File size: 8,592 Bytes
9714fa7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
a9d134a
 
 
 
 
 
 
9714fa7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
a9d134a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9714fa7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
# AGENTS.md

Guidance for agents and contributors adding a source and cutting a release.
Read this before opening a PR — several recent contributions added data but
skipped the doc/version bump, forcing a maintainer cleanup release.

## How the docs are actually maintained

`src/make_docs.py` is a **scaffolding/assembly helper, not a round-trip source
of truth.** It regenerates the README source table + release totals, `LICENSE`,
a `CHANGELOG` stub, and *template* datasheets — but it does **not** reproduce the
committed docs on its own:

- It iterates `SOURCES` in `src/sources.py`; any source in `data/` but missing
  from `SOURCES` is silently dropped from the table and totals.
- It stamps every regenerated datasheet's "Added" with the single global `ADDED`
  constant, overwriting real per-source add dates.
- It cannot reproduce hand-written README narrative (audit notes, policy notes,
  the phrase-frequency section).

So datasheets and the README narrative are **hand/contributor-maintained**.
Never run `make_docs.py` and commit the result blind — `git diff` first and
restore anything it dropped or restamped.

## Before you start: check the findings log

`artifacts/source_findings.md` records sources already investigated, including
the rejected ones and *why*. Check it before spending a day on a source someone
already found to be blocked — and append your own finding there whether the
answer was yes or no.

## Add a source

1. Produce the artifact under `data/<key>/`:
   - `<key>.parquet` — built by `src/build_dynaword.py` (LFS-tracked automatically).
   - `<key>.stats.json` — doc/token/char counts (drives all totals).
   - `<key>.md` — datasheet (see below).
2. Add the ingestion script: `src/fetch_<key>.py` or `src/clean_<key>.py`, so the
   source is reproducible. `build_source` (build_dynaword.py) expects a
   `<file_key|speakleash_key>.jsonl.zst` intermediate.
3. Register the source in `src/sources.py` (`SOURCES`) — required, or make_docs
   never sees it. Copy an existing entry's shape: `pretty`, `license`,
   `license_spdx`, `traceable`, `upstream`, `domain`, `created`, `is_ocr`, and the
   `speakleash_key`/`file_key`. If the datasheet is hand-authored (rich provenance
   or a fixed add date), add `"custom_datasheet": True` so make_docs leaves it
   alone.
4. Add a contract test: `src/test_<key>_contract.py` (canonical schema, non-empty
   text, positive token counts, uniform source/license, stats-file consistency).
   Run `python3 -m pytest src/` before committing.

## What the PR must show

These two are not optional — they are the difference between a source a reviewer
can accept and one that sits in the queue. Treat every source PR as a worked
example other contributors will copy.

1. **A sample of the data, inline in the PR description.** A few real documents
   (or truncated ones), verbatim, so a reviewer can see at a glance what kind of
   text this actually is — prose, transcripts, boilerplate, OCR noise, HTML
   leftovers. Include the metadata columns too, not just `text`. Don't make the
   reviewer download a parquet to find out.

2. **Provenance and licensing, written out in the datasheet (`data/<key>/<key>.md`)
   and summarized in the PR description:**
   - Where the data comes from — the concrete origin (institution, portal, API,
     dump), not just a domain name. Link it.
   - Under what license, and **where that license statement lives** — link the
     exact terms-of-use page, API docs section, or statute. "Public domain
     because it's government data" is a claim, not a source; cite the provision.
   - What the texts are — genre, register, time span, language variety, whether
     they are OCR'd, machine-translated, or user-generated.
   - How it was collected and filtered — dedup, minimum length, language ID,
     anything dropped and why.
   - The argument for inclusion — what this adds that the corpus does not
     already have, and any known bias or quality caveat a downstream user should
     weigh.

Yes, this is meta work on top of the fetching. That is the point: the datasheet
is the artifact other people read to learn how to contribute well.

