--- license: apache-2.0 library_name: transformers pipeline_tag: text-classification tags: [laya, system-one, calibrated-decisions, rlcd, classification, routing, scoring, guardrails, moderation, reinforcement-learning, commercial-use] --- # Laya Open-source, non-autoregressive **System 1 decision model**. Give it a **state** (text, email, ticket, or JSON) and **typed questions**; it returns typed answers with calibrated probabilities in a single forward pass. It never generates text, so there is nothing to parse and nothing to hallucinate. **This repo holds the English checkpoint** and serves as the hub for the family. | checkpoint | encoder | params | context | use it for | |---|---|---|---|---| | **`convaiinnovations/laya`** (this repo) | ModernBERT-large | 421M | 512 | English | | [`convaiinnovations/laya-multilingual`](https://huggingface.co/convaiinnovations/laya-multilingual) | mmBERT-base | 322M | 1024 | 100+ languages, ~2x faster | | [`convaiinnovations/laya-typed-decisions`](https://huggingface.co/convaiinnovations/laya-typed-decisions) | ModernBERT-large | 421M | 1024 | the typed-decisions workflows | | question type | returns | |---|---| | `choice` | selected option, probability per option, confidence | | `score` | expected level on your ordinal rubric, distribution, confidence | | `noul` | calibrated probability P(true) | ## Quickstart ```bash pip install laya ``` ```python import laya agent = laya.load("convaiinnovations/laya") result = agent.predict( {"subject": "Duplicate charge on invoice 4411", "body": "We were billed twice for March. Please refund the duplicate."}, {"department": {"type": "choice", "instructions": "Which team should handle this?", "criteria": {"billing": "invoices, payments, refunds", "technical": "bugs and outages", "sales": "pricing"}}, "urgency": {"type": "score", "instructions": "How urgent is this?", "criteria": ["not urgent", "soon", "blocking"]}, "churn_risk": {"type": "noul", "instructions": "Does the user threaten to cancel?"}}, ) print(result["answers"]["department"]["choice"]) ``` ### Routing between the three checkpoints ```python from laya import Router router = Router() # lazy-loads only what a request needs router.predict({"body": "I was charged twice"}, questions) # -> laya router.predict({"body": "मुझसे दो बार शुल्क लिया गया"}, questions) # -> laya-multilingual router.predict(state, questions, model="typed-decisions") # explicit ``` `Router` keeps one checkpoint resident by default (`max_loaded`); raise it for mixed-language traffic so it does not reload on every language switch. > **If `laya.load()` hangs:** `transformers` probes for TensorFlow at import, and when TF is > installed its abseil runtime can deadlock model construction. Run with `USE_TF=0`. ## Architecture - **Backbone** ModernBERT-large (395M, bidirectional, fully fine-tuned) + a decision head trained from scratch: 2 transformer layers, an option-marker scorer, and an act/escalate head. 421M total. - **Option markers** every option is scored at its own `[MASK]` token, then softmaxed over that question's options. The answer space is defined at request time, so new schemas need no retraining. - **Budget** 512 tokens per question (question + options + state). - **Batching** every question in a call is answered in one forward pass. ## Training **RLCD (Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions).** The policy reports a distribution; exploration adds zero-mean Gaussian noise to the logits; the reward is a strictly proper scoring rule (log + spherical, plus ranked probability score for ordinal questions). Expected reward is maximised only by reporting honest probabilities. Updates are REINFORCE with a group-mean baseline (GRPO-style). Multi-turn conversations use TD(λ=1.0) over prefix slices. 