{
  "verdict": "η_c = γ-1 (Lévy-derived) is correct; η_c = 2γ paper 1 claim is INCORRECT",
  "c_central_derivation": "c=3 = γ_susc(γ=0) from Rushbrooke or Fisher hyperscaling",
  "new_identity": "γ_susc(γ) = (3-γ)/(1-γ)",
  "implications": [
    "Paper 1 should correct η_c from 2γ to γ-1",
    "c=3 is NOT just a 'CFT central charge' claim — it is γ_susc at γ=0 derived from hyperscaling",
    "γ_susc(γ) gives full γ-dependence; c=3 is just the γ→0 limit",
    "This UNIFIES paper 1 c=3 with the critical exponents framework"
  ],
  "status": "★ NEW DERIVATION — paper 2 candidate"
}