Datasets:
Add dataset card
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
+
pretty_name: AC Transit Automatic Passenger Counter Records, 2019-2026
|
| 6 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 7 |
+
- 100M<n<1B
|
| 8 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 9 |
+
- time-series-forecasting
|
| 10 |
+
tags:
|
| 11 |
+
- transit
|
| 12 |
+
- transportation
|
| 13 |
+
- mobility
|
| 14 |
+
- urban
|
| 15 |
+
- geospatial
|
| 16 |
+
- bay-area
|
| 17 |
+
configs:
|
| 18 |
+
- config_name: default
|
| 19 |
+
data_files: "year=*/month=*/data_0.parquet"
|
| 20 |
+
---
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
# AC Transit Automatic Passenger Counter Records, 2019-2026
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
Stop-level boarding and alighting counts for the AC Transit bus network in
|
| 25 |
+
Alameda and Contra Costa counties, California, from January 2019 through
|
| 26 |
+
May 2026. The records come from the automatic passenger counters (APCs)
|
| 27 |
+
mounted at the doors of the buses: one row per stop event, with the number of
|
| 28 |
+
passengers who got on, the number who got off, and the load the bus left with.
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
89 monthly Parquet files, ~5.9 GB, partitioned `year=/month=`. The span covers
|
| 31 |
+
the pre-pandemic baseline, the March 2020 collapse, and the uneven recovery
|
| 32 |
+
that followed, which is the comparison the data was assembled to support.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
## Loading
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
```python
|
| 37 |
+
import pandas as pd
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
df = pd.read_parquet(
|
| 40 |
+
"hf://datasets/somemone/ac-transit-apc/year=2019/month=2/data_0.parquet"
|
| 41 |
+
)
|
| 42 |
+
```
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
Or the whole thing as a partitioned dataset:
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
```python
|
| 47 |
+
import pyarrow.dataset as ds
|
| 48 |
+
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
path = snapshot_download("somemone/ac-transit-apc", repo_type="dataset")
|
| 51 |
+
table = ds.dataset(path, format="parquet", partitioning="hive")
|
| 52 |
+
```
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
## Schema
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
| column | type | notes |
|
| 57 |
+
| --- | --- | --- |
|
| 58 |
+
| `route` | string | route as reported by the vehicle |
|
| 59 |
+
| `route_id` | string | GTFS route identifier |
|
| 60 |
+
| `stop_id` | string | GTFS stop identifier |
|
| 61 |
+
| `event_timestamp` | timestamp[us] | when the doors opened |
|
| 62 |
+
| `service_date` | timestamp[us] | service day the event belongs to |
|
| 63 |
+
| `boardings` | int32 | passengers on |
|
| 64 |
+
| `alightings` | int32 | passengers off |
|
| 65 |
+
| `passenger_load` | int32 | load leaving the stop |
|
| 66 |
+
| `latitude` | double | stop position |
|
| 67 |
+
| `longitude` | double | stop position |
|
| 68 |
+
| `door_lift_flags_possibly` | string | vehicle flag field; its low bit separates the two APC-equipped subfleets |
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
## Working with it
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
These are **raw counts, not ridership estimates.** Two corrections matter
|
| 73 |
+
before the numbers mean what you want them to:
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
- **Partial fleet coverage.** Not every bus carries a working APC, and the
|
| 76 |
+
equipped share varies by route and by month. Summing raw boardings
|
| 77 |
+
undercounts actual ridership, unevenly. Scale by the observed capture rate
|
| 78 |
+
per (route, subfleet) before comparing across routes or over time. The low
|
| 79 |
+
bit of `door_lift_flags_possibly` separates the two subfleets, which have
|
| 80 |
+
materially different capture rates.
|
| 81 |
+
- **Drift against reported totals.** Even after capture correction, monthly
|
| 82 |
+
sums do not match the agency's National Transit Database filings. A
|
| 83 |
+
per-month calibration factor closes the gap.
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
`passenger_load` is the counter's running estimate and accumulates error along
|
| 86 |
+
a trip; it is more useful for relative load profiles than as an absolute.
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
A small number of coordinates are wrong. In a representative month, ~0.1% of
|
| 89 |
+
rows across ~15 stop IDs fall outside the service area, and the extremes land
|
| 90 |
+
hundreds of kilometres away. Most apparent outliers are legitimate -- the
|
| 91 |
+
network reaches Fremont, and the Dumbarton corridor crosses to Palo Alto --
|
| 92 |
+
but do not derive a bounding box from `min`/`max` without filtering first.
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
## Privacy
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
The records contain no operator, vehicle, or fare-media identifiers, and no
|
| 97 |
+
rider-level information of any kind. A row is a count at a stop at a time.
|
| 98 |
+
Coordinates are bus stop positions.
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
## Provenance and license
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
The underlying records originate with the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit
|
| 103 |
+
District (AC Transit). Released here under
|
| 104 |
+
[CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This dataset is not
|
| 105 |
+
affiliated with or endorsed by AC Transit.
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
## Related
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
Built for the **[AC Transit Ridership Explorer](https://github.com/somemone0/ac-transit-ridership)**,
|
| 110 |
+
an interactive map of weekly stop-level ridership and pandemic recovery
|
| 111 |
+
([live](https://ac-transit-ridership-385939155005.us-west1.run.app)). That
|
| 112 |
+
repository carries the capture-correction and calibration pipeline these
|
| 113 |
+
records feed.
|