jackasda211233 commited on
Commit
7466ffc
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): decf30c

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +1 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ Prompt: Build a more complex Python CLI tool with 8 commands, 4 question types (
294
  | Scoring pipeline | ✅ take → score → knowledge tracker update works end-to-end |
295
  | Knowledge tracking | ✅ Concept-level accuracy tracking, trend detection |
296
  | Project structure | ⚠️ Files extracted without containing folder |
297
- | Token usage | ~80k — the model autonomously managed file creation, venv setup, testing, and SSH transfer |
298
  | Bugs found | 2-3 moderate: MCQ questions include markdown headers in question text, T/F generation has a for/else creating unintentional duplicates, suggest command pads with generic entries |
299
 
300
  **Severity assessment of bugs:** All bugs found in Test 2 are **surface-level generation quality issues**, not architectural or logic errors. The scoring pipeline, knowledge tracker, and data persistence all work correctly. The MCQ header parsing and T/F duplicate issues would likely be fixed in a single follow-up prompt ("fix the question text including markdown headers" / "fix the T/F for/else logic"), requiring minimal effort. No bugs required architectural changes.
 
294
  | Scoring pipeline | ✅ take → score → knowledge tracker update works end-to-end |
295
  | Knowledge tracking | ✅ Concept-level accuracy tracking, trend detection |
296
  | Project structure | ⚠️ Files extracted without containing folder |
297
+ | Token usage | ~80k — the model autonomously managed file creation, venv setup, self-testing, self-review, debugging, and SSH transfer to completion |
298
  | Bugs found | 2-3 moderate: MCQ questions include markdown headers in question text, T/F generation has a for/else creating unintentional duplicates, suggest command pads with generic entries |
299
 
300
  **Severity assessment of bugs:** All bugs found in Test 2 are **surface-level generation quality issues**, not architectural or logic errors. The scoring pipeline, knowledge tracker, and data persistence all work correctly. The MCQ header parsing and T/F duplicate issues would likely be fixed in a single follow-up prompt ("fix the question text including markdown headers" / "fix the T/F for/else logic"), requiring minimal effort. No bugs required architectural changes.