2imi9 commited on
Commit
ffe86f9
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 385f658

v8: rebalanced + sample_karst_score for per-pixel binary karst regression

Browse files

Combines all 3 AOIs (Central/East/West), adds sample_karst_score field (0=other, 1=karst) for per-pixel binary regression, soft-balanced to max/min class ratio 9.9, pre-sharded into 5 longitude-coherent regions under Studio 10K-record cap. Passes 7/7 OE audit criteria. See v8/DATASET_CARD_ADDENDUM.md.

.gitattributes CHANGED
@@ -67,3 +67,5 @@ annotations/annotation_features.geojson filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
67
  annotation_features.geojson filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
68
  studio/import.geojson filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
69
  studio/import.json filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 
 
 
67
  annotation_features.geojson filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
68
  studio/import.geojson filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
69
  studio/import.json filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
70
+ v8/studio/import_full.geojson filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
71
+ v8/studio/import_full.json filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
v8/DATASET_CARD_ADDENDUM.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ # This is an addendum to be merged into the existing README.md on HF
3
+ # Dataset: BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base
4
+ # Version: v8 (rebalanced + sample_karst_score)
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ # v8 Rebalanced Edition (2026-05-23)
8
+
9
+ A new variant of the Karst fine-tuning dataset that:
10
+
11
+ 1. **Combines all 3 AOI regions** (Central, East, West) into one mixed training set
12
+ 2. **Adds `sample_karst_score`** — a binary regression target (0.0 = other / 1.0 = karst) that lets OlmoEarth Studio's per-pixel regression head actually learn karst vs non-karst, instead of regressing to the mean of `sample_number` (confidence)
13
+ 3. **Passes the 7-criterion OE quality audit** (max/min class ratio reduced from 13.0 to 9.9; spatial spread verified; negative class present)
14
+ 4. **Pre-sharded** into 5 longitude-sorted regions of ~8,200 features each, all under Studio's 10K-records / 1-hour upload cap (pitfall #7)
15
+
16
+ ## What's new in this version
17
+
18
+ | Aspect | Original (v1) | v8 |
19
+ |---|---|---|
20
+ | Rows | 47,020 | **40,989** |
21
+ | Class distribution | other 53%, depression 35%, sinkhole 8%, mine 4% | other 46%, depression 40%, sinkhole 9%, mine 5% |
22
+ | Max/min class ratio | 13.0 (fails audit) | **9.9 (passes)** |
23
+ | Binary karst balance (positive : negative) | 47 : 53 | **54 : 46** |
24
+ | Per-AOI columns | implicit only | **explicit `task_name`** (pa_karst_central / east / west) |
25
+ | Per-pixel regression target | `confidence` (0.6–0.9 for all classes — degenerate) | **`sample_karst_score` (0 or 1 — discriminative)** |
26
+ | Studio shards | none — 47K records times out (pitfall #7) | **5 longitude-coherent shards, each ~8,200** |
27
+
28
+ ## New field: `sample_karst_score`
29
+
30
+ A pre-computed binary regression target so per-pixel regression in Studio produces a real karst probability map instead of collapsing to the mean (the V6 failure).
31
+
32
+ | `sample_category` (existing) | `sample_karst_score` (new) |
33
+ |---|---|
34
+ | `other` | **0.0** |
35
+ | `sinkhole` | **1.0** |
36
+ | `surface_depression` | **1.0** |
37
+ | `surface_mine` | **1.0** |
38
+
39
+ All other existing fields (`sample_category`, `sample_number`, `sample_true_false`, etc.) are preserved unchanged, so window-level classification and point detection workflows remain available.
40
+
41
+ ## New field: `task_name`
42
+
43
+ Spatial AOI assignment (was implicit in v1, now an explicit column):
44
+
45
+ | AOI | Longitude range | Row count |
46
+ |---|---|---:|
47
+ | `pa_karst_west` | lon < -78.5 | 557 |
48
+ | `pa_karst_central` | -78.5 ≤ lon < -76.5 | 21,517 |
49
+ | `pa_karst_east` | lon ≥ -76.5 | 18,915 |
50
+
51
+ ## Why three V6/V7 training runs produced unusable outputs
52
+
53
+ | Run | What it did | Why it failed |
54
+ |---|---|---|
55
+ | **V6 run2** (per-pixel regression on `sample_number`) | Trained continuous regression on labeler confidence (0.6–0.9 across all classes) | Confidence carries no class signal — model regressed to mean ≈ 0.82 with std 0.02. Output raster looks flat. |
56
+ | **V7 run2** (window-level classification on `sample_category`) | Studio output a single polygon covering the entire 13,000 km² AOI, labeled `other` | "Window-level" inference applied to a whole AOI = one prediction for the whole region = majority class |
57
+ | **What V8 enables** (per-pixel regression on **`sample_karst_score`**) | Per-pixel regression with a binary 0/1 target | Each pixel gets a genuine `P(karst)` value. Map is interpretable, thresholdable, AUC-evaluatable. |
58
+
59
+ ## Studio import — recommended workflow
60
+
61
+ The dataset includes pre-built Studio import files at both `.geojson` and `.json` extensions (Windows MIME pitfall #4):
62
+
63
+ ```
64
+ studio/
65
+ ├── import_full.geojson + .json # 40,989 features (over Studio's 10K cap — use shards)
66
+ └── shards/
67
+ ├── region_00_lon-78.67_to_-77.74.{geojson,json} # 8,198 features (W)
68
+ ├── region_01_lon-77.74_to_-77.15.{geojson,json} # 8,198
69
+ ├── region_02_lon-77.15_to_-76.34.{geojson,json} # 8,198
70
+ ├── region_03_lon-76.34_to_-75.70.{geojson,json} # 8,198
71
+ └── region_04_lon-75.70_to_-74.97.{geojson,json} # 8,197 (E)
72
+ ```
73
+
74
+ Upload the 5 shards as 5 separate Studio "regions" — each fits under the 1-hour upload limit and is geographically coherent (longitude-sorted, not random).
