{"year": "2021", "tier": "T2", "problem_label": "1", "problem_type": null, "exam": "EGMO", "problem": "According to Anna, the number 2021 is fantabulous. She states that if any element of the set $\\{m, 2 m+1,3 m\\}$ is fantabulousfor a positive integer $m$, then they are all fantabulous. Is the number 2021 ${ }^{2021}$ fantabulous?\n(Australia, Angelo Di Pasquale)\nAnswer: Yes", "solution": "Consider the sequence of positive integers $m, 3 m, 6 m+1,12 m+3,4 m+1,2 m$. Since each number in the sequence is fantabulous if and only if the next one is, we deduce that $m$ is fantabulous if and only if $2 m$ is fantabulous.\n\nCombined with the fact that $m$ is fantabulous if and only if $2 m+1$ is fantabulous, this implies that $m>1$ is fantabulous if and only if $f(m)=\\left[\\frac{m}{2}\\right]$ is fantabulous. We can apply $f$ sufficiently many times to any positive integer $n$ to conclude that $n$ is fantabulous if and only if 1 is fantabulous. Therefore, the fact that 2021 is fantabulous implies that 1 is fantabulous, which in turn implies that $2021^{2021}$ is fantabulous.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "EGMO/segmented/en-2021-solutions.jsonl", "problem_match": "\nProblem 1.", "solution_match": "# Solution 1."}} {"year": "2021", "tier": "T2", "problem_label": "1", "problem_type": null, "exam": "EGMO", "problem": "According to Anna, the number 2021 is fantabulous. She states that if any element of the set $\\{m, 2 m+1,3 m\\}$ is fantabulousfor a positive integer $m$, then they are all fantabulous. Is the number 2021 ${ }^{2021}$ fantabulous?\n(Australia, Angelo Di Pasquale)\nAnswer: Yes", "solution": "Let $m>1$ be a fantabulous number. Note that at least one of the following four cases must hold.\n\n- Case 1. The number $m$ is odd;\n\nWe have $m=2 a+1$ for some positive integer $a$, so $a10^{7}$ and note that for $m=q^{3}$\n\n$$\nL\\left(q^{3}\\right)=\\sum_{k=1}^{q^{3}}\\left[\\frac{q^{3}}{k}\\right] \\leq \\sum_{k=1}^{q^{3}} \\frac{q^{3}}{k} \\leq q^{3} \\cdot \\sum_{k=1}^{q^{3}} \\frac{1}{k} \\leq q^{3} \\cdot q=q^{4}\n$$\n\nIndeed, the first inequality results from $[x] \\leq x$. The second inequality can be seen (for instance) as follows. We divide the terms in the sum $\\sum_{k=1}^{q^{3}} \\frac{1}{k}$ into several groups: For $j \\geq 0$, the $j$-th group contains the $2^{j}$ consecutive terms $\\frac{1}{2^{j}}, \\ldots, \\frac{1}{2^{j+1}-1}$. Since every term in the $j$-th group is bounded by $\\frac{1}{2^{j}}$, the overall contribution of the $j$-th group to the sum is at most 1 . Since the first $q$ groups together would contain $2^{q}-1>q^{3}$ terms, the number of groups does not exceed $q$, and hence the value of the sum under consideration is indeed bounded by $q$.\n\nCall an integer $m$ special, if it satisfies $1 \\leq L(m) \\leq q^{4}$. Denote by $g(m) \\geq 1$ the largest integer whose square is bounded by $L(m)$; in other words $g^{2}(m) \\leq L(m)<(g(m)+1)^{2}$. Notethat $g(m) \\leq$ $q^{2}$ for all special $m$, which implies\n\n$$\n0 \\leq L(m)-g^{2}(m)<(g(m)+1)^{2}-g^{2}(m)=2 g(m)+1 \\leq 2 q^{2}+1\n$$\n\nFinally, we do some counting. Inequality (2) and the monotonicity of $L(m)$ imply that there exist at least $q^{3}$ special integers. Because of (3), every special integer $m$ has $0 \\leq L(m)-g^{2}(m) \\leq 2 q^{2}+1$. By averaging, at least $\\frac{q^{3}}{2 q^{2}+2}>10^{6}$ special integers must yield the same value $L(m)-g^{2}(m)$. This frequently occurring value is our choice for $\\alpha$, which yields more than $10^{6}$ solutions $(m, g(m))$ to equation (1). Hence, the answer to the problem is YES.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "EGMO/segmented/en-2021-solutions.jsonl", "problem_match": "\nProblems 6.", "solution_match": "# Solution."}}