---
tags:
- sentence-transformers
- sentence-similarity
- feature-extraction
- generated_from_trainer
- dataset_size:1458
- loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
- unsloth
base_model: unsloth/Qwen3-Embedding-4B
widget:
- source_sentence: 'Company: Goldman Sachs | Year: 2017 | Question: What was the percentage
change in the average daily Value-at-Risk (VaR) for interest rates from 2016 to
2017 for Goldman Sachs?'
sentences:
- 'a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits
, for the periods indicated , is as follows: .
| ( dollars in thousands ) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| balance at january 1 | $ 29010 | $ 34366 | $ 29132 |
| additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 7119 | 6997 |
5234 |
| additions for tax positions of prior years | - | - | - |
| reductions for tax positions of prior years | - | - | - |
| settlements with taxing authorities | -12356 ( 12356 ) | -12353 ( 12353 ) |
- |
| lapses of applicable statutes of limitations | - | - | - |
| balance at december 31 | $ 23773 | $ 29010 | $ 34366 |
the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective
tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004
irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest
of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $
12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and
2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and
local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007
. the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits
and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009
and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately
$ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in
interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $
( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003
and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is
reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly
increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income
tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand
that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the
company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire
. management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize
the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance
has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and
$ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options
exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in
capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets.
.'
- 'from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements
as a result of a number of factors , including those we discuss under 201crisk
factors 201d and elsewhere in this form 10-k . you should read 201crisk factors
201d and 201cforward-looking statements . 201d executive overview general american
water works company , inc . ( herein referred to as 201camerican water 201d or
the 201ccompany 201d ) is the largest investor-owned united states water and wastewater
utility company , as measured both by operating revenues and population served
. our approximately 6400 employees provide drinking water , wastewater and other
water related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states and in one
canadian province . our primary business involves the ownership of water and wastewater
utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential , commercial
, industrial and other customers . our regulated businesses that provide these
services are generally subject to economic regulation by state regulatory agencies
in the states in which they operate . the federal government and the states also
regulate environmental , health and safety and water quality matters . our regulated
businesses provide services in 16 states and serve approximately 3.2 million customers
based on the number of active service connections to our water and wastewater
networks . we report the results of these businesses in our regulated businesses
segment . we also provide services that are not subject to economic regulation
by state regulatory agencies . we report the results of these businesses in our
market-based operations segment . in 2014 , we continued the execution of our
strategic goals . our commitment to growth through investment in our regulated
infrastructure and expansion of our regulated customer base and our market-based
operations , combined with operational excellence led to continued improvement
in regulated operating efficiency , improved performance of our market-based operations
, and enabled us to provide increased value to our customers and investors . during
the year , we focused on growth , addressed regulatory lag , made more efficient
use of capital and improved our regulated operation and maintenance ( 201co&m
201d ) efficiency ratio . 2014 financial results for the year ended december 31
, 2014 , we continued to increase net income , while making significant capital
investment in our infrastructure and implementing operational efficiency improvements
to keep customer rates affordable . highlights of our 2014 operating results compared
to 2013 and 2012 include: .
| | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| income from continuing operations | $ 2.39 | $ 2.07 | $ 2.10 |
| income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax | $ -0.04 ( 0.04 ) |
$ -0.01 ( 0.01 ) | $ -0.09 ( 0.09 ) |
| diluted earnings per share | $ 2.35 | $ 2.06 | $ 2.01 |
continuing operations income from continuing operations included 4 cents per diluted
share of costs resulting from the freedom industries chemical spill in west virginia
in 2014 and included 14 cents per diluted share in 2013 related to a tender offer
. earnings from continuing operations , adjusted for these two items , increased
10% ( 10 % ) , or 22 cents per share , mainly due to favorable operating results
from our regulated businesses segment due to higher revenues and lower operating
expenses , partially offset by higher depreciation expenses . also contributing
to the overall increase in income from continuing operations was lower interest
expense in 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. .'
- 'the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion
and analysis the risk committee of the board and the risk governance committee
( through delegated authority from the firmwide risk committee ) approve market
risk limits and sub-limits at firmwide , business and product levels , consistent
with our risk appetite statement . in addition , market risk management ( through
delegated authority from the risk governance committee ) sets market risk limits
and sub-limits at certain product and desk levels . the purpose of the firmwide
limits is to assist senior management in controlling our overall risk profile
. sub-limits are set below the approved level of risk limits . sub-limits set
the desired maximum amount of exposure that may be managed by any particular business
on a day-to-day basis without additional levels of senior management approval
, effectively leaving day-to-day decisions to individual desk managers and traders
. accordingly , sub-limits are a management tool designed to ensure appropriate
escalation rather than to establish maximum risk tolerance . sub-limits also distribute
risk among various businesses in a manner that is consistent with their level
of activity and client demand , taking into account the relative performance of
each area . our market risk limits are monitored daily by market risk management
, which is responsible for identifying and escalating , on a timely basis , instances
where limits have been exceeded . when a risk limit has been exceeded ( e.g. ,
due to positional changes or changes in market conditions , such as increased
volatilities or changes in correlations ) , it is escalated to senior managers
in market risk management and/or the appropriate risk committee . such instances
are remediated by an inventory reduction and/or a temporary or permanent increase
to the risk limit . model review and validation our var and stress testing models
are regularly reviewed by market risk management and enhanced in order to incorporate
changes in the composition of positions included in our market risk measures ,
as well as variations in market conditions . prior to implementing significant
changes to our assumptions and/or models , model risk management performs model
validations . significant changes to our var and stress testing models are reviewed
with our chief risk officer and chief financial officer , and approved by the
firmwide risk committee . see 201cmodel risk management 201d for further information
about the review and validation of these models . systems we have made a significant
investment in technology to monitor market risk including : 2030 an independent
calculation of var and stress measures ; 2030 risk measures calculated at individual
position levels ; 2030 attribution of risk measures to individual risk factors
of each position ; 2030 the ability to report many different views of the risk
measures ( e.g. , by desk , business , product type or entity ) ; 2030 the ability
to produce ad hoc analyses in a timely manner . metrics we analyze var at the
firmwide level and a variety of more detailed levels , including by risk category
, business , and region . the tables below present average daily var and period-end
var , as well as the high and low var for the period . diversification effect
in the tables below represents the difference between total var and the sum of
the vars for the four risk categories . this effect arises because the four market
risk categories are not perfectly correlated . the table below presents average
daily var by risk category. .
| $ in millions | year ended december 2017 | year ended december 2016 | year ended
december 2015 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| interest rates | $ 40 | $ 45 | $ 47 |
| equity prices | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| currency rates | 12 | 21 | 30 |
| commodity prices | 13 | 17 | 20 |
| diversification effect | -35 ( 35 ) | -45 ( 45 ) | -47 ( 47 ) |
| total | $ 54 | $ 63 | $ 76 |
our average daily var decreased to $ 54 million in 2017 from $ 63 million in 2016
, due to reductions across all risk categories , partially offset by a decrease
in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was primarily due to lower
levels of volatility . our average daily var decreased to $ 63 million in 2016
from $ 76 million in 2015 , due to reductions across all risk categories , partially
offset by a decrease in the diversification effect . the overall decrease was
primarily due to reduced exposures . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 91 .'