75
+
76
+ ## Recommended Studio model config for V8
77
+
78
+ | Wizard step | Choice | Rationale |
79
+ |---|---|---|
80
+ | Model type | **Per-pixel regression** | Continuous raster output, what V6 was trying to be |
81
+ | Label field | **`sample_karst_score`** | The new binary target — must appear in the dropdown alongside `sample_number` |
82
+ | Foundation model | OlmoEarth-v1 default | |
83
+ | Temporal context | A period of time, 12 months, January start | Persistent geomorphic features |
84
+ | Image sources | Sentinel-2 only (Sentinel-1 optional for run upgrade) | Backbone is S2-trained |
85
+ | Patch size | 640 m × 640 m | Captures all 4 feature scales + lithology context |
86
+ | Inference AOI | One Central tile from the 2×2 split (or all 4 sequentially) | Studio's 10,000 km² inference cap |
87
+
88
+ Expected output: a single-band 10 m float raster with values in `[0, 1]` interpretable as `P(karst)`.
89
+
90
+ ## Audit results
91
+
92
+ Ran with `scripts/audit.py` from the `olmoearth-data-prep` skill:
93
+
94
+ ```
95
+ [PASS] Volume: 40989 samples
96
+ [PASS] Schema: studio_import (properties.sample_category) on all 40989
97
+ [PASS] Class distribution: 4 classes, max/min ratio = 9.9
98
+ [PASS] Per-class volume: all classes >= 30 samples
99
+ [PASS] Negative class: 'other' present
100
+ [PASS] Spatial distribution: largest of 4 k-means clusters holds 32% of points
101
+ [PASS] Polygon cleanliness: n/a (point dataset)
102
+ ```
v8/HF_UPLOAD_INSTRUCTIONS.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # HuggingFace upload instructions — Karst v8
2
+
3
+ The local rebuild is at `C:\Users\Frank\Downloads\karst_rebuild\`. To push to HF as a new dataset version on `BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base`:
4
+
5
+ ## One-time setup (if not done)
6
+
7
+ ```powershell
8
+ pip install huggingface_hub
9
+ huggingface-cli login # paste your HF write token (must have write access to BAIGroup org)
10
+ ```
11
+
12
+ ## Upload commands
13
+
14
+ ```powershell
15
+ cd C:\Users\Frank\Downloads\karst_rebuild
16
+
17
+ # 1. Upload the new parquet (replaces or sits alongside the existing one)
18
+ huggingface-cli upload BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base `
19
+ balanced_karst_v8.parquet `
20
+ v8/balanced_karst_v8.parquet `
21
+ --repo-type dataset
22
+
23
+ # 2. Upload the studio/ folder (import_full + 5 shards, .geojson + .json each)
24
+ huggingface-cli upload BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base `
25
+ studio `
26
+ v8/studio `
27
+ --repo-type dataset
28
+
29
+ # 3. Upload the addendum so the dataset card documents the v8 changes
30
+ huggingface-cli upload BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base `
31
+ DATASET_CARD_ADDENDUM.md `
32
+ v8/DATASET_CARD_ADDENDUM.md `
33
+ --repo-type dataset
34
+
35
+ # 4. Upload rebuild summary
36
+ huggingface-cli upload BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base `
37
+ rebuild_summary.csv `
38
+ v8/rebuild_summary.csv `
39
+ --repo-type dataset
40
+
41
+ # 5. Upload the build script for reproducibility
42
+ huggingface-cli upload BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base `
43
+ build_balanced_karst_dataset.py `
44
+ v8/build_balanced_karst_dataset.py `
45
+ --repo-type dataset
46
+ ```
47
+
48
+ ## Alternative: single-shot via Python
49
+
50
+ ```python
51
+ from huggingface_hub import HfApi
52
+ api = HfApi()
53
+ api.upload_folder(
54
+ folder_path=r"C:\Users\Frank\Downloads\karst_rebuild",
55
+ repo_id="BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base",
56
+ repo_type="dataset",
57
+ path_in_repo="v8",
58
+ commit_message="v8: rebalanced + sample_karst_score for per-pixel binary karst regression",
59
+ )
60
+ ```
61
+
62
+ ## Merging the dataset card
63
+
64
+ The existing README.md on HF stays as-is. The new `DATASET_CARD_ADDENDUM.md` documents v8 specifically. Option to keep them separate or merge into README later.
65
+
66
+ If you want to merge into README.md, just append the contents of `DATASET_CARD_ADDENDUM.md` to the existing README before pushing. The YAML frontmatter at the top of the addendum should be stripped if merging into a file that already has frontmatter.
67
+
68
+ ## After upload — verify on HF
69
+
70
+ 1. Visit https://huggingface.co/datasets/BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base/tree/main/v8
71
+ 2. Confirm files: `balanced_karst_v8.parquet`, `studio/import_full.geojson`, `studio/shards/region_00..04`
72
+ 3. Click the parquet to check schema includes the new columns: `task_name`, `sample_karst_score`
73
+
74
+ ## Studio import — what to upload
75
+
76
+ You have two options for the V8 run:
77
+
78
+ ### Option A: Single combined upload (preferred if Studio accepts ~16 MB file)
79
+ Upload `studio/import_full.geojson` (or `.json` if Windows MIME blocks the .geojson).
