacks sharpness, which affects the overall quality. The details are not clear, and the image appears to be out of focus.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the mirror frame and the reflection are well-defined.


raw:
3

The image has a moderate level of blur and lacks sharpness, which affects the overall quality. The lighting and color are somewhat muted, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be expected in a high-quality image.


raw: 3 The image appears to be a painting with a soft, somewhat blurry quality, which is typical for artistic renderings. The details are not sharp, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be expected in a high-quality photograph. However, the colors and composition are well-defined, indicating a good perceptual quality for a painting.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a soft, painterly quality with a lack of sharpness and detail, which is characteristic of a certain artistic style or filter rather than a degradation in quality. The colors are vibrant, and the subject is recognizable, but the overall impression is more artistic than photographic.


raw: 3 The image is clear and the details are distinguishable, but there is a slight blur and the lighting is not optimal, which slightly reduces the quality.


raw: 3 The image appears to be of moderate quality, with some noise and compression artifacts present, but the details are still discernible.


raw: 4 The image is visually striking and the details are clear, but the surreal nature of the composition and the blending of elements (like the road and the sky) might be seen as slightly artificial, which slightly reduces the overall quality.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The subject is in focus, and the details are sharp, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is clear and the colors are vibrant, but there is a slight lack of sharpness and detail that prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the person's clothing and the texture of the goose are sharp, indicating a high-quality image.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, but there are some artifacts and distortions, particularly around the edges of the subject and the background, which slightly degrade the overall quality.


raw:
3

The image has a high level of detail and color, but the lines are not perfectly sharp, and there is a slight lack of clarity in the edges of the objects, which prevents it from being rated as a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is clear and detailed, with good lighting and color, but there is a slight graininess that suggests it might be a painting rather than a photograph, which is common for older artworks.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and detailed, with a high level of visual complexity and a clear, sharp focus on the subject matter. The colors are rich and the lines are well-defined, indicating a high-quality digital illustration. However, the image is not completely free of noise or artifacts, which slightly reduces its score to 4.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, though there is a slight lack of depth and texture that might be due to the digital nature of the character model. The lighting is well-balanced, and the character's features are rendered with good clarity.


raw: 4 The image is visually striking and the dragon is well-defined with smooth gradients and a clear circular frame. However, the edges of the dragon and the frame could be slightly sharper, indicating it might not be at the highest quality.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and contrast are well-balanced, and the subject is in focus.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the equipment and the individuals are sharp, indicating a high quality image.


raw: 4 The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the rock and the water are well-defined, and the lighting is even, contributing to a high-quality appearance.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with good detail and a clean background, indicating a high quality photograph.


raw: 3 The image has a soft, painterly quality with a focus on the subject's face, but the background is somewhat blurry and lacks detail, which slightly reduces the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and clarity, with smooth gradients and a lack of noise or compression artifacts. The lighting is well-balanced, and the subject is in focus, making it a high-quality image.


raw: 3 The image has a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the details are still discernible, and the lighting is balanced, making it a decent quality image.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and detailed, with a high level of clarity and a wide range of colors. The spiral structure is well-defined, and the stars are numerous and distinct, indicating a high-quality image. However, the image is not perfect, as there are some minor artifacts and the colors are somewhat saturated, which prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 3 The image has a clear subject and a well-defined environment, but the lighting and reflections create some visual noise and artifacts, which slightly degrade the overall quality.


raw: 3 The image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which is why it doesn't qualify for a higher rating.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The character and background are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The lighting is even, and the overall composition is pleasing to the eye.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, minimal noise, and no visible compression artifacts or blurring.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but there is a slight lack of depth and the lighting could be more natural.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with good detail in the subject and background. There are no noticeable artifacts or compression issues.


raw: 4 The image is vibrant and clear, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the trees and flowers are sharp, and the colors are rich and well-defined. However, the text in the bottom left corner appears to be a watermark or signature, which slightly detracts from the overall quality.


