{"year": "2008", "tier": "T4", "problem_label": "1", "problem_type": null, "exam": "HMMT", "problem": "(Distributive law) Prove that $(x \\oplus y) \\odot z=x \\odot z \\oplus y \\odot z$ for all $x, y, z \\in \\mathbb{R} \\cup\\{\\infty\\}$.", "solution": "This is equivalent to proving that\n\n$$\n\\min (x, y)+z=\\min (x+z, y+z) .\n$$\n\nConsider two cases. If $x \\leq y$, then $L H S=x+z$ and $R H S=x+z$. If $x>y$, then $L H S=y+z$ and $R H S=y+z$. It follows that $L H S=R H S$.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "HarvardMIT/segmented/en-112-2008-feb-team2-solutions.jsonl", "problem_match": "\n1. [10]", "solution_match": "\nSolution: "}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T4", "problem_label": "2", "problem_type": null, "exam": "HMMT", "problem": "(Freshman's Dream) Let $z^{n}$ denote $z \\odot z \\odot z \\odot \\cdots \\odot z$ with $z$ appearing $n$ times. Prove that $(x \\oplus y)^{n}=x^{n} \\oplus y^{n}$ for all $x, y \\in \\mathbb{R} \\cup\\{\\infty\\}$ and positive integer $n$.", "solution": "Without loss of generality, suppose that $x \\leq y$, then $L H S=\\min (x, y)^{n}=x^{n}=$ $n x$, and RHS $=\\min \\left(x^{n}, y^{n}\\right)=\\min (n x, n y)=n x$.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "HarvardMIT/segmented/en-112-2008-feb-team2-solutions.jsonl", "problem_match": "\n2. [10]", "solution_match": "\nSolution: "}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T4", "problem_label": "3", "problem_type": null, "exam": "HMMT", "problem": "By a tropical polynomial we mean a function of the form\n\n$$\np(x)=a_{n} \\odot x^{n} \\oplus a_{n-1} \\odot x^{n-1} \\oplus \\cdots \\oplus a_{1} \\odot x \\oplus a_{0}\n$$\n\nwhere exponentiation is as defined in the previous problem.\nLet $p$ be a tropical polynomial. Prove that\n\n$$\np\\left(\\frac{x+y}{2}\\right) \\geq \\frac{p(x)+p(y)}{2}\n$$\n\nfor all $x, y \\in \\mathbb{R} \\cup\\{\\infty\\}$. (This means that all tropical polynomials are concave.)", "solution": "First, note that for any $x_{1}, \\ldots, x_{n}, y_{1}, \\ldots, y_{n}$, we have\n\n$$\n\\min \\left\\{x_{1}+y_{1}, x_{2}+y_{2}, \\ldots, x_{n}+y_{n}\\right\\} \\geq \\min \\left\\{x_{1}, x_{2}, \\ldots, x_{n}\\right\\}+\\min \\left\\{y_{1}, y_{2}, \\ldots, y_{n}\\right\\} .\n$$\n\nIndeed, suppose that $x_{m}+y_{m}=\\min _{i}\\left\\{x_{i}+y_{i}\\right\\}$, then $x_{m} \\geq \\min _{i} x_{i}$ and $y_{m} \\geq \\min _{i} y_{i}$, and so $\\min _{i}\\left\\{x_{i}+y_{i}\\right\\}=x_{m}+y_{m} \\geq \\min _{i} x_{i}+\\min _{i} y_{i}$.\nNow, let us write a tropical polynomial in a more familiar notation. We have\n\n$$\np(x)=\\min _{0 \\leq k \\leq n}\\left\\{a_{k}+k x\\right\\} .