80
+
81
+ ### Option B: 5-shard upload (if Studio chokes on 40K records)
82
+ Upload each of `studio/shards/region_NN.geojson` as a separate region in Studio. They're pre-sorted W-to-E so each shard is geographically coherent.
83
+
84
+ ## V8 model wizard reminder
85
+
86
+ | Step | Choose |
87
+ |---|---|
88
+ | Model type | **Per-pixel regression** |
89
+ | Label field | **`sample_karst_score`** (should now appear alongside `sample_number`) |
90
+ | Period | 12 months annual, January start |
91
+ | Imagery | Sentinel-2 |
92
+ | Patch | 640 m × 640 m |
93
+ | Training AOI | Central (or Central + East for surface_mine count) |
94
+ | Inference AOI | Central 2×2 tile split (each ≤ 3,200 km², well under Studio's 10,000 km² cap) |
v8/balanced_karst_v8.parquet ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:49e6125a0dfcc1085e4e3bec616a49959450fa24ff7f917d25339facd2b349e4
3
+ size 908984
v8/build_balanced_karst_dataset.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ """Rebuild Karst dataset for OlmoEarth Studio with proper balance + sample_karst_score.
2
+
3
+ Steps:
4
+ 1. Pull parquet from BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base
5
+ 2. Assign AOI (east / central / west) by longitude
6
+ 3. Soft-balance: keep all 22,021 positives + sample 22,021 "other" → 44k features 1:1 karst binary
7
+ 4. Add sample_karst_score (0/1) while keeping sample_number (confidence) untouched
8
+ 5. Emit Studio-import-ready geojson (schema #1: sample_category + sample_*) with dual .geojson/.json
9
+ 6. Auto-shard at 10K (sorted by longitude per pitfall #6) — Studio 1-hour upload cap
10
+ 7. Also emit parquet for HF upload
11
+ 8. Emit dataset_card_addendum.md documenting the new field
12
+ """
13
+ import json
14
+ import shutil
15
+ from pathlib import Path
16
+ import numpy as np
17
+ import pandas as pd
18
+
19
+ OUT = Path(r"C:\Users\Frank\Downloads\karst_rebuild")
20
+ OUT.mkdir(exist_ok=True, parents=True)
21
+ PARQUET_URL = "https://huggingface.co/datasets/BAIGroup/OlmoEarth-v1-FT-Karst-Groundwater-Base/resolve/refs%2Fconvert%2Fparquet/default/train/0000.parquet"
22
+
23
+ # Longitude thresholds for PA AOI assignment (verified against run2 raster bounds)
24
+ LON_WEST_MAX = -78.5 # west: lon < -78.5
25
+ LON_CENTRAL_MAX = -76.5 # central: -78.5 <= lon < -76.5
26
+ # east: lon >= -76.5
27
+
28
+ # Studio 1-hour upload cap per shard
29
+ MAX_PER_SHARD = 10000
30
+
31
+ # RNG seed for reproducibility
32
+ RNG = np.random.default_rng(42)
33
+
34
+
35
+ def assign_aoi(lon: float) -> str:
36
+ if lon < LON_WEST_MAX:
37
+ return "pa_karst_west"
38
+ if lon < LON_CENTRAL_MAX:
39
+ return "pa_karst_central"
40
+ return "pa_karst_east"
41
+
42
+
43
+ def main():
44
+ print("=" * 72)
45
+ print("Karst dataset rebuild — balanced + sample_karst_score")
46
+ print("=" * 72)
47
+
48
+ # ---- 1. Pull parquet ----
49
+ print(f"\n[1] Fetching parquet from HF...")
50
+ df = pd.read_parquet(PARQUET_URL)
51
+ print(f" loaded {len(df):,} rows / columns: {list(df.columns)}")
52
+
53
+ # ---- 2. AOI assignment ----
54
+ print(f"\n[2] Assigning AOIs by longitude (W<{LON_WEST_MAX}, C<{LON_CENTRAL_MAX}, E>=)...")
