{ "name": "disputed-terms-national", "title": "Disputed Contract and Instrument Terms in US State Appellate Courts", "description": "One row per (term, decision) pair: a word or phrase a court quoted as the disputed language in a decision containing an ambiguity holding, across the state appellate courts of all 50 states and DC. Terms are extracted from the whole opinion by cue-anchored quotation ('the term \"X\"', '\"X\" as used in'), classified into functional drafting categories, and linked to the holding by three graded levels of evidence.", "licenses": [ { "name": "CC BY 4.0", "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" } ], "homepage": "https://stepuplaw.com/research/disputed-terms-national/", "version": "2026-09-02", "created": "2026-09-02", "sources": [ { "title": "CourtListener bulk export, topped up nightly from the courts", "path": "https://www.courtlistener.com/help/api/bulk-data/" } ], "resources": [ { "name": "disputed-terms-national", "path": "disputed-terms-national.csv", "format": "csv", "mediatype": "text/csv", "encoding": "utf-8", "bytes": 80549261, "rows": 286846, "hash": "sha256:41794102c0d5c052b40fda0c7779415be95d43a61d08bbbe5462fb66269b11bd", "schema": { "fields": [ { "name": "term", "type": "string", "description": "the disputed language, lowercased and normalised, as the court quoted it" }, { "name": "category", "type": "string", "description": "functional drafting class: nexus, degree, temporal, scope, modal, role, succession, property, event, conduct, condition, mental, uncategorised" }, { "name": "source", "type": "string", "description": "the instrument the words sit in: testamentary, deed, insurance, contract, statute, constitution, uncertain" }, { "name": "posture", "type": "string", "description": "found | rejected | alleged | uncertain -- whether the court held the language ambiguous" }, { "name": "link", "type": "string", "description": "direct | proximate | inferred -- strength of the link between this term and the holding; inferred rows must not be pooled with the other two" }, { "name": "oid", "type": "integer", "description": "CourtListener opinion id" }, { "name": "cid", "type": "integer", "description": "CourtListener cluster id" }, { "name": "court", "type": "string", "description": "CourtListener court id" }, { "name": "state", "type": "string", "description": "two-letter state postal code" }, { "name": "year", "type": "integer", "description": "year the decision was filed" }, { "name": "statement", "type": "string", "description": "the row written as one self-contained English sentence, so it can be retrieved, quoted and checked on its own" } ] } }, { "name": "disputed-terms-national-parquet", "path": "disputed-terms-national.parquet", "format": "parquet", "mediatype": "application/vnd.apache.parquet", "bytes": 13491680, "rows": 286846, "hash": "sha256:6413e4a714109851594077589eef1ef9d0aac5367dab90dd3fa236b83cd65d7c" } ], "provenance": { "repository": "https://github.com/stepuplaw/legal-empirics", "commit": "1524ffac73d194b895be2eaac16430be96d97299", "run": { "query": "(ambiguous OR ambiguity OR ambiguities)", "scope": "national state appellate (S+SA)", "corpus": "CourtListener bulk snapshot 2026-06-30", "workers": 8, "runtime_minutes": 119.7, "funnel": { "decisions_queued": 236561, "noterm": 118750, "ok": 117804, "noamb": 7 }, "term_hits": 286846, "distinct_terms": 100679 } } }