material_class,material_grade,density_kg_m3,youngs_modulus_GPa,poissons_ratio,poissons_ratio_fem_safe,value_provenance,citation_gap_note,source_id,source_citation,source_doi_or_url,source_license,redistribution_clearance
metal_ferrous,hard steel,7850,205,0.29,0.29,rho=family_standard;E=family_standard;nu=class_prior_self,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L2_ALLOY_FAMILY_RHO). Basis: carbon and low-alloy steel: carbon and low-alloy steel 7.85 g/cm3, E 200-210 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor 7850. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | E is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L3_ALLOY_FAMILY_E). Basis: carbon and low-alloy steel: carbon and low-alloy steel 7.85 g/cm3, E 200-210 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor 7850. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: median of this class within this dataset (the upstream reference states 'self-referential prior') (upstream fill_log route=D2_CLASS_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: this dataset (self-referential prior). This value is derived from the dataset itself, so agreement with other rows of the same class is not independent validation",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_ferrous,mild steel,7850,205,0.29,0.29,rho=family_standard;E=family_standard;nu=class_prior_self,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L2_ALLOY_FAMILY_RHO). Basis: carbon and low-alloy steel: carbon and low-alloy steel 7.85 g/cm3, E 200-210 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor 7850. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | E is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L3_ALLOY_FAMILY_E). Basis: carbon and low-alloy steel: carbon and low-alloy steel 7.85 g/cm3, E 200-210 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor 7850. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: median of this class within this dataset (the upstream reference states 'self-referential prior') (upstream fill_log route=D2_CLASS_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: this dataset (self-referential prior). This value is derived from the dataset itself, so agreement with other rows of the same class is not independent validation",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_nonferrous,Ti-6Al-4V,4430,113,0.33,0.33,rho=family_standard;E=family_standard;nu=class_prior_self,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L2_ALLOY_FAMILY_RHO). Basis: titanium alloy: Ti-6Al-4V/CP-Ti 4.43-4.51 g/cm3, E 110-115 GPa (ASM); in-table friction anchor 0.36. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | E is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L3_ALLOY_FAMILY_E). Basis: titanium alloy: Ti-6Al-4V/CP-Ti 4.43-4.51 g/cm3, E 110-115 GPa (ASM); in-table friction anchor 0.36. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: median of this class within this dataset (the upstream reference states 'self-referential prior') (upstream fill_log route=D2_CLASS_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: this dataset (self-referential prior). This value is derived from the dataset itself, so agreement with other rows of the same class is not independent validation",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_nonferrous,aluminium,2710,70,0.33,0.33,rho=family_standard;E=family_standard;nu=class_prior_self,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L2_ALLOY_FAMILY_RHO). Basis: wrought aluminium alloy: wrought aluminium alloy 2.66-2.81 g/cm3, E 68-72 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor 2700/2810. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | E is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L3_ALLOY_FAMILY_E). Basis: wrought aluminium alloy: wrought aluminium alloy 2.66-2.81 g/cm3, E 68-72 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor 2700/2810. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: median of this class within this dataset (the upstream reference states 'self-referential prior') (upstream fill_log route=D2_CLASS_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: this dataset (self-referential prior). This value is derived from the dataset itself, so agreement with other rows of the same class is not independent validation",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_nonferrous,chromium,7190,279,0.33,0.33,rho=named_standard;E=named_standard;nu=class_prior_self,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from a CRC / ASM standard element value (upstream fill_log route=N2_ELEMENT_CRC_RHO). Basis: chromium (Cr) density, CRC Handbook 93rd ed., 20 C | E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from a CRC / ASM standard element value (upstream fill_log route=N2_ELEMENT_CRC_E). Basis: chromium (Cr) polycrystalline Young's modulus, CRC / ASM | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: median of this class within this dataset (the upstream reference states 'self-referential prior') (upstream fill_log route=D2_CLASS_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: this dataset (self-referential prior). This value is derived from the dataset itself, so agreement with other rows of the same class is not independent validation",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_nonferrous,copper,8600,110,0.33,0.33,rho=family_standard;E=family_standard;nu=source,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L2_ALLOY_FAMILY_RHO). Basis: copper alloy: brass, bronze and pure copper 8.4-8.9 g/cm3, E 100-130 GPa (ASM; within-family spread is wide, so a +/-20% error is declared); in-table friction anchor 1.00. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | E is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L3_ALLOY_FAMILY_E). Basis: copper alloy: brass, bronze and pure copper 8.4-8.9 g/cm3, E 100-130 GPa (ASM; within-family spread is wide, so a +/-20% error is declared); in-table friction anchor 1.00. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_nonferrous,magnesium,1800,45,0.271,0.271,rho=family_standard;E=family_standard;nu=source,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L2_ALLOY_FAMILY_RHO). Basis: magnesium alloy: wrought and cast magnesium alloy 1.74-1.84 g/cm3, E 44-45 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor 44.8 GPa. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | E is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L3_ALLOY_FAMILY_E). Basis: magnesium alloy: wrought and cast magnesium alloy 1.74-1.84 g/cm3, E 44-45 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor 44.8 GPa. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_nonferrous,nickel,8220,205,0.33,0.33,rho=family_standard;E=family_standard;nu=class_prior_self,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L2_ALLOY_FAMILY_RHO). Basis: nickel-base superalloy: nickel-base superalloy 8.19-8.44 g/cm3, E 200-210 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor Hastelloy X 205.5. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | E is not reported by the citation on this row: filled from the ASM range for this alloy family; not reported by the citation on this row (upstream fill_log route=L3_ALLOY_FAMILY_E). Basis: nickel-base superalloy: nickel-base superalloy 8.19-8.44 g/cm3, E 200-210 GPa (ASM); in-table anchor Hastelloy X 205.5. The paper cited on this row does not report this quantity: upstream judged the original value corrupt and substituted an alloy-family standard, so the citation and the value do not correspond | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: median of this class within this dataset (the upstream reference states 'self-referential prior') (upstream fill_log route=D2_CLASS_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: this dataset (self-referential prior). This value is derived from the dataset itself, so agreement with other rows of the same class is not independent validation",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_nonferrous,platinum,21450,168,0.33,0.33,rho=named_standard;E=named_standard;nu=class_prior_self,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from a CRC / ASM standard element value (upstream fill_log route=N2_ELEMENT_CRC_RHO). Basis: platinum (Pt) density, CRC Handbook 93rd ed., 20 C | E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from a CRC / ASM standard element value (upstream fill_log route=N2_ELEMENT_CRC_E). Basis: platinum (Pt) polycrystalline Young's modulus, CRC / ASM | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: median of this class within this dataset (the upstream reference states 'self-referential prior') (upstream fill_log route=D2_CLASS_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: this dataset (self-referential prior). This value is derived from the dataset itself, so agreement with other rows of the same class is not independent validation",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_nonferrous,silver,10490,83,0.33,0.33,rho=named_standard;E=named_standard;nu=class_prior_self,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from a CRC / ASM standard element value (upstream fill_log route=N2_ELEMENT_CRC_RHO). Basis: silver (Ag) density, CRC Handbook 93rd ed., 20 C | E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from a CRC / ASM standard element value (upstream fill_log route=N2_ELEMENT_CRC_E). Basis: silver (Ag) polycrystalline Young's modulus, CRC / ASM | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: median of this class within this dataset (the upstream reference states 'self-referential prior') (upstream fill_log route=D2_CLASS_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: this dataset (self-referential prior). This value is derived from the dataset itself, so agreement with other rows of the same class is not independent validation",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
metal_nonferrous,zinc,7140,108,0.33,0.33,rho=named_standard;E=named_standard;nu=class_prior_self,"rho is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from a CRC / ASM standard element value (upstream fill_log route=N2_ELEMENT_CRC_RHO). Basis: zinc (Zn) density, CRC Handbook 93rd ed., 20 C | E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from a CRC / ASM standard element value (upstream fill_log route=N2_ELEMENT_CRC_E). Basis: zinc (Zn) polycrystalline Young's modulus, CRC / ASM | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: median of this class within this dataset (the upstream reference states 'self-referential prior') (upstream fill_log route=D2_CLASS_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: this dataset (self-referential prior). This value is derived from the dataset itself, so agreement with other rows of the same class is not independent validation",contact_params_reference,NASA RP-1228 friction tables; Wikipedia Poisson table; literature restitution,https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424,"CC BY-SA 4.0 (poissons_ratio from Wikipedia) / US Government work (NASA RP-1228 friction, public domain) -- filed under the stricter component",COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Abarema jupunba,685,12.661,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Abies alba,490,11.2595,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Abrahamia ditimena,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Acacia elata,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Acacia heterophylla,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Acacia mangium,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Acacia shirleyi,1175,18.4719,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Afrocarpus mannii,430,10.0894,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Afzelia africana,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Afzelia bella,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Afzelia