- source_sentence: 'Company: Ecolab | Year: 2017 | Question: As of January 2016, what
was the amount, in millions, equivalent to an annual interest rate of 3.25% for
the $400 million aggregate principal seven-year fixed-rate note issued by Ecolab?'
sentences:
- 'in april 2009 , the fasb issued additional guidance under asc 820 which provides
guidance on estimat- ing the fair value of an asset or liability ( financial or
nonfinancial ) when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability
have significantly decreased , and on identifying transactions that are not orderly
. the application of the requirements of this guidance did not have a material
effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements . in august 2009
, the fasb issued asu 2009-05 , 201cmeasuring liabilities at fair value , 201d
which further amends asc 820 by providing clarification for cir- cumstances in
which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available
. the company included the disclosures required by this guidance in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
in june 2006 , the fasb issued guidance under asc 740 , 201cincome taxes 201d
( formerly fin 48 ) . this guid- ance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in tax returns . specifically , the financial statement
effects of a tax position may be recognized only when it is determined that it
is 201cmore likely than not 201d that , based on its technical merits , the tax
position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authority . the
amount recognized shall be measured as the largest amount of tax benefits that
exceed a 50% ( 50 % ) probability of being recognized . this guidance also expands
income tax disclosure requirements . international paper applied the provisions
of this guidance begin- ning in the first quarter of 2007 . the adoption of this
guidance resulted in a charge to the beginning bal- ance of retained earnings
of $ 94 million at the date of adoption . note 3 industry segment information
financial information by industry segment and geo- graphic area for 2009 , 2008
and 2007 is presented on pages 47 and 48 . effective january 1 , 2008 , the company
changed its method of allocating corpo- rate overhead expenses to its business
segments to increase the expense amounts allocated to these businesses in reports
reviewed by its chief executive officer to facilitate performance comparisons
with other companies . accordingly , the company has revised its presentation
of industry segment operat- ing profit to reflect this change in allocation method
, and has adjusted all comparative prior period information on this basis . note
4 earnings per share attributable to international paper company common shareholders
basic earnings per common share from continuing operations are computed by dividing
earnings from continuing operations by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding . diluted earnings per common share from continuing oper- ations are
computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities , including 201cin-the-money
201d stock options , were converted into common shares at the beginning of each
year . in addition , the computation of diluted earnings per share reflects the
inclusion of contingently convertible securities in periods when dilutive . a
reconciliation of the amounts included in the computation of basic earnings per
common share from continuing operations , and diluted earnings per common share
from continuing operations is as fol- in millions except per share amounts 2009
2008 2007 .
| in millions except per share amounts | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations | $ 663 | $ -1269 ( 1269 ) | $
1215 |
| effect of dilutive securities ( a ) | 2013 | 2013 | 2013 |
| earnings ( loss ) from continuing operations 2013 assumingdilution | $ 663 |
$ -1269 ( 1269 ) | $ 1215 |
| average common shares outstanding | 425.3 | 421.0 | 428.9 |
| effect of dilutive securities restricted performance share plan ( a ) | 2.7
| 2013 | 3.7 |
| stock options ( b ) | 2013 | 2013 | 0.4 |
| average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution | 428.0 | 421.0 | 433.0
|
| basic earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations | $ 1.56
| $ -3.02 ( 3.02 ) | $ 2.83 |
| diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations | $ 1.55
| $ -3.02 ( 3.02 ) | $ 2.81 |
average common shares outstanding 2013 assuming dilution 428.0 421.0 433.0 basic
earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations $ 1.56 $ ( 3.02
) $ 2.83 diluted earnings ( loss ) per common share from continuing operations
$ 1.55 $ ( 3.02 ) $ 2.81 ( a ) securities are not included in the table in periods
when anti- dilutive . ( b ) options to purchase 22.2 million , 25.1 million and
17.5 million shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively
, were not included in the computation of diluted common shares outstanding because
their exercise price exceeded the average market price of the company 2019s common
stock for each respective reporting date . note 5 restructuring and other charges
this footnote discusses restructuring and other charges recorded for each of the
three years included in the period ended december 31 , 2009 . it .'
- 'security ownership of 5% ( 5 % ) holders , directors , nominees and executive
officers shares of common stock percent of common stock name of beneficial owner
beneficially owned ( 1 ) outstanding .
| name of beneficial owner | shares of common stock beneficially owned ( 1 ) | |
percent of common stock outstanding |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| fidelity investments | 56583870 | -2 ( 2 ) | 6.49% ( 6.49 % ) |
| steven p . jobs | 5546451 | | * |
| william v . campbell | 112900 | -3 ( 3 ) | * |
| timothy d . cook | 13327 | -4 ( 4 ) | * |
| millard s . drexler | 230000 | -5 ( 5 ) | * |
| tony fadell | 288702 | -6 ( 6 ) | * |
| albert a . gore jr . | 70000 | -7 ( 7 ) | * |
| ronald b . johnson | 1450620 | -8 ( 8 ) | * |
| arthur d . levinson | 365015 | -9 ( 9 ) | * |
| peter oppenheimer | 14873 | -10 ( 10 ) | * |
| eric e . schmidt | 12284 | -11 ( 11 ) | * |
| jerome b . york | 90000 | -12 ( 12 ) | * |
| all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons ) | 8352396
| -13 ( 13 ) | 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) |
all current executive officers and directors as a group ( 14 persons ) 8352396
( 13 ) 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) ( 1 ) represents shares of the company 2019s common stock
held and options held by such individuals that were exercisable at the table date
or within 60 days thereafter . this does not include options or restricted stock
units that vest more than 60 days after the table date . ( 2 ) based on a form
13g/a filed february 14 , 2007 by fmr corp . fmr corp . lists its address as 82
devonshire street , boston , ma 02109 , in such filing . ( 3 ) includes 110000
shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . campbell has the right to acquire
by exercise of stock options . ( 4 ) excludes 600000 unvested restricted stock
units . ( 5 ) includes 40000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr
. drexler holds indirectly and 190000 shares of the company 2019s common stock
that mr . drexler has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 6
) includes 275 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell holds
indirectly , 165875 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell
has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days after the
table date , 1157 shares of the company 2019s common stock held by mr . fadell
2019s spouse , and 117375 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . fadell
2019s spouse has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options within 60 days
after the table date . excludes 210000 unvested restricted stock units held by
mr . fadell and 40000 unvested restricted stock units held by mr . fadell 2019s
spouse . ( 7 ) consists of 70000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that
mr . gore has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 8 ) includes
1300000 shares of the company 2019s common stock that mr . johnson has the right
to acquire by exercise of stock options and excludes 450000 unvested restricted
stock units . ( 9 ) includes 2000 shares of the company 2019s common stock held
by dr . levinson 2019s spouse and 110000 shares of the company 2019s common stock
that dr . levinson has the right to acquire by exercise of stock options . ( 10
) excludes 450000 unvested restricted stock units. .'
- 'in january 2016 , the company issued $ 800 million of debt securities consisting
of a $ 400 million aggregate principal three year fixed rate note with a coupon
rate of 2.00% ( 2.00 % ) and a $ 400 million aggregate principal seven year fixed
rate note with a coupon rate of 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) . the proceeds were used to repay
a portion of the company 2019s outstanding commercial paper , repay the remaining
term loan balance , and for general corporate purposes . the company 2019s public
notes and 144a notes may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption
prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon
the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the notes
below investment grade rating , within a specified time period , the company would
be required to offer to repurchase the public notes and 144a notes at a price
equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the aggregate principal amount thereof , plus any accrued
and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase . the public notes and 144a notes
are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally
with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company . the company
entered into a registration rights agreement in connection with the issuance of
the 144a notes . subject to certain limitations set forth in the registration
rights agreement , the company has agreed to ( i ) file a registration statement
( the 201cexchange offer registration statement 201d ) with respect to registered
offers to exchange the 144a notes for exchange notes ( the 201cexchange notes
201d ) , which will have terms identical in all material respects to the new 10-year
notes and new 30-year notes , as applicable , except that the exchange notes will
not contain transfer restrictions and will not provide for any increase in the
interest rate thereon in certain circumstances and ( ii ) use commercially reasonable
efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to be declared effective
within 270 days after the date of issuance of the 144a notes . until such time
as the exchange offer registration statement is declared effective , the 144a
notes may only be sold in accordance with rule 144a or regulation s of the securities
act of 1933 , as amended . private notes the company 2019s private notes may be
redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued
and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium . upon the occurrence of specified
changes of control involving the company , the company would be required to offer
to repurchase the private notes at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the aggregate
principal amount thereof , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
repurchase . additionally , the company would be required to make a similar offer
to repurchase the private notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events
or asset sales involving the company , when accompanied by a downgrade of the
private notes below investment grade rating , within a specified time period .
the private notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equal
in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company . the private
notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain
circumstances , as described in the note purchase agreements as amended . other
debt during 2015 , the company acquired the beneficial interest in the trust owning
the leased naperville facility resulting in debt assumption of $ 100.2 million
and the addition of $ 135.2 million in property , plant and equipment . certain
administrative , divisional , and research and development personnel are based
at the naperville facility . cash paid as a result of the transaction was $ 19.8
million . the assumption of debt and the majority of the property , plant and
equipment addition represented non-cash financing and investing activities , respectively
. the remaining balance on the assumed debt was settled in december 2017 and was
reflected in the "other" line of the table above at december 31 , 2016 . covenants
and future maturities the company is in compliance with all covenants under the
company 2019s outstanding indebtedness at december 31 , 2017 . as of december
31 , 2017 , the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five
years were : ( millions ) .
| 2018 | $ 550 |
| --- | --- |
| 2019 | 397 |
| 2020 | 300 |
| 2021 | 1017 |
| 2022 | 497 |
.'