55
+ df["task_name"] = df["lon"].apply(assign_aoi)
56
+ print("\n AOI distribution:")
57
+ print(df["task_name"].value_counts().to_string())
58
+
59
+ # ---- 3. Soft balance: all positives + sampled negatives 1:1 ----
60
+ print(f"\n[3] Soft balance — keep all positives, subsample 'other' to 1:1 binary ratio")
61
+ print("\n Original class distribution:")
62
+ print(df["tag"].value_counts().to_string())
63
+
64
+ positives = df[df["tag"] != "other"].copy()
65
+ negatives = df[df["tag"] == "other"].copy()
66
+ n_pos = len(positives)
67
+ # Cap "other" at 9.9x the smallest class to satisfy audit pitfall #5 (max/min ratio < 10)
68
+ min_class_count = positives["tag"].value_counts().min() # surface_mine = 1,916
69
+ n_neg_target = min(n_pos, int(min_class_count * 9.9)) # = 18,968 — passes audit
70
+ print(f" smallest class count: {min_class_count:,} (surface_mine)")
71
+ print(f" capping 'other' at 9.9x = {n_neg_target:,} to keep max/min ratio < 10")
72
+
73
+ # Stratified sample of negatives by AOI to preserve regional proportion
74
+ print(f"\n positives total: {n_pos:,} / target negatives: {n_neg_target:,}")
75
+ neg_per_aoi = negatives["task_name"].value_counts()
76
+ print(f" negatives per AOI before sampling:")
77
+ print(neg_per_aoi.to_string())
78
+
79
+ # Proportional allocation across AOIs
80
+ sampled_neg = []
81
+ for aoi, total_in_aoi in neg_per_aoi.items():
82
+ # match each AOI's negative share to its share of original negatives
83
+ share = total_in_aoi / negatives.shape[0]
84
+ n_take = int(round(n_neg_target * share))
85
+ n_take = min(n_take, total_in_aoi)
86
+ aoi_negs = negatives[negatives["task_name"] == aoi]
87
+ sampled_neg.append(aoi_negs.sample(n=n_take, random_state=42))
88
+ print(f" {aoi}: sampling {n_take:,} of {total_in_aoi:,} negatives ({share*100:.1f}% share)")
89
+ neg_sampled = pd.concat(sampled_neg, ignore_index=True)
90
+
91
+ combined = pd.concat([positives, neg_sampled], ignore_index=True)
92
+ combined = combined.sample(frac=1, random_state=42).reset_index(drop=True) # shuffle
93
+ print(f"\n combined dataset: {len(combined):,} rows")
94
+ print(f" final class distribution:")
95
+ print(combined["tag"].value_counts().to_string())
96
+ print(f" final AOI distribution:")
97
+ print(combined["task_name"].value_counts().to_string())
98
+
99
+ # ---- 4. Add sample_karst_score (the whole point) ----
100
+ print(f"\n[4] Adding sample_karst_score field (0.0=other, 1.0=karst)")
101
+ combined["sample_karst_score"] = np.where(combined["tag"] == "other", 0.0, 1.0)
102
+ print(" sample_karst_score distribution:")
103
+ print(combined["sample_karst_score"].value_counts().to_string())
104
+
105
+ # Sanity check: class ratio for audit (pitfall #5)
106
+ ratio = combined["tag"].value_counts().max() / combined["tag"].value_counts().min()
107
+ print(f"\n max/min class ratio: {ratio:.1f} (audit warn threshold = 10)")
108
+
109
+ # ---- 5. Build Studio import features (schema #1) ----
110
+ print(f"\n[5] Building Studio import features (schema #1: properties.sample_category)")
111
+ features = []
112
+ for _, row in combined.iterrows():
113
+ # observation_time: use start of label window
114
+ obs_time = str(row["oe_start_time"]).split("+")[0].replace(" ", "T") + "Z"
115
+ feat = {
116
+ "type": "Feature",
117
+ "geometry": {
118
+ "type": "Point",
119
+ "coordinates": [float(row["lon"]), float(row["lat"])],
120
+ },
121
+ "properties": {
122
+ # Studio framework fields (no sample_ prefix)
123
+ "task_name": str(row["task_name"]),
124
+ "observation_time": obs_time,
125
+ # Studio recognized class label
126
+ "sample_category": str(row["tag"]),
127
+ # Original confidence preserved as sample_number (Studio's recognized numeric field)
128
+ "sample_number": float(row["confidence"]),
129
+ # NEW: binary karst regression target
130
+ "sample_karst_score": float(row["sample_karst_score"]),
131
+ # auto_generated flag (matches original Studio mapping)
132
+ "sample_true_false": bool(row["auto_generated"]),
133
+ # Extra audit fields (Studio ignores, useful for downstream)
134
+ "sample_quality_flags": str(row["quality_flags"]) if pd.notna(row["quality_flags"]) else "",
135
+ "sample_merged_from_cave": bool(row["merged_from_cave"]),
136
+ },
137
+ }
138
+ features.append(feat)
139
+ print(f" built {len(features):,} features")
140
+
141
+ # ---- 6. Spatial sort + shard at MAX_PER_SHARD ----
142
+ print(f"\n[6] Spatial-sort by longitude + shard at {MAX_PER_SHARD:,}/shard (pitfalls #6, #7)")
143
+ features.sort(key=lambda f: f["geometry"]["coordinates"][0]) # sort by lon
144
+ n_shards = (len(features) + MAX_PER_SHARD - 1) // MAX_PER_SHARD
145
+ shard_size = (len(features) + n_shards - 1) // n_shards
146
+ shards = [features[i : i + shard_size] for i in range(0, len(features), shard_size)]
147
+ print(f" -> {len(shards)} shards of ~{shard_size:,} each (sorted W-to-E)")
148
+
149
+ # ---- 7. Write outputs ----
150
+ print(f"\n[7] Writing outputs to {OUT}")
151
+
152
+ # Full combined file (one big import.geojson + .json, before sharding — for reference)
153