7,313 updates, 1 epoch, ~1.96 h. Fitted temperatures `[1.637, 1.251, 1.983]` with per-option-count scaling. ## Benchmarks Measured on a Tesla T4; every checkpoint answered byte-identical questions in the same run. ### Speed | questions/call | `laya` | `laya-multilingual` | |---|---|---| | 1 | 39.5 ms | **32.8 ms** | | 10 | 158.6 ms (15.9 ms/q) | **72.3 ms (7.2 ms/q)** | | 50 | 771 ms | **337 ms (6.8 ms/q)** | 103–332 questions/sec batched. TypeSafe Jev has been independently measured at 236–276 ms p50 ([AbdelStark](https://github.com/AbdelStark/jev-benchmarks), [nibzard](https://github.com/nibzard/decision-model-benchmark)), so Laya answers a single question roughly **6–7× faster**. ### Against Jev Jev figures are **published by third parties, not measured here** — no TypeSafe API access. Sample sizes and prompts differ; treat as indicative, not a controlled head-to-head. | dataset | Jev | Laya | | |---|---|---|---| | **typed-decisions** (2,000 decisions) | 0.727 | **0.766** | `laya-typed-decisions` | | AG News (4 labels) | 0.910 | **0.950** | `laya` | | DAIR Emotion (6) | 0.480 · Brier 0.846 · NLL 5.588 | **0.595** | `laya`, held out | | ECE | 0.246 | **0.081** | after temperature fitting | On DAIR Emotion, Jev assigned zero probability to the true label on 16% of examples. ### typed-decisions, all three checkpoints 400 cases, 2,000 decisions, four workflows — measured here. | model | accuracy | soft acc | Brier | ECE | score MAE | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | **`laya-typed-decisions`** | **0.766** | 0.471 | **0.062** | 0.213 | **0.242** | | `laya` | 0.362 | 0.332 | 0.316 | 0.175 | 0.694 | | `laya-multilingual` | 0.342 | 0.326 | 0.439 | 0.285 | 0.687 | | *Jev 1.13.0 (published)* | *0.727* | *0.580* | *0.148* | *0.144* | *0.391* | | *teacher ceiling* | *0.735* | | | | | | *majority class* | *0.461* | | | | | The fine-tuned checkpoint clears the teacher ceiling and wins all four workflows: invoice processing 0.804, security incidents 0.766, customer service 0.764, agent-trace observability 0.730. By primitive: `noul` 0.857, `choice` 0.733, `score` 0.723. The base checkpoints sit below the majority-class baseline here — the capability on this benchmark comes from fine-tuning, which is what the [fine-tuning notebook](https://github.com/NandhaKishorM/laya/blob/main/notebooks/laya_finetune_typed_decisions_2xT4_kaggle.ipynb) is for. ### English tasks | task | `laya` | `laya-multilingual` | | |---|---|---|---| | AG News | **0.947** | 0.937 | in training mix | | BoolQ | **0.830** | 0.787 | in training mix | | DAIR Emotion | **0.573** | 0.513 | held out | | prompt-injections | **0.698** | 0.578 | held out, n=116 | | SST-5 (ordinal) | 0.372 | 0.282 | held out | ### Languages — use `laya-multilingual` outside English Across 51 languages on MASSIVE intent (20 options, random = 0.050), this checkpoint macro-averages **0.227** with macro ECE **0.733**, clearing 3× random on only 23 of 51. Khmer scores **0.000 accuracy at 0.952 confidence**. | | `laya` | `laya-multilingual` | |---|---|---| | MASSIVE intent, English | **0.783** | 0.657 | | MASSIVE intent, 13 others | 0.306 | **0.451** | | XNLI, English | **0.860** | 0.843 | | XNLI, 14 others | 0.521 | **0.731** | The confidence score gives no warning when the input is unreadable, so the choice has to be made before the forward pass — that is what `Router` is for. ## Limits - **Near chance on typed-decisions zero-shot** — 0.362 here and 0.352 for multilingual, against a 0.318 random and 0.461 majority-class baseline. The 0.766 belongs to the checkpoint fine-tuned on that benchmark's own training split. Laya is a fast base to specialise, not a zero-shot decision engine. - **Keep `choice` questions under ~20 options.** Options share a fixed `head_max_len` budget (192 tokens here), so a very large label space leaves only a few tokens per label and accuracy falls off sharply. Split into a coarse choice then a fine one. - Ordinal `score` questions are the weakest primitive (SST-5 0.372). - Ships over-confident: refitting one temperature per (question type, option count) moves mean ECE **0.466 → 0.081**. Do this on your own data before trusting the probabilities. - English only. Use `laya-multilingual` for anything else. ## Links - **GitHub** https://github.com/NandhaKishorM/laya - **PyPI** https://pypi.org/project/laya/ - **Demo** https://huggingface.co/spaces/convaiinnovations/laya-demo - **Write-up** [dev.to](https://dev.to/nandakishor_m_6cc0adfde9f/i-built-non-autoregressive-decision-models-a-year-ago-then-a-frontier-lab-called-it-a-18me) Apache 2.0 · Convai Innovations