- source_sentence: 'Company: JPMorgan Chase | Year: 2010 | Question: In JPMorgan Chase''s
2010 Annual Report, what is the ratio of derivative receivables to derivative
payables within the trading assets and liabilities section?'
sentences:
- 'jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 187 trading assets and liabilities trading
assets include debt and equity instruments held for trading purposes that jpmorgan
chase owns ( 201clong 201d positions ) , certain loans managed on a fair value
basis and for which the firm has elected the fair value option , and physical
commodities inventories that are generally accounted for at the lower of cost
or fair value . trading liabilities include debt and equity instruments that the
firm has sold to other parties but does not own ( 201cshort 201d positions ) .
the firm is obligated to purchase instruments at a future date to cover the short
positions . included in trading assets and trading liabilities are the reported
receivables ( unrealized gains ) and payables ( unre- alized losses ) related
to derivatives . trading assets and liabilities are carried at fair value on the
consolidated balance sheets . bal- ances reflect the reduction of securities owned
( long positions ) by the amount of securities sold but not yet purchased ( short
posi- tions ) when the long and short positions have identical committee on uniform
security identification procedures ( 201ccusips 201d ) . trading assets and liabilities
2013average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for
the periods indicated. .
| year ended december 31 ( in millions ) | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) | $ 354441 | $ 318063
| $ 384102 |
| trading assets 2013 derivative receivables | 84676 | 110457 | 121417 |
| trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) ( b ) | 78159 | 60224
| 78841 |
| trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables | 65714 | 77901 | 93200 |
( a ) balances reflect the reduction of securities owned ( long positions ) by
the amount of securities sold , but not yet purchased ( short positions ) when
the long and short positions have identical cusips . ( b ) primarily represent
securities sold , not yet purchased . note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value
option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for
selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments
, and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value . elections
elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility
caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for
example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual
basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for
on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting
models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments
) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value
basis . elections include the following : 2022 loans purchased or originated as
part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting
, or man- aged on a fair value basis . 2022 securities financing arrangements
with an embedded deriva- tive and/or a maturity of greater than one year . 2022
owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded
credit derivatives , which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted
for as a derivative in- strument . 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments
acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction . 2022 structured notes
issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities . ( structured notes are financial
instruments that contain em- bedded derivatives. ) 2022 long-term beneficial interests
issued by ib 2019s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets
are carried at fair value. .'
- 'devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements
2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the
changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 ( in mmboe
) . .
| | u.s . | canada | total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2013 | 258 | 443 | 701 |
| extensions and discoveries | 153 | 8 | 161 |
| revisions due to prices | -1 ( 1 ) | -34 ( 34 ) | -35 ( 35 ) |
| revisions other than price | -61 ( 61 ) | 18 | -43 ( 43 ) |
| sale of reserves | -4 ( 4 ) | -2 ( 2 ) | -6 ( 6 ) |
| conversion to proved developed reserves | -40 ( 40 ) | -49 ( 49 ) | -89 ( 89
) |
| proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2014 | 305 | 384 | 689 |
at december 31 , 2014 , devon had 689 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this
represents a 2 percent decrease as compared to 2013 and represents 25 percent
of total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon
2019s proved undeveloped reserves 161 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of
89 mmboe , or 13 percent , of the 2013 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed
reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s
proved undeveloped reserves were approximately $ 1.0 billion for 2014 . additionally
, revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves
43 mmboe primarily due to evaluations of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas ,
which devon does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions
, which were approximately 69 mmboe , relate to the dry-gas areas in the barnett
shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped
reserves at the end of 2014 related to its jackfish operations . at december 31
, 2014 and 2013 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 384 mmboe
and 441 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves
are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000
barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors
such as total steam processing capacity and steam-oil ratios . furthermore , development
of these projects involves the up-front construction of steam injection/distribution
and bitumen processing facilities . due to the large up-front capital investments
and large reserves required to provide economic returns , the project conditions
meet the specific circumstances requiring a period greater than 5 years for conversion
to developed reserves . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved
undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for
these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2014 2013 reserves
increased 9 mmboe primarily due to higher gas prices in the barnett shale and
the anadarko basin , partially offset by higher bitumen prices , which result
in lower after-royalty volumes , in canada . 2013 2013 reserves increased 94 mmboe
primarily due to higher gas prices . of this increase , 43 mmboe related to the
barnett shale and 19 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2012 2013 reserves
decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100
mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain
area. .'
- 'american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements
2014 ( continued ) 7 . derivative financial instruments under the terms of the
credit facility , the company is required to enter into interest rate protection
agreements on at least 50% ( 50 % ) of its variable rate debt . under these agreements
, the company is exposed to credit risk to the extent that a counterparty fails
to meet the terms of a contract . such exposure is limited to the current value
of the contract at the time the counterparty fails to perform . the company believes
its contracts as of december 31 , 2004 are with credit worthy institutions . as
of december 31 , 2004 , the company had two interest rate caps outstanding with
an aggregate notional amount of $ 350.0 million ( each at an interest rate of
6.0% ( 6.0 % ) ) that expire in 2006 . as of december 31 , 2003 , the company
had three interest rate caps outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of
$ 500.0 million ( each at a rate of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ) that expired in 2004 . as
of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , there was no fair value associated with any of
these interest rate caps . during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company
recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 0.3 million ( net of a tax benefit
of approximately $ 0.2 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in
fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 5.9 million ( net of a tax benefit
of approximately $ 3.2 million ) into results of operations . during the year
ended december 31 , 2002 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately
$ 9.1 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 4.9 million ) in other
comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified
$ 19.5 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 10.5 million ) into results
of operations . hedge ineffectiveness resulted in a gain of approximately $ 1.0
million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , which is recorded in other expense
in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations . the company records
the changes in fair value of its derivative instruments that are not accounted
for as hedges in other expense . the company did not reclassify any derivative
losses into its statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2004
and does not anticipate reclassifying any derivative losses into its statement
of operations within the next twelve months , as there are no amounts included
in other comprehensive loss as of december 31 , 2004 . 8 . commitments and contingencies
lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space
under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain
renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the
renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those
tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are straight-lined over the term
of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable
operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s
option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower
site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured
that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31
, 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
| 2005 | $ 106116 |
| --- | --- |
| 2006 | 106319 |
| 2007 | 106095 |
| 2008 | 106191 |
| 2009 | 106214 |
| thereafter | 1570111 |
| total | $ 2101046 |
aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense )
under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002
approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .'
