stindardlogic commited on
Commit
258db43
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): c942cdf

Add dataset card

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +137 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ language:
3
+ - en
4
+ license: apache-2.0
5
+ size_categories:
6
+ - 100K<n<1M
7
+ task_categories:
8
+ - text-generation
9
+ pretty_name: Structured Output SFT (100K)
10
+ tags:
11
+ - structured-output
12
+ - json
13
+ - yaml
14
+ - csv
15
+ - xml
16
+ - markdown
17
+ - json-schema
18
+ - openapi
19
+ - formatting
20
+ - sft
21
+ - supervised-fine-tuning
22
+ - synthetic
23
+ configs:
24
+ - config_name: default
25
+ data_files:
26
+ - split: train
27
+ path: structured-output-sft-100k.jsonl
28
+ ---
29
+
30
+ # Structured Output SFT (100K)
31
+
32
+ 100,000 ShareGPT conversations demonstrating correct generation of structured data formats: JSON, YAML, CSV, XML, Markdown tables, JSON Schema, and OpenAPI fragments. Each example pairs a natural language specification with a valid, well-formed output.
33
+
34
+ ## Motivation
35
+
36
+ Structured output generation is among the most commercially critical LLM capabilities. Models fail in characteristic ways:
37
+
38
+ - **Invalid JSON**: unclosed brackets, trailing commas, unquoted keys, mismatched types
39
+ - **Schema violations**: required fields missing, wrong types, values outside enum constraints
40
+ - **Nesting errors**: objects where arrays expected, flat structure instead of hierarchy
41
+ - **Format inconsistency**: CSV with inconsistent quoting, XML without closing tags, YAML indentation errors
42
+ - **Semantic errors**: technically valid JSON that violates the intended schema
43
+
44
+ This dataset trains models to produce valid, semantically correct structured output from natural language specifications.
45
+
46
+ ## Dataset Description
47
+
48
+ **100,000 conversations** across 7 output formats and 20 task types:
49
+
50
+ ### Format Distribution
51
+
52
+ | Format | Count | % |
53
+ |---|---|---|
54
+ | JSON | ~36,400 | 36% |
55
+ | YAML | ~18,200 | 18% |
56
+ | Markdown Tables | ~18,200 | 18% |
57
+ | CSV | ~13,600 | 14% |
58
+ | JSON Schema | ~4,500 | 5% |
59
+ | Markdown (docs) | ~4,500 | 5% |
60
+ | XML | ~4,500 | 5% |
61
+
62
+ ### Task Categories
63
+
64
+ | Category | Examples |
65
+ |---|---|
66
+ | Data extraction (text to JSON) | 4,546 |
67
+ | Schema/config design | 13,637 |
68
+ | API design (request/response/error formats) | 9,091 |
69
+ | Infrastructure config (Docker, Kubernetes, CI) | 13,637 |
70
+ | Data generation (sample/test data) | 9,091 |
71
+ | Data formatting (tables, reports) | 9,090 |
72
+ | Data modeling (trees, state machines) | 9,090 |
73
+ | Technical documentation | 4,545 |
74
+ | Geospatial (GeoJSON) | 4,545 |
75
+ | ML results (confusion matrices) | 4,545 |
76
+ | Time-series data | 4,545 |
77
+
78
+ ## Format Example
79
+
80
+ ```json
81
+ {
82
+ "conversations": [
83
+ {
84
+ "from": "human",
85
+ "value": "Extract the following information into JSON: 'John Smith, 34 years old, works as a software engineer at Acme Corp...'"
86
+ },
87
+ {
88
+ "from": "gpt",
89
+ "value": "```json\n{\n \"name\": \"John Smith\",\n \"age\": 34,\n ...\n}\n```"
90
+ }
91
+ ],
92
+ "metadata": {
93
+ "format": "json",
94
+ "topic": "user_profile_schema",
95
+ "output_format": "json",
96
+ "task": "extraction"
97
+ },
98
+ "id": "abc123"
99
+ }
100
+ ```
101
+
102
+ ## Key Properties of Responses
103
+
104
+ **1. Syntactic validity**: Every JSON/YAML/CSV/XML output is syntactically valid and would parse without errors.
105
+
106
+ **2. Schema adherence**: When a schema is specified (required fields, type constraints, enum values, length limits), the output strictly follows it.
107
+
108
+ **3. Semantic correctness**: Beyond syntax, outputs are semantically meaningful -- GeoJSON coordinates are [lon, lat] not [lat, lon]; polygon rings are closed; state machine terminal states have no transitions.
109
+
110
+ **4. Format-specific conventions**: XML declarations, RSS version attributes, GeoJSON `FeatureCollection` wrapper, YAML `---` document separator, CSV quoting -- each format's conventions are followed.
111
+
112
+ **5. Explanatory notes**: Where non-obvious choices are made (coordinate order, ring closure, terminal states), responses explain why.
113
+
114
+ **6. Production-quality patterns**: Kubernetes Deployments use `readOnly`, Docker Compose uses named volumes, GitHub Actions use pinned action versions (`actions/checkout@v4`).
115
+
116
+ ## Real-World Use Cases Covered
117
+
118
+ - **REST API design**: request bodies, response envelopes, error formats, pagination
119
+ - **Infrastructure as Code**: Kubernetes Deployments, Docker Compose, GitHub Actions CI/CD
120
+ - **Data schemas**: JSON Schema, OpenAPI component schemas, Pydantic-like definitions
121
+ - **Data exchange**: webhook payloads, GeoJSON features, RSS feeds
122
+ - **Analytics**: comparison tables, time-series, confusion matrices, cohort data
123
+ - **Configuration**: server config with nested structure, environment-specific settings
124
+ - **Documentation**: API endpoint docs with request/response examples
125
+
126
+ ## Use Cases for Training
127
+
128
+ - SFT fine-tuning for structured output reliability
129
+ - Training models for JSON mode and function calling
130
+ - Improving model performance on schema-following benchmarks
131
+ - Building AI data entry, extraction, and transformation pipelines
132
+ - Training code assistants that generate config files correctly
133
+ - Complementary to `json-structured-output-dpo-3k` (small DPO) -- this provides large-scale SFT
134
+
135
+ ## License
136
+
137
+ Apache 2.0