bipindensis,835,14.5434,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Afzelia pachyloba,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Agathis dammara,520,11.8358,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Agathis lanceolata,580,12.9728,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Agathis macrophylla,550,12.4068,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Agathis moorei,510,11.6443,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Albizia adianthifolia,535,10.6496,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Albizia ferruginea,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Albizia gummifera,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Albizia lebbeck,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Albizia pedicellaris,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Albizia saman,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Albizia sp,605,11.6068,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Albizia zygia,500,10.1569,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aldina heterophylla,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aleurites moluccanus,410,8.8396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Alexa grandiflora,725,13.1741,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Allanblackia floribunda,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Allanblackia staneriana,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Allantoma integrifolia,635,12.0068,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Allophylus cobbe,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Alluaudia procera,430,9.13928,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Alphitonia neocaledonica,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Alstonia boonei,360,8.07041,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 360, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Amanoa caribaea,1090,17.526,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Amburana cearensis,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ampelocera edentula,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Amphimas pterocarpoides,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Amphimas sp,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anacardium giganteum,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Andira coriacea,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Andira inermis,770,17.2,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Andira parviflora,865,14.9072,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Andira sp,915,15.5052,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aniba burchellii,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aniba canellila,1140,18.085,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aniba melinonii,970,16.1519,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aniba parviflora,645,12.1388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aniba puchury-minor,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anisoptera costata,635,12.0068,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anisoptera laevis,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anisoptera thurifera,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Annickia chlorantha,540,10.7191,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anonidium mannii,340,7.75388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 340, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anopyxis klaineana,895,15.2672,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anthocarpa nitidula,915,15.5052,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anthocleista nobilis,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anthocleista sp,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anthonotha fragrans,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Anthostema madagascariense,555,10.9267,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Antiaris toxicaria,455,9.50806,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Antonia ovata,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Antrocaryon klaineanum,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Antrocaryon micraster,520,10.4397,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aoranthe cladantha,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Apeiba membranacea,350,7.91283,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 350, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aphanocalyx heitzii,540,10.7191,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Apodocephala pauciflora,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Apodytes clusiifolia,765,13.6788,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Apuleia leiocarpa,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Araucaria angustifolia,550,12.4068,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Araucaria columnaris,490,11.2595,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Araucaria luxurians,480,11.0661,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Araucaria subulata,550,12.4068,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Archidendropsis granulosa,615,11.7408,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Arillastrum gummiferum,1000,16.5,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Artocarpus altilis,340,7.75388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 340, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Arytera collina,1120,17.8623,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aspidosperma album,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aspidosperma cylindrocarpon,900,15.3269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aspidosperma obscurinervium,1000,16.5,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aspidosperma sandwithianum,960,16.0352,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aspidosperma sp,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Asteropeia rhopaloides,960,16.0352,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Asteropeia sp,980,16.2683,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Astronium lecointei,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Astrotrichilia thouvenotii,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Aucoumea klaineana,450,9.4348,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Autranella congolensis,940,15.8006,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Avicennia germinans,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bagassa guianensis,800,14.1139,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Baillonella toxisperma,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Balfourodendron riedelianum,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Beilschmiedia corbisieri,730,13.2376,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Beilschmiedia diversiflora,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Beilschmiedia letouzeyi,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Beilschmiedia nitida,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Beilschmiedia sp,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Beilschmiedia velutina,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Berlinia bracteosa,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Berlinia confusa,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Berlinia grandiflora,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Berlinia sp,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Berlinia viridicans,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bertholletia excelsa,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bikinia grisea,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bikinia le-testui,615,11.7408,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bikinia pellegrinii,585,11.3369,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bixa arborea,400,8.68812,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Blighia sapida,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Blighia welwitschii,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bobgunnia fistuloides,1020,16.7303,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bocoa prouacensis,1220,18.9643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bombax costatum,400,8.68812,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bombax sp,290,6.93685,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 290, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Borassus aethiopum,960,16.0352,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brachylaena ramiflora,930,15.6827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brachystegia cynometroides,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brachystegia laurentii,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brachystegia leonensis,525,10.5098,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brachystegia mildbraedii,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brachystegia sp,545,10.7885,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Breonia decaryana,960,16.0352,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Breonia macrocarpa,810,14.2372,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Breonia perrieri,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Breonia sp,810,14.2372,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Breviea sericea,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bridelia grandis,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bridelia micrantha,500,10.1569,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Bridelia tulasneana,550,10.8577,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brosimum parinarioides,645,12.1388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brosimum potabile,685,12.661,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brosimum rubescens,1040,16.9593,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Brosimum utile,490,10.0143,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Broussonetia greveana,480,9.87081,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Buchenavia oxycarpa,960,16.0352,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Byrsonima spicata,665,12.4011,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cabralea cangerana,540,10.7191,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Callitris columellaris,570,12.7846,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Callitris endlicheri,650,14.2758,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Callitris preissii,600,13.3475,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Callitris sp,740,15.9187,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum angulare,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum brasiliense,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum calaba,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum caledonicum,795,14.0521,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum drouhardii,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum ferrugineum,960,16.0352,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum inophyllum,635,12.0068,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum milvum,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum neoebudicum,635,12.0068,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calophyllum sp,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calpocalyx heitzii,815,14.2986,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calpocalyx sp,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Calycophyllum sp,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Canarium madagascariense,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Canarium oleiferum,520,10.4397,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Canarium sp,490,10.0143,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Canarium