raw: 4 The image is visually striking and has a high level of detail, with a clear and sharp focus on the tunnel's perspective. The lighting and color gradient are well-executed, contributing to a high-quality appearance. However, there is a slight presence of noise, which slightly detracts from the perfect score.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The lighting is well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. The subject is in focus, and the background is appropriately blurred, which enhances the overall quality of the image.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but the lighting and color grading give it a slightly surreal, painterly quality which might be considered a stylistic choice rather than a degradation.


raw: 4 The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the flowers are well-defined, and the colors are vibrant, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but there is a slight softness in the rendering that might be considered a minor degradation.


raw: 3 The image is clear and the details of the Eiffel Tower are well-defined, but the red splatter effect and the lack of a background context slightly reduce the overall quality.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, but the background is slightly blurred which is a common technique to emphasize the subject.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but there is a slight lack of depth and contrast that prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 4 The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details are well-defined, and the colors are vibrant, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with good detail and color accuracy. However, there is a slight softness to the image that prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and shading are well-executed, contributing to a visually appealing and realistic appearance.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clear details, vibrant colors, and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The underwater scene is well-lit and the textures of the rocks and plants are sharp.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines and vibrant colors, but it appears to be a digital illustration rather than a photograph, which might slightly lower the score. The details are sharp, and there are no visible compression artifacts or noise.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and clear, with a high level of detail and a smooth color gradient. The lines are sharp, and there are no visible artifacts or noise, indicating a high perceptual quality.


raw: 4 The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the donut and its toppings are well-defined, and the lighting is even, contributing to the high quality of the image.


raw:
4

The image appears to have a high level of detail and clarity, with a soft focus that adds to the aesthetic quality. The lighting is well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or noise that would detract from the overall quality. The subject is in focus, and the composition is pleasing, which contributes to a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with good detail and color, but there is a slight softness in the background which slightly reduces the overall quality from a perfect 5.


raw:
4

The image appears to have a high level of detail and clarity, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The textures of the stones, plants, and the wooden structure are well-defined, and the lighting is even, contributing to the overall quality of the image.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, suggesting it is not heavily degraded. However, there is a slight lack of depth and the lighting seems a bit flat, which might slightly lower the score. The image is not compressed or noisy, and the details are well-defined.


raw:
4

The image appears to have a high level of detail and clarity, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting is well-balanced, and the subject is in focus, which contributes to the overall quality of the image.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and clarity, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and color saturation are well-balanced, and the subject is in focus, making it a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and color are well-balanced, contributing to the overall perception of a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting is even, and the colors are well-defined, contributing to a visually pleasing and professional appearance.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, with some visible noise and artifacts, particularly around the edges of the astronaut and the planets. The colors are vibrant, but the overall sharpness and clarity are not at the highest level, which is why it is not rated as a 5.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with good detail in the cat's fur and the leaf. The colors are vibrant, and there is no visible noise or compression artifacts. However, the background is slightly out of focus, which is a common technique to draw attention to the subject but it slightly reduces the overall quality from a perfect 5.


raw:
4

The image is clear and detailed, with a high level of sharpness and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The colors are vibrant, and the subject is well-defined against the background, indicating a high-quality image.


raw:
3

The image appears to be of moderate quality, with some graininess and lack of sharpness, which is common for older photographs. The details are not very crisp, and there are some visible artifacts, particularly in the lighting and contrast. The subject is recognizable, but the overall image quality is not high.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with a clean and sharp appearance. The lighting is well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The details in the subject's face are clear, and the background is softly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, but there is a slight blur and some noise, which slightly reduces its quality from a perfect 5. The composition and lighting are well-executed, making it a strong 4.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, with a soft focus that adds to the dreamy quality. The butterflies and background are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. However, the slight softness might be considered a slight degradation from a perfect score.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with a clear focus on the subject, sharp details, and a high level of contrast. The lighting and shadows are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or noise that would detract from the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with a clean and sharp appearance. The details in the subject's hair, clothing, and jewelry are well-defined, and the background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject. There are no visible noise, compression artifacts, or blurring that would detract from the overall quality of the image.