# Qualitative export: data-defect check This is a report-only audit. No dataset, result, prompt, answer key, or image was modified. ## L4/L5 exact-text comparison The table compares the full stored L4 and L5 prompt text for every image in each domain's `question_set.csv`. | Domain | L4/L5 identical? | Affected images | Images compared | |---|---:|---:|---:| | `angle_estimation` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `clock_reading` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `combination3d` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `combination` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `compass_bearing` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `coordinate_geometry` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `cube_net` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `cube_structure` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `depth_height` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `embedded_figures` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `fbd` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `fold_punch` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `gauge_reading` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `gear_train` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `hex_pathfinding` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `impossible_object` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `laser_mirror` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `line_intersection` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `nested_hexagons` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `nested_squares` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `nested_triangles` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `occluded_pattern` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `optical_illusion` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `orthographic` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `overlap_circles` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `physical_stability` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `polyhedron` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `projectile_motion` | no | 0 | 1,000 | | `rotation_matching` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `route` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `rpm` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `shadow_inference` | yes | 627 | 3,000 | | `surface_topology` | no | 0 | 3,000 | | `symmetry_pattern` | no | 0 | 3,000 | ## Physical-stability L5 ground truth and strict scoring - Full-corpus L5 ground truths classified as sentence-valued (>5 whitespace-delimited words): **3,000/3,000 (100.00%)**. - Strictly correct stored Test-1 L5 responses across evaluated models: **0/500 (0.00%)**. - The response fraction uses the existing strict comparator and the stored Test-1 evaluation sample; no semantic regrading was applied. - Sentence-valued keys can penalize semantically compatible paraphrases under exact comparison; this audit reports the exposure without changing scores.