{"year": "2008", "tier": "T1", "problem_label": "1", "problem_type": null, "exam": "USAMO", "problem": "Prove that for each positive integer $n$, there are pairwise relatively prime integers $k_{0}, \\ldots, k_{n}$, all strictly greater than 1 , such that $k_{0} k_{1} \\ldots k_{n}-1$ is the product of two consecutive integers.", "solution": " In other words, if we let $$ P(x)=x(x+1)+1 $$ then we would like there to be infinitely many primes dividing some $P(t)$ for some integer $t$. In fact, this result is true in much greater generality. We first state: ## Theorem 1.1 (Schur's theorem) If $P(x) \\in \\mathbb{Z}[x]$ is nonconstant and $P(0)=1$, then there are infinitely many primes which divide $P(t)$ for some integer $t$. Let $S$ be any finite set of prime numbers. Consider then the value $$ P\\left(k \\prod_{p \\in S} p\\right) $$ for some integer $k$. It is $1(\\bmod p)$ for each prime $p$, and if $k$ is large enough it should not be equal to 1 (because $P$ is not constant). Therefore, it has a prime divisor not in $S$. Remark. In fact the result holds without the assumption $P(0) \\neq 1$. The proof requires only small modifications, and a good exercise would be to write down a similar proof that works first for $P(0)=20$, and then for any $P(0) \\neq 0$. (The $P(0)=0$ case is vacuous, since then $P(x)$ is divisible by $x$.) $$ \\begin{aligned} P\\left(x_{1}\\right) & \\equiv 0 \\quad\\left(\\bmod p_{1}\\right) \\\\ P\\left(x_{2}\\right) & \\equiv 0 \\quad\\left(\\bmod p_{2}\\right) \\\\ \\vdots & \\\\ P\\left(x_{n}\\right) & \\equiv 0 \\quad\\left(\\bmod p_{n}\\right) \\end{aligned} $$ as promised by Schur's theorem. Then, by Chinese remainder theorem, we can find $x$ such that $x \\equiv x_{i}\\left(\\bmod p_{i}\\right)$ for each $i$, whence $P(x)$ has at least $n$ prime factor.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "USAMO/segmented/en-USAMO-2008-notes.jsonl"}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T1", "problem_label": "2", "problem_type": null, "exam": "USAMO", "problem": "Let $A B C$ be an acute, scalene triangle, and let $M, N$, and $P$ be the midpoints of $\\overline{B C}, \\overline{C A}$, and $\\overline{A B}$, respectively. Let the perpendicular bisectors of $\\overline{A B}$ and $\\overline{A C}$ intersect ray $A M$ in points $D$ and $E$ respectively, and let lines $B D$ and $C E$ intersect in point $F$, inside triangle $A B C$. Prove that points $A, N, F$, and $P$ all lie on one circle.", "solution": " 【 Barycentric solution. First, we find the coordinates of $D$. As $D$ lies on $\\overline{A M}$, we know $D=(t: 1: 1)$ for some $t$. Now by perpendicular bisector formula, we find $$ 0=b^{2}(t-1)+\\left(a^{2}-c^{2}\\right) \\Longrightarrow t=\\frac{c^{2}+b^{2}-a^{2}}{b^{2}} $$ Thus we obtain $$ D=\\left(2 S_{A}: c^{2}: c^{2}\\right) . $$ Analogously $E=\\left(2 S_{A}: b^{2}: b^{2}\\right)$, and it follows that $$ F=\\left(2 S_{A}: b^{2}: c^{2}\\right) $$ The sum of the coordinates of $F$ is $$ \\left(b^{2}+c^{2}-a^{2}\\right)+b^{2}+c^{2}=2 b^{2}+2 c^{2}-a^{2} $$ Hence the reflection of $A$ over $F$ is simply $$ 2 F-A=\\left(2\\left(b^{2}+c^{2}-a^{2}\\right)-\\left(2 b^{2}+2 c^{2}-a^{2}\\right): 2 b^{2}: 2 c^{2}\\right)=\\left(-a^{2}: 2 b^{2}: 2 c^{2}\\right) . $$ It is evident that $F^{\\prime}$ lies on $(A B C):-a^{2} y z-b^{2} z x-c^{2} x y=0$, and we are done.