\n$$\n\nSo\n\n$$\n\\begin{aligned}\np\\left(\\frac{x+y}{2}\\right) & =\\min _{0 \\leq k \\leq n}\\left\\{a_{k}+k\\left(\\frac{x+y}{2}\\right)\\right\\} \\\\\n& =\\frac{1}{2} \\min _{0 \\leq k \\leq n}\\left\\{\\left(a_{k}+k x\\right)+\\left(a_{k}+k y\\right)\\right\\} \\\\\n& \\geq \\frac{1}{2}\\left(\\min _{0 \\leq k \\leq n}\\left\\{a_{k}+k x\\right\\}+\\min _{0 \\leq k \\leq n}\\left\\{a_{k}+k y\\right\\}\\right) \\\\\n& =\\frac{1}{2}(p(x)+p(y)) .\n\\end{aligned}\n$$", "metadata": {"resource_path": "HarvardMIT/segmented/en-112-2008-feb-team2-solutions.jsonl", "problem_match": "\n3. [35]", "solution_match": "\nSolution: "}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T4", "problem_label": "4", "problem_type": null, "exam": "HMMT", "problem": "(Fundamental Theorem of Algebra) Let $p$ be a tropical polynomial:\n\n$$\np(x)=a_{n} \\odot x^{n} \\oplus a_{n-1} \\odot x^{n-1} \\oplus \\cdots \\oplus a_{1} \\odot x \\oplus a_{0}, \\quad a_{n} \\neq \\infty\n$$\n\nProve that we can find $r_{1}, r_{2}, \\ldots, r_{n} \\in \\mathbb{R} \\cup\\{\\infty\\}$ so that\n\n$$\np(x)=a_{n} \\odot\\left(x \\oplus r_{1}\\right) \\odot\\left(x \\oplus r_{2}\\right) \\odot \\cdots \\odot\\left(x \\oplus r_{n}\\right)\n$$\n\nfor all $x$.", "solution": "Again, we have\n\n$$\np(x)=\\min _{0 \\leq k \\leq n}\\left\\{a_{k}+k x\\right\\} .\n$$\n\nSo the graph of $y=p(x)$ can be drawn as follows: first, draw all the lines $y=a_{k}+k x$, $k=0,1, \\ldots, n$, then trace out the lowest broken line, which then is the graph of $y=p(x)$.\nSo $p(x)$ is piecewise linear and continuous, and has slopes from the set $\\{0,1,2, \\ldots, n\\}$. We know from the previous problem that $p(x)$ is concave, and so its slope must be decreasing (this can also be observed simply from the drawing of the graph of $y=p(x)$ ). Then, let $r_{k}$ denote the $x$-coordinate of the leftmost kink such that the slope of the graph is less than $k$ to the right of this kink. Then, $r_{n} \\leq r_{n-1} \\leq \\cdots \\leq r_{1}$, and for $r_{k-1} \\leq x \\leq r_{k}$, the graph of $p$ is linear with slope $k$. Note that is if possible that $r_{k-1}=r_{k}$, if no segment of $p$ has slope $k$. Also, since $a_{n} \\neq \\infty$, the leftmost piece of $p(x)$ must have slope $n$, and thus $r_{n}$ exists, and thus all $r_{i}$ exist.\nNow, compare $p(x)$ with\n\n$$\n\\begin{aligned}\nq(x) & =a_{n} \\odot\\left(x \\oplus r_{1}\\right) \\odot\\left(x \\oplus r_{2}\\right) \\odot \\cdots \\odot\\left(x \\oplus r_{n}\\right) \\\\\n& =a_{n}+\\min \\left(x, r_{1}\\right)+\\min \\left(x, r_{2}\\right)+\\cdots+\\min \\left(x, r_{n}\\right) .\n\\end{aligned}\n$$\n\nFor $r_{k-1} \\leq x \\leq r_{k}$, the slope of $q(x)$ is $k$, and for $x \\leq r_{n}$ the slope of $q$ is $n$ and for $x \\geq r_{1}$ the slope of $q$ is 0 . So $q$ is piecewise linear, and of course it is continuous. It follows that the graph of $q$ coincides with that of $p$ up to a translation. By taking any $x