Datasets:
Rebuild dataset card, provenance, composition, and Dot research identity
Browse files- README.md +66 -37
- SHA256SUMS +9 -7
- assets/dataset-composition.png +0 -0
- assets/dot-mark.png +0 -0
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -11,8 +11,10 @@ annotations_creators:
|
|
| 11 |
- machine-generated
|
| 12 |
source_datasets:
|
| 13 |
- original
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
tags:
|
| 15 |
- synthetic
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
- model-routing
|
| 17 |
- inference-orchestration
|
| 18 |
- multi-agent
|
|
@@ -28,15 +30,36 @@ configs:
|
|
| 28 |
path: test.jsonl
|
| 29 |
---
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
multi-model execution plans.** Every example describes a task, three anonymous candidate workers,
|
| 35 |
-
hard call/credit/latency budgets, and the highest-utility feasible Lean, Balanced, or Strict plan.
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
## Load
|
| 42 |
|
|
@@ -48,22 +71,24 @@ print(dataset)
|
|
| 48 |
print(dataset["train"][0]["target"])
|
| 49 |
```
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-
##
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
| Split | Examples | Lean | Balanced | Strict | Task families |
|
| 54 |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|
|
| 55 |
| Train | 9,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 8 |
|
| 56 |
| Validation | 900 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 3 |
|
| 57 |
| Test | 1,200 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 8 |
|
| 58 |
-
| Total | 11,100 | 3,700 | 3,700 | 3,700 | 19 |
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
| Field | Type | Meaning |
|
| 69 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -72,7 +97,7 @@ Each row contains both the serialized completion-training pair and its inspectab
|
|
| 72 |
| `task` | object | Risk, complexity, consequence, ambiguity, evidence need, reversibility, and input size |
|
| 73 |
| `workers` | list[object] | Three anonymous capability, reliability, cost, latency, provider, and strength profiles |
|
| 74 |
| `constraints` | object | Maximum calls, credits, latency, and target minimum quality |
|
| 75 |
-
| `label` | object |
|
| 76 |
| `oracle` | object | Utility, predicted quality, pass rate, candidate count, and target attainment |
|
| 77 |
| `family` | string | Synthetic task family used for split isolation |
|
| 78 |
| `split` | string | Train, validation, or held-out test |
|
|
@@ -103,45 +128,48 @@ Each row contains both the serialized completion-training pair and its inspectab
|
|
| 103 |
}
|
| 104 |
```
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
-
The
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
-
## Label
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
-
For every example, the generator enumerates all 15
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
- Three Lean writer-only plans
|
| 114 |
- Six ordered writer-reviewer plans
|
| 115 |
- Six ordered writer-reviewer-finalizer plans
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
-
Plans
|
| 118 |
-
scores task-adjusted quality, pass rate, cost, latency, role fitness,
|
| 119 |
reviewer regression risk, and finalizer synthesis. The highest-utility feasible plan becomes the
|
| 120 |
-
label. If any feasible plan meets the
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
Worker profiles are sampled around three frozen empirical anchors from a six-case Dot Loom
|
| 123 |
-
|
| 124 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 125 |
|
| 126 |
## Independent label audit
|
| 127 |
|
| 128 |
A blinded independent OpenAI judge audited 90 stratified train and validation labels. Test labels
|
| 129 |
were not sent to the judge.
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
-
|
| 132 |
-
-
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
-
The judge is an independent critic, not ground truth. Raw
|
| 138 |
-
revalidation are
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 |
## Privacy and provenance
|
| 141 |
|
| 142 |
The corpus contains no user prompts, production conversations, wallets, API keys, private code,
|
| 143 |
or customer data. Task descriptions are synthetic. Worker identities and provider groups are
|
| 144 |
-
anonymous and shuffled.
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
| Split | SHA-256 |
|
| 147 |
|---|---|
|
|
@@ -152,7 +180,7 @@ anonymous and shuffled. Dataset seed: `20260716`.
|
|
| 152 |
## Intended use
|
| 153 |
|
| 154 |
- Supervised fine-tuning for structured routing-plan generation
|
| 155 |
-
- Research on cost, latency, verification, and model-allocation policies
|
| 156 |
- Comparing learned conductors with deterministic routers
|
| 157 |
- Testing deterministic enforcement around model-proposed plans
|
| 158 |
|
|
@@ -165,10 +193,7 @@ anonymous and shuffled. Dataset seed: `20260716`.
|
|
| 165 |
- The balanced label distribution does not represent natural production traffic.
|
| 166 |
- Production systems must validate learned plans with deterministic runtime enforcement.
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
-
##
|
| 169 |
-
|
| 170 |
-
The generator, scoring code, complete methods, raw predictions, and audit receipts are published at
|
| 171 |
-
[usedotai/dot-loom](https://github.com/usedotai/dot-loom/tree/main/research/ministral-conductor).
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
```bibtex
|
| 174 |
@dataset{dotloomconductorv2_2026,
|
|
@@ -180,3 +205,7 @@ The generator, scoring code, complete methods, raw predictions, and audit receip
|
|
| 180 |
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/usedot/dot-loom-conductor-v2}
|
| 181 |
}
|
| 182 |
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
- machine-generated
|
| 12 |
source_datasets:
|
| 13 |
- original
|
| 14 |
+
thumbnail: https://huggingface.co/datasets/usedot/dot-loom-conductor-v2/resolve/main/assets/dataset-composition.png
|
| 15 |
tags:
|
| 16 |
- synthetic
|
| 17 |
+
- structured-output
|
| 18 |
- model-routing
|
| 19 |
- inference-orchestration
|
| 20 |
- multi-agent
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
path: test.jsonl
|
| 31 |
---
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+
<p align="center">
|
| 34 |
+
<img src="assets/dot-mark.png" width="104" alt="Dot">
|
| 35 |
+
</p>
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
<h1 align="center">Dot Loom Conductor v2</h1>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+
<p align="center"><strong>11,100 synthetic traces for training budget-constrained multi-model routers.</strong></p>
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
<p align="center">
|
| 42 |
+
<a href="https://huggingface.co/usedot/Dot-Loom-Conductor-14B">Trained adapter</a>
|
| 43 |
+
·
|
| 44 |
+
<a href="https://huggingface.co/spaces/usedot/Dot-Loom-Conductor-Lab">Policy explorer</a>
|
| 45 |
+
·
|
| 46 |
+
<a href="https://github.com/usedotai/dot-loom/tree/main/research/ministral-conductor">Generator and receipts</a>
|
| 47 |
+
</p>
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
Each example describes one task, three anonymous worker profiles, hard call, credit, and latency
|
| 50 |
+
budgets, and the highest-utility feasible **Lean**, **Balanced**, or **Strict** execution plan.
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+

|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
| Property | Value |
|
| 55 |
+
|---|---:|
|
| 56 |
+
| Examples | 11,100 |
|
| 57 |
+
| Train / validation / test | 9,000 / 900 / 1,200 |
|
| 58 |
+
| Policy balance | 3,700 Lean / 3,700 Balanced / 3,700 Strict |
|
| 59 |
+
| Task families | 19, disjoint across splits |
|
| 60 |
+
| Candidate plans evaluated per example | 15 |
|
| 61 |
+
| User or production data | 0 |
|
| 62 |
+
| Dataset seed | `20260716` |
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
## Load
|
| 65 |
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
print(dataset["train"][0]["target"])
|
| 72 |
```
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
+
## Split design
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
| Split | Examples | Lean | Balanced | Strict | Task families |
|
| 77 |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|
|
| 78 |
| Train | 9,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 3,000 | 8 |
|
| 79 |
| Validation | 900 | 300 | 300 | 300 | 3 |
|
| 80 |
| Test | 1,200 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 8 |
|
| 81 |
+
| **Total** | **11,100** | **3,700** | **3,700** | **3,700** | **19** |
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
+
Task families are disjoint across splits. The test families are payment races, tenant isolation,
|
| 84 |
+
webhook replay, OAuth integrity, SSRF egress, stream settlement, health triage, and contract risk.
|
| 85 |
+
None appears in training or validation.
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
+
The JSONL payload is 46,900,561 bytes.
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
+
## Schema
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
Each row includes both a serialized completion-training pair and inspectable source fields.
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
| Field | Type | Meaning |
|
| 94 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 97 |
| `task` | object | Risk, complexity, consequence, ambiguity, evidence need, reversibility, and input size |
|
| 98 |
| `workers` | list[object] | Three anonymous capability, reliability, cost, latency, provider, and strength profiles |
|
| 99 |
| `constraints` | object | Maximum calls, credits, latency, and target minimum quality |
|
| 100 |
+
| `label` | object | Policy, roles, receipts, reasons, verification, and access graph |
|
| 101 |
| `oracle` | object | Utility, predicted quality, pass rate, candidate count, and target attainment |
|
| 102 |
| `family` | string | Synthetic task family used for split isolation |
|
| 103 |
| `split` | string | Train, validation, or held-out test |
|
|
|
|
| 128 |
}
|
| 129 |
```
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
+
The example is abbreviated for readability. The dataset viewer exposes every complete field and
|
| 132 |
+
canonical target.
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
+
## Label construction
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
+
For every example, the generator enumerates all 15 role assignments:
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
- Three Lean writer-only plans
|
| 139 |
- Six ordered writer-reviewer plans
|
| 140 |
- Six ordered writer-reviewer-finalizer plans
|
| 141 |
|
| 142 |
+
Plans that exceed hard call, credit, or latency budgets are rejected. The disclosed outcome model
|
| 143 |
+
scores task-adjusted quality, pass rate, cost, latency, role fitness, provider independence,
|
| 144 |
reviewer regression risk, and finalizer synthesis. The highest-utility feasible plan becomes the
|
| 145 |
+
label. If any feasible plan meets the target quality, below-target plans are excluded.
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
Worker profiles are sampled around three frozen empirical anchors from a six-case Dot Loom
|
| 148 |
+
receipt. Model names never appear in training prompts. Worker identifiers and provider groups are
|
| 149 |
+
shuffled so the model must route from capability and constraint fields instead of memorizing
|
| 150 |
+
brands.
|
| 151 |
|
| 152 |
## Independent label audit
|
| 153 |
|
| 154 |
A blinded independent OpenAI judge audited 90 stratified train and validation labels. Test labels
|
| 155 |
were not sent to the judge.
|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
+
| Audit outcome | Count |
|
| 158 |
+
|---|---:|
|
| 159 |
+
| Agreement | 76 of 90 |
|
| 160 |
+
| Proposed disagreements | 14 |
|
| 161 |
+
| Feasible alternatives | 3 |
|
| 162 |
+
| Invalid or over-budget alternatives | 11 |
|
| 163 |
+
| Feasible alternatives improving the disclosed oracle | 0 |
|
| 164 |
|
| 165 |
+
The judge is an independent critic, not ground truth. Raw responses and deterministic
|
| 166 |
+
revalidation are included in the public research package.
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
## Privacy and provenance
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
The corpus contains no user prompts, production conversations, wallets, API keys, private code,
|
| 171 |
or customer data. Task descriptions are synthetic. Worker identities and provider groups are
|
| 172 |
+
anonymous and shuffled.
|
| 173 |
|
| 174 |
| Split | SHA-256 |
|
| 175 |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 180 |
## Intended use
|
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
- Supervised fine-tuning for structured routing-plan generation
|
| 183 |
+
- Research on cost, latency, independence, verification, and model-allocation policies
|
| 184 |
- Comparing learned conductors with deterministic routers
|
| 185 |
- Testing deterministic enforcement around model-proposed plans
|
| 186 |
|
|
|
|
| 193 |
- The balanced label distribution does not represent natural production traffic.
|
| 194 |
- Production systems must validate learned plans with deterministic runtime enforcement.
|
| 195 |
|
| 196 |
+
## Citation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 197 |
|
| 198 |
```bibtex
|
| 199 |
@dataset{dotloomconductorv2_2026,
|
|
|
|
| 205 |
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/usedot/dot-loom-conductor-v2}
|
| 206 |
}
|
| 207 |
```
|
| 208 |
+
|
| 209 |
+
## License
|
| 210 |
+
|
| 211 |
+
Released under Apache 2.0.
|
SHA256SUMS
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
a466c2e30628d2a15287d71cfdee69df605cff2419886f5420a8450e69465c48 .
|
| 2 |
-
cfc7749b96f63bd31c3c42b5c471bf756814053e847c10f3eb003417bc523d30
|
| 3 |
-
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
a466c2e30628d2a15287d71cfdee69df605cff2419886f5420a8450e69465c48 .gitattributes
|
| 2 |
+
cfc7749b96f63bd31c3c42b5c471bf756814053e847c10f3eb003417bc523d30 LICENSE
|
| 3 |
+
eff3ad3c85c33e46b536d82d982d1c84b7b81dfee4d2d53862f69f2742c7c0f1 README.md
|
| 4 |
+
3c7fa6649e10726831731a0a06a9c017d226742666dfa9a9d4db3786a3269790 assets/dataset-composition.png
|
| 5 |
+
d8b632da85953ed75b11f9e77d998ad01e89e042a14abd8f3990fc5fc2442b68 assets/dot-mark.png
|
| 6 |
+
53c644751b2ba45e9b03dc2b492a798dfd9c13bc056fdd52a50ba2e2f37de536 manifest.json
|
| 7 |
+
9cd3065a36787ce18042aa8bde7e10b1ccf3acd04093058cf78c77f338c5d049 test.jsonl
|
| 8 |
+
8e8244bb5ad7034f6d2a5949503526762895072875998662510d5a3a9b269739 train.jsonl
|
| 9 |
+
b6579587f1123c32b58fe5e55ca9516a5e2d94c47e04a1a84405802dfa4f2795 validation.jsonl
|
assets/dataset-composition.png
ADDED
|
assets/dot-mark.png
ADDED
|