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "USAMO/segmented/en-USAMO-2008-notes.jsonl"}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T1", "problem_label": "2", "problem_type": null, "exam": "USAMO", "problem": "Let $A B C$ be an acute, scalene triangle, and let $M, N$, and $P$ be the midpoints of $\\overline{B C}, \\overline{C A}$, and $\\overline{A B}$, respectively. Let the perpendicular bisectors of $\\overline{A B}$ and $\\overline{A C}$ intersect ray $A M$ in points $D$ and $E$ respectively, and let lines $B D$ and $C E$ intersect in point $F$, inside triangle $A B C$. Prove that points $A, N, F$, and $P$ all lie on one circle.", "solution": " II Synthetic solution (harmonic). Here is a synthetic solution. Let $X$ be the point so that $A P X N$ is a cyclic harmonic quadrilateral. We contend that $X=F$. To see this it suffices to prove $B, X, D$ collinear (and hence $C, X, E$ collinear by symmetry). ![](https://cdn.mathpix.com/cropped/2024_11_19_cd8a472922fcd4109f27g-04.jpg?height=618&width=798&top_left_y=2010&top_left_x=635) Let $T$ be the midpoint of $\\overline{P N}$, so $\\triangle A P X \\sim \\triangle A T N$. So $\\triangle A B X \\sim \\triangle A M N$, ergo $$ \\measuredangle X B A=\\measuredangle N M A=\\measuredangle B A M=\\measuredangle B A D=\\measuredangle D B A $$ as desired.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "USAMO/segmented/en-USAMO-2008-notes.jsonl"}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T1", "problem_label": "2", "problem_type": null, "exam": "USAMO", "problem": "Let $A B C$ be an acute, scalene triangle, and let $M, N$, and $P$ be the midpoints of $\\overline{B C}, \\overline{C A}$, and $\\overline{A B}$, respectively. Let the perpendicular bisectors of $\\overline{A B}$ and $\\overline{A C}$ intersect ray $A M$ in points $D$ and $E$ respectively, and let lines $B D$ and $C E$ intersect in point $F$, inside triangle $A B C$. Prove that points $A, N, F$, and $P$ all lie on one circle.", "solution": " 【 Angle chasing solution (Mason Fang). Obviously $A N O P$ is concyclic. Claim - Quadrilateral BFOC is cyclic. $$ \\begin{aligned} \\measuredangle B F C=\\measuredangle F B C+\\measuredangle B C F & =\\measuredangle F B A+\\measuredangle A B C+\\measuredangle B C A+\\measuredangle A C F \\\\ & =\\measuredangle D B A+\\measuredangle A B C+\\measuredangle B C A+\\measuredangle A C E \\\\ & =\\measuredangle B A D+\\measuredangle A B C+\\measuredangle B C A+\\measuredangle E A C \\\\ & =2 \\angle B A C=\\angle B O C . \\end{aligned} $$ Define $Q=\\overline{A A} \\cap \\overline{B C}$. Claim - Point $Q$ lies on $\\overline{F O}$. $$ \\begin{aligned} \\measuredangle B O Q=\\measuredangle B O A+\\measuredangle A O Q & =2 \\measuredangle B C A+90^{\\circ}+\\measuredangle A Q O \\\\ & =2 \\measuredangle B C A+90^{\\circ}+\\measuredangle A M O \\\\ & =2 \\measuredangle B C A+90^{\\circ}+\\measuredangle A M C+90^{\\circ} \\\\ & =\\measuredangle B C A+\\measuredangle M A C=\\measuredangle B C A+\\measuredangle A C E \\\\ & =\\measuredangle B C E=\\measuredangle B O F . \\end{aligned} $$ As $Q$ is the radical center of $(A N O P),(A B C)$ and $(B F O C)$, this implies the result.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "USAMO/segmented/en-USAMO-2008-notes.jsonl"}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T1", "problem_label": "2", "problem_type": null, "exam": "USAMO", "problem": "Let $A B C$ be an acute, scalene triangle, and let $M, N$, and $P$ be the midpoints of $\\overline{B C}, \\overline{C A}$, and $\\overline{A B}$, respectively. Let the perpendicular bisectors of $\\overline{A B}$ and $\\overline{A C}$ intersect ray $A M$ in points $D$ and $E$ respectively, and let lines $B D$ and $C E$ intersect in point $F$, inside triangle $A B C$. Prove that points $A, N, F$, and $P$ all lie on one circle.", "solution": " 【 Inversive solution (Kelin Zhu). Invert about $A$ with radius $\\sqrt{b c}$ followed by a reflection over the angle bisector of $\\angle