velutinum,490,10.0143,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Canthium sp,1000,16.5,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Caraipa densifolia,745,13.4274,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Carapa guianensis,660,13.8,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Carapa procera,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Carapa sp,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cariniana pyriformis,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Carpinus betulus,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Carya sp,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Caryocar glabrum,825,14.4212,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Caryocar microcarpum,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Caryocar sp,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Caryocar villosum,810,14.2372,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cassipourea guianensis,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Castanopsis acuminatissima,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Castanospermum australe,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Casuarina collina,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Casuarina equisetifolia,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Casuarina glauca,940,15.8006,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cathormion altissimum,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Catostemma albuquerquei,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Catostemma fragrans,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cecropia sciadophylla,300,7.10344,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 300, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cedrela fissilis,495,10.0857,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cedrela odorata,450,9.4348,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cedrela sp,510,10.2987,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cedrelinga cateniformis,490,10.0143,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cedrus libani,510,11.6443,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ceiba pentandra,320,3.7,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Celtis adolfi-friderici,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Celtis mildbraedii,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Celtis sp,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Celtis tessmannii,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Celtis zenkeri,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cerberiopsis candelabra,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chaetocarpus schomburgkianus,1130,17.9738,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chimarrhis cymosa,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chlorocardium rodiei,970,16.1519,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chloroxylon faho,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum africanum,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum boivinianum,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum giganteum,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum lacourtianum,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum lucentifolium,995,16.4422,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum perpulchrum,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum pomiferum,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum prieurii,1235,19.1272,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum sanguinolentum,730,13.2376,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum sp,655,12.2702,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Chrysophyllum subnudum,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cinnamomum camphora,540,10.7191,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cinnamomum tetragonum,420,8.98997,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Citronella sarmentosa,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Clarisia racemosa,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cleistopholis glauca,350,7.91283,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 350, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cocos nucifera,430,9.13928,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cocos sp,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Codia sp,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Coelocaryon preussii,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Colubrina faraloatra,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Commiphora pterocarpa,410,8.8396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Commiphora sp,380,8.38171,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 380, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Copaifera duckei,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Copaifera guyanensis,825,14.4212,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Copaifera mildbraedii,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Copaifera multijuga,500,10.1569,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Copaifera religiosa,575,11.2009,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Copaifera salikounda,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Copaifera sp,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cordia alliodora,505,10.2279,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cordia collococca,460,9.58108,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cordia goeldiana,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cordia platythyrsa,410,8.8396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cordia trichotoma,550,10.8577,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cordyla pinnata,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Corymbia citriodora,1020,16.7303,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Corymbia gummifera,730,13.2376,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Corymbia maculata,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Corynanthe pachyceras,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Corythophora rimosa,1025,16.7877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couepia guianensis,940,15.8006,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Coula edulis,1035,16.9022,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couma guianensis,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couratari guianensis,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couratari multiflora,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couratari oblongifolia,585,11.3369,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couratari sp,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couratari stellata,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couroupita sp,415,8.91492,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couroupita subsessilis,460,9.58108,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Couthovia novocaledonica,470,9.72641,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Craspidospermum verticillatum,970,16.1519,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cratoxylum sp,450,9.4348,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Crescentia cujete,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Crossostylis grandiflora,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Crossostylis multiflora,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Croton oligandrus,675,12.5313,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Croton tchibangensis,410,8.8396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Crudia chrysantha,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya aristata,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya elliptica,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya leptospermoides,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya louvelii,805,14.1756,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya macrocarpa,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya odorata,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya ovalifolia,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya retusa,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya sp,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptocarya thouvenotii,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptomeria japonica,340,8.28316,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 340, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cryptosepalum staudtii,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ctenolophon englerianus,930,15.6827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cunonia austrocaledonica,960,16.0352,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cunonia linearisepala,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cupaniopsis apiocarpa,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cupressus lusitanica,430,10.0894,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cupressus nootkatensis,490,11.2595,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cylicodiscus gabunensis,915,15.5052,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cynometra ananta,955,15.9767,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Cynometra hankei,970,16.1519,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacrycarpus imbricatus,540,12.217,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacrydium balansae,600,13.3475,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacryodes buettneri,575,11.2009,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacryodes excelsa,605,11.6068,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacryodes heterotricha,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacryodes igaganga,605,11.6068,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacryodes klaineana,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacryodes macrophylla,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacryodes normandii,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacryodes pubescens,665,12.4011,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dacryodes sp,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dalbergia baronii,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dalbergia melanoxylon,1290,19.7195,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dalbergia monticola,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dalbergia sp,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dalbergia spruceana,1040,16.9593,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Daniellia klainei,495,10.0857,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Daniellia ogea,480,9.87081,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Daniellia oliveri,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Daniellia soyauxii,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Daniellia sp,550,10.8577,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Daniellia thurifera,515,10.3693,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dendrobangia boliviana,810,14.2372,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Desbordesia insignis,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Detarium macrocarpum,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Detarium senegalense,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dialium aubrevillei,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dialium bipindense,1080,17.4133,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dialium cochinchinense,1090,17.526,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dialium dinklagei,935,15.7417,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dialium indum,1000,16.5,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dialium