{ "@context": { "@language": "en", "@vocab": "https://schema.org/", "cr": "http://mlcommons.org/croissant/", "sc": "https://schema.org/", "dct": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/", "data": { "@id": "cr:data", "@type": "@json" }, "dataType": { "@id": "cr:dataType", "@type": "@vocab" }, "extract": "cr:extract", "field": "cr:field", "fileObject": "cr:fileObject", "fileProperty": "cr:fileProperty", "column": "cr:column", "recordSet": "cr:recordSet", "source": "cr:source", "subField": "cr:subField", "references": "cr:references", "repeated": "cr:repeated", "examples": { "@id": "cr:examples", "@type": "@json" }, "conformsTo": "dct:conformsTo" }, "@type": "sc:Dataset", "conformsTo": "http://mlcommons.org/croissant/1.0", "citeAs": "Klagge, Kevin D. legal-empirics. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22247377", "name": "disputed_terms_national", "description": "One row per (term, decision) pair: a word or phrase a court quoted as the disputed language in a decision containing an ambiguity holding, across the state appellate courts of all 50 states and DC. Terms are extracted from the whole opinion by cue-anchored quotation ('the term \"X\"', '\"X\" as used in'), classified into functional drafting categories, and linked to the holding by three graded levels of evidence.", "url": "https://stepuplaw.com/research/disputed-terms-national/", "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", "version": "2026-09-02", "keywords": [ "contract interpretation", "ambiguity", "corpus linguistics", "legal drafting", "empirical legal studies", "state courts" ], "creator": { "@type": "sc:Person", "name": "Kevin D. Klagge", "sameAs": "https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1385-8498" }, "distribution": [ { "@type": "cr:FileObject", "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv", "name": "disputed-terms-national.csv", "description": "The dataset as a single UTF-8 CSV with a header row.", "contentUrl": "https://stepuplaw.com/research/disputed-terms-national/disputed-terms-national.csv", "encodingFormat": "text/csv", "sha256": "41794102c0d5c052b40fda0c7779415be95d43a61d08bbbe5462fb66269b11bd" } ], "recordSet": [ { "@type": "cr:RecordSet", "@id": "rows", "name": "rows", "description": "Disputed Contract and Instrument Terms in US State Appellate Courts", "field": [ { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/term", "name": "term", "description": "the disputed language, lowercased and normalised, as the court quoted it", "dataType": "sc:Text", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "term" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/category", "name": "category", "description": "functional drafting class: nexus, degree, temporal, scope, modal, role, succession, property, event, conduct, condition, mental, uncategorised", "dataType": "sc:Text", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "category" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/source", "name": "source", "description": "the instrument the words sit in: testamentary, deed, insurance, contract, statute, constitution, uncertain", "dataType": "sc:Text", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "source" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/posture", "name": "posture", "description": "found | rejected | alleged | uncertain -- whether the court held the language ambiguous", "dataType": "sc:Text", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "posture" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/link", "name": "link", "description": "direct | proximate | inferred -- strength of the link between this term and the holding; inferred rows must not be pooled with the other two", "dataType": "sc:Text", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "link" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/oid", "name": "oid", "description": "CourtListener opinion id", "dataType": "sc:Integer", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "oid" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/cid", "name": "cid", "description": "CourtListener cluster id", "dataType": "sc:Integer", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "cid" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/court", "name": "court", "description": "CourtListener court id", "dataType": "sc:Text", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "court" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/state", "name": "state", "description": "two-letter state postal code", "dataType": "sc:Text", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "state" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/year", "name": "year", "description": "year the decision was filed", "dataType": "sc:Integer", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "year" } } }, { "@type": "cr:Field", "@id": "rows/statement", "name": "statement", "description": "the row written as one self-contained English sentence, so it can be retrieved, quoted and checked on its own", "dataType": "sc:Text", "source": { "fileObject": { "@id": "disputed-terms-national.csv" }, "extract": { "column": "statement" } } } ] } ] }