A$, and denote the image of a point $X$ by $X^{\\prime}$. The inverted problem now states the following: In triangle $A P^{*} N^{*}$, let $B^{*}, C^{*}$ be the midpoints of $A P^{*}, A N^{*}$ and $D^{*}, E^{*}$ be the intersection of the $A$ symmedian with $\\left(A P^{*}\\right),\\left(A N^{*}\\right)$, respectively. $\\left(A B^{*} D^{*}\\right),\\left(A C^{*} E^{*}\\right)$ intersect at a point $F^{*}$; prove that it lies on $P^{*} N^{*}$. I claim that, in fact, the midpoint of $P^{*} N^{*}$ is the desired intersection. Redefine that point as $F^{*}$ and I will prove that $\\left(A B^{*} D^{*}\\right),\\left(A C^{*} E^{*}\\right)$ pass through it. Note that $$ \\angle A D^{*} B^{*}=\\angle D^{*} A B^{*}=\\angle F^{*} A N^{*}=\\angle A F^{*} B^{*}, $$ where the first equality is due to $B^{*}$ being the circumcircle of $A D^{*} P^{*}$, the second equality is due to the definition of the symmedian, and the third equality is due to the parallelogram $A B^{*} F^{*} C^{*}$. A symmetric argument for $C$ finishes.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "USAMO/segmented/en-USAMO-2008-notes.jsonl"}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T1", "problem_label": "3", "problem_type": null, "exam": "USAMO", "problem": "Let $n$ be a positive integer. Denote by $S_{n}$ the set of points $(x, y)$ with integer coordinates such that $$ |x|+\\left|y+\\frac{1}{2}\\right|1$. Let $S$ denote the set of points $$ S=\\left\\{(x, y): x+\\left|y+\\frac{1}{2}\\right| \\geq n-2\\right\\} $$ An example when $n=4$ is displayed below. ![](https://cdn.mathpix.com/cropped/2024_11_19_cd8a472922fcd4109f27g-06.jpg?height=800&width=766&top_left_y=1276&top_left_x=642) For any minimal partition $\\mathcal{P}$ of $S_{n}$, let $P$ denote the path passing through the point $a=(n-1,0)$. Then the intersection of $P$ with $S$ consists of several disconnected paths; let $N$ be the number of nodes in the component containing $a$, and pick $\\mathcal{P}$ such that $N$ is maximal. We claim that in this case $P=S$. Assume not. First, note $a=(n-1,0)$ must be connected to $b=(n-1,-1)$ (otherwise join them to decrease the number of paths). Now, starting from $a=(n-1,0)$ walk along $P$ away from $b$ until one of the following three conditions is met: - We reach a point $v$ not in $S$. Let $w$ be the point before $v$, and $x$ the point in $S$ adjacent to $w$. Then delete $v w$ and add $w x$. This increases $N$ while leaving the number of edges unchanged: so this case can't happen. - We reach an endpoint $v$ of $P$ (which may be $a$ ), lying inside the set $S$, which is not the topmost point $(0, n-1)$. Let $w$ be the next point of $S$. Delete any edge touching $w$ and add edge $v w$. This increases $N$ while leaving the number of edges unchanged: so this case can't happen. - We reach the topmost point $(0, n-1)$. Thus we see that $P$ must follow $S$ until reaching the topmost point $(0, n-1)$. Similarly it must reach the bottom-most point $(0,-n)$. Hence $P=S$. The remainder of $S_{n}$ is just $S_{n-1}$, and hence this requires at least $n-1$ paths to cover by the inductive hypothesis. So $S_{n}$ requires at least $n$ paths, as desired. Remark (Motivational comments from Evan). Basically the idea is that I wanted to peel away the right path $S$ highlighted in red in the figure, so that one could induct. But the problem is that the red path might not actually exist, e.g. the set of paths might contain the mirror of $S$ instead. Nonetheless, in those equality cases I found I could perturb some edges (e.g. change from $(-1, n-2)-(0, n-2)$ to $(0, n-2)-(1, n-2))$. So the idea then was to do little changes and try to convert the given partition into one where the red path $S$ exists, (and then peel it away for induction) without decreasing the total number of paths. To make this work, you actually want the incisions to begin ear the points $a$ and $b$, because that's the point of $S$ that is most constrained (e.g. you get $a-b$ right away for free), and assemble the path from there. (If you try to do it from the top, it's much less clear what's happening.) That's why the algorithm starts the mutations from around a.