{"name": "glide_normal_263.jpg", "mos": 0.0, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1. The image is completely black, indicating no discernible content or details. This suggests severe degradation, with no visual information to assess quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.42795372009277344, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_130.jpg", "mos": 0.195283431, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily degraded, with significant noise and a lack of discernible details, making it difficult to identify any specific content or features.", "elapsed_s": 0.27666449546813965, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_225.jpg", "mos": 0.339513003, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern any clear details or content. The lack of focus and clarity significantly degrades the perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.2867302894592285, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_highcorr_037.jpg", "mos": 0.550374317, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern any details or content. The lack of clarity and sharpness significantly degrades the perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.27996015548706055, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "glide_normal_225.jpg", "mos": 0.613396089, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily degraded with significant noise, compression artifacts, and blur, making it difficult to discern any clear details or content.", "elapsed_s": 0.25064826011657715, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "glide_normal_094.jpg", "mos": 0.678182301, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily degraded, with significant noise and a lack of sharpness, making it difficult to discern details.", "elapsed_s": 0.23379254341125488, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_293.jpg", "mos": 0.739960598, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily blurred and lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern specific features or objects. The lack of sharpness and clarity suggests a low perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.2978236675262451, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_161.jpg", "mos": 0.780698266, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily distorted, with visible artifacts and a lack of clarity, making it difficult to discern details.", "elapsed_s": 0.2273728847503662, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_264.jpg", "mos": 0.831522735, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern any details or content. The lack of clarity and sharpness significantly degrades the perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.28820323944091797, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_190.jpg", "mos": 0.875752826, "score": 2.0, "raw": "2\n\nThe image appears to have a high level of noise and lacks sharpness, which are common issues in low-quality digital images. The details are not clear, and there is a noticeable lack of fine detail that would be present in a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.39647984504699707, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "glide_normal_280.jpg", "mos": 0.902526954, "score": 2.0, "raw": "2. The image is somewhat blurry and lacks detail, which is typical for low-resolution or compressed images. The lack of sharpness and detail suggests it is not of high quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.29959845542907715, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_172.jpg", "mos": 0.940601322, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the details are still discernible, and there are no severe artifacts or blurring present.", "elapsed_s": 0.3332939147949219, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_068.jpg", "mos": 1.006207915, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily blurred and lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern specific features or content. The lack of sharpness and clarity significantly degrades the perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.3099856376647949, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_114.jpg", "mos": 1.038703499, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a somewhat abstract and painterly quality, which might be intentional, but it also appears to have some level of noise or distortion, particularly in the background and the details of the figure. The overall clarity and sharpness are not high, which is why it doesn't quite reach a 5.", "elapsed_s": 0.6769933700561523, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_262.jpg", "mos": 1.075025374, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image exhibits heavy noise, compression artifacts, and a lack of sharpness, making it difficult to discern clear details or content.", "elapsed_s": 0.4604148864746094, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_245.jpg", "mos": 1.126728573, "score": 2.0, "raw": "2\n\nThe image appears to have a moderate level of noise and blurriness, which affects the overall clarity and detail. The edges are not sharp, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be expected in a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.5579328536987305, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "AttnGAN_normal_202.jpg", "mos": 1.182958257, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily distorted, with a blurred and indistinct appearance, making it difficult to discern any clear details or features. The overall quality is very poor, indicating severe degradation.", "elapsed_s": 0.4704287052154541, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "glide_normal_157.jpg", "mos": 1.269550286, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, with some visible noise and artifacts, particularly around the edges of the object. The colors are somewhat muted, and there is a lack of sharpness that prevents it from being rated higher.", "elapsed_s": 0.6132681369781494, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "DALLE2_normal_268.jpg", "mos": 1.351025623, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern specific details or features. The lack of sharpness and clarity suggests a low perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.5306763648986816, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "glide_normal_142.jpg", "mos": 1.391281461, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with