[System]
You are an expert ABA (Applied Behavior Analysis) clinical assistant. You
analyze multi-session behavioral session logs for individuals with autism and
produce structured clinical interpretations that identify patterns, hypothesize
behavior functions when applicable, and recommend programming adjustments
structured along BIP lines (antecedent strategies, replacement behaviors,
consequence strategies, crisis plan). Your interpretation also includes an
escalation level and a confidence expression. Every recommendation is grounded
in the data provided. Follow BACB ethical guidelines and reference no real
client data.

[User]
Here is a multi-session behavioral log for a learner. Analyze it and provide your clinical interpretation using the structured format.

LEARNER PROFILE
Synthetic ID: SYN-3049
Profile: Adolescent Learner (13–17 years)
Curricula: Community + Mand + Reading + Tolerating Denied Access
Date range: Sessions 1–6 across 12 days (2026-02-09 to 2026-02-21)

ACCELERATION PROGRAMS
1. sounds out CVC words (Reading)
   Method: DTT
2. requesting a break during non-preferred activities (Mand)
   Method: NET
3. wait calmly when access to preferred item is denied (Tolerating Denied Access)
   Method: FCT
4. ordering in a restaurant (Community)
   Method: Task Analysis

SESSION DATA

Session 1 — 2026-02-09 — 41 min — 1 observer
  sounds out CVC words: 3/10 correct (32%); latency 4.3s; prompts FP×1, PP×2, G×1, I×6
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 5/10 correct (53%); latency 3.4s; prompts FP×2, PP×1, G×0, I×7
  wait calmly when access to preferred item is denied: 4/11 correct (35%); latency 4.7s; prompts FP×2, PP×0, G×1, I×8
  ordering in a restaurant: 6/14 correct (46%); latency 4.2s; prompts FP×1, PP×2, G×4, I×7

Session 2 — 2026-02-11 — 41 min — 1 observer
  sounds out CVC words: 3/8 correct (39%); latency 3.9s; prompts FP×2, PP×1, G×2, I×3
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 6/9 correct (61%); latency 3.2s; prompts FP×2, PP×0, G×2, I×5
  wait calmly when access to preferred item is denied: 4/10 correct (42%); latency 4.0s; prompts FP×0, PP×0, G×2, I×8
  ordering in a restaurant: 5/10 correct (52%); latency 3.8s; prompts FP×2, PP×3, G×0, I×5

Session 3 — 2026-02-13 — 41 min — 1 observer
  sounds out CVC words: 5/10 correct (45%); latency 4.2s; prompts FP×3, PP×3, G×1, I×3
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 8/11 correct (69%); latency 3.1s; prompts FP×0, PP×0, G×1, I×10
  wait calmly when access to preferred item is denied: 6/13 correct (46%); latency 4.0s; prompts FP×0, PP×2, G×3, I×8
  ordering in a restaurant: 5/9 correct (57%); latency 3.5s; prompts FP×3, PP×3, G×2, I×1

Session 4 — 2026-02-15 — 41 min — 1 observer
  sounds out CVC words: 6/13 correct (49%); latency 3.5s; prompts FP×2, PP×2, G×1, I×8
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 8/10 correct (77%); latency 2.3s; prompts FP×0, PP×2, G×3, I×5
  wait calmly when access to preferred item is denied: 7/13 correct (51%); latency 3.6s; prompts FP×1, PP×1, G×4, I×7
  ordering in a restaurant: 5/8 correct (64%); latency 2.9s; prompts FP×1, PP×1, G×1, I×5

Session 5 — 2026-02-17 — 41 min — 1 observer
  sounds out CVC words: 6/12 correct (52%); latency 3.5s; prompts FP×0, PP×4, G×1, I×7
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 12/15 correct (81%); latency 2.1s; prompts FP×3, PP×0, G×0, I×12
  wait calmly when access to preferred item is denied: 4/8 correct (56%); latency 3.4s; prompts FP×2, PP×0, G×1, I×5
  ordering in a restaurant: 10/15 correct (70%); latency 3.1s; prompts FP×5, PP×2, G×3, I×5

Session 6 — 2026-02-19 — 41 min — 1 observer
  sounds out CVC words: 7/12 correct (55%); latency 3.3s; prompts FP×1, PP×1, G×1, I×9
  requesting a break during non-preferred activities: 10/12 correct (81%); latency 2.2s; prompts FP×2, PP×1, G×2, I×7
  wait calmly when access to preferred item is denied: 5/9 correct (58%); latency 3.2s; prompts FP×0, PP×1, G×3, I×5
  ordering in a restaurant: 10/13 correct (73%); latency 2.9s; prompts FP×2, PP×0, G×4, I×7

BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATIONS (across sessions)
- Echolalic responding (repeating SD rather than answering)
- Playing with non-task materials

[Assistant]
## Clinical Concerns
- **Skill loss following break**: performance dropped to 32% at return, recovering to 55%.
- Maintenance schedule should be reviewed and strengthened.

## Pattern Classification
skill_loss_after_break

Sharp drop at the start of the log followed by gradual recovery indicates skill loss following an absence.

## Programming Recommendations

### Antecedent strategies
- Implement booster sessions at the most-recently-effective prompt level.
- Increase session frequency temporarily until pre-break levels are recovered.

### Consequence strategies
- Review and strengthen the maintenance schedule to prevent future skill loss.
- Consider sending practice materials home during extended breaks.

## Escalation Level
2 — Adjust next session

Programming adjustments indicated at next session; no immediate safety concern.

## Confidence
moderate

Pattern is supported but alternatives cannot be fully excluded: 6 sessions of data; no IOA session included.

## Data-Supported Rationale
- Mean accuracy across 6 sessions: 45.4%.
- Trend direction: upward (first session: 32%, last session: 55%).
- No IOA session in this log; reliability of measurements cannot be independently verified.