pachyphyllum,1030,16.845,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dialium sp,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dicorynia guianensis,800,15.1,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Didelotia brevipaniculata,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Didelotia idae,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Didelotia letouzeyi,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dilobeia tenuinervis,940,15.8006,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dilobeia thouarsii,1010,16.6153,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dimorphandra polyandra,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dinizia excelsa,1070,17.3003,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Diogoa zenkeri,825,14.4212,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Diospyros mespiliformis,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Diospyros nigra,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Diospyros sanza-minika,855,14.7863,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Diplotropis purpurea,900,15.3269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dipterocarpus alatus,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dipterocarpus costatus,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dipterocarpus grandiflorus,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dipterocarpus obtusifolius,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dipterocarpus sp,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dipteryx odorata,1070,17.3003,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dipteryx polyphylla,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dipteryx punctata,1140,18.085,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Discoglypremna caloneura,395,8.61196,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 395, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Distemonanthus benthamianus,730,13.2376,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dryobalanops sp,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dryobalanops sumatrensis,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Drypetes gossweileri,785,13.9281,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Drypetes variabilis,950,15.9181,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Duabanga moluccana,500,10.1569,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Duguetia confinis,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Duguetia staudtii,765,13.6788,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dysoxylum loureirii,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dysoxylum macranthum,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dysoxylum rufescens,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dysoxylum sp,815,14.2986,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Dysoxylum translucidum,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Elaeocarpus angustifolius,495,10.0857,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Elaeocarpus comptonii,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Elaeocarpus speciosus,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Elaeodendron sp,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Endlicheria sp,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Endodesmia calophylloides,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Engelhardtia roxburghiana,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Entandrophragma angolense,550,10.8577,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Entandrophragma candollei,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Entandrophragma congoense,510,10.2987,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Entandrophragma cylindricum,695,12.7901,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Entandrophragma excelsum,500,10.1569,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Entandrophragma utile,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Enterolobium contortisiliquum,490,10.0143,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Enterolobium oldemanii,930,15.6827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Enterolobium schomburgkii,800,14.1139,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eperua falcata,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eperua grandiflora,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eperua rubiginosa,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eperua sp,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eriotheca crassa,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eriotheca globosa,550,10.8577,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eriotheca sp,540,10.7191,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erisma sp,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erisma uncinatum,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erismadelphus exsul,705,12.9186,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erythrina sp,300,7.10344,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 300, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erythrina vogelii,280,6.76853,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 280, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erythrophleum chlorostachys,1210,18.8553,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erythrophleum fordii,950,15.9181,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erythrophleum ivorense,905,15.3864,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erythrophleum sp,800,14.1139,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erythrophleum suaveolens,950,15.9181,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Erythroxylum mannii,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eschweilera congestiflora,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eschweilera coriacea,1020,16.7303,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eschweilera simiorum,1140,18.085,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eschweilera sp,995,16.4422,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus acmenoides,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus botryoides,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus camaldulensis,800,14.1139,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus cloeziana,795,14.0521,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus deglupta,490,10.0143,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus delegatensis,970,16.1519,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus globulus,875,15.0276,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus gomphocephala,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus goniocalyx,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus grandis,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus leucoxylon,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus microcorys,1010,16.6153,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus muelleriana,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus paniculata,1070,17.3003,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus pilularis,865,14.9072,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus piperita,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus resinifera,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus robusta,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus saligna,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus sp,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus tereticornis,755,13.5534,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus tetrodonta,1040,16.9593,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eucalyptus viminalis,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eugenia monticola,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Eugenia sp,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Euplassa pinnata,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Euroschinus vieillardii,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Euxylophora paraensis,810,14.2372,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Excoecaria parvifolia,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Fagraea berteroana,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Fagus sylvatica,715,13.0466,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Faidherbia albida,645,12.1388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Falcataria moluccana,425,9.06476,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Faucherea ambrensis,1040,16.9593,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Faucherea laciniata,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Faucherea parvifolia,1025,16.7877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Faucherea sp,1040,16.9593,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Faucherea thouvenotii,1040,16.9593,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ficus elastica,440,9.28754,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ficus insipida,420,8.98997,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ficus sp,605,11.6068,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ficus thonningii,510,10.2987,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Fillaeopsis discophora,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Fitzroya cupressoides,480,11.0661,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Fleroya ledermannii,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Fleroya stipulosa,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Flindersia fournieri,730,13.2376,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Flueggea flexuosa,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Foetidia clusioides,1015,16.6729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Foetidia sp,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Fraxinus angustifolia,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Fraxinus excelsior,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ganophyllum giganteum,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Garcinia verrucosa,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gastrolepis austrocaledonica,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Geissois montana,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Geissois racemosa,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Geissois sp,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gilbertiodendron brachystegioides,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gilbertiodendron dewevrei,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gilbertiodendron grandiflorum,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gilbertiodendron klainei,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gilbertiodendron mayombense,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gilbertiodendron preussii,800,14.1139,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gilbertiodendron sp,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gilbertiodendron splendidum,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gluta tourtour,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Glycydendron amazonicum,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gmelina arborea,485,9.94267,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gmelina lignum-vitreum,635,12.0068,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gmelina sp,510,10.2987,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gonystylus sp,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gossweilerodendron balsamiferum,510,10.2987,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Goupia glabra,855,14.7863,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Greenwayodendron suaveolens,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Grevillea robusta,625,11.8741,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Grewia