# $1^{\text {st }}$ Annual Harvard-MIT November Tournament
Saturday 8 November 2008 ## Team Round ## Unit Fractions [100] A unit fraction is a fraction of the form $\frac{1}{n}$, where $n$ is a positive integer. In this problem, you will find out how rational numbers can be expressed as sums of these unit fractions. Even if you do not solve a problem, you may apply its result to later problems. We say we decompose a rational number $q$ into unit fractions if we write $q$ as a sum of 2 or more distinct unit fractions. In particular, if we write $q$ as a sum of $k$ distinct unit fractions, we say we have decomposed $q$ into $k$ fractions. As an example, we can decompose $\frac{2}{3}$ into 3 fractions: $\frac{2}{3}=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{12}$. 1. (a) Decompose 1 into unit fractions. Answer: $\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{6}$ (b) Decompose $\frac{1}{4}$ into unit fractions. Answer: $\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{12}+\frac{1}{24}$ (c) Decompose $\frac{2}{5}$ into unit fractions. Answer: $\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{15}+\frac{1}{30}$ 2. Explain how any unit fraction $\frac{1}{n}$ can be decomposed into other unit fractions. Answer: $\frac{1}{2 n}+\frac{1}{3 n}+\frac{1}{6 n}$ 3. (a) Write 1 as a sum of 4 distinct unit fractions. Answer: $\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{42}$ (b) Write 1 as a sum of 5 distinct unit fractions. Answer: $\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{43}+\frac{1}{43 \cdot 42}$ (c) Show that, for any integer $k>3,1$ can be decomposed into $k$ unit fractions. Solution: If we can do it for $k$ fractions, simply replace the last one (say $\frac{1}{n}$ ) with $\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{n(n+1)}$. Then we can do it for $k+1$ fractions. So, since we can do it for $k=3$, we can do it for any $k>3$. 4. Say that $\frac{a}{b}$ is a positive rational number in simplest form, with $a \neq 1$. Further, say that $n$ is an integer such that: $$ \frac{1}{n}>\frac{a}{b}>\frac{1}{n+1} $$ Show that when $\frac{a}{b}-\frac{1}{n+1}$ is written in simplest form, its numerator is smaller than $a$. Solution: $\quad \frac{a}{b}-\frac{1}{n+1}=\frac{a(n+1)-b}{b(n+1)}$. Therefore, when we write it in simplest form, its numerator will be at most $a(n+1)-b$. We claim that $a(n+1)-bn$, which is given. ## 5. An aside: the sum of all the unit fractions It is possible to show that, given any real M , there exists a positive integer $k$ large enough that: $$ \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{n}=\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3} \ldots>M $$ Note that this statement means that the infinite harmonic series, $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n}$, grows without bound, or diverges. For the specific example $\mathrm{M}=5$, find a value of $k$, not necessarily the smallest, such that the inequality holds. Justify your answer. Solution: Note that $\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{n+2}+\ldots+\frac{1}{2 n}>\frac{1}{2 n}+\ldots+\frac{1}{2 n}=\frac{1}{2}$. Therefore, if we apply this to $n=1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128$, we get $$ \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{4}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{5}+\frac{1}{6}+\frac{1}{7}+\frac{1}{8}\right)+\ldots+\left(\frac{1}{129}+\ldots+\frac{1}{256}\right)>\frac{1}{2}+\ldots+\frac{1}{2}=4 $$ so, adding in $\frac{1}{1}$, we get $$ \sum_{n=1}^{256} \frac{1}{n}>5 $$ so $k=256$ will suffice. 