vibrant colors and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the flower's structure are well-defined, indicating a high perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.5057659149169922, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_006.jpg", "mos": 1.445015122, "score": 1.0, "raw": "1\nThe image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern details, and the overall quality is very low.", "elapsed_s": 0.5345802307128906, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_103.jpg", "mos": 1.48681785, "score": 2.0, "raw": "2\n\nThe image is blurry and lacks sharpness, which affects its overall quality. The details are not clear, and the edges are not well-defined, indicating a lower perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.522895097732544, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_140.jpg", "mos": 1.540771109, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a soft, painterly quality with a warm color palette, which gives it a certain charm. However, the details are not very sharp, and there is a slight blur, which prevents it from being rated higher. The lighting and composition are well-executed, but the lack of sharpness brings it down to a 3.", "elapsed_s": 0.7348649501800537, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "glide_normal_066.jpg", "mos": 1.619473192, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image is somewhat blurry and the details are not very sharp, which affects the overall quality. However, the colors are vibrant and the subject is recognizable, which slightly elevates the rating above a 1.", "elapsed_s": 0.5165982246398926, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowstep_229.jpg", "mos": 1.711133213, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a high level of detail and clarity, with a clean and sharp appearance. However, the subject matter is highly stylized and surreal, which may not be indicative of the image's technical quality. The color palette and composition are well-executed, but the subject's expression and the blood-like substance on the face add an element of artistic interpretation that could be seen as a departure from traditional high-quality standards.", "elapsed_s": 0.9591643810272217, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_261.jpg", "mos": 1.776898668, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image appears to have a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the overall structure and details are still discernible, indicating it is not severely degraded.", "elapsed_s": 0.5955295562744141, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_068.jpg", "mos": 1.894194533, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, but there is a slight blur and the edges are not perfectly sharp, which slightly reduces its quality from a perfect 5.", "elapsed_s": 0.6189990043640137, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_186.jpg", "mos": 1.916425889, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, with some softness in the edges and a slightly blurred background. There are no obvious signs of heavy noise, compression artifacts, or blurriness that would significantly degrade the quality. However, the lack of sharpness and the presence of a soft focus suggest it is not in the highest quality category.", "elapsed_s": 0.66792893409729, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowcorr_141.jpg", "mos": 1.971039124, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image is somewhat blurry and lacks sharpness, which affects its overall quality. The colors appear muted, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be expected in a high-quality image. The framing and composition are clear, but the technical aspects of the image itself are not of the highest quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.7650983333587646, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowstep_003.jpg", "mos": 2.004546739, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is vibrant and detailed, with a high level of color saturation and clarity. The stars and nebulae are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or blurriness. However, the image appears to be a composite or a heavily processed photograph, which might slightly reduce the score.", "elapsed_s": 0.6339643001556396, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowstep_195.jpg", "mos": 2.03716536, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the character's outfit and the weapon are well-defined, indicating a high-quality render.", "elapsed_s": 0.527179479598999, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_235.jpg", "mos": 2.075576292, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a soft focus and a dreamy quality, which might be intentional for artistic effect. However, the lack of sharpness and the presence of some noise or softness in the details suggest it is not of high quality. The lighting and color are well-balanced, but the overall sharpness is below the ideal for a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.6355671882629395, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "glide_normal_108.jpg", "mos": 2.138862877, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with good detail in the feathers and the bird's features. The background is a gradient of yellow, which does not detract from the main subject. There are no visible artifacts or compression issues, indicating a high perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.616762638092041, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_171.jpg", "mos": 2.18011346, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and detailed, with vibrant colors and smooth lines. However, there is a slight softness in the edges, which prevents it from being rated as a perfect 5.", "elapsed_s": 0.65787672996521, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_080.jpg", "mos": 2.210104633, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the character's face and hair are well-defined, indicating a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.5435221195220947, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_004.jpg", "mos": 2.293494507, "score": 2.0, "raw": "2. The image is blurry and lacks sharpness, which affects the overall quality. The details of the armor are not clear, and there is a lack of focus that detracts from the image's clarity.", "elapsed_s": 