\subsubsection*{Reinterpretation for the Geometric $\mathbf{g}$-Factor $\mathbf{g}_v$ and Consistency Check:}
The geometric correction factor $\mathbf{g}_v$ is applied to maintain **numerical consistency with the core EWT model**. While the fundamental \textbf{Lorentz-like shortening} of matter in motion is an integral part of the EWT framework, the specific factor $\mathbf{g}_v$ used to define $\mathbf{r_{\nu}}$ (which results in **radius expansion** relative to the uncorrected wavelength) is \textbf{not interpreted as a kinematic Doppler shift}. Instead, it is better interpreted as a consequence of the **absence, or near-absence, of the magnetic deformation term $\mathbf{\epsilon_M}$** in the neutral neutrino. This term is critical for describing the electron's spin and anomalous magnetic moment, suggesting the expansion is driven by the fundamental difference in magnetic/spin geometry between the two leptons.

Specifically, it is proposed that the magnetic field of a charged lepton acts as a geometric torque that actively compresses the soliton radius $\mathbf{r}$, whereas the absence of this strain in the neutral neutrino allows it to maintain its expanded statutory radius $\mathbf{r_{\nu}}$.

The numerical consistency script (Listing \ref{lst:scilab_script} in the Appendix) verifies that this statutory value $\mathbf{r_{\nu}}$ adheres to the power-law relationships that govern the ratios of Lepton Soliton radii ($\mathbf{r_e} / \mathbf{r_{\nu}}$) \cite{yee2014leptons}. The numerical test confirms that $\mathbf{r_{\nu}}$ yields an implied geometric scaling factor of $\mathbf{\approx 10^{10}}$, validating its derived magnitude with exceptional precision (see the full execution results in Listing \ref{lst:scilab_output}, Part II). The model's demonstrated robustness against large relative changes in radius (Figure \ref{fig:robustness_analysis}). 

\subsubsection*{$N_{\nu}$ hierarchy:}
Building upon the unified framework of the EWT model \cite{yee2019spacetime, Yee2020Aether}, we distinguish three fundamental levels of density that define the transition from pure vacuum geometry to physical gravity:

\subsubsection*{1. Absolute Maximum Capacity ($N_{\nu, \text{max}}$)}
The theoretical maximum number of EMCs that can be packed into the soliton's radius $r_{\nu}$ relative to the fundamental Planck scale $\lambda_l$ is defined by the geometric limits of the elastic medium \cite{yee2019spacetime}:
\begin{equation}
	N_{\nu, \text{max}} = \left( \frac{r_{\nu}}{\lambda_l} \right)^3 \approx 5.3004 \times 10^{54}
	\label{eq:N_nu_max}
\end{equation}
This value represents the "solid-state" saturation of the vacuum before any lattice dynamics or dilution effects are considered.

\subsubsection*{2. Statutory Background Density ($N_{\nu, \text{stat}}$)}
As derived in the study of the relationship between light speed and medium density \cite{Yee2020Aether}, the actual equilibrium density of the vacuum is governed by the Eulerian Dilution factor ($2e$). This defines the statutory background state:
\begin{equation}
	N_{\nu, \text{stat}} = \left( \frac{r_{\nu}}{2 \lambda_l e} \right)^3 \approx 3.2986 \times 10^{52}
	\label{eq:N_nu_stat}
\end{equation}
This level establishes the \textbf{Eulerian Dilution} ($\approx 99.37\%$), providing the reference constituent count against which all particle deficits and gravitational gradients are measured.

\subsubsection*{3. Effective Gravitational Density ($N_{\nu, \text{eff}}$)}
The emergence of physical gravity corresponds to a second stage of dilution, defined here as the \textbf{Soliton Push-out}. Within the BCC lattice structure, the effective density for the electron soliton ($K=10$ wave centers) is further reduced:
\begin{equation}
	N_{\nu, \text{eff}} \approx 6.2525 \times 10^{48}
	\label{eq:N_nu_eff}
\end{equation}
This represents a cumulative dilution of approximately $99.98\%$ relative to the background $N_{\nu, \text{stat}}$. In the EWT framework, this exceedingly low effective density explains the extreme weakness of the gravitational force, characterizing it as a pressure deficit (buoyancy) within the high-density medium.



\subsubsection*{Summary of Density Hierarchy}
The transition from the Planck scale to the gravitational scale in EWT is governed by a hierarchical dilution process:
\begin{itemize}
	\item \textbf{Max Packing ($10^{54}$):} Pure geometric capacity \cite{yee2019spacetime}.
	\item \textbf{Background ($10^{52}$):} Dynamic vacuum equilibrium \cite{yee2019spacetime}.
	\item \textbf{Effective ($10^{48}$):} Gravitational active density (EMC capacity).
\end{itemize}
This multi-stage dilution reconciles the substantial geometric radius of the soliton ($r_{\nu} \approx 10^{-17}$ m) with the observed CODATA value of $G$ through the $X_{\text{eff}}$ scaling factor.


\subsubsection{Evolution of the EWT Framework: From Wave Attenuation to EMC Push out}The introduction of the Push out Mechanism marks a fundamental shift in the interpretation of gravitational forces within the Energy Wave Theory (EWT). While the baseline EWT model \cite{yee2019spacetime} treats the BCC lattice primarily as a passive \textit{wave carrier}—where gravity is attributed to a minute loss of wave energy (shadow effect)—the current framework redefines the BCC lattice as an \textbf{active actor}.

