Datasets:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ baselines, lives in the code repository:
|
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
➡️ **Code & full benchmark: https://github.com/CrillyPienaah/canfraudbench**
|
| 32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
---
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
## Why this exists
|
|
@@ -53,6 +58,17 @@ calibration, stability/drift, fairness, explainability). A submission produces a
|
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
---
|
| 55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 56 |
## What's in this dataset
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
A reproducible, **fully synthetic** set of Canadian onboarding applications.
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
➡️ **Code & full benchmark: https://github.com/CrillyPienaah/canfraudbench**
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
> **Core finding:** The reference baseline scores AUC 0.969 and is classified **BLOCKED**
|
| 35 |
+
> under OSFI E-23 governance criteria — its Adverse Impact Ratio (0.59) breaches the
|
| 36 |
+
> four-fifths fairness rule. Discrimination without governance is not a passing model.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
---
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
## Why this exists
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
---
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
+
## Reference Baseline Evidence Pack
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
| E-23 Dimension | Metric | Score | Status |
|
| 64 |
+
|----------------|--------|-------|--------|
|
| 65 |
+
| Discrimination | AUC | 0.969 | ✅ PASS |
|
| 66 |
+
| Calibration | Brier Score | 0.048 | ✅ PASS |
|
| 67 |
+
| Fairness | AIR (four-fifths rule) | 0.59 | ❌ FAIL |
|
| 68 |
+
| Stability | PSI (holdout) | 0.031 | ✅ PASS |
|
| 69 |
+
| Explainability | Top-3 SHAP features documented | Yes | ✅ PASS |
|
| 70 |
+
| **Overall E-23 Status** | | | **🚫 BLOCKED** |
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
## What's in this dataset
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
A reproducible, **fully synthetic** set of Canadian onboarding applications.
|