+ fc_full = {"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": features}
154
+ full_gj = OUT / "studio" / "import_full.geojson"
155
+ full_gj.parent.mkdir(exist_ok=True, parents=True)
156
+ full_gj.write_text(json.dumps(fc_full))
157
+ shutil.copy2(full_gj, OUT / "studio" / "import_full.json")
158
+ print(f" wrote studio/import_full.geojson + .json ({len(features):,} features)")
159
+
160
+ # Sharded files (Studio uploads — these are what user uses)
161
+ shards_dir = OUT / "studio" / "shards"
162
+ shards_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
163
+ for i, shard in enumerate(shards):
164
+ # Determine geographic descriptor for shard
165
+ lons = [f["geometry"]["coordinates"][0] for f in shard]
166
+ lon_range = f"{min(lons):.2f}_to_{max(lons):.2f}"
167
+ name = f"region_{i:02d}_lon{lon_range}"
168
+ gj_path = shards_dir / f"{name}.geojson"
169
+ json_path = shards_dir / f"{name}.json"
170
+ gj_path.write_text(json.dumps({"type": "FeatureCollection", "features": shard}))
171
+ shutil.copy2(gj_path, json_path)
172
+ print(f" wrote shards/{name}.{{geojson,json}} ({len(shard):,} features)")
173
+
174
+ # Parquet (HF dataset payload)
175
+ parquet_path = OUT / "balanced_karst_v8.parquet"
176
+ # Add task_name + sample_karst_score columns to parquet
177
+ parquet_df = combined[[
178
+ "category", "tag", "lon", "lat", "oe_start_time", "oe_end_time",
179
+ "oe_annotations_task_id", "confidence", "quality_flags",
180
+ "auto_generated", "merged_from_cave",
181
+ # NEW columns
182
+ "task_name", "sample_karst_score",
183
+ ]].copy()
184
+ parquet_df.to_parquet(parquet_path, index=False)
185
+ print(f" wrote {parquet_path.name} ({len(parquet_df):,} rows, {len(parquet_df.columns)} cols)")
186
+
187
+ # Summary CSV for the user's records
188
+ summary = pd.DataFrame({
189
+ "metric": [
190
+ "total_features",
191
+ "n_positives (karst)",
192
+ "n_negatives (other)",
193
+ "n_west",
194
+ "n_central",
195
+ "n_east",
196
+ "max_min_class_ratio",
197
+ "sample_karst_score_mean",
198
+ "n_shards",
199
+ "shard_size_target",
200
+ ],
201
+ "value": [
202
+ len(combined),
203
+ int((combined["sample_karst_score"] == 1.0).sum()),
204
+ int((combined["sample_karst_score"] == 0.0).sum()),
205
+ int((combined["task_name"] == "pa_karst_west").sum()),
206
+ int((combined["task_name"] == "pa_karst_central").sum()),
207
+ int((combined["task_name"] == "pa_karst_east").sum()),
208
+ round(ratio, 2),
209
+ round(combined["sample_karst_score"].mean(), 3),
210
+ len(shards),
211
+ shard_size,
212
+ ],
213
+ })
214
+ summary_path = OUT / "rebuild_summary.csv"
215
+ summary.to_csv(summary_path, index=False)
216
+ print(f" wrote {summary_path.name}")
217
+
218
+ print(f"\n{'=' * 72}")
219
+ print("DONE. Run audit next:")
220
+ print(f" python {Path(r'C:/Users/Frank/.claude/skills/olmoearth-data-prep/scripts/audit.py')} {full_gj}")
221
+ print(f"{'=' * 72}")
222
+
223
+
224
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
225
+ main()
v8/evaluate_v8_vs_v6.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,321 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ """evaluate_v8_vs_v6.py
2
+
3
+ V8 vs V6 evaluation harness for the Karst per-pixel regression task.
4
+
5
+ What it does:
6
+ 1. Samples V8 (and V6) raster values at every labeled point in the v8 parquet
7
+ 2. Computes AUC of sample_karst_score against model predictions:
8
+ - in-sample (all labels)
9
+ - held-out-by-shard (longitude-banded, mimics spatial CV)
10
+ 3. Plots per-class score distributions, ROC curves, and spatial diff maps
11
+ 4. Reports the value-distribution fingerprint (was V6's mean=0.82 std=0.02 fixed?)
12
+ 5. Writes everything to <out_dir>/
13
+
14
+ Usage:
15
+ python evaluate_v8_vs_v6.py ^
16
+ --v8-rasters "C:\\Users\\Frank\\Downloads\\PA_KARST_Central_V8_run*\\*.tif" ^
17
+ --v6-rasters "C:\\Users\\Frank\\Downloads\\PA_KARST_Central_V6_run2\\*.tif" ^
18
+ --labels "C:\\Users\\Frank\\Downloads\\karst_rebuild\\balanced_karst_v8.parquet" ^
19
+ --out "C:\\Users\\Frank\\Downloads\\v8_vs_v6_eval"
20
+
21
+ Dependencies: rasterio, numpy, pandas, matplotlib, scikit-learn
22
+ """
23
+ from __future__ import annotations
24
+ import argparse
25
+ import glob
26
+ import json
27
+ from pathlib import Path
28
+ import sys
29
+
30
+ import numpy as np
31
+ import pandas as pd
32
+ import rasterio
33
+ from rasterio.warp import transform as warp_transform
34
+ import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
35
+ from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score, roc_curve, average_precision_score
36
+
37
+
38
+ def expand_rasters(patterns: list[str]) -> list[Path]:
39
+ """Resolve glob patterns to a flat list of raster paths."""
40
+ out = []
41
+ for p in patterns:
42
+ matches = sorted(glob.glob(p))
43
+ if not matches:
44
+ print(f" WARN: no rasters match '{p}'")
45
+ out.extend(Path(m) for m in matches)
46
+ return out
47
+
48
+
49
+ def sample_raster_at_points(raster: Path, lons: np.ndarray, lats: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
50
+ """Sample raster value at each (lon, lat). Returns NaN for points outside raster."""
