gyung commited on
Commit
f1e2b4d
Β·
verified Β·
1 Parent(s): 3a7a28c

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +78 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ library_name: transformers
3
+ license: apache-2.0
4
+ base_model: LiquidAI/LFM2.5-8B-A1B
5
+ base_model_relation: finetune
6
+ tags:
7
+ - lfm
8
+ - liquid-ai
9
+ - moe
10
+ - agentic
11
+ - terminal
12
+ - fable-5
13
+ - distillation
14
+ - sft
15
+ - ablation
16
+ language:
17
+ - en
18
+ pipeline_tag: text-generation
19
+ ---
20
+
21
+ # Fabliq-8B-Agent-FromBase πŸŒŠπŸ”¬
22
+
23
+ > **Ablation variant** of [Fabliq-8B-Agent](https://huggingface.co/LLM-OS-Models/Fabliq-8B-Agent) β€” fine-tuned directly from raw [`LiquidAI/LFM2.5-8B-A1B`](https://huggingface.co/LiquidAI/LFM2.5-8B-A1B), skipping the ToolBench foundation. Used to isolate the effect of the ToolBench intermediate stage.
24
+
25
+ ## πŸ”¬ Why this variant?
26
+
27
+ [Fabliq-8B-Agent](https://huggingface.co/LLM-OS-Models/Fabliq-8B-Agent) is trained as: `LiquidAI/LFM2.5-8B-A1B` β†’ `ToolBench-Full-SFT-1Epoch` β†’ `Fable-5`.
28
+
29
+ **This model** skips the middle step: `LiquidAI/LFM2.5-8B-A1B` β†’ `Fable-5` (direct).
30
+
31
+ Comparing the two answers the question: **does ToolBench foundation actually help, or does Fable-5 alone give you the same agent?**
32
+
33
+ ## πŸ§ͺ Model details
34
+
35
+ | | |
36
+ | --- | --- |
37
+ | **Architecture** | Lfm2MoeForCausalLM (24 layers, 32 experts, 4 experts/token) |
38
+ | **Parameters** | ~8B total / ~1B active (MoE) |
39
+ | **Context** | 8,192 trained Β· 128K native |
40
+ | **Precision** | bfloat16 |
41
+ | **Fine-tune type** | Full-parameter SFT (direct from base, no ToolBench) |
42
+ | **License** | Apache 2.0 |
43
+
44
+ ## πŸ“š Training data
45
+
46
+ Same as Phase-1: [Fable-5-traces](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Glint-Research/Fable-5-traces), 4,047 rows Γ— 3 epoch.
47
+
48
+ ## πŸ”§ Training procedure
49
+
50
+ | Hyperparameter | Value |
51
+ | --- | --- |
52
+ | Schedule | 3 epochs, constant LR |
53
+ | Max sequence length | 8,192 |
54
+ | Per-device batch size | 2 |
55
+ | Gradient accumulation | 4 |
56
+ | GPUs | 8Γ— H200 (effective batch 64) |
57
+ | Learning rate | **1e-6** (higher than Phase-1's 5e-7, since starting from base) |
58
+ | Precision | bf16 |
59
+ | Final train_loss | logged in run_config.json |
60
+ | Train runtime | ~14 min |
61
+
62
+ ## 🌳 Model tree
63
+
64
+ ```
65
+ LiquidAI/LFM2.5-8B-A1B
66
+ β”œβ”€ LLM-OS-Models/LFM2.5-8B-A1B-Terminal-ToolBench-Full-SFT-1Epoch
67
+ β”‚ └─ LLM-OS-Models/Fabliq-8B-Agent ← Phase-1 (ToolBench β†’ Fable-5)
68
+ └─ LLM-OS-Models/Fabliq-8B-Agent-FromBase ← this model (base β†’ Fable-5, direct)
69
+ └─ LLM-OS-Models/Fabliq-8B-Agent-FromBase-Reasoning ← + reasoning expansion
70
+ ```
71
+
72
+ ## πŸš€ Usage
73
+
74
+ See [Fabliq-8B-Agent](https://huggingface.co/LLM-OS-Models/Fabliq-8B-Agent) β€” same system prompt, same tool-call format, same inference code.
75
+
76
+ ## πŸ“œ License
77
+
78
+ Apache 2.0.