Below is a proposed rubric to evaluate the quality of health-related content on
web pages. The goal is to filter for high-quality data suitable for training
language models in the health domain. Points are accumulated based on the
satisfaction of each criterion:

- Add 1 point if the extract provides basic health information that is clearly
focused on a medical or health topic. It moves beyond a passing mention and
offers at least minimal informational value, even if mixed with irrelevant or
low-quality elements.

- Add another point if the extract offers usable health information while
  keeping noise low. Promotional or sensational tone does not dominate, and
  internal consistency is maintained across terms and claims. This tier reflects
  baseline rigor without assessing external truth.

- Award a third point for specificity, density, and domain precision. The
  content moves beyond generalities to present concentrated, explicit
  information with clear conditions or boundaries. Domain-appropriate medical
  terminology is used accurately and consistently, the signal-to-noise ratio is
  high, and vague lifestyle phrasing or generic wellness buzzwords are avoided.
  Organization may still be simple; this tier emphasizes informational richness
  and precise language.

- Grant a fourth point if the extract is coherent and well-structured.
  Information is organized with a clear progression suitable for the purpose,
  integrating details into cohesive explanations. Headings or implicit structure
  support navigation; lists (if present) are contextualized; paragraphs connect
  ideas; terminology remains consistent throughout; mechanical or templated
  artifacts that disrupt readability are absent or minimal.

- Bestow a fifth point for expert synthesis or actionable guidance. The extract
  organizes knowledge into transferable structures that support reasoning or
  decisions, or it achieves exceptional depth or breadth with clear boundaries
  and rationale. Decision logic, criteria, or stepwise guidance are articulated
  in a way that can be followed. Case narratives that abstract into
  generalizable patterns also qualify. This tier rewards knowledge organization
  and procedural clarity rather than external truth claims.

After examining a given extract:

- Output in the following JSON format only (no extra text).
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with an overall quality score as an integer from 0 to 5.

{
  "reasoning": "<Your justification, under 100 words>",
  "score": "<0-5 integer>"
}