oligoneura,470,9.72641,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guarea cedrata,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guarea gomma,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guarea guidonia,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guarea macrophylla,945,15.8594,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guarea thompsonii,675,12.5313,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guibourtia arnoldiana,770,14.1,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guibourtia demeusei,1140,18.085,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guibourtia ehie,830,17.7,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guibourtia pellegriniana,935,15.7417,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guibourtia sp,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Guibourtia tessmannii,885,15.1476,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gymnostemon zaizou,400,8.68812,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gymnostoma nodiflorum,1210,18.8553,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gyrocarpus americanus,240,6.0762,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 240, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gyrostipula comorensis,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Gyrostipula foveolata,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Handroanthus heptaphyllus,940,15.8006,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Handroanthus serratifolius,1140,18.085,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Haplormosia monophylla,800,14.1139,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hazomalania voyronii,405,8.764,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hernandia cordigera,405,8.764,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hevea brasiliensis,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hevea sp,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hexalobus crispiflorus,545,10.7885,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hibiscus lasiococcus,380,8.38171,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 380, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hibiscus tilliaceus,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Holoptelea grandis,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Homalium le-testui,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Homalium racemosum,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hopea odorata,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hopea sangal,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Humbertia madagascariensis,1275,19.5587,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Humiria balsamifera,945,15.8594,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hura crepitans,455,8.1,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hylodendron gabunense,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hymenaea courbaril,855,14.7863,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hymenaea intermedia,1055,17.1301,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hymenaea parvifolia,1090,17.526,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hymenaea sp,1025,16.7877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hymenolobium excelsum,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hymenolobium petraeum,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hymenolobium sericeum,835,14.5434,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hymenolobium sp,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Hymenostegia pellegrinii,990,16.3843,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ilex casiquiarensis,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ilex sebertii,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ilex sideroxyloides,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Inga alba,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Inga capitata,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Inga ingoides,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Inga sp,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Inga vera,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Intsia bijuga,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Intsia palembanica,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Irvingia gabonensis,925,15.6237,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Irvingia grandifolia,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Iryanthera sagotiana,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Iryanthera sp,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Iryanthera tricornis,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Isoberlinia doka,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Jacaranda copaia,425,9.06476,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Jacaranda sp,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Juglans regia,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Julbernardia pellegriniana,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Julbernardia seretii,735,13.301,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Juniperus oxycedrus,720,15.5565,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Juniperus thurifera,580,12.9728,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Kermadecia sinuata,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Keteleeria evelyniana,410,9.69376,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Khaya anthotheca,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Khaya grandifoliola,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Khaya ivorensis,500,10.1569,0.297,0.297,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: matched by Latin binomial to a USDA Wood Handbook species value (upstream fill_log route=D1_WH_SPECIES_LATIN). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Khaya senegalensis,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Khaya sp,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Klainedoxa gabonensis,1065,17.2436,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Labourdonnaisia calophylloides,940,15.8006,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Laetia procera,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lagerstroemia angustifolia,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lagerstroemia sp,695,12.7901,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lannea sp,460,9.58108,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lannea welwitschii,505,10.2279,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Larix sp,600,13.3475,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Laurelia sp,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Laureliopsis philippiana,520,10.4397,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lecomtedoxa klaineana,995,16.4422,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lecythis corrugata,915,15.5052,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lecythis idatimon,930,15.6827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lecythis persistens,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lecythis pisonis,1100,17.6384,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lecythis zabucajo,995,16.4422,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Leptolaena multiflora,1125,17.918,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Letestua durissima,1095,17.5822,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Librevillea klainei,1085,17.4697,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania alba,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania canescens,1120,17.8623,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania licaniiflora,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania macrophylla,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania majuscula,1030,16.845,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania membranacea,1075,17.3568,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania micrantha,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania ovalifolia,1130,17.9738,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania sp,990,16.3843,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licania ternatensis,1100,17.6384,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licaria canella,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licaria chrysophylla,895,15.2672,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licaria polyphylla,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Licaria sp,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lithocarpus celebicus,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lithocarpus sp,730,13.2376,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Litsea costalis,575,11.2009,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Litsea vang,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lonchocarpus heptaphyllus,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lophira alata,1055,17,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lophopetalum duperreanum,550,10.8577,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Lovoa trichilioides,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ludia sp,955,15.9767,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mabea speciosa,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Macarisia pyramidata,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Maclura tinctoria,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Macrolobium bifolium,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Maesopsis eminii,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Magnolia dodecapetala,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mammea africana,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mammea americana,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mammea bongo,975,16.2102,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mammea sp,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mangifera indica,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mangifera sp,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Manilkara bidentata,1080,17.4133,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Manilkara dissecta,1140,18.085,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Manilkara huberi,1120,17.8623,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Manilkara mabokeensis,955,15.9767,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Manilkara obovata,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mansonia altissima,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mansonia sp,645,12.1388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Maquira coriacea,495,10.0857,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Maranthes glabra,1020,16.7303,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Maranthes robusta,1010,16.6153,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Margaritaria nobilis,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Markhamia tomentosa,540,10.7191,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Martiodendron sp,1040,16.9593,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mauloutchia sp,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Melaleuca dealbata,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Melaleuca leucadendra,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Melia azedarach,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Metrosideros laurifolia,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mezilaurus ita-uba,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mezilaurus sp,1315,19.9863,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Microberlinia bisulcata,730,13.2376,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Microberlinia brazzavillensis,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Micropholis