- source_sentence: 'Company: American Tower | Year: 2005 | Question: What percentage
of the total federal net operating loss carryforwards available to American Tower
as of December 31, 2005, is represented by the amount set to expire between 2016
and 2020?'
sentences:
- 'consolidated income statement review net income for 2009 was $ 2.4 billion and
for 2008 was $ 914 million . amounts for 2009 include operating results of national
city and the fourth quarter impact of a $ 687 million after-tax gain related to
blackrock 2019s acquisition of bgi . increases in income statement comparisons
to 2008 , except as noted , are primarily due to the operating results of national
city . our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report
. net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in
millions 2009 2008 .
| year ended december 31 dollars in millions | 2009 | 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| net interest income | $ 9083 | $ 3854 |
| net interest margin | 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) | 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) |
changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume
and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing
liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding
. see statistical information 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest
( unaudited ) income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis
in item 8 of this report for additional information . higher net interest income
for 2009 compared with 2008 reflected the increase in average interest-earning
assets due to national city and the improvement in the net interest margin . the
net interest margin was 3.82% ( 3.82 % ) for 2009 and 3.37% ( 3.37 % ) for 2008
. the following factors impacted the comparison : 2022 a decrease in the rate
accrued on interest-bearing liabilities of 97 basis points . the rate accrued
on interest-bearing deposits , the largest component , decreased 107 basis points
. 2022 these factors were partially offset by a 45 basis point decrease in the
yield on interest-earning assets . the yield on loans , which represented the
largest portion of our earning assets in 2009 , decreased 30 basis points . 2022
in addition , the impact of noninterest-bearing sources of funding decreased 7
basis points . for comparing to the broader market , the average federal funds
rate was .16% ( .16 % ) for 2009 compared with 1.94% ( 1.94 % ) for 2008 . we
expect our net interest income for 2010 will likely be modestly lower as a result
of cash recoveries on purchased impaired loans in 2009 and additional run-off
of higher- yielding assets , which could be mitigated by rising interest rates
. this assumes our current expectations for interest rates and economic conditions
2013 we include our current economic assumptions underlying our forward-looking
statements in the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information section
of this item 7 . noninterest income summary noninterest income was $ 7.1 billion
for 2009 and $ 2.4 billion for 2008 . noninterest income for 2009 included the
following : 2022 the gain on blackrock/bgi transaction of $ 1.076 billion , 2022
net credit-related other-than-temporary impairments ( otti ) on debt and equity
securities of $ 577 million , 2022 net gains on sales of securities of $ 550 million
, 2022 gains on hedging of residential mortgage servicing rights of $ 355 million
, 2022 valuation and sale income related to our commercial mortgage loans held
for sale , net of hedges , of $ 107 million , 2022 gains of $ 103 million related
to our blackrock ltip shares adjustment in the first quarter , and net losses
on private equity and alternative investments of $ 93 million . noninterest income
for 2008 included the following : 2022 net otti on debt and equity securities
of $ 312 million , 2022 gains of $ 246 million related to our blackrock ltip shares
adjustment , 2022 valuation and sale losses related to our commercial mortgage
loans held for sale , net of hedges , of $ 197 million , 2022 impairment and other
losses related to private equity and alternative investments of $ 180 million
, 2022 income from hilliard lyons totaling $ 164 million , including the first
quarter gain of $ 114 million from the sale of this business , 2022 net gains
on sales of securities of $ 106 million , and 2022 a gain of $ 95 million related
to the redemption of a portion of our visa class b common shares related to visa
2019s march 2008 initial public offering . additional analysis asset management
revenue increased $ 172 million to $ 858 million in 2009 , compared with $ 686
million in 2008 . this increase reflected improving equity markets , new business
generation and a shift in assets into higher yielding equity investments during
the second half of 2009 . assets managed totaled $ 103 billion at both december
31 , 2009 and 2008 , including the impact of national city . the asset management
group section of the business segments review section of this item 7 includes
further discussion of assets under management . consumer services fees totaled
$ 1.290 billion in 2009 compared with $ 623 million in 2008 . service charges
on deposits totaled $ 950 million for 2009 and $ 372 million for 2008 . both increases
were primarily driven by the impact of the national city acquisition . reduced
consumer spending .'
- 'at december 31 , 2014 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable
operating leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .
| in millions | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | thereafter |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| lease obligations | $ 142 | $ 106 | $ 84 | $ 63 | $ 45 | $ 91 |
| purchase obligations ( a ) | 3266 | 761 | 583 | 463 | 422 | 1690 |
| total | $ 3408 | $ 867 | $ 667 | $ 526 | $ 467 | $ 1781 |
( a ) includes $ 2.3 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into
at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and
in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard
, packaging and recycling business . rent expense was $ 154 million , $ 168 million
and $ 185 million for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . guarantees in connection
with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets
, international paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to
such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to
tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties
, and other matters . where liabilities for such matters are determined to be
probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded
at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction . environmental proceedings cercla
and state actions international paper has been named as a potentially responsible
party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws
, including the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability
act ( cercla ) . many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances
at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources
. while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent
state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically
allocated among the many potential responsible parties . remedial costs are recorded
in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably
estimable . international paper has estimated the probable liability associated
with these matters to be approximately $ 95 million in the aggregate as of december
31 , 2014 . cass lake : one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating
facility located in cass lake , minnesota . during 2009 , in connection with an
environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted
to the epa a remediation feasibility study . in june 2011 , the epa selected and
published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million
. the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 50 million to address
the selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall
site remedy . in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating
that the final soil remedy decision would be delayed . in the unlikely event that
the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive
clean- up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and significantly
higher than amounts currently recorded . in october 2012 , the natural resource
trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially
responsible parties of their intent to perform a natural resource damage assessment
. it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss
or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred . other remediation costs in
addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with
the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned
facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately
$ 41 million as of december 31 , 2014 . other than as described above , completion
of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our
consolidated financial statements . legal proceedings environmental kalamazoo
river : the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied
paper , inc./ portage creek/kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund
site ) in michigan . the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by
pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the kalamazoo
river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st . regis paper company ( st
. regis ) . the company is a successor in interest to st . regis . although the
company has not received any orders from the epa , in december 2014 , the epa
sent the company a letter demanding payment of $ 19 million to reimburse the epa
for costs associated with a time critical removal action of pcb contaminated sediments
from a portion of the site . the company 2019s cercla liability has not been finally
determined with respect to this or any other portion of the site and we have declined
to reimburse the epa at this time . as noted below , the company is involved in
allocation/ apportionment litigation with regard to the site . accordingly , it
is premature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site . the
company was named as a defendant by georgia- pacific consumer products lp , fort
james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery
action for alleged pollution at the site . the suit .'
- 'american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements
2014 ( continued ) at december 31 , 2005 , the company had net federal and state
operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately
$ 2.2 billion and $ 2.4 billion , respectively . if not utilized , the company
2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .
| years ended december 31, | federal | state |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2006 to 2010 | $ 5248 | $ 469747 |
| 2011 to 2015 | 10012 | 272662 |
| 2016 to 2020 | 397691 | 777707 |
| 2021 to 2025 | 1744552 | 897896 |
| total | $ 2157503 | $ 2418012 |
sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies
record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 ,
2005 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 422.4
million , including approximately $ 249.5 million attributable to spectrasite
, primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards . approximately
$ 237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition
date . the balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred
tax assets . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining
deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards ,
as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these
federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward
period . the company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through
its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal
net operating losses . in june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal
income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million
of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially
anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million . based on preliminary discussions
with tax authorities , the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable
value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund
of approximately $ 65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006
. there can be no assurances , however , with respect to the specific amount and
timing of any refund . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred
tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based
on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation
and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result
of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first
fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest
expense . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not
dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other
non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income
during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax
asset will be realized . the realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets
as of december 31 , 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately
$ 1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2006 to december 31 , 2025 .
if the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future ,
or carry back losses , as described above , it will be required to reduce its
net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result
in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity . from time to time the
company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions
in which the company has significant business operations . the company regularly
assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions
resulting from these examinations . during the year ended .'
- source_sentence: 'Company: Hologic | Year: 2011 | Question: What is the maximum
amount of additional cash that Hologic could pay as contingent payments for the
acquisition of Sentinelle Medical?'
