gmannem commited on
Commit
6389aef
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): d714593

Create Tower of hanoi.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. Tower of hanoi.md +258 -0
Tower of hanoi.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Tower of Hanoi
2
+
3
+ **Transfer N disks between three pegs following size constraints**
4
+
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ ## Overview
8
+
9
+ The Tower of Hanoi is a classic recursive puzzle consisting of three pegs (labeled A, B, and C) and N disks of different sizes, numbered from 1 (smallest) to N (largest). This puzzle is famous in computer science for demonstrating recursion and exponential time complexity.
10
+
11
+ ### Difficulty Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very Hard - Exponential)
12
+
13
+ ---
14
+
15
+ ## 📊 Statistics
16
+
17
+ | Metric | Value |
18
+ |--------|-------|
19
+ | **Total Puzzles** | 60 |
20
+ | **Total Moves** | 12,216 |
21
+ | **Training Puzzles (N=1-7)** | 42 |
22
+ | **Test Puzzles (N=8-10)** | 18 |
23
+ | **Difficulty Parameter** | N (number of disks) |
24
+ | **Number of Pegs** | 3 (A, B, C) |
25
+ | **Solution Length** | L(N) = **2^N - 1** (exponential!) |
26
+ | **Transition Locality** | O(N) - must check top disk constraints |
27
+
28
+ ---
29
+
30
+ ## 🎯 Puzzle Rules
31
+
32
+ ### Objective
33
+ Transfer all N disks from a designated **start peg** to a **target end peg** while maintaining size ordering (largest at bottom, smallest at top) throughout all intermediate states.
34
+
35
+ ### Constraints
36
+ 1. **Single Disk Movement**: Only one disk may be moved at a time
37
+ 2. **Top Disk Access**: Only the topmost disk from any peg can be selected for movement
38
+ 3. **Size Ordering Constraint**: A larger disk may **never** be placed on top of a smaller disk
39
+
40
+ ### Why Tower of Hanoi is Extremely Challenging
41
+
42
+ Tower of Hanoi is the **hardest** puzzle in the RecurrReason benchmark:
43
+
44
+ 1. **Exponential Solution Length**: L(N) = 2^N - 1
45
+ - N=3: 7 moves
46
+ - N=7: 127 moves
47
+ - N=10: **1,023 moves!**
48
+
49
+ 2. **Recursive Structure**: Optimal solution requires decomposing problem recursively:
50
+ - Move top N-1 disks to auxiliary peg
51
+ - Move largest disk to target peg
52
+ - Move N-1 disks from auxiliary to target peg
53
+
54
+ 3. **Compounding Errors**: With per-step error rate ε, success probability is:
55
+ ```
56
+ P(success) ≈ (1-ε)^(2^N - 1) → 0 as N grows
57
+ ```
58
+
59
+ ---
60
+
61
+ ## 📋 State Representation
62
+
63
+ States are represented as **lists of three lists**, where each list represents one peg (A, B, C) containing disks ordered from **top to bottom**.
64
+
65
+ ### Format
66
+ ```python
67
+ [[1, 2, 3], [], []]
68
+ ```
69
+
70
+ This represents:
71
+ - **Peg A**: Disks 1 (top), 2, 3 (bottom)
72
+ - **Peg B**: Empty
73
+ - **Peg C**: Empty
74
+
75
+ **Important**: Disks are numbered 1 (smallest) to N (largest).
76
+
77
+ ### Move Representation
78
+ ```python
79
+ [1, 'A', 'B']
80
+ ```
81
+
82
+ This represents: **Move disk 1 from peg A to peg B**
83
+
84
+ Format: `[disk_number, source_peg, destination_peg]`
85
+
86
+ ---
87
+
88
+ ## 🖼️ Example Puzzle
89
+
90
+ ![Tower of Hanoi Example](https://github.com/gowravmannem/Recurrent-Reasoning-on-Puzzles/blob/main/assets/tower_of_hanoi.png?raw=true)
91
+
92
+ ### Example Trajectory (N=2)
93
+
94
+ **Initial State**: `[[], [], [1, 2]]` (both disks on peg C)
95
+ **Goal State**: `[[], [1, 2], []]` (both disks on peg B)
96
+ **Start Peg**: C
97
+ **Goal Peg**: B
98
+ **Optimal Solution Length**: 3 moves (2^2 - 1 = 3)
99
+
100
+ **Step-by-step solution:**
101
+
102
+ | Step | Current State | Next State | Move | Description |
103
+ |------|--------------|-----------|------|-------------|
104
+ | 0 | `[[], [], [1, 2]]` | `[[1], [], [2]]` | `[1, 'C', 'A']` | Move disk 1 from C to A |
105
+ | 1 | `[[1], [], [2]]` | `[[1], [2], []]` | `[2, 'C', 'B']` | Move disk 2 from C to B |
106
+ | 2 | `[[1], [2], []]` | `[[], [1, 2], []]` | `[1, 'A', 'B']` | Move disk 1 from A to B |
107
+ | 3 | `[[], [1, 2], []]` | `[[], [1, 2], []]` | `['_', '_', '_']` | Goal reached! |
108
+
109
+ ### Recursive Pattern
110
+
111
+ The recursive pattern for N disks:
112
+ ```
113
+ function HANOI(n, source, target, auxiliary):
114
+ if n == 1:
115
+ move disk 1 from source to target
116
+ else:
117
+ HANOI(n-1, source, auxiliary, target) # Move n-1 to aux
118
+ move disk n from source to target # Move largest
119
+ HANOI(n-1, auxiliary, target, source) # Move n-1 to target
120
+ ```
121
+
122
+ ---
123
+
124
+ ## 📁 CSV Column Descriptions
125
+
126
+ ### Columns
127
+
128
+ | Column | Type | Description |
129
+ |--------|------|-------------|
130
+ | `N` | int | Number of disks (difficulty parameter) |
131
+ | `start_state` | string | Initial configuration of all three pegs |
132
+ | `goal_state` | string | Target configuration to achieve |
133
+ | `start_peg` | string | Starting peg ('A', 'B', or 'C') |
134
+ | `goal_peg` | string | Target peg ('A', 'B', or 'C') |
135
+ | `current_state` | string | State before this move |
136
+ | `next_state` | string | State after applying this move |
137
+ | `move` | string | Action taken: `[disk, source_peg, dest_peg]` |
138
+ | `num_moves` | int | Total moves in optimal solution (2^N - 1) |
139
+
140
+ ### Data Format
141
+
142
+ Each row represents one **move** in a solution trajectory.