0.881641149520874, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_216.jpg", "mos": 2.326531297, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the mirror frame and the reflection are well-defined, indicating a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.5366344451904297, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_294.jpg", "mos": 2.36946733, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a moderate level of blur and lacks sharpness, which affects the overall quality. The lighting and color are somewhat muted, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be present in a high-quality image. However, the image is not heavily degraded, and the subject is still recognizable.", "elapsed_s": 0.6667828559875488, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "DALLE2_normal_223.jpg", "mos": 2.40326321, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image appears to have a soft focus and a somewhat muted color palette, which gives it a painterly quality. While the details are not sharp, the overall composition and the interplay of light and shadow are well-executed, suggesting a moderate level of perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.856346845626831, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_132.jpg", "mos": 2.442957962, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image appears to have a moderate level of blurriness and lacks sharpness, which affects the overall quality. The lighting is even, and there are no obvious compression artifacts or noise, but the lack of detail and focus brings it down from a higher rating.", "elapsed_s": 0.6610889434814453, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "DALLE2_normal_018.jpg", "mos": 2.476222723, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image is clear and the details are visible, but there is a slight blur and the lighting is not optimal, which slightly reduces the quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.621588945388794, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_highcorr_046.jpg", "mos": 2.491680335, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3 The image is somewhat clear but has a slightly grainy texture and the text appears to be distorted, which affects the overall quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.45157909393310547, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_178.jpg", "mos": 2.518413241, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image has a high level of detail and clarity, with a clean and sharp appearance. The lighting and colors are well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The composition is also well-executed, making it a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.8286399841308594, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_101.jpg", "mos": 2.542752246, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the person's skin texture and clothing are sharp, indicating a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.6225788593292236, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowstep_115.jpg", "mos": 2.560764083, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is vibrant and clear, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The colors are well-defined, and the details in the clouds and waves are sharp, indicating a high perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.6196126937866211, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_221.jpg", "mos": 2.580492981, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, with good detail on the subject and the background. The colors are vibrant, and there are no visible artifacts or blurriness. However, the image appears to be slightly overexposed, which slightly reduces the overall quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.6176762580871582, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowstep_132.jpg", "mos": 2.610261314, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image appears to have a moderate level of distortion, with the person's body and the object they are holding appearing to be unnaturally deformed and stretched. This suggests that the image may have been manipulated or is of low quality, resulting in a perceptual quality of 3.", "elapsed_s": 0.6688086986541748, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowcorr_005.jpg", "mos": 2.64254653, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, but the edges are not perfectly sharp, and there is a slight blurriness, which prevents it from being rated as a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.5442168712615967, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_highcorr_156.jpg", "mos": 2.660597966, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-defined, with good lighting and color saturation. The details in the clothing and facial features are sharp, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. However, the image appears to be a painting, which may not be considered high quality in the context of digital photography.", "elapsed_s": 0.8225152492523193, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowcorr_200.jpg", "mos": 2.674859949, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, but there are some minor artifacts and a slightly grainy texture that detract from its overall quality. The composition is interesting, but the image could benefit from smoother blending and less noise for a higher rating.", "elapsed_s": 0.7287497520446777, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowstep_249.jpg", "mos": 2.692443672, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image appears to be of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, though there is a slight lack of depth and texture that might be due to the stylized nature of the character design. The lighting is even, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues.", "elapsed_s": 0.8464398384094238, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_005.jpg", "mos": 2.731010208, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and the details of the dragon are well-defined, with a smooth gradient and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and color are vibrant, contributing to a high-quality appearance.", "elapsed_s": 0.5077250003814697, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_101.jpg", "mos": 2.747600946, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, with a high level of detail visible in the subject's clothing and the instrument. The lighting