sentences:
- 'table of contents the company concluded that the acquisition of sentinelle medical
did not represent a material business combination , and therefore , no pro forma
financial information has been provided herein . subsequent to the acquisition
date , the company 2019s results of operations include the results of sentinelle
medical , which is included within the company 2019s breast health reporting segment
. the company accounted for the sentinelle medical acquisition as a purchase of
a business under asc 805 . the purchase price was comprised of an $ 84.8 million
cash payment , which was net of certain adjustments , plus three contingent payments
up to a maximum of an additional $ 250.0 million in cash . the contingent payments
are based on a multiple of incremental revenue growth during the two-year period
following the completion of the acquisition as follows : six months after acquisition
, 12 months after acquisition , and 24 months after acquisition . pursuant to
asc 805 , the company recorded its estimate of the fair value of the contingent
consideration liability based on future revenue projections of the sentinelle
medical business under various potential scenarios and weighted probability assumptions
of these outcomes . as of the date of acquisition , these cash flow projections
were discounted using a rate of 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) . the discount rate is based
on the weighted-average cost of capital of the acquired business plus a credit
risk premium for non-performance risk related to the liability pursuant to asc
820 . this analysis resulted in an initial contingent consideration liability
of $ 29.5 million , which will be adjusted periodically as a component of operating
expenses based on changes in the fair value of the liability driven by the accretion
of the liability for the time value of money and changes in the assumptions pertaining
to the achievement of the defined revenue growth milestones . this fair value
measurement was based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus
represented a level 3 measurement as defined in asc during each quarter in fiscal
2011 , the company has re-evaluated its assumptions and updated the revenue and
probability assumptions for future earn-out periods and lowered its projections
. as a result of these adjustments , which were partially offset by the accretion
of the liability , and using a current discount rate of approximately 17.0% (
17.0 % ) , the company recorded a reversal of expense of $ 14.3 million in fiscal
2011 to record the contingent consideration liability at fair value . in addition
, during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 , the first earn-out period ended ,
and the company adjusted the fair value of the contingent consideration liability
for actual results during the earn-out period . this payment of $ 4.3 million
was made in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . at september 24 , 2011 , the fair
value of the liability is $ 10.9 million . the company did not issue any equity
awards in connection with this acquisition . the company incurred third-party
transaction costs of $ 1.2 million , which were expensed within general and administrative
expenses in fiscal 2010 . the purchase price was as follows: .
| cash | $ 84751 |
| --- | --- |
| contingent consideration | 29500 |
| total purchase price | $ 114251 |
source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 23 , 2011 powered by morningstar ae document
research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or
distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely . the user
assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information
, except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by
applicable law . past financial performance is no guarantee of future results.
.'
- 'banking ) . the results of the first step of the impairment test showed no indication
of impairment in any of the reporting units at any of the periods except december
31 , 2008 and , accordingly , the company did not perform the second step of the
impairment test , except for the test performed as of december 31 , 2008 . as
of december 31 , 2008 , there was an indication of impairment in the north america
consumer banking , latin america consumer banking and emea consumer banking reporting
units and , accordingly , the second step of testing was performed on these reporting
units . based on the results of the second step of testing , the company recorded
a $ 9.6 billion pretax ( $ 8.7 billion after tax ) goodwill impairment charge
in the fourth quarter of 2008 , representing the entire amount of goodwill allocated
to these reporting units . the primary cause for the goodwill impairment in the
above reporting units was the rapid deterioration in the financial markets , as
well as in the global economic outlook particularly during the period beginning
mid-november through year end 2008 . this deterioration further weakened the near-term
prospects for the financial services industry . these and other factors , including
the increased possibility of further government intervention , also resulted in
the decline in the company 2019s market capitalization from approximately $ 90
billion at july 1 , 2008 and approximately $ 74 billion at october 31 , 2008 to
approximately $ 36 billion at december 31 , 2008 . the more significant fair-value
adjustments in the pro forma purchase price allocation in the second step of testing
were to fair-value loans and debt and were made to identify and value identifiable
intangibles . the adjustments to measure the assets , liabilities and intangibles
were for the purpose of measuring the implied fair value of goodwill and such
adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet . the following
table shows reporting units with goodwill balances and the excess of fair value
of allocated book value as of december 31 , 2008 . reporting unit ( $ in millions
) fair value as a % ( % ) of allocated book value goodwill ( post-impairment
) .
| reporting unit ( $ inmillions ) | fair value as a % ( % ) of allocated book
value | goodwill ( post-impairment ) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| north america cards | 139% ( 139 % ) | 6765 |
| international cards | 218% ( 218 % ) | 4066 |
| asia consumer banking | 293% ( 293 % ) | 3106 |
| securities & banking | 109% ( 109 % ) | 9774 |
| global transaction services | 994% ( 994 % ) | 1570 |
| north america gwm | 386% ( 386 % ) | 1259 |
| international gwm | 171% ( 171 % ) | 592 |
while no impairment was noted in step one of our securities and banking reporting
unit impairment test at october 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2008 , goodwill present
in that reporting unit may be particularly sensitive to further deterioration
in economic conditions . under the market approach for valuing this reporting
unit , the earnings multiples and transaction multiples were selected from multiples
obtained using data from guideline companies and acquisitions . the selection
of the actual multiple considers operating performance and financial condition
such as return on equity and net income growth of securities and banking as compared
to the guideline companies and acquisitions . for the valuation under the income
approach , the company utilized a discount rate which it believes reflects the
risk and uncertainty related to the projected cash flows , and selected 2013 as
the terminal year . in 2013 , the value was derived assuming a return to historical
levels of core-business profitability for the reporting unit , despite the significant
losses experienced in 2008 . this assumption is based on management 2019s view
that this recovery will occur based upon various macro- economic factors such
as the recent u.s . government stimulus actions , restoring marketplace confidence
and improved risk-management practices on an industry-wide basis . furthermore
, company-specific actions such as its recently announced realignment of its businesses
to optimize its global businesses for future profitable growth , will also be
a factor in returning the company 2019s core securities and banking business to
historical levels . small deterioration in the assumptions used in the valuations
, in particular the discount rate and growth rate assumptions used in the net
income projections , could significantly affect the company 2019s impairment evaluation
and , hence , results . if the future were to differ adversely from management
2019s best estimate of key economic assumptions and associated cash flows were
to decrease by a small margin , the company could potentially experience future
material impairment charges with respect to the goodwill remaining in our securities
and banking reporting unit . any such charges by themselves would not negatively
affect the company 2019s tier 1 and total regulatory capital ratios , tangible
capital or the company 2019s liquidity position. .'
- 'determined that it will primarily be subject to the ietu in future periods ,
and as such it has recorded tax expense of approximately $ 20 million in 2007
for the deferred tax effects of the new ietu system . as of december 31 , 2007
, the company had us federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$ 206 million which will begin to expire in 2023 . of this amount , $ 47 million
relates to the pre-acquisition period and is subject to limitation . the remaining
$ 159 million is subject to limitation as a result of the change in stock ownership
in may 2006 . this limitation is not expected to have a material impact on utilization
of the net operating loss carryforwards . the company also had foreign net operating
loss carryforwards as of december 31 , 2007 of approximately $ 564 million for
canada , germany , mexico and other foreign jurisdictions with various expiration
dates . net operating losses in canada have various carryforward periods and began
expiring in 2007 . net operating losses in germany have no expiration date . net
operating losses in mexico have a ten year carryforward period and begin to expire
in 2009 . however , these losses are not available for use under the new ietu
tax regulations in mexico . as the ietu is the primary system upon which the company
will be subject to tax in future periods , no deferred tax asset has been reflected
in the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 for these income tax loss carryforwards
. the company adopted the provisions of fin 48 effective january 1 , 2007 . fin
48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition
threshold a tax benefit is required to meet before being recognized in the financial
statements . fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , measurement , classification
, interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure and transition
. as a result of the implementation of fin 48 , the company increased retained
earnings by $ 14 million and decreased goodwill by $ 2 million . in addition ,
certain tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits , as well as related potential
penalties and interest , were reclassified from current liabilities to long-term
liabilities . liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2007
relate to various us and foreign jurisdictions . a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows : year ended december
31 , 2007 ( in $ millions ) .
| | year ended december 31 2007 ( in $ millions ) |
| --- | --- |
| balance as of january 1 2007 | 193 |
| increases in tax positions for the current year | 2 |
| increases in tax positions for prior years | 28 |
| decreases in tax positions of prior years | -21 ( 21 ) |
| settlements | -2 ( 2 ) |
| balance as of december 31 2007 | 200 |
included in the unrecognized tax benefits of $ 200 million as of december 31 ,
2007 is $ 56 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would reduce the company
2019s effective tax rate . the company recognizes interest and penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes . as of december
31 , 2007 , the company has recorded a liability of approximately $ 36 million
for interest and penalties . this amount includes an increase of approximately
$ 13 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . the company operates in the
united states ( including multiple state jurisdictions ) , germany and approximately
40 other foreign jurisdictions including canada , china , france , mexico and
singapore . examinations are ongoing in a number of those jurisdictions including
, most significantly , in germany for the years 2001 to 2004 . during the quarter
ended march 31 , 2007 , the company received final assessments in germany for
the prior examination period , 1997 to 2000 . the effective settlement of those
examinations resulted in a reduction to goodwill of approximately $ 42 million
with a net expected cash outlay of $ 29 million . the company 2019s celanese corporation
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued )
%%transmsg*** transmitting job : y48011 pcn : 122000000 ***%%pcmsg|f-49 |00023|yes|no|02/26/2008
22:07|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .'