143
+
144
+ **Example CSV rows:**
145
+ ```csv
146
+ N,start_state,goal_state,start_peg,goal_peg,current_state,next_state,move,num_moves
147
+ 2,"[[],[],[1,2]]","[[],[1,2],[]]",C,B,"[[],[],[1,2]]","[[1],[],[2]]","[1,'C','A']",3
148
+ 2,"[[],[],[1,2]]","[[],[1,2],[]]",C,B,"[[1],[],[2]]","[[1],[2],[]]","[2,'C','B']",3
149
+ 2,"[[],[],[1,2]]","[[],[1,2],[]]",C,B,"[[1],[2],[]]","[[],[1,2],[]]","[1,'A','B']",3
150
+ 2,"[[],[],[1,2]]","[[],[1,2],[]]",C,B,"[[],[1,2],[]]","[[],[1,2],[]]","['_','_','_']",3
151
+ ```
152
+
153
+ ---
154
+
155
+ ## 💡 Usage Tips
156
+
157
+ ### For Model Training
158
+
159
+ ⚠️ **Warning**: Tower of Hanoi is **difficult** for current sequence models.
160
+
161
+ Suggested approaches:
162
+ 1. **Add explicit subgoal markers**: Annotate when recursive subproblems start/end
163
+ 2. **Hierarchical representations**: Encode recursive structure explicitly
164
+ 3. **Search augmentation**: Use beam search or MCTS during decoding
165
+ 4. **Curriculum learning**: Start with N=1, slowly increase (but likely still fails at N≥3)
166
+
167
+ ### For Evaluation
168
+
169
+ ```python
170
+ from datasets import load_dataset
171
+
172
+ # Load Tower of Hanoi
173
+ dataset = load_dataset("gmannem/RecurrReason", "tower_of_hanoi")
174
+
175
+ # WARNING: Expect very low success rates!
176
+ # Models typically solve only N=1
177
+
178
+ def evaluate_hanoi(model, example):
179
+ """
180
+ Evaluation with strict constraints.
181
+
182
+ A single size-ordering violation = immediate failure.
183
+ """
184
+ current = example['start_state']
185
+ goal = example['goal_state']
186
+ steps = 0
187
+ max_steps = 2 * example['num_moves'] # 2 × (2^N - 1)
188
+
189
+ while steps < max_steps:
190
+ next_state = model.predict(current, goal)
191
+
192
+ # Check size ordering (CRITICAL!)
193
+ if violates_size_constraint(next_state):
194
+ return "INVALID_MOVE", steps
195
+
196
+ if next_state == goal:
197
+ return "SUCCESS", steps
198
+
199
+ current = next_state
200
+ steps += 1
201
+
202
+ return "TIMEOUT", steps
203
+
204
+ def violates_size_constraint(state):
205
+ """Check if any peg has larger disk on top of smaller."""
206
+ for peg in state:
207
+ for i in range(len(peg) - 1):
208
+ if peg[i] > peg[i+1]: # Larger disk on top!
209
+ return True
210
+ return False
211
+ ```
212
+
213
+ ---
214
+
215
+ ## 🔬 Research Directions
216
+
217
+ Tower of Hanoi poses fundamental challenges for sequence models:
218
+
219
+ 1. **Hierarchical Planning**: How to encode recursive subgoals?
220
+
221
+ 2. **Search Integration**: Can we augment models with A* or MCTS?
222
+
223
+ 3. **Neuro-Symbolic Approaches**: Combine neural prediction with symbolic constraint checking
224
+
225
+ 4. **Explicit Memory**: External memory to track subproblem state
226
+
227
+ 5. **Length Generalization**: Current models cannot extrapolate from short to long sequences on this task
228
+
229
+ **Key Insight**: Success on Tower of Hanoi likely requires **search** or **explicit hierarchical representations**, not just larger models.
230
+
231
+ ---
232
+
233
+
234
+ ## 📚 References
235
+
236
+ **Main Paper:**
237
+ ```bibtex
238
+ @inproceedings{mannem2026recurrent,
239
+ title={Recurrent Reasoning on Symbolic Puzzles with Sequence Models},
240
+ author={Gowrav Mannem and Chowdhury Marzia Mahjabin and Jason Chen and Shivank Garg and Kevin Zhu},
241
+ booktitle={ICLR 2026 Workshop on Logical Reasoning of Large Language Models},
242
+ year={2026}
243
+ }
244
+ ```
245
+
246
+ **Classic Reference:**
247
+ ```bibtex
248
+ @article{lucas1883tower,
249
+ title={Récréations mathématiques},
250
+ author={Lucas, Édouard},
251
+ journal={Gauthier-Villars},
252
+ year={1883}
253
+ }
254
+ ```
255
+
256
+ ---
257
+
258
+ [← Back to Main README](README.md)