51
+ with rasterio.open(raster) as ds:
52
+ # Transform WGS84 points to raster CRS
53
+ xs, ys = warp_transform("EPSG:4326", ds.crs, lons.tolist(), lats.tolist())
54
+ xs = np.array(xs)
55
+ ys = np.array(ys)
56
+
57
+ # Convert to row/col indices
58
+ # rasterio's index() takes (x, y) one at a time; vectorize via Affine inverse
59
+ inv = ~ds.transform
60
+ cols_f, rows_f = inv * (xs, ys)
61
+ cols = np.round(cols_f).astype(int)
62
+ rows = np.round(rows_f).astype(int)
63
+
64
+ # Mask out-of-bounds
65
+ h, w = ds.shape
66
+ valid = (rows >= 0) & (rows < h) & (cols >= 0) & (cols < w)
67
+
68
+ # Read raster (small enough — 1 band)
69
+ arr = ds.read(1)
70
+ nd = ds.nodata
71
+
72
+ out = np.full(len(lons), np.nan)
73
+ out[valid] = arr[rows[valid], cols[valid]]
74
+ if nd is not None:
75
+ out[out == nd] = np.nan
76
+ return out
77
+
78
+
79
+ def sample_multi_raster(rasters: list[Path], lons: np.ndarray, lats: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
80
+ """Sample across multiple rasters; for each point use first raster that contains it."""
81
+ if not rasters:
82
+ return np.full(len(lons), np.nan)
83
+ out = np.full(len(lons), np.nan)
84
+ for r in rasters:
85
+ vals = sample_raster_at_points(r, lons, lats)
86
+ mask = np.isnan(out) & ~np.isnan(vals)
87
+ out[mask] = vals[mask]
88
+ return out
89
+
90
+
91
+ def value_fingerprint(name: str, vals: np.ndarray) -> dict:
92
+ v = vals[~np.isnan(vals)]
93
+ if len(v) == 0:
94
+ return {"name": name, "n": 0}
95
+ return {
96
+ "name": name,
97
+ "n": int(len(v)),
98
+ "min": float(v.min()),
99
+ "p1": float(np.percentile(v, 1)),
100
+ "p25": float(np.percentile(v, 25)),
101
+ "mean": float(v.mean()),
102
+ "median": float(np.median(v)),
103
+ "p75": float(np.percentile(v, 75)),
104
+ "p99": float(np.percentile(v, 99)),
105
+ "max": float(v.max()),
106
+ "std": float(v.std()),
107
+ }
108
+
109
+
110
+ def compute_aucs(y: np.ndarray, scores: np.ndarray, label: str) -> dict:
111
+ """ROC-AUC + PR-AUC + summary. Returns NaN entries if data is missing."""
112
+ mask = ~np.isnan(scores) & ~np.isnan(y)
113
+ if mask.sum() < 20 or len(np.unique(y[mask])) < 2:
114
+ return {"label": label, "n": int(mask.sum()), "roc_auc": float("nan"), "pr_auc": float("nan")}
115
+ return {
116
+ "label": label,
117
+ "n": int(mask.sum()),
118
+ "roc_auc": float(roc_auc_score(y[mask], scores[mask])),
119
+ "pr_auc": float(average_precision_score(y[mask], scores[mask])),
120
+ "positive_rate": float(y[mask].mean()),
121
+ }
122
+
123
+
124
+ def plot_score_histograms(df: pd.DataFrame, score_col: str, model_name: str, out_path: Path):
125
+ fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(8, 5))
126
+ valid = df.dropna(subset=[score_col])
127
+ for cat, color in zip(
128
+ ["other", "surface_depression", "sinkhole", "surface_mine"],
129
+ ["#888", "#d62728", "#2ca02c", "#1f77b4"],
130
+ ):
131
+ sub = valid[valid["sample_category"] == cat]
132
+ if len(sub):
133
+ ax.hist(
134
+ sub[score_col], bins=50, alpha=0.5, label=f"{cat} (n={len(sub):,})",
135
+ color=color, density=True,
136
+ )
137
+ ax.set_xlabel(f"{model_name} predicted score at label point")
138
+ ax.set_ylabel("density")
139
+ ax.set_title(f"{model_name} score distribution by true class")
140
+ ax.legend()
141
+ ax.grid(alpha=0.3)
142
+ fig.tight_layout()
143
+ fig.savefig(out_path, dpi=120)
144
+ plt.close(fig)
145
+
146
+
147
+ def plot_roc(y: np.ndarray, scores: dict[str, np.ndarray], out_path: Path):
148
+ fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(6, 6))
149
+ for name, s in scores.items():
150
+ mask = ~np.isnan(s) & ~np.isnan(y)
151
+ if mask.sum() < 20 or len(np.unique(y[mask])) < 2:
152
+ continue
153
+ fpr, tpr, _ = roc_curve(y[mask], s[mask])
154
+ auc = roc_auc_score(y[mask], s[mask])
155
+ ax.plot(fpr, tpr, lw=2, label=f"{name} AUC={auc:.3f}")
156
+ ax.plot([0, 1], [0, 1], color="gray", lw=1, linestyle="--", label="random")
157
+ ax.set_xlabel("FPR"); ax.set_ylabel("TPR")
158
+ ax.set_title("ROC — V6 (regression on confidence) vs V8 (regression on sample_karst_score)")
159
+ ax.legend(loc="lower right")
160
+ ax.grid(alpha=0.3)
161
+ fig.tight_layout()
162
+ fig.savefig(out_path, dpi=120)
163
+ plt.close(fig)
164
+
165
+
166
+ def plot_v8_v6_scatter(df: pd.DataFrame, out_path: Path):
167
+ """Scatter V8 score vs V6 score, colored by true class."""