and composition are effective, creating a dramatic and professional appearance. However, there is a slight softness to the image that prevents it from being a perfect 5, but it is still of high perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.6679718494415283, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_highcorr_167.jpg", "mos": 2.782759734, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, with good detail visible on the equipment and the individuals. The colors are vibrant, and there are no noticeable artifacts or compression issues. However, the image could be slightly sharper, which would elevate the quality to a perfect 5.", "elapsed_s": 0.7203850746154785, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_103.jpg", "mos": 2.803217798, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is relatively clean and sharp, with a clear distinction between the mountain, the water, and the sky. The lighting is even, and there are no visible compression artifacts or noise. However, the image appears to be a digital creation or a highly stylized photograph, which might not be considered \"high quality\" in the traditional sense of a photograph taken with a high-end camera.", "elapsed_s": 0.7729556560516357, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowcorr_034.jpg", "mos": 2.841733922, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with good focus on the subject. The lighting is even, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject, but the overall quality is high.", "elapsed_s": 0.6393687725067139, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_281.jpg", "mos": 2.869008944, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a soft focus and a painterly quality, which gives it a certain artistic appeal but also results in a lack of sharpness and detail that would be expected in a high-quality image. The colors are muted and the overall composition is somewhat abstract, which might be intentional for artistic effect, but it does not contribute to the image's clarity or sharpness.", "elapsed_s": 1.0042636394500732, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_254.jpg", "mos": 2.886258786, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image has a high level of detail and clarity, with smooth gradients and a well-defined subject. The lighting is soft and even, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The composition is also well-balanced, contributing to the overall high quality of the image.", "elapsed_s": 0.6561849117279053, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "DALLE2_normal_218.jpg", "mos": 2.908664621, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a moderate level of noise and some blurriness, particularly noticeable in the details of the furniture and the lighting. The lighting is uneven, with some areas being too bright and others too dark, which affects the overall perception of the image quality. The composition is somewhat cluttered, which might be intentional but still detracts from the perceived quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.796473503112793, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_003.jpg", "mos": 2.92075847, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is vibrant and detailed, with a high level of clarity and sharpness. The colors are vivid, and the structure of the galaxy is well-defined, indicating a high-quality image with minimal noise or artifacts.", "elapsed_s": 0.6593854427337646, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_160.jpg", "mos": 2.941741401, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a clear and sharp appearance with good contrast and color saturation. However, there is a noticeable lack of fine detail and texture, which slightly reduces the overall quality. The lighting and reflections are well-executed, but the lack of fine detail brings it down from a higher rating.", "elapsed_s": 0.7901194095611572, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowcorr_204.jpg", "mos": 2.966953132, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the details are still discernible, and the colors are vibrant, which is a positive aspect.", "elapsed_s": 0.6505274772644043, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowstep_281.jpg", "mos": 2.975194143, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The character and background are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or blurriness. The lighting and shading are also well-executed, contributing to the overall high-quality appearance.", "elapsed_s": 0.6462454795837402, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_129.jpg", "mos": 3.001476926, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image appears to be of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and a soft, natural lighting that enhances the subject's features without any visible noise or compression artifacts. The composition is well-balanced, and the background is unobtrusive, which helps to keep the focus on the subject.", "elapsed_s": 0.8656666278839111, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_164.jpg", "mos": 3.033265998, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-defined, with good color saturation and detail. However, there is a slight softness to the edges, which prevents it from being a perfect 5.", "elapsed_s": 0.6409480571746826, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_155.jpg", "mos": 3.062007692, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, with good detail visible in the vehicle and the surrounding environment. The colors are vibrant, and there is no noticeable noise or compression artifacts. The sharpness is good, and the overall composition is pleasing.", "elapsed_s": 0.8363807201385498, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowstep_100.jpg", "mos": 3.091620808, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is vibrant and clear, with well-defined colors and details. The trees, flowers, and the beehive are all sharp and distinct, indicating a high-quality image. However, there is a slight softness to the edges, which might be due to the artistic style rather than degradation.", "elapsed_s": 0.7331397533416748, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_highcorr_222.jpg", "mos": 3.108253189, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image has a high level of detail and clarity, with a smooth gradient and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and color are well-balanced, contributing to a visually appealing and high-quality appearance.", "elapsed_s": 0.7148237228393555, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_100.jpg", "mos": 3.135881857, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The lighting is well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. The character and background elements are rendered with good resolution, contributing to the overall high-quality appearance.", "elapsed_s": 0.6562826633453369, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_highcorr_194.jpg", "mos": 3.150815738, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and detailed, with a high level of sharpness and a lack of visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and color are well-balanced, contributing to a high-quality visual experience.", "elapsed_s": 0.5852651596069336, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "DALLE2_normal_212.jpg", "mos": 3.169097903, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, with the flowers in focus and the background providing a clean, neutral backdrop. There are no visible noise, compression artifacts, or blurriness that would detract from the overall quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.6210207939147949, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_normal_032.jpg", "mos": 3.195617381, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image has a high level of detail and clarity, with smooth gradients and a well-defined subject. The lighting and color are well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or distortions. However, the background is somewhat blurred, which might be intentional to emphasize the subject, but it slightly reduces the overall sharpness.", "elapsed_s": 0.7942671775817871, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_083.jpg", "mos": 3.214375205, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image has a stylized, artistic quality with a clear focus on the Eiffel Tower. The colors are vibrant, and the lines are sharp, but the overall image appears to be a digital illustration rather than a photograph, which may slightly reduce its perceived quality. The lack of noise and compression artifacts suggests it is not severely degraded, but the stylized nature means it doesn't quite reach the highest quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.8189189434051514, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_lowstep_043.jpg", "mos": 3.231255627, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-focused, with good lighting and color saturation. The details on the frog and the hat are sharp, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject, but it does not detract from the overall quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.7569394111633301, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_182.jpg", "mos": 3.270286787, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and detailed, with smooth lines and vibrant colors. The character is well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or blurriness. The lighting and shading are effective, contributing to the overall high-quality appearance of the image.", "elapsed_s": 0.6126916408538818, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_normal_185.jpg", "mos": 3.30238721, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-defined, with no visible noise, compression artifacts, or blur. The lines are sharp, and the colors are vibrant, indicating a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.5390779972076416, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_033.jpg", "mos": 3.344956193, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, with good detail visible in the subject's clothing and facial features. There are no noticeable compression artifacts or blurring, indicating a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.6058135032653809, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_293.jpg", "mos": 3.374329815, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The lighting and shading are well-executed, contributing to a visually appealing and realistic appearance. There are no visible artifacts or compression issues that would detract from the overall quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.7513759136199951, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_normal_179.jpg", "mos": 3.387959109, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is quite clear and sharp, with good lighting and color saturation. The underwater scene is well-composed, and the details of the coral and the water's texture are visible. However, there is a slight haze or blur, which might be due to the underwater environment, but it doesn't significantly degrade the overall quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.7227201461791992, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_121.jpg", "mos": 3.424268421, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and detailed, with vibrant colors and well-defined features. The texture of the fur and the leaves is visible, and there are no noticeable artifacts or blurriness. However, the image appears to be a digital illustration rather than a photograph, which might slightly lower the quality compared to a high-resolution photo.", "elapsed_s": 0.7120945453643799, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_normal_200.jpg", "mos": 3.455503573, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is vibrant and detailed, with a clear and sharp depiction of the landscape. The colors are rich and the lines are well-defined, indicating a high-quality digital illustration. However, there are no visible artifacts or noise, which slightly reduces the score to 4.", "elapsed_s": 0.6564741134643555, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_114.jpg", "mos": 3.472753415, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, with good focus on the donut and the small pastry. The details are sharp, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The composition is also pleasing, with the donut and pastry placed attractively on the plate.", "elapsed_s": 0.6799511909484863, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_211.jpg", "mos": 3.502054974, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, with a good level of detail visible in the subject's features and clothing. The colors are natural and the composition is pleasing, indicating a high-quality photograph. However, there