## Normalize the text before you build

`build_dynaword.py` applies only *minimal gates* — strip, `len < 200`, Polish
diacritic ratio, OCR alpha ratio, exact sha1 dedup. It does **not** clean text.
`src/normalize_schema.py` is a schema/stats tool despite the name; it never
touches `text`. So normalization is the fetcher's job, and today each fetcher
reimplements it (`fetch_govpl.py:43` and `fetch_saos.py:42` carry byte-identical
`html_to_text`; `clean_samorzad_gov_pl.py:65` a third variant). If you are
writing a new fetcher, factor the shared parts out rather than pasting a fourth
copy.

What a fetcher should do to `text` before writing the `.jsonl.zst`:

- **Unicode**: NFKC normalize. Map non-breaking/thin/zero-width spaces to plain
  space (or drop), strip control characters and soft hyphens, normalize the
  quote/dash/ellipsis zoo. Repair mojibake if the upstream encoding is unreliable.
- **Whitespace**: collapse runs of spaces/tabs, trim per line, cap blank runs at
  one empty line. Do not flatten paragraph breaks — they carry structure.
- **Structural junk**: navigation, cookie banners, "share this", pagination,
  footnote back-references, and — for OCR/PDF sources — page headers/footers,
  running titles, and hyphenation split across line breaks.
- **Numbering**: strip standalone chapter/section/page numbers and repeated
  heading numerals (`1.`, `Art. 5.`, `Rozdział III`) *only where they are layout
  artifacts*. In `dziennik_ustaw` or `saos` the article numbering is content —
  removing it destroys the document. Judge per source, and say what you did in
  the datasheet.
- **Boilerplate**: near-identical blocks repeated across most documents of a
  source (license footers, institutional disclaimers, "Pokaż odpowiedź"-style UI
  chrome) should be detected by frequency across the shard and removed, not
  hand-listed.
- **Personal data**: scrub before the parquet is written, not after. At minimum
  email addresses, phone numbers, and national identifiers (PESEL, NIP, REGON,
  account numbers). Replace with a stable placeholder (`[PII]`, `[Telefon]`)
  rather than deleting, so sentence structure survives. Names of public
  officials acting in an official capacity are not PII and should stay —
  removing them would gut parliamentary and judicial sources.

Two rules about all of the above:

1. **The normalization must live in the committed fetch/clean script**, so the
   shard is reproducible. A shard whose datasheet describes a cleaning step that
   no script in `src/` performs is not reproducible, however good the intent.
2. **Report it in the datasheet**: which steps ran, and what the gates dropped.
   Include a handful of before/after excerpts in the PR — this is the fastest way
   for a reviewer to see whether normalization ate real content.

## Cut the release (the part that gets skipped)

1. In `src/make_docs.py`: bump `VERSION` and `RELEASE_DATE`. Add a row for the new
   version to the version table and a row for yourself to the Contributors table
   (both are literal rows in the template).
2. Regenerate the phrase-frequency report and charts (registry-independent — it
   globs `data/*/*.parquet`):
   ```bash
   python3 src/pattern_frequency_report.py
   ```
   Writes `artifacts/pattern_frequency_hf_snippet.md` + 10 PNGs. Splice the tables
   and chart embeds into the README "Results" section by hand.
3. Update `README.md` by hand: header totals, version table, source table row,
   Contributors row. The document/token totals must equal the sum of the
   per-source `stats.json` files.
4. Prepend the release notes to `CHANGELOG.md` under a new `## vX.Y.Z (date)`
   heading. History is append-only — never rewrite earlier releases.

## Do not commit

`*.log` (fetch/build logs), `.DS_Store`, `src/__pycache__/`. Only `logs/` is in
`.gitignore` — root-level logs and OS cruft are not, so check `git status`
before staging. `*.parquet` is LFS-tracked; commit the pointer, not the blob.

## Known drift / cleanup opportunities

- `biblioteka_nauki`, `europeana`, `parlamint_pl` are in `SOURCES` but have no
  `data/` shard (make_docs skips them with `! no stats`). Intentional placeholders
  or stale — confirm before relying on `build_dynaword.py --all`.
- The global `ADDED` datasheet stamp is a footgun: give datasheets a per-source
  add date (or `custom_datasheet`) before making make_docs regenerate them.