168
+ fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(7, 7))
169
+ valid = df.dropna(subset=["v8_score", "v6_score"])
170
+ for cat, color in zip(
171
+ ["other", "surface_depression", "sinkhole", "surface_mine"],
172
+ ["#888", "#d62728", "#2ca02c", "#1f77b4"],
173
+ ):
174
+ sub = valid[valid["sample_category"] == cat]
175
+ if len(sub):
176
+ ax.scatter(sub["v6_score"], sub["v8_score"], s=2, alpha=0.3, color=color, label=f"{cat} (n={len(sub):,})")
177
+ ax.set_xlabel("V6 score (regression on confidence)")
178
+ ax.set_ylabel("V8 score (regression on sample_karst_score)")
179
+ ax.set_title("V8 vs V6 — point-wise comparison\n(want V8 to spread; V6 was stuck near 0.82)")
180
+ ax.legend(markerscale=4, loc="upper left")
181
+ ax.grid(alpha=0.3)
182
+ fig.tight_layout()
183
+ fig.savefig(out_path, dpi=120)
184
+ plt.close(fig)
185
+
186
+
187
+ def spatial_holdout(df: pd.DataFrame, k: int = 5) -> pd.Series:
188
+ """Assign each point to a longitude-banded fold (0..k-1). Mimics how we sharded."""
189
+ sorted_idx = df["lon"].sort_values().index
190
+ fold = pd.Series(0, index=df.index, dtype=int)
191
+ band_size = len(df) // k
192
+ for i in range(k):
193
+ start = i * band_size
194
+ end = (i + 1) * band_size if i < k - 1 else len(df)
195
+ fold.loc[sorted_idx[start:end]] = i
196
+ return fold
197
+
198
+
199
+ def main():
200
+ ap = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="V8 vs V6 evaluation")
201
+ ap.add_argument("--v8-rasters", nargs="+", required=True,
202
+ help="V8 prediction raster path(s) — supports globs (use quotes)")
203
+ ap.add_argument("--v6-rasters", nargs="*", default=[],
204
+ help="V6 raster path(s) for comparison. Optional but recommended.")
205
+ ap.add_argument("--labels", required=True,
206
+ help="balanced_karst_v8.parquet path")
207
+ ap.add_argument("--out", required=True, help="Output directory")
208
+ ap.add_argument("--holdout-fold", type=int, default=2,
209
+ help="Which longitude band (0..4) to treat as held-out for spatial-CV AUC (default 2 = middle)")
210
+ args = ap.parse_args()
211
+
212
+ out = Path(args.out)
213
+ out.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
214
+
215
+ print(f"[1] Loading labels from {args.labels}")
216
+ df = pd.read_parquet(args.labels)
217
+ print(f" {len(df):,} rows / classes: {df['sample_category'].value_counts().to_dict() if 'sample_category' in df.columns else df['tag'].value_counts().to_dict()}")
218
+ # Column compat: parquet has 'tag' and 'sample_karst_score' from build script
219
+ if "sample_category" not in df.columns and "tag" in df.columns:
220
+ df["sample_category"] = df["tag"]
221
+
222
+ y = df["sample_karst_score"].values
223
+ lons = df["lon"].values.astype(float)
224
+ lats = df["lat"].values.astype(float)
225
+
226
+ print(f"\n[2] Resolving V8 rasters...")
227
+ v8_paths = expand_rasters(args.v8_rasters)
228
+ print(f" found {len(v8_paths)} V8 raster(s):")
229
+ for p in v8_paths:
230
+ print(f" {p}")
231
+
232
+ v6_paths = expand_rasters(args.v6_rasters) if args.v6_rasters else []
233
+ if v6_paths:
234
+ print(f"\n[3] Resolving V6 rasters...")
235
+ print(f" found {len(v6_paths)} V6 raster(s):")
236
+ for p in v6_paths:
237
+ print(f" {p}")
238
+
239
+ if not v8_paths:
240
+ print("ERROR: no V8 rasters found — pass --v8-rasters with valid paths/globs")
241
+ sys.exit(2)
242
+
243
+ print(f"\n[4] Sampling raster values at {len(df):,} label points...")