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics:
- cosine_accuracy@1
- cosine_accuracy@3
- cosine_accuracy@5
- cosine_accuracy@10
- cosine_precision@5
- cosine_precision@10
- cosine_recall@5
- cosine_recall@10
- cosine_ndcg@10
- cosine_mrr@10
- cosine_map@100
model-index:
- name: SentenceTransformer based on unsloth/Qwen3-Embedding-4B
results:
- task:
type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset:
name: Unknown
type: unknown
metrics:
- type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.1505
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
- type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.343
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
- type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.437
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
- type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.5605
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
- type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.0874
name: Cosine Precision@5
- type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.056049999999999996
name: Cosine Precision@10
- type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.437
name: Cosine Recall@5
- type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.5605
name: Cosine Recall@10
- type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.3407446598825165
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
- type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.27206567460317443
name: Cosine Mrr@10
- type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.2857010491933338
name: Cosine Map@100
---
# SentenceTransformer based on unsloth/Qwen3-Embedding-4B
This is a [sentence-transformers](https://www.SBERT.net) model finetuned from [unsloth/Qwen3-Embedding-4B](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3-Embedding-4B) on the generator dataset. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 2560-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for retrieval.
## Model Details
### Model Description
- **Model Type:** Sentence Transformer
- **Base model:** [unsloth/Qwen3-Embedding-4B](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/Qwen3-Embedding-4B)
- **Maximum Sequence Length:** 4096 tokens
- **Output Dimensionality:** 2560 dimensions
- **Similarity Function:** Cosine Similarity
- **Supported Modalities:** Text, Message
- **Training Dataset:**
- generator
### Model Sources
- **Documentation:** [Sentence Transformers Documentation](https://sbert.net)
- **Repository:** [Sentence Transformers on GitHub](https://github.com/huggingface/sentence-transformers)
- **Hugging Face:** [Sentence Transformers on Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/models?library=sentence-transformers)
### Full Model Architecture
```
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'transformer_task': 'feature-extraction', 'modality_config': {'text': {'method': 'forward', 'method_output_name': 'last_hidden_state'}, 'message': {'method': 'forward', 'method_output_name': 'last_hidden_state', 'format': 'flat'}}, 'module_output_name': 'token_embeddings', 'max_seq_length': 4096, 'do_lower_case': False, 'architecture': 'PeftModelForFeatureExtraction'})
(1): Pooling({'embedding_dimension': 2560, 'pooling_mode': 'lasttoken', 'include_prompt': True})
(2): Normalize({})
)
```
## Usage
### Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)
First install the Sentence Transformers library:
```bash
pip install -U sentence-transformers
```
Then you can load this model and run inference.
```python
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SentenceTransformer("borntobeignored/qwen3-embedding-4b_lora")
# Run inference
queries = [
'Company: Hologic | Year: 2011 | Question: What is the maximum amount of additional cash that Hologic could pay as contingent payments for the acquisition of Sentinelle Medical?',
]
documents = [
'table of contents the company concluded that the acquisition of sentinelle medical did not represent a material business combination , and therefore , no pro forma financial information has been provided herein . subsequent to the acquisition date , the company 2019s results of operations include the results of sentinelle medical , which is included within the company 2019s breast health reporting segment . the company accounted for the sentinelle medical acquisition as a purchase of a business under asc 805 . the purchase price was comprised of an $ 84.8 million cash payment , which was net of certain adjustments , plus three contingent payments up to a maximum of an additional $ 250.0 million in cash . the contingent payments are based on a multiple of incremental revenue growth during the two-year period following the completion of the acquisition as follows : six months after acquisition , 12 months after acquisition , and 24 months after acquisition . pursuant to asc 805 , the company recorded its estimate of the fair value of the contingent consideration liability based on future revenue projections of the sentinelle medical business under various potential scenarios and weighted probability assumptions of these outcomes . as of the date of acquisition , these cash flow projections were discounted using a rate of 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) . the discount rate is based on the weighted-average cost of capital of the acquired business plus a credit risk premium for non-performance risk related to the liability pursuant to asc 820 . this analysis resulted in an initial contingent consideration liability of $ 29.5 million , which will be adjusted periodically as a component of operating expenses based on changes in the fair value of the liability driven by the accretion of the liability for the time value of money and changes in the assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined revenue growth milestones . this fair value measurement was based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represented a level 3 measurement as defined in asc during each quarter in fiscal 2011 , the company has re-evaluated its assumptions and updated the revenue and probability assumptions for future earn-out periods and lowered its projections . as a result of these adjustments , which were partially offset by the accretion of the liability , and using a current discount rate of approximately 17.0% ( 17.0 % ) , the company recorded a reversal of expense of $ 14.3 million in fiscal 2011 to record the contingent consideration liability at fair value . in addition , during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 , the first earn-out period ended , and the company adjusted the fair value of the contingent consideration liability for actual results during the earn-out period . this payment of $ 4.3 million was made in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . at september 24 , 2011 , the fair value of the liability is $ 10.9 million . the company did not issue any equity awards in connection with this acquisition . the company incurred third-party transaction costs of $ 1.2 million , which were expensed within general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2010 . the purchase price was as follows: .\n| cash | $ 84751 |\n| --- | --- |\n| contingent consideration | 29500 |\n| total purchase price | $ 114251 |\nsource : hologic inc , 10-k , november 23 , 2011 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely . the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law . past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .',
'determined that it will primarily be subject to the ietu in future periods , and as such it has recorded tax expense of approximately $ 20 million in 2007 for the deferred tax effects of the new ietu system . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company had us federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 206 million which will begin to expire in 2023 . of this amount , $ 47 million relates to the pre-acquisition period and is subject to limitation . the remaining $ 159 million is subject to limitation as a result of the change in stock ownership in may 2006 . this limitation is not expected to have a material impact on utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards . the company also had foreign net operating loss carryforwards as of december 31 , 2007 of approximately $ 564 million for canada , germany , mexico and other foreign jurisdictions with various expiration dates . net operating losses in canada have various carryforward periods and began expiring in 2007 . net operating losses in germany have no expiration date . net operating losses in mexico have a ten year carryforward period and begin to expire in 2009 . however , these losses are not available for use under the new ietu tax regulations in mexico . as the ietu is the primary system upon which the company will be subject to tax in future periods , no deferred tax asset has been reflected in the balance sheet as of december 31 , 2007 for these income tax loss carryforwards . the company adopted the provisions of fin 48 effective january 1 , 2007 . fin 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax benefit is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements . fin 48 also provides guidance on derecognition , measurement , classification , interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure and transition . as a result of the implementation of fin 48 , the company increased retained earnings by $ 14 million and decreased goodwill by $ 2 million . in addition , certain tax liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits , as well as related potential penalties and interest , were reclassified from current liabilities to long-term liabilities . liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2007 relate to various us and foreign jurisdictions . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows : year ended december 31 , 2007 ( in $ millions ) .\n| | year ended december 31 2007 ( in $ millions ) |\n| --- | --- |\n| balance as of january 1 2007 | 193 |\n| increases in tax positions for the current year | 2 |\n| increases in tax positions for prior years | 28 |\n| decreases in tax positions of prior years | -21 ( 21 ) |\n| settlements | -2 ( 2 ) |\n| balance as of december 31 2007 | 200 |\nincluded in the unrecognized tax benefits of $ 200 million as of december 31 , 2007 is $ 56 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would reduce the company 2019s effective tax rate . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company has recorded a liability of approximately $ 36 million for interest and penalties . this amount includes an increase of approximately $ 13 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . the company operates in the united states ( including multiple state jurisdictions ) , germany and approximately 40 other foreign jurisdictions including canada , china , france , mexico and singapore . examinations are ongoing in a number of those jurisdictions including , most significantly , in germany for the years 2001 to 2004 . during the quarter ended march 31 , 2007 , the company received final assessments in germany for the prior examination period , 1997 to 2000 . the effective settlement of those examinations resulted in a reduction to goodwill of approximately $ 42 million with a net expected cash outlay of $ 29 million . the company 2019s celanese corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : y48011 pcn : 122000000 ***%%pcmsg|f-49 |00023|yes|no|02/26/2008 22:07|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .',
'banking ) . the results of the first step of the impairment test showed no indication of impairment in any of the reporting units at any of the periods except december 31 , 2008 and , accordingly , the company did not perform the second step of the impairment test , except for the test performed as of december 31 , 2008 . as of december 31 , 2008 , there was an indication of impairment in the north america consumer banking , latin america consumer banking and emea consumer banking reporting units and , accordingly , the second step of testing was performed on these reporting units . based on the results of the second step of testing , the company recorded a $ 9.6 billion pretax ( $ 8.7 billion after tax ) goodwill impairment charge in the fourth quarter of 2008 , representing the entire amount of goodwill allocated to these reporting units . the primary cause for the goodwill impairment in the above reporting units was the rapid deterioration in the financial markets , as well as in the global economic outlook particularly during the period beginning mid-november through year end 2008 . this deterioration further weakened the near-term prospects for the financial services industry . these and other factors , including the increased possibility of further government intervention , also resulted in the decline in the company 2019s market capitalization from approximately $ 90 billion at july 1 , 2008 and approximately $ 74 billion at october 31 , 2008 to approximately $ 36 billion at december 31 , 2008 . the more significant fair-value adjustments in the pro forma purchase price allocation in the second step of testing were to fair-value loans and debt and were made to identify and value identifiable intangibles . the adjustments to measure the assets , liabilities and intangibles were for the purpose of measuring the implied fair value of goodwill and such adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated balance sheet . the following table shows reporting units with goodwill balances and the excess of fair value of allocated book value as of december 31 , 2008 . reporting unit ( $ in millions ) fair value as a % ( % ) of allocated book value goodwill ( post-impairment ) .\n| reporting unit ( $ inmillions ) | fair value as a % ( % ) of allocated book value | goodwill ( post-impairment ) |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| north america cards | 139% ( 139 % ) | 6765 |\n| international cards | 218% ( 218 % ) | 4066 |\n| asia consumer banking | 293% ( 293 % ) | 3106 |\n| securities & banking | 109% ( 109 % ) | 9774 |\n| global transaction services | 994% ( 994 % ) | 1570 |\n| north america gwm | 386% ( 386 % ) | 1259 |\n| international gwm | 171% ( 171 % ) | 592 |\nwhile no impairment was noted in step one of our securities and banking reporting unit impairment test at october 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2008 , goodwill present in that reporting unit may be particularly sensitive to further deterioration in economic conditions . under the market approach for valuing this reporting unit , the earnings multiples and transaction multiples were selected from multiples obtained using data from guideline companies and acquisitions . the selection of the actual multiple considers operating performance and financial condition such as return on equity and net income growth of securities and banking as compared to the guideline companies and acquisitions . for the valuation under the income approach , the company utilized a discount rate which it believes reflects the risk and uncertainty related to the projected cash flows , and selected 2013 as the terminal year . in 2013 , the value was derived assuming a return to historical levels of core-business profitability for the reporting unit , despite the significant losses experienced in 2008 . this assumption is based on management 2019s view that this recovery will occur based upon various macro- economic factors such as the recent u.s . government stimulus actions , restoring marketplace confidence and improved risk-management practices on an industry-wide basis . furthermore , company-specific actions such as its recently announced realignment of its businesses to optimize its global businesses for future profitable growth , will also be a factor in returning the company 2019s core securities and banking business to historical levels . small deterioration in the assumptions used in the valuations , in particular the discount rate and growth rate assumptions used in the net income projections , could significantly affect the company 2019s impairment evaluation and , hence , results . if the future were to differ adversely from management 2019s best estimate of key economic assumptions and associated cash flows were to decrease by a small margin , the company could potentially experience future material impairment charges with respect to the goodwill remaining in our securities and banking reporting unit . any such charges by themselves would not negatively affect the company 2019s tier 1 and total regulatory capital ratios , tangible capital or the company 2019s liquidity position. .',
]
query_embeddings = model.encode_query(queries)
document_embeddings = model.encode_document(documents)
print(query_embeddings.shape, document_embeddings.shape)
# [1, 2560] [3, 2560]
# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
similarities = model.similarity(query_embeddings, document_embeddings)
print(similarities)
# tensor([[0.7098, 0.3908, 0.3726]])
```
## Evaluation
### Metrics
#### Information Retrieval
* Evaluated with [InformationRetrievalEvaluator](https://sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/evaluation.html#sentence_transformers.sentence_transformer.evaluation.InformationRetrievalEvaluator)
| Metric | Value |
|:--------------------|:-----------|
| cosine_accuracy@1 | 0.1505 |
| cosine_accuracy@3 | 0.343 |
| cosine_accuracy@5 | 0.437 |
| cosine_accuracy@10 | 0.5605 |
| cosine_precision@5 | 0.0874 |
| cosine_precision@10 | 0.056 |
| cosine_recall@5 | 0.437 |
| cosine_recall@10 | 0.5605 |
| **cosine_ndcg@10** | **0.3407** |
| cosine_mrr@10 | 0.2721 |
| cosine_map@100 | 0.2857 |
## Training Details
### Training Dataset
#### generator
* Dataset: generator
* Size: 1,458 training samples
* Columns: anchor and positive
* Approximate statistics based on the first 100 samples:
| | anchor | positive |
|:---------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| type | string | string |
| modality | text | text |
| details | - min: 51 tokens
- mean: 67.54 tokens
- max: 92 tokens
| - min: 343 tokens
- mean: 998.76 tokens
- max: 3223 tokens
|
* Samples:
| anchor | positive |
|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Company: United Parcel Service \| Year: 2010 \| Question: What was the cumulative total return on investment for United Parcel Service's Class B common stock at the end of 2010, assuming $100 was invested on December 31, 2005? | shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation averag... |
| Company: United Parcel Service \| Year: 2013 \| Question: What was the change in net cash from operating activities at United Parcel Service between 2011 and 2012? | united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources operating activities the following is a summary of the significant sources ( uses ) of cash from operating activities ( amounts in millions ) : .