In this refined model, the gravitational constant is no longer dependent on an arbitrary wave attenuation coefficient. Instead, the extreme weakness of gravity ($\sim 10^{-42}$) is a direct consequence of \textbf{holographic energy dilution}. The energy density, concentrated within the volumetric saturation of the lattice (${A_{\pi}}^4$), is projected onto the 3D surface of the matter soliton and further corrected by the effective EMC density $N_{\nu, \text{eff}}$.

This transition is governed by the fundamental geometric derivative of the vacuum state, where the volumetric saturation $A_{\pi}^4$ yields the \textbf{push-out force density}:

\begin{equation}
	y = {A_{\pi}}^4 \implies y' = 4 {A_{\pi}}^3
\end{equation}

\begin{itemize}
	\item \textbf{Baseline EWT:} Relies on a nearly infinitesimal energy loss during wave propagation to account for the weakness of gravity, which lacks a direct structural justification.
	\item \textbf{Push-out Model (Enhanced EWT):} Identifies gravity as a "blurred image" of an extremely strong lattice interaction. The $10^{-42}$ factor emerges naturally from the geometric ratio between the 4D saturation base (${A_{\pi}}^4$) and the holographic surface projection of the soliton.
\end{itemize}

By replacing "leaking wave energy" with the \textbf{structural stiffness} and \textbf{statutory density ($N_{\nu, \text{stat}}$)} of the lattice, the model provides a deterministic explanation for gravitational emergence. Gravity is thus revealed as the mechanical reaction of the BCC medium to a localized EMC deficit, governed by the derivative of the vacuum's volumetric impedance.

\subsubsection*{Structural Range: Continuity vs. Wave Dissipation}

A significant challenge for the baseline EWT model is explaining the immense, theoretically infinite range of gravity. In a framework based on infinitesimal wave attenuation, a signal as weak as $10^{-42}$ would realistically be dissipated by the vacuum's stochastic noise over long distances. 

The \textbf{EMC Push-out Mechanism} provides a structural solution to this problem:

\begin{itemize}
	\item \textbf{Geometric Continuity:} Unlike a wave signal that requires constant energy propagation, the push-out mechanism creates a \textbf{static structural deformation} of the BCC lattice. Since the medium is a continuous mechanical entity, the gradient between $N_{\nu, \text{stat}}$ and $N_{\nu, \text{eff}}$ must propagate throughout the entire network to maintain topological equilibrium.
	\item \textbf{Infinite Reach:} The $1/r^2$ scaling is revealed as a geometric requirement of 3D projection from the 4D saturation base ($A_{\pi}^4$), not a result of "fading waves." This explains why gravity remains stable across cosmological scales—it is not a "message" being sent, but a permanent "tilt" in the lattice geometry.
\end{itemize}



By shifting the focus from "energy loss" to \textbf{lattice elasticity}, the Enhanced EWT accounts for both the extreme weakness of the force (via holographic dilution) and its universal reach (via structural integrity), identifying gravity as the deterministic mechanical response of the vacuum's impedance.

\subsubsection{EWT as Pressure-Driven Emergent Gravity}
\label{subsubsec:pressure_driven}

The fundamental mechanism proposed by EWT—where mass creates a **Geometric Deficit** ($\mathbf{N_{\nu, \text{effective}}}$) which is then compensated by the surrounding EWT medium—aligns the model with modern interpretations of gravity as a **Push Force** or a vacuum pressure effect.

This interpretation contrasts sharply with the classic Newtonian view (attraction) and even with General Relativity (spacetime curvature), instead focusing on local density gradients:

\begin{itemize}
	\item \textbf{Density Deficit and Energy Conservation:} The Soliton structure (the particle) constitutes a localized region of \textbf{lower packing} (a geometric deficit $\mathbf{N_{\nu}}$) compared to the undisturbed background of the EWT medium (the vacuum). Simultaneously, due to continuous internal wave interference, the Soliton \textbf{conserves} a large, localized amount of \textbf{energy} (mass equivalent).
	\item \textbf{Equilibrium Drive (Gravity):} The resulting force (gravity) is the expression of the \textbf{EWT medium's fundamental drive to restore equilibrium} by moving into the region of lower packing. This motion generates a net \textbf{pressure gradient}, which pushes all matter towards the center of the deficit.
\end{itemize}

This conceptualization places EWT in close affinity with models advocating that gravity is generated by the **pressure of a Quantum Vacuum** (or: \textit{Medium}) flowing from higher to lower energy density areas \cite{daywitt2015pressure}, offering a coherent, picture of the gravitational interaction that is both emergent and pressure-driven.

This interpretation provides direct justification for the appearance of the square root term ($\mathbf{N_{\nu, \text{effective}}}^{-1/2}$) in the scaling factor $\mathbf{\Omega_G}$. This term represents the **geometric transition** from the underlying three-dimensional volume deficit ($\mathbf{N_{\nu, \text{effective}}}$) to the **two-dimensional surface effect** (pressure) exerted by the EWT medium, aligning EWT with the surface-based scaling principles of holographic gravity models.