is a slight softness to the image, which prevents it from being a perfect 5.", "elapsed_s": 0.8432807922363281, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_014.jpg", "mos": 3.516316957, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is very clear and sharp, with vibrant colors and fine details visible on the gecko's skin. There are no noticeable artifacts or compression issues, indicating a high-quality image.", "elapsed_s": 0.8000748157501221, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowcorr_173.jpg", "mos": 3.544604966, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with good lighting and detail in the garden and building. There are no visible noise or compression artifacts, and the colors are vibrant. The only slight issue is the presence of a watermark, but it does not significantly degrade the overall quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.7496452331542969, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowcorr_099.jpg", "mos": 3.576252467, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and detailed, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The texture of the brain is well-defined, and the lighting is even, contributing to a high-quality appearance.", "elapsed_s": 0.5034568309783936, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "DALLE2_normal_284.jpg", "mos": 3.593502309, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image appears to have a high quality with clean and sharp details, although there is a slight blur around the edges which might slightly lower the score. The lighting and color saturation are well-balanced, and the subject is in focus.", "elapsed_s": 0.5840914249420166, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_274.jpg", "mos": 3.628001993, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with good color saturation and contrast. The details of the train car and the surrounding environment are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The composition is also well-balanced, contributing to the overall high quality of the image.", "elapsed_s": 0.6478002071380615, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_231.jpg", "mos": 3.64048937, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is of high quality with a clean and sharp appearance. The details in the lion's fur and facial features are well-defined, and there are no visible compression artifacts or noise. The lighting and color saturation are also well-balanced, contributing to the overall high-quality perception of the image.", "elapsed_s": 0.75581955909729, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_lowstep_242.jpg", "mos": 3.671121754, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the furniture and the reflections in the windows are clear, indicating a high-quality render.", "elapsed_s": 0.692033052444458, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_highcorr_002.jpg", "mos": 3.688435461, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, with some visible noise and artifacts, particularly around the edges of the astronaut and the background. The text is somewhat legible, but the overall quality is not as sharp or clean as it could be.", "elapsed_s": 0.7916238307952881, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_highcorr_121.jpg", "mos": 3.744508689, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with good detail in the cat's fur and the leaf. The colors are vibrant, and there is no visible noise or compression artifacts. The background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject, but it does not detract from the overall quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.9447252750396729, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_normal_005.jpg", "mos": 3.773032655, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and detailed, with a high level of sharpness and a clean appearance. The textures and colors are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. The contrast is high, which enhances the visual impact of the dragon and the intricate background.", "elapsed_s": 0.7434322834014893, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_047.jpg", "mos": 3.800500414, "score": 3.0, "raw": "3\n\nThe image is clear and well-lit, but it appears to be a black and white photograph, which inherently limits the detail and color quality. There are no visible artifacts or blurriness, and the subject is in focus, indicating a moderate level of perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.7874724864959717, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_129.jpg", "mos": 3.825753384, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp with good lighting and color balance, but there is a slight softness in the skin texture which might be due to the lighting or post-processing effects, not noise or compression artifacts.", "elapsed_s": 0.5622360706329346, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_139.jpg", "mos": 3.897509797, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, but there is a slight blur and some noise, which slightly reduces its quality. The composition is visually appealing, but the imperfections prevent it from being a perfect 5.", "elapsed_s": 0.6864492893218994, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "midjourney_normal_170.jpg", "mos": 3.923239841, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is vibrant and detailed, with a high level of clarity and sharpness. The butterflies and the background are well-defined, and the colors are rich and harmonious. There are no visible artifacts or noise, indicating a high perceptual quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.6076340675354004, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "sd1.5_normal_009.jpg", "mos": 3.986962403, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with good contrast and detail. The lighting is well managed, and there are no visible artifacts or noise that would detract from the overall quality.", "elapsed_s": 0.5959548950195312, "attempts": 1}
{"name": "xl2.2_normal_144.jpg", "mos": 4.106196029, "score": 4.0, "raw": "4\n\nThe image is clear and sharp, with good lighting and a well-composed subject. The details in the hair and the texture of the dress are visible, and there are no noticeable artifacts or compression issues. The background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the subject, but the overall quality is high.", "elapsed_s": 0.7762186527252197, "attempts": 1}