\| \| 2013 \| 2012 \| 2011 \|
\| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \|
\| net income \| $ 4372 \| $ 807 \| $ 3804 \|
\| non-cash operating activities ( a ) \| 3318 \| 7313 \| 4578 \|
\| pension and postretirement plan contributions ( ups-sponsored plans ) \| -212 ( 212 ) \| -917 ( 917 ) \| -1436 ( 1436 ) \|
\| income tax receivables and payables \| -155 ( 155 ) \| 280 \| 236 \|
\| changes in working capital and other noncurrent assets and liabilities \| 121 \| -148 ( 148 ) \| -12 ( 12 ) \|
\| other operating activities \| -140 ( 140 ) \| -119 ( 119 ) \| -97 ( 97 ) \|
\| net cash from operating activities \| $ 7304 \| $ 7216 \| $ 7073 \|
( a ) represents depreciation and amortization , gains and losses on derivative and foreign exchan... |
| Company: Marathon Oil \| Year: 2008 \| Question: As of December 31, 2008, what were the total undiscounted minimum capital lease obligations for Marathon Oil, excluding assets under construction, in millions? | marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements preferred shares 2013 in connection with the acquisition of western discussed in note 6 , the board of directors authorized a class of voting preferred stock consisting of 6 million shares . upon completion of the acquisition , we issued 5 million shares of this voting preferred stock to a trustee , who holds the shares for the benefit of the holders of the exchangeable shares discussed above . each share of voting preferred stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to the holders of marathon common stock . each holder of exchangeable shares may direct the trustee to vote the number of shares of voting preferred stock equal to the number of shares of marathon common stock issuable upon the exchange of the exchangeable shares held by that holder . in no event will the aggregate number of votes entitled to be cast by the trustee with respect to the outstanding shares of voting preferred stock exceed the numb... |
* Loss: [MultipleNegativesRankingLoss](https://sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/losses.html#multiplenegativesrankingloss) with these parameters:
```json
{
"scale": 20.0,
"similarity_fct": "cos_sim",
"gather_across_devices": false,
"directions": [
"query_to_doc"
],
"partition_mode": "joint",
"hardness_mode": null,
"hardness_strength": 0.0
}
```
### Evaluation Dataset
#### generator
* Dataset: generator
* Size: 2,000 evaluation samples
* Columns: anchor and positive
* Approximate statistics based on the first 100 samples:
| | anchor | positive |
|:---------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| type | string | string |
| modality | text | text |
| details | - min: 48 tokens
- mean: 65.95 tokens
- max: 92 tokens
| - min: 321 tokens
- mean: 977.77 tokens
- max: 3223 tokens
|
* Samples:
| anchor | positive |
|:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Company: Air Products \| Year: 2015 \| Question: What was the total amount of unconditional purchase obligations that Air Products was committed to in 2017? | guarantees and warranties in april 2015 , we entered into joint venture arrangements in saudi arabia . an equity bridge loan has been provided to the joint venture until 2020 to fund equity commitments , and we guaranteed the repayment of our 25% ( 25 % ) share of this loan . our venture partner guaranteed repayment of their share . our maximum exposure under the guarantee is approximately $ 100 . as of 30 september 2015 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 67.5 for our obligation to make future equity contributions based on the equity bridge loan . air products has also entered into a sale of equipment contract with the joint venture to engineer , procure , and construct the industrial gas facilities that will supply gases to saudi aramco . we will provide bank guarantees to the joint venture of up to $ 326 to support our performance under the contract . we are party to an equity support agreement and operations guarantee related to an air separation facility constructed in trini... |
| Company: JPMorgan Chase \| Year: 2003 \| Question: In JPMorgan Chase's 2003 annual report, what was the ratio of securities purchased under resale agreements to securities borrowed, based on the values of $62,801 million and $41,834 million respectively? | notes to consolidated financial statements j.p . morgan chase & co . 98 j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report securities financing activities jpmorgan chase enters into resale agreements , repurchase agreements , securities borrowed transactions and securities loaned transactions primarily to finance the firm 2019s inventory positions , acquire securities to cover short positions and settle other securities obligations . the firm also enters into these transactions to accommodate customers 2019 needs . securities purchased under resale agreements ( 201cresale agreements 201d ) and securities sold under repurchase agreements ( 201crepurchase agreements 201d ) are generally treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried on the consolidated bal- ance sheet at the amounts the securities will be subsequently sold or repurchased , plus accrued interest . where appropriate , resale and repurchase agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis in a... |
| Company: Altria \| Year: 2016 \| Question: As of December 31, 2016, how many individual smoking and health cases, plus smoking and health class actions and aggregated claims litigation, were pending against PM USA and, in some instances, Altria Group, Inc.? | altria group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements _________________________ may not be obtainable in all cases . this risk has been substantially reduced given that 47 states and puerto rico limit the dollar amount of bonds or require no bond at all . as discussed below , however , tobacco litigation plaintiffs have challenged the constitutionality of florida 2019s bond cap statute in several cases and plaintiffs may challenge state bond cap statutes in other jurisdictions as well . such challenges may include the applicability of state bond caps in federal court . states , including florida , may also seek to repeal or alter bond cap statutes through legislation . although altria group , inc . cannot predict the outcome of such challenges , it is possible that the consolidated results of operations , cash flows or financial position of altria group , inc. , or one or more of its subsidiaries , could be materially affected in a particular fiscal quarter o... |
* Loss: [MultipleNegativesRankingLoss](https://sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/losses.html#multiplenegativesrankingloss) with these parameters:
```json
{
"scale": 20.0,
"similarity_fct": "cos_sim",
"gather_across_devices": false,
"directions": [
"query_to_doc"
],
"partition_mode": "joint",
"hardness_mode": null,
"hardness_strength": 0.0
}
```
### Training Hyperparameters
#### Non-Default Hyperparameters
- `per_device_train_batch_size`: 1
- `gradient_accumulation_steps`: 8
- `learning_rate`: 0.0002
- `num_train_epochs`: 1
- `warmup_ratio`: 0.1
- `bf16`: True
- `gradient_checkpointing`: unsloth
#### All Hyperparameters
Click to expand
- `overwrite_output_dir`: False
- `do_predict`: False
- `prediction_loss_only`: True
- `per_device_train_batch_size`: 1
- `per_device_eval_batch_size`: 8
- `per_gpu_train_batch_size`: None
- `per_gpu_eval_batch_size`: None
- `gradient_accumulation_steps`: 8
- `eval_accumulation_steps`: None
- `torch_empty_cache_steps`: None
- `learning_rate`: 0.0002
- `weight_decay`: 0.0
- `adam_beta1`: 0.9
- `adam_beta2`: 0.999
- `adam_epsilon`: 1e-08
- `max_grad_norm`: 1.0
- `num_train_epochs`: 1
- `max_steps`: -1
- `lr_scheduler_type`: linear
- `lr_scheduler_kwargs`: {}
- `warmup_ratio`: 0.1
- `warmup_steps`: 0
- `log_level`: passive
- `log_level_replica`: warning
- `log_on_each_node`: True
- `logging_nan_inf_filter`: True
- `save_safetensors`: True
- `save_on_each_node`: False
- `save_only_model`: False
- `restore_callback_states_from_checkpoint`: False
- `no_cuda`: False
- `use_cpu`: False
- `use_mps_device`: False
- `seed`: 42
- `data_seed`: None
- `jit_mode_eval`: False
- `use_ipex`: False
- `bf16`: True
- `fp16`: False
- `fp16_opt_level`: O1
- `half_precision_backend`: auto
- `bf16_full_eval`: False
- `fp16_full_eval`: False
- `tf32`: None
- `local_rank`: 0
- `ddp_backend`: None
- `tpu_num_cores`: None
- `tpu_metrics_debug`: False
- `debug`: []
- `dataloader_drop_last`: False
- `dataloader_num_workers`: 0
- `dataloader_prefetch_factor`: None
- `past_index`: -1
- `disable_tqdm`: False
- `remove_unused_columns`: True
- `label_names`: None
- `load_best_model_at_end`: False
- `ignore_data_skip`: False
- `fsdp`: []
- `fsdp_min_num_params`: 0
- `fsdp_config`: {'min_num_params': 0, 'xla': False, 'xla_fsdp_v2': False, 'xla_fsdp_grad_ckpt': False}
- `fsdp_transformer_layer_cls_to_wrap`: None
- `accelerator_config`: {'split_batches': False, 'dispatch_batches': None, 'even_batches': True, 'use_seedable_sampler': True, 'non_blocking': False, 'gradient_accumulation_kwargs': None}
- `parallelism_config`: None
- `deepspeed`: None
- `label_smoothing_factor`: 0.0
- `optim`: adamw_torch_fused
- `optim_args`: None
- `adafactor`: False
- `group_by_length`: False
- `length_column_name`: length
- `ddp_find_unused_parameters`: None
- `ddp_bucket_cap_mb`: None
- `ddp_broadcast_buffers`: False
- `dataloader_pin_memory`: True
- `dataloader_persistent_workers`: False
- `skip_memory_metrics`: True
- `use_legacy_prediction_loop`: False
- `push_to_hub`: False
- `resume_from_checkpoint`: None
- `hub_model_id`: None
- `hub_strategy`: every_save
- `hub_private_repo`: None
- `hub_always_push`: False
- `hub_revision`: None
- `gradient_checkpointing`: unsloth
- `gradient_checkpointing_kwargs`: None
- `include_inputs_for_metrics`: False
- `include_for_metrics`: []
- `eval_do_concat_batches`: True
- `fp16_backend`: auto
- `push_to_hub_model_id`: None
- `push_to_hub_organization`: None
- `mp_parameters`:
- `auto_find_batch_size`: False
- `full_determinism`: False
- `torchdynamo`: None
- `ray_scope`: last
- `ddp_timeout`: 1800
- `torch_compile`: False
- `torch_compile_backend`: None
- `torch_compile_mode`: None
- `include_tokens_per_second`: False
- `include_num_input_tokens_seen`: False
- `neftune_noise_alpha`: None
- `optim_target_modules`: None
- `batch_eval_metrics`: False
- `eval_on_start`: False
- `use_liger_kernel`: False
- `liger_kernel_config`: None
- `eval_use_gather_object`: False
- `average_tokens_across_devices`: False
- `prompts`: None
- `batch_sampler`: batch_sampler
- `multi_dataset_batch_sampler`: proportional
- `router_mapping`: {}
- `learning_rate_mapping`: {}