--- license: cc-by-4.0 task_categories: - audio-classification - text-to-speech language: - en pretty_name: "E-VOC: Expressive VOice Control Corpus" tags: - text-to-speech - instruction-guided-tts - expressive-speech - human-perception - human-annotation - emotion - prosody size_categories: - 10K **Do You Hear What I Mean? Quantifying the Instruction-Perception Gap in > Instruction-Guided Expressive Text-To-Speech Systems** > Yi-Cheng Lin, Huang-Cheng Chou, Tzu-Chieh Wei, Kuan-Yu Chen, Hung-yi Lee. > Accepted to **ICASSP 2026**. arXiv:[2509.13989](https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13989). ## Overview ITTS lets users control speech generation through natural-language prompts, but how well listeners perceive the requested style is largely unexplored. E-VOC provides a perceptual analysis of ITTS controllability across two expressive dimensions (**adverbs of degree** and **graded emotion intensity**) and adds human ratings on **speaker age** and **word-level emphasis**. ## ITTS systems Audio is generated by five systems and stored under the corresponding top-level directories in this repository: - `Parler-TTS-large-v1` - `Parler-TTS-mini-v1` - `PromptTTS++` - `UniAudio` - `gpt-4o-mini-tts` ## Annotation tasks The dataset is exposed as **five splits** (one per task) of the `default` config. Select a split in the Dataset Viewer to browse that task; each row pairs the playable `audio` clip with its annotation. | Viewer split | Dimension | What annotators judged | | --- | --- | --- | | `task1_adv_degree` | Adverbs of degree | Perceived intensity (Very Low … Very High) of an adverb-modulated emotion clip | | `task2_emotion_intensity` | Graded emotion intensity | Perceived intensity of an emotion within an emotion sub-category | | `task3_emphasis` | Word-level emphasis | Which word in the sentence sounds emphasized | | `task4_age` | Speaker age | Perceived speaker age | | `task5_emotion` | Emotion classification | Perceived emotion category of the clip | Tasks 1 and 5 are annotated on the **same** `Adv/emotion` audio clips, asking a different question per task (degree vs. emotion category). Each split is an [AudioFolder](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/audio_dataset#audiofolder) under `data//` (a `metadata.csv` plus the split's clips), so the viewer shows an inline audio player and duration distribution next to every annotation. The same content is also available as plain CSVs under [`labels/`](./labels) for easy download. ## Dataset statistics | File | Annotations | Unique clips | Annotators | Annotation values | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | `Task1_Adv_Degree.csv` | 17,482 | 2,880 | 29 | `1 - Very Low` … `5 - Very High`, `Unclear` | | `Task2_Emotion_Intensity.csv` | 29,295 | 3,600 | 59 | `1 - Very Low` … `5 - Very High`, `Unclear` | | `Task3_Emphasis.csv` | 10,811 | 1,440 | 27 | emphasized word (50 distinct) | | `Task4_Age.csv` | 3,597 | 720 | 10 | `Child`, `Teenager`, `Adult`, `Elderly`, `Unclear` | | `Task5_Emotion.csv` | 20,205 | 2,880 | 40 | `Angry`, `Happy`, `Sad`, `Surprised`, `Neutral`, `Other`, `Unclear` | | **Total** | **81,390** | — | **144 unique** | — | Each clip is rated by multiple annotators. Generation metadata spans 5 ITTS systems x 3 samples x 2 templates x several conversational contexts (e.g. Customer, Family, Friends, Lover, Teacher-Student, Normal). ## Columns Each row (in both the viewer splits and the CSVs) has: - `audio` – the playable audio clip. - `Task` – task identifier. - `Model`, `Context`, `Template`, `Sample` – generation metadata. - `Ground Truth` – the intended/target attribute of the clip. Its meaning is task-specific: emotion + degree for Task 1 (e.g. `Slightly Sad`), emotion intensity for Task 2 (e.g. `2 - Low`), the emphasized word for Task 3, the target age for Task 4, and the target emotion for Task 5. - `Annotation` – the annotator's response. - `Annotator ID` – anonymized annotator pseudonym. - `FileName` – the original synthetic clip identifier used during collection. - `Sentence` – the carrier sentence read in the clip (present in all tasks). In the CSV files the audio link is the `audio_path` column, a repo-relative path pointing into `data//`. ## Repository layout - `data//` – the human-annotated clips (one AudioFolder per task) plus the per-split `metadata.jsonl`. This is the full audio backing every annotation. - `acoustic//…` – the objective acoustic stimuli for Task I (Adverbs of Degree): `Adv/pitch`, `Adv/loudness`, and `Adv/rate` clips (5,400 total). These are analyzed objectively (LUFS / F0 / words-per-second, paper Fig. 1) and have no human ratings. - `labels/` – the same annotations as plain CSVs. ## Usage ```python from datasets import load_dataset # Load a single task split, with decoded audio ds = load_dataset("wizzzzzzzzz/E-VOC", split="task1_adv_degree") row = ds[0] print(row["Annotation"], row["Sentence"]) print(row["audio"]["sampling_rate"], row["audio"]["array"].shape) # Or load all five task splits at once all_tasks = load_dataset("wizzzzzzzzz/E-VOC") print(all_tasks) # task1_adv_degree, task2_emotion_intensity, ... task5_emotion ``` ## Privacy / anonymization Original annotator identifiers (Prolific and Amazon Mechanical Turk IDs) are **not** published. Each `Annotator ID` is a salted `HMAC-SHA256` pseudonym (`anon_` + 12 hex chars). The same annotator maps to the same pseudonym across all five files, enabling cross-task analysis, while the secret salt is kept private so the pseudonyms cannot be reversed to real identifiers. ## Citation ```bibtex @inproceedings{lin2026you, title={Do You Hear What I Mean? Quantifying the Instruction-Perception GAP in Instruction-Guided Expressive Text-to-Speech Systems}, author={Lin, Yi-Cheng and Chou, Huang-Cheng and Wei, Tzu-Chieh and Chen, Kuan-Yu and Lee, Hung-yi}, booktitle={ICASSP 2026-2026 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)}, pages={16472--16476}, year={2026}, organization={IEEE} } ```