6. Now, using information from problems 4 and 5 , prove that the following method to decompose any positive rational number will always terminate: Step 1. Start with the fraction $\frac{a}{b}$. Let $t_{1}$ be the largest unit fraction $\frac{1}{n}$ which is less than or equal to $\frac{a}{b}$. Step 2. If we have already chosen $t_{1}$ through $t_{k}$, and if $t_{1}+t_{2}+\ldots+t_{k}$ is still less than $\frac{a}{b}$, then let $t_{k+1}$ be the largest unit fraction less than both $t_{k}$ and $\frac{a}{b}$. Step 3. If $t_{1}+\ldots+t_{k+1}$ equals $\frac{a}{b}$, the decomposition is found. Otherwise, repeat step 2 . Why does this method never result in an infinite sequence of $t_{i}$ ? Solution: Let $\frac{a_{k}}{b_{k}}=\frac{a}{b}-t_{1}-\ldots-t_{k}$, where $\frac{a_{k}}{b_{k}}$ is a fraction in simplest terms. Initially, this algorithm will have $t_{1}=1, t_{2}=\frac{1}{2}, t_{3}=\frac{1}{3}$, etc. until $\frac{a_{k}}{b_{k}}<\frac{1}{k+1}$. This will eventually happen by problem 5 , since there exists a $k$ such that $\frac{1}{1}+\ldots+\frac{1}{k+1}>\frac{a_{k}}{b_{k}}$. At that point, there is some $n$ with $\frac{1}{n}\frac{a_{k}}{b_{k}}>\frac{1}{n+1}$. In this case, $t_{k+1}=\frac{1}{n+1}$. Suppose that there exists $n_{k}$ such that $\frac{1}{n_{k}}>\frac{a_{k}}{b_{k}}>\frac{1}{n_{k}+1}$ for some $k$. Then we have $t_{k+1}=\frac{1}{n_{k}+1}$ and $\frac{a_{k+1}}{b_{k+1}}<\frac{1}{n_{k}\left(n_{k}+1\right)}$. This shows that once we have found $n_{k}$ such that $\frac{1}{n_{k}}>\frac{a_{k}}{b_{k}}>\frac{1}{n_{k}+1}$ and $\frac{1}{n_{k}} \leq t_{k}$, we no longer have to worry about $t_{k+1}$ being less than $t_{k}$, since $t_{k+1}=\frac{1}{n_{k}+1}<\frac{1}{n_{k}}<$ $t_{k}$, and also $n_{k+1} \geq n_{k}\left(n_{k}+1\right)$ while $\frac{1}{n_{k}\left(n_{k}+1\right)} \leq \frac{1}{n_{k}+1}=t_{k+1}$. On the other hand, once we have found such an $n_{k}$, the sequence $\left\{a_{k}\right\}$ must be decreasing by problem 4. Since the $a_{k}$ are all integers, we eventually have to get to 0 (as there is no infinite decreasing sequence of positive integers). Therefore, after some finite number of steps the algorithm terminates with $a_{k+1}=0$, so $0=\frac{a_{k}}{b_{k}}=\frac{a}{b}-t_{1}-\ldots-t_{k}$, so $\frac{a}{b}=t_{1}+\ldots+t_{k}$, which is what we wanted. ## Juicy Numbers [100] A juicy number is an integer $j>1$ for which there is a sequence $a_{1}1,2 b_{1}>2$. 5. Prove that the product of two juicy numbers (not necessarily distinct) is always a juicy number. Hint: if $j_{1}$ and $j_{2}$ are the two numbers, how can you change the decompositions of 1 ending in $\frac{1}{j_{1}}$ or $\frac{1}{j_{2}}$ to make them end in $\frac{1}{j_{1} j_{2}}$ ? Solution: Let $1=\frac{1}{b_{1}}+\ldots+\frac{1}{b_{n}}=\frac{1}{c_{1}}+\ldots+\frac{1}{c_{m}}$, where $b_{n}=j_{1}$ and $c_{m}=j_{2}$. Then $$ 1=\frac{1}{b_{1}}+\ldots+\frac{1}{b_{n-1}}+\left(\frac{1}{b_{n} c_{1}}+\frac{1}{b_{n} c_{2}}+\ldots+\frac{1}{b_{n} c_{m}}\right) $$ and so $j_{1} j_{2}$ is juicy.