guyanensis,815,14.2986,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Micropholis melinoniana,675,12.5313,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Micropholis sp,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Micropholis venulosa,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Milicia excelsa,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Milicia regia,625,11.8741,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Milicia sp,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Millettia laurentii,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mimusops balata,775,13.8037,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mimusops sp,1090,17.526,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Minquartia guianensis,900,15.3269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Misanteca aritu,1020,16.7303,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Monopetalanthus coriaceus,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Monopetalanthus durandii,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Monopteryx inpae,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Montrouziera cauliflora,675,12.5313,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Montrouziera sp,940,15.8006,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mora excelsa,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mora paraensis,1020,16.7303,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Moronobea coccinea,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Morus mesozygia,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Mouriri sp,1100,17.6384,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Musanga cecropioides,245,6.16453,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 245, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Myodocarpus pinnatus,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Myrocarpus frondosus,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Myroxylon balsamum,950,15.9181,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Nauclea diderrichii,750,13.4,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Nectandra sp,485,9.94267,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Neea floribunda,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Neoguillauminia cleopatra,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Neolemonniera clitandrifolia,980,16.2683,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Nesogordonia fouassieri,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Nesogordonia papaverifera,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Newtonia buchananii,510,10.2987,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Newtonia glandulifera,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Newtonia leucocarpa,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Newtonia sp,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Nothofagus aequilateralis,1100,17.6384,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ochna calodendron,960,16.0352,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ochroma pyramidale,195,3.4,0.229,0.229,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: matched by Latin binomial to a USDA Wood Handbook species value (upstream fill_log route=D1_WH_SPECIES_LATIN). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ochrosia borbonica,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea amazonica,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea benthamiana,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea comoriensis,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea cymbarum,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea cymosa,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea floribunda,625,11.8741,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea fragrantissima,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea glomerata,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea guianensis,395,8.61196,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 395, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea neesiana,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea oblonga,420,8.98997,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea petalanthera,490,10.0143,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea porosa,685,12.661,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea racemosa,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea schomburgkiana,480,9.87081,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea sp,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea splendens,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea thouvenotii,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ocotea trichophlebia,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Oddoniodendron normandii,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Oldfieldia africana,900,15.3269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Olea sp,1010,16.6153,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ongokea gore,875,15.0276,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Onychopetalum amazonicum,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ormosia coccinea,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ormosia flava,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ormosia monosperma,715,13.0466,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ormosia sp,785,13.9281,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Osteophloeum platyspermum,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Oxystigma mannii,510,10.2987,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Oxystigma oxyphyllum,645,12.1388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pachira nervosa,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pachira sp,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Palaquium sp,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pancheria brunhesii,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pancheria sebertii,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pancheria ternata,1020,16.7303,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parahancornia fasciculata,515,10.3693,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parashorea malaanonan,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parashorea sp,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parinari campestris,885,15.1476,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parinari excelsa,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parinari sp,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parkia bicolor,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parkia nitida,410,8.8396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parkia pendula,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parkia sp,445,9.3613,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Parkia ulei,340,7.75388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 340, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pausinystalia brachythyrsum,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Peltogyne sp,950,15.9181,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Peltogyne venosa,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Peltophorum dubium,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pentace sp,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pentaclethra macrophylla,945,15.8594,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pentadesma butyracea,955,15.9767,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pericopsis elata,740,13.4,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Petersianthus macrocarpus,805,14.1756,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Petersianthus quadrialatus,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Phoebe elongata,490,10.0143,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Phyllarthron articulatum,1140,18.085,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Phyllarthron madagascariense,1070,17.3003,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Picea abies,435,10.1879,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Piliocalyx laurifolius,705,12.9186,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Piliocalyx sp,895,15.2672,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pimenta racemosa,1010,16.6153,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pinus caribaea,450,10.4822,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pinus elliottii,500,11.4522,0.392,0.392,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: matched by Latin binomial to a USDA Wood Handbook species value (upstream fill_log route=D1_WH_SPECIES_LATIN). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pinus kesiya,515,11.7401,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pinus oocarpa,540,15.5,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pinus patula,485,11.1629,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pinus pinaster,560,12.596,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pinus sp,510,11.6443,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pinus sylvestris,545,12.312,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Piptadeniastrum africanum,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Plagiostyles africana,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Planchonella amieuana,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Planchonella microphylla,1100,17.6384,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Planchonella sphaerocarpa,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Planchonella torricellensis,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Planchonella wakere,1100,17.6384,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Platonia insignis,835,14.5434,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Platymiscium sp,1065,17.2436,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Platymiscium trinitatis,1240,19.1813,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Platymiscium ulei,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Podocarpus salicifolius,570,12.7846,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Podocarpus sp,520,11.8358,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Podocarpus sylvestris,730,15.7378,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Poga oleosa,465,9.65386,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Polyscias ornifolia,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Populus deltoides,570,11.1326,0.344,0.344,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: matched by Latin binomial to a USDA Wood Handbook species value (upstream fill_log route=D1_WH_SPECIES_LATIN). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Potameia antevaratra,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pourouma sp,370,8.22669,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 370, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pourouma villosa,330,7.59353,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 330, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pouteria altissima,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pouteria guianensis,1090,17.526,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pouteria pallida,1100,17.6384,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pouteria pierrei,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pouteria sp,980,16.2683,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pouteria superba,550,10.8577,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pradosia cochlearia,925,15.6237,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pradosia schomburgkiana,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pradosia sp,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Prosopis africana,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Protium sagotianum,625,11.8741,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Protium sp,565,11.0641,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Prunus africana,810,14.2372,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Prunus arborea,470,9.72641,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pseudocedrela kotschyi,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pseudopiptadenia psilostachya,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pseudopiptadenia suaveolens,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pseudotsuga menziesii,510,11.6443,0.292,0.292,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: matched by Latin binomial to a USDA Wood Handbook species value (upstream fill_log route=D1_WH_SPECIES_LATIN). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Psidium guajava,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pteleopsis hylodendron,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pterocarpus erinaceus,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pterocarpus officinalis,785,13.9281,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pterocarpus soyauxii,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pterocarpus sp,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pterocarpus tinctorius,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pterogyne nitens,855,14.7863,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pterygota macrocarpa,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pterygota sp,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pycnandra acuminata,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pycnandra comptonii,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pycnandra fastuosa,950,15.9181,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pycnandra gordoniifolia,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pycnandra sarlinii,915,15.5052,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Pycnanthus angolensis,470,9.72641,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Qualea albiflora,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Qualea coerulea,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Qualea homosepala,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Qualea paraensis,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Qualea rosea,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Qualea sp,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Quassia gabonensis,340,7.75388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 340, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Quercus afares,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Quercus canariensis,1000,16.5,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Quercus ilex,955,15.9767,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Quercus petraea,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Quercus robur,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Quercus sp,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Quercus suber,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rauvolfia caffra,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ravensara sp,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Recordoxylon amazonicum,930,15.6827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Recordoxylon speciosum,980,16.2683,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Retrophyllum comptonii,500,11.4522,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rhabdodendron amazonicum,900,15.3269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rhizophora mangle,1120,17.8623,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rhizophora racemosa,1060,17.1869,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rhizophora sp,1020,16.7303,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rhodognaphalon brevicuspe,455,9.50806,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rhodolaena bakeriana,980,16.2683,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rhodostemonodaphne grandis,420,8.98997,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rhodostemonodaphne kunthiana,425,9.06476,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Rhus thouarsii,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Richeria grandis,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Richeria sp,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ricinodendron heudelotii,270,6.5984,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 270, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sacoglottis cydonioides,855,14.7863,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sacoglottis gabonensis,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sacoglottis guianensis,930,15.6827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Samanea dinklagei,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Santiria rubiginosa,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Santiria trimera,625,11.8741,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Scaphium macropodum,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Scaphium sp,665,12.4011,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Schefflera decaphylla,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Schefflera gabriellae,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Schefflera morototoni,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Schefflera pancheri,540,10.7191,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sclerolobium melanocarpum,645,12.1388,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sclerolobium melinonii,495,10.0857,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sclerolobium sp,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Scleronema micranthum,730,13.2376,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Scolopia sp,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Scorodophloeus zenkeri,915,15.5052,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Scottellia klaineana,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Scyphocephalium mannii,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Scytopetalum klaineanum,800,14.1139,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Scytopetalum tieghemii,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Serianthes sachetae,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sextonia rubra,665,12.4011,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea almon,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea assamica,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea contorta,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea guiso,870,14.9674,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea hopeifolia,470,9.72641,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea hypochra,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea leprosula,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea negrosensis,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea palosapis,510,10.2987,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea pauciflora,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea polita,515,10.3693,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea polysperma,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea sp,695,12.7901,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Shorea stellata,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Simaba orinocensis,535,10.6496,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Simarouba amara,415,8.91492,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sindora klaineana,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sindoropsis letestui,705,12.9186,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sleumerodendron austrocaledonicum,550,10.8577,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sloanea latifolia,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sloanea macrophylla,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sloanea rhodantha,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sloanea sp,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Spondias mombin,510,10.2987,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Stachyandra viticifolia,930,15.6827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Staudtia kamerunensis,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Staudtia sp,865,14.9072,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Stemonocoleus micranthus,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Stenocarpus trinervis,1040,16.9593,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Stephanostegia sp,950,15.9181,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sterculia oblonga,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sterculia pruriens,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sterculia rhinopetala,835,14.5434,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sterculia setigera,390,8.5355,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 390, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sterculia sp,490,10.0143,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Storckiella pancheri,925,15.6237,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Streblus dimepate,895,15.2672,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Strephonema pseudocola,705,12.9186,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Strombosia grandifolia,1010,16.6153,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Strombosia pustulata,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Strychnos sp,770,13.7413,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Stryphnodendron polystachyum,570,11.1326,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Swartzia benthamiana,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Swartzia ingaefolia,1200,18.7461,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Swartzia leptopetala,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Swartzia oblanceolata,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Swartzia panacoco,1235,19.1272,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Sweetia fruticosa,955,15.9767,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Swietenia macrophylla,590,11.4046,0.314,0.314,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: matched by Latin binomial to a USDA Wood Handbook species value (upstream fill_log route=D1_WH_SPECIES_LATIN). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Swietenia mahagoni,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Swietenia sp,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Swintonia sp,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Symphonia fasciculata,775,13.8037,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Symphonia globulifera,695,17,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Symphonia louvelii,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Symphonia sp,875,15.0276,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Symphonia tanalensis,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Symphonia urophylla,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Symplocos martinicensis,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Syzygium dyerianum,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Syzygium frutescens,910,15.4459,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Syzygium guineense,740,13.3643,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Syzygium inophylloides,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Syzygium lateriflorum,790,13.9902,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Syzygium parkeri,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Syzygium sp,905,15.3864,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Syzygium wagapense,965,16.0936,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tabebuia fluviatilis,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tabebuia heterophylla,560,10.9955,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tabebuia pallida,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tabebuia sp,1015,16.6729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tachigali myrmecophila,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tachigali paniculata,520,10.4397,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tachigali rusbyi,660,12.3357,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tachigali sp,495,10.0857,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tambourissa trichophylla,595,11.4722,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tapirira guianensis,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Taralea oppositifolia,1050,17.0733,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tarrietia densiflora,765,13.6788,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tarrietia javanica,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tarrietia simplicifolia,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tarrietia sp,700,12.8544,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tarrietia utilis,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tectona grandis,655,10.7,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia amazonia,900,15.3269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia avicennioides,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia bellirica,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia benzoin,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia catappa,515,10.3693,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia guyanensis,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia ivorensis,505,10.2279,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia mantaly,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia sp,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia superba,550,7,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=handbook;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook measured-MOE table (upstream fill_log route=H1_WH_MEASURED_MOE). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-5a (imported species, metric); US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05 | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Terminalia tetrandra,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Testulea gabonensis,725,13.1741,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tetraberlinia bifoliolata,565,11.0641,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tetraberlinia tubmaniana,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tetraclinis articulata,755,16.1893,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tetragastris altissima,810,14.2372,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tetragastris hostmannii,890,15.2075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tetragastris panamensis,955,15.9767,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tetragastris sp,850,14.7257,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tetramerista sp,730,13.2376,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tetrapleura tetraptera,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Thuja plicata,380,9.09436,0.378,0.378,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: matched by Latin binomial to a USDA Wood Handbook species value (upstream fill_log route=D1_WH_SPECIES_LATIN). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 380, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Thuja sp,520,11.8358,0.341,0.341,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Thyrsodium guianense,880,15.0877,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Thyrsodium spruceanum,620,11.8075,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tieghemella africana,715,13.0466,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tieghemella heckelii,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tina apiculata,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Toona sureni,780,13.866,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tovomita carinata,950,15.9181,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Trattinnickia burserifolia,600,11.5396,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Trattinnickia rhoifolia,585,11.3369,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Trattinnickia sp,460,9.58108,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Trema orientalis,470,9.72641,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Trichilia tessmannii,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Trichoscypha arborea,755,13.5534,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Trichoscypha sp,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Triplaris weigeltiana,590,11.4046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Triplochiton scleroxylon,375,8.30435,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 375, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tristania sp,930,15.6827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Tsuga heterophylla,430,10.0894,0.485,0.45,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook,"poissons_ratio_fem_safe = 0.45: at nu = 0.485 this row would lock volumetrically in linear-tetrahedron FEM and cause pressure oscillation in MLS-MPM (K/G rises from 9.7 at nu = 0.45 to 49.7 at nu = 0.49). That column is a solver parameter, not a material property; the original value stays in poissons_ratio. With mixed / F-bar elements or a near-incompressible constitutive model, use the original value | E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: matched by Latin binomial to a USDA Wood Handbook species value (upstream fill_log route=D1_WH_SPECIES_LATIN). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Turraeanthus africana,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Uapaca corbisieri,720,13.1104,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Uapaca densifolia,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Uapaca guineensis,655,12.2702,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Uapaca heudelotii,745,13.4274,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Uapaca louvelii,820,14.36,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Uapaca paludosa,760,13.6161,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Uapaca sp,785,13.9281,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ulmus minor,650,12.2046,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vantanea sp,975,16.2102,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vatairea paraensis,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vataireopsis sp,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vataireopsis surinamensis,690,12.7256,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Virola michelii,575,11.2009,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Virola pavonis,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Virola sp,520,10.4397,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Virola surinamensis,460,9.58108,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Virotia leptophylla,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vitellaria paradoxa,950,15.9181,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vitex doniana,545,10.7885,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vitex grandifolia,500,10.1569,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vitex micrantha,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vochysia cayennensis,425,9.06476,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vochysia guianensis,610,11.6739,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vochysia neyratii,520,10.4397,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vochysia sp,440,9.28754,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vochysia speciosa,540,10.7191,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vochysia tomentosa,445,9.3613,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Vouacapoua americana,920,15.5645,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Walsura trichostemon,580,11.269,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Weinmannia comorensis,750,13.4905,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Weinmannia minutiflora,670,12.4663,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Weinmannia rutenbergii,955,15.9767,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Weinmannia sp,855,14.7863,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Xanthocercis madagascariensis,1115,17.8064,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Xanthomyrtus hienghenensis,1100,17.6384,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Xylia evansii,810,14.2372,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Xylopia aethiopica,630,11.9405,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Xylopia aromatica,640,12.0729,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Xylopia hypolampra,830,14.4823,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Xylopia quintasii,840,14.6043,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Xylopia sericea,530,10.5798,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Xylopia vieillardii,680,12.5962,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Zanthoxylum flavum,930,15.6827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Zanthoxylum gilletii,860,14.8468,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Zanthoxylum heitzii,520,10.4397,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Zanthoxylum martinicense,380,8.38171,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high | E is systematically over-predicted in this density band. fill_log retains both rounds for the same cell on 32 species (round-1 specific-gravity regression vs round-5 USDA measured MOE, on a matched density basis); the regression bias correlates with log(rho) at -0.60. On the 5 reference species below rho = 400 the median over-prediction is +54% (Ceiba pentandra: measured 2.8 vs regression 5.56 GPa, +99%; Ochroma pyramidale +55%). This row has rho = 380, so E is likely 30-100% high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Zanthoxylum rhoifolium,500,10.1569,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Zanthoxylum tsihanimposa,575,11.2009,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Ziziphus jujuba,710,12.9827,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT
wood_solid,Zygia racemosa,1010,16.6153,0.3665,0.3665,rho=source;E=derived_from_rho;nu=handbook_group,"E is not reported by the citation on this row: derived from density via the USDA Wood Handbook specific-gravity regression (upstream fill_log route=C_SG_REGRESSION). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190, Chapter 5; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr | nu is not reported by the citation on this row: taken from the USDA Wood Handbook softwood/hardwood group median (upstream fill_log route=D3_WH_GROUP_MEDIAN_NU). Basis: USDA Wood Handbook FPL-GTR-190 Chapter 5, Table 5-2; US Government work, public domain; https://www.fpl.fs.usda.gov/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf | Isotropic proxy, valid for rigid-body and contact-stiffness use only: this material is orthotropic, E is the along-grain / fibre-direction modulus and nu is the Poisson's ratio for that direction. 287 rows in this table carry a source-reported shear modulus, which tests the isotropic closure G = E/(2(1+nu)) directly: on isotropic classes (metals, ceramics, glass, rock; n=273) the median error is 0.24%, whereas on wood (Populus tremula veneer, oak consensus row) it over-predicts by 3.3-5.2x. In deformable (FEM/MPM) simulation the transverse stiffness will therefore be markedly too high",cirad_wood_density,Cirad wood density database (Vieilledent et al.),https://github.com/ghislainv/wood-density-Cirad,CC BY-SA 4.0,COPYLEFT