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "USAMO/segmented/en-USAMO-2008-notes.jsonl"}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T1", "problem_label": "3", "problem_type": null, "exam": "USAMO", "problem": "Let $n$ be a positive integer. Denote by $S_{n}$ the set of points $(x, y)$ with integer coordinates such that $$ |x|+\\left|y+\\frac{1}{2}\\right|4$ is even, then $n$ works iff $n / 2$ does. ![](https://cdn.mathpix.com/cropped/2024_11_19_cd8a472922fcd4109f27g-09.jpg?height=316&width=315&top_left_y=1561&top_left_x=873) Thus the sides of $\\mathcal{P}$ must pair off, and when we finish drawing we have an $n / 2$-gon. Since $n=4$ works, this implies all powers of 2 work and it remains to study the case when $n$ is odd. Claim - If $n>1$ is odd, then $n$ works if and only if $n=2^{b}+1$ for some positive integer $b$. Then we get $\\frac{1}{2}(n-1)$ small triangles, pairing up the remaining sides. Now repeating the argument with the triangles on each half shows that the number $n-1$ must be a power of 2 , as needed.", "metadata": {"resource_path": "USAMO/segmented/en-USAMO-2008-notes.jsonl"}} {"year": "2008", "tier": "T1", "problem_label": "5", "problem_type": null, "exam": "USAMO", "problem": "Three nonnegative real numbers $r_{1}, r_{2}, r_{3}$ are written on a blackboard. These numbers have the property that there exist integers $a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}$, not all zero, satisfying $a_{1} r_{1}+a_{2} r_{2}+a_{3} r_{3}=0$. We are permitted to perform the following operation: find two numbers $x, y$ on the blackboard with $x \\leq y$, then erase $y$ and write $y-x$ in its place. Prove that after a finite number of such operations, we can end up with at least one 0 on the blackboard.", "solution": " We first show we can decrease the quantity $\\left|a_{1}\\right|+\\left|a_{2}\\right|+\\left|a_{3}\\right|$ as long as $0 \\notin\\left\\{a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}\\right\\}$. Assume $a_{1}>0$ and $r_{1}>r_{2}>r_{3}$ without loss of generality and consider two cases. - Suppose $a_{2}>0$ or $a_{3}>0$; these cases are identical. (One cannot have both $a_{2}>0$ and $a_{3}>0$.) If $a_{2}>0$ then $a_{3}<0$ and get $$ 0=a_{1} r_{1}+a_{2} r_{2}+a_{3} r_{3}>a_{1} r_{3}+a_{3} r_{3} \\Longrightarrow a_{1}+a_{3}<0 $$ so $\\left|a_{1}+a_{3}\\right|<\\left|a_{3}\\right|$, and hence we perform $\\left(r_{1}, r_{2}, r_{3}\\right) \\mapsto\\left(r_{1}-r_{3}, r_{2}, r_{3}\\right)$. - Both $a_{2}<0$ and $a_{3}<0$. Assume for contradiction that $\\left|a_{1}+a_{2}\\right| \\geq-a_{2}$ and $\\left|a_{1}+a_{3}\\right| \\geq-a_{3}$ both hold (if either fails then we use $\\left(r_{1}, r_{2}, r_{3}\\right) \\mapsto\\left(r_{1}-r_{2}, r_{2}, r_{3}\\right)$ and $\\left(r_{1}, r_{2}, r_{3}\\right) \\mapsto\\left(r_{1}-r_{3}, r_{2}, r_{3}\\right)$, respectively). Clearly $a_{1}+a_{2}$ and $a_{1}+a_{3}$ are both positive in this case, so we get $a_{1}+2 a_{2}$ and $a_{1}+2 a_{3} \\geq 0$; adding gives $a_{1}+a_{2}+a_{3} \\geq 0$. But $$ \\begin{aligned} 0 & =a_{1} r_{1}+a_{2} r_{2}+a_{3} r_{3} \\\\ & >a_{1} r_{2}+a_{2} r_{2}+a_{3} r_{2} \\\\ & =r_{2}\\left(a_{1}+a_{2}+a_{3}\\right) \\\\ \\Longrightarrow 0 &