244
+ df["v8_score"] = sample_multi_raster(v8_paths, lons, lats)
245
+ print(f" V8 valid samples: {(~np.isnan(df['v8_score'])).sum():,} / {len(df):,}")
246
+
247
+ if v6_paths:
248
+ df["v6_score"] = sample_multi_raster(v6_paths, lons, lats)
249
+ print(f" V6 valid samples: {(~np.isnan(df['v6_score'])).sum():,} / {len(df):,}")
250
+ else:
251
+ df["v6_score"] = np.nan
252
+
253
+ print(f"\n[5] Value distribution fingerprints")
254
+ print(f" (V6 ground truth from run2 was: mean=0.82 std=0.02 — flat regression-to-mean failure)")
255
+ fps = []
256
+ for name, col in [("V6", "v6_score"), ("V8", "v8_score")]:
257
+ fp = value_fingerprint(name, df[col].values)
258
+ fps.append(fp)
259
+ if fp.get("n", 0):
260
+ print(f" {name}: n={fp['n']:,} min={fp['min']:.4f} mean={fp['mean']:.4f} std={fp['std']:.4f} max={fp['max']:.4f}")
261
+ print(f" p1={fp['p1']:.4f} p25={fp['p25']:.4f} median={fp['median']:.4f} p75={fp['p75']:.4f} p99={fp['p99']:.4f}")
262
+ pd.DataFrame(fps).to_csv(out / "value_fingerprints.csv", index=False)
263
+
264
+ print(f"\n[6] AUCs — in-sample (all 40,989 labels)")
265
+ in_sample = []
266
+ for name, col in [("V6", "v6_score"), ("V8", "v8_score")]:
267
+ r = compute_aucs(y, df[col].values, f"{name}_in_sample")
268
+ in_sample.append(r)
269
+ if not np.isnan(r.get("roc_auc", np.nan)):
270
+ print(f" {r['label']:>20s} n={r['n']:>6,} ROC-AUC={r['roc_auc']:.4f} PR-AUC={r['pr_auc']:.4f} pos-rate={r['positive_rate']:.3f}")
271
+ else:
272
+ print(f" {r['label']:>20s} no overlap / insufficient data")
273
+
274
+ print(f"\n[7] AUCs — spatial holdout (longitude fold {args.holdout_fold} of 5)")
275
+ df["fold"] = spatial_holdout(df, k=5)
276
+ holdout = df[df["fold"] == args.holdout_fold]
277
+ print(f" holdout n={len(holdout):,} lon range=[{holdout['lon'].min():.2f}, {holdout['lon'].max():.2f}]")
278
+ holdout_aucs = []
279
+ for name, col in [("V6", "v6_score"), ("V8", "v8_score")]:
280
+ r = compute_aucs(holdout["sample_karst_score"].values, holdout[col].values, f"{name}_holdout_fold{args.holdout_fold}")
281
+ holdout_aucs.append(r)
282
+ if not np.isnan(r.get("roc_auc", np.nan)):
283
+ print(f" {r['label']:>30s} n={r['n']:>6,} ROC-AUC={r['roc_auc']:.4f} PR-AUC={r['pr_auc']:.4f}")
284
+
285
+ pd.DataFrame(in_sample + holdout_aucs).to_csv(out / "auc_summary.csv", index=False)
286
+
287
+ print(f"\n[8] Plotting diagnostics...")
288
+ plot_score_histograms(df, "v8_score", "V8", out / "hist_v8_by_class.png")
289
+ print(f" wrote hist_v8_by_class.png")
290
+ if v6_paths:
291
+ plot_score_histograms(df, "v6_score", "V6", out / "hist_v6_by_class.png")
292
+ print(f" wrote hist_v6_by_class.png")
293
+
294
+ scores = {"V8": df["v8_score"].values}
295
+ if v6_paths:
296
+ scores["V6"] = df["v6_score"].values
297
+ plot_roc(y, scores, out / "roc_v8_v6.png")
298
+ print(f" wrote roc_v8_v6.png")
299
+
300
+ if v6_paths:
301
+ plot_v8_v6_scatter(df, out / "scatter_v8_v6.png")
302
+ print(f" wrote scatter_v8_v6.png")
303
+
304
+ # Save full per-point sample table
305
+ df_out = df[["lon", "lat", "task_name", "sample_category", "sample_karst_score", "v8_score", "v6_score", "fold"]]
306
+ df_out.to_csv(out / "per_point_scores.csv", index=False)
307
+ print(f" wrote per_point_scores.csv ({len(df_out):,} rows)")
308
+
309
+ print(f"\n{'=' * 70}")
310
+ print("VERDICT GUIDE:")
311
+ print(f" V6 in-sample AUC was likely ~0.50–0.55 (the regression-to-mean failure)")
312
+ print(f" V8 should target:")
313
+ print(f" - in-sample AUC > 0.80 (model fits)")
314
+ print(f" - holdout AUC > 0.70 (model generalizes spatially)")
315
+ print(f" - value std > 0.10 (real spatial discrimination, not flat 0.82±0.02)")
316
+ print(f" - histogram visibly bimodal (modes near 0 and 1)")
317
+ print(f"{'=' * 70}")
318
+
319
+
320
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
321
+ main()
v8/rebuild_summary.csv ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ metric,value
2
+ total_features,40989.0
3
+ n_positives (karst),22021.0
4
+ n_negatives (other),18968.0
5
+ n_west,557.0
6
+ n_central,21517.0
7
+ n_east,18915.0
8
+ max_min_class_ratio,9.9
9
+ sample_karst_score_mean,0.537
10
+ n_shards,5.0
11
+ shard_size_target,8198.0
v8/studio/import_full.geojson ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:be7a1b76e57ea3877c90ef314f1857c8b60caf165b3e358aa5bd73ef724374c6
3
+ size 16396210
v8/studio/import_full.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:be7a1b76e57ea3877c90ef314f1857c8b60caf165b3e358aa5bd73ef724374c6
3
+ size 16396210
v8/studio/shards/region_00_lon-78.67_to_-77.74.geojson ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
v8/studio/shards/region_00_lon-78.67_to_-77.74.json ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
v8/studio/shards/region_01_lon-77.74_to_-77.15.geojson ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
v8/studio/shards/region_01_lon-77.74_to_-77.15.json ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
v8/studio/shards/region_02_lon-77.15_to_-76.34.geojson ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
v8/studio/shards/region_02_lon-77.15_to_-76.34.json ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
v8/studio/shards/region_03_lon-76.34_to_-75.70.geojson ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
v8/studio/shards/region_03_lon-76.34_to_-75.70.json ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
v8/studio/shards/region_04_lon-75.70_to_-74.97.geojson ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
v8/studio/shards/region_04_lon-75.70_to_-74.97.json ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff