• Introduction to Spotlight series on Node.js • Interview with James Snell about H2 implementation for Node.js • Discussion of current state and challenges of implementing H2 in Node.js • Debate over whether H2 should be a module or part of Node's core • Importance of keeping Node's core small and focused • Defining what belongs in Node Core vs. separate modules • Importance of keeping Node Core small and focused on web fundamentals • URL parsing as an example of a functionality that could be moved to a separate module • Discussion on H2 protocol and its differences from H1, including binary framing, stateful header compression, and implications for web application design and performance • Security as a top priority for the next year • H2 protocol will be designed to be highly spec-compliant and prioritizes security over performance • H1 was not fully compliant with the specification, which led to several security issues • H2 servers will require TLS connections by default due to browser implementation requirements • Node's reputation as a TLS terminator is a limitation that needs improvement for better performance • H2 enables new extensibility models and possibilities for new kinds of protocols • New proposals for other layered protocols are emerging within the working group • WebSockets' relationship with H1 is being considered as a precedent • The framing model in H2 will allow for experimentation without the pain of introducing WebSockets like before • Potential innovations could come out of it, but require collective experience and testing • Criticisms of the H2P protocol include: • Inefficient header compression (staple header compression) • Repetitive headers leading to waste in transmission • HPAC's stateful compression model adds complexity • Maintaining state tables can be resource-intensive • Additional complexity in H2 compared to H1 • Flow control and prioritization in H2 • Impact on proxy software vendors and protocol criticism • Server affinity issue with H2 • Performance benefits of using H2 efficiently (e.g. better request handling) • Memory usage trade-off for increased performance • H2 protocol offers a significant savings of header bytes, potentially saving users money on bandwidth costs • The adoption of H2 requires careful consideration due to trade-offs in security and API compatibility with H1 • Status messages are removed in H2, which may break existing applications that rely on them • Designing an application specifically for H2 is necessary to take advantage of its capabilities • H2 is more suitable for internal server-to-server communication rather than user-facing web servers • The H2 project is currently being worked on by a single developer with plans to grow the team and accept open-source contributions • H2 protocol implementation and integration into Node.js • Discussion about deprecating the H1 protocol in favor of H2 • Decision to offer both H1 and H2 as options for developers • Implementation challenges and future plans for HTTP development in Node.js • Consideration for a module-based approach for H2 implementation • Discussing the size and complexity of an ecosystem • Need for input on code direction • Best ways to provide feedback and get involved (repo, open issues, pull requests) • Code stabilization and distinct areas needing help (tests, performance benchmarks) • Linking repo in show notes • Closing down Node Interactive