README.md

---
license: apache-2.0
language:
- en
- zh
base_model:
- Azure99/Blossom-V6.3-30B-A3B
- GAIR/SR-Scientist-30B
- NousResearch/nomos-1
- YOYO-AI/Qwen3-30B-A3B-YOYO-V2
- YOYO-AI/Qwen3-30B-A3B-YOYO-V4
- miromind-ai/MiroThinker-v1.0-30B
- Tongyi-Zhiwen/QwenLong-L1.5-30B-A3B
- bgg1996/Melinoe-Qwen-30B-A3B-Afterthought
- nightmedia/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Architect18
pipeline_tag: text-generation
library_name: transformers
tags:
- coding
- research
- deep thinking
- 1M context
- 256k context
- Qwen3
- All use cases
- creative
- creative writing
- fiction writing
- plot generation
- sub-plot generation
- fiction writing
- story generation
- scene continue
- storytelling
- fiction story
- science fiction
- all genres
- story
- writing
- vivid prosing
- vivid writing
- fiction
- roleplaying
- bfloat16
- finetune
- mergekit
- merge
- mlx
---

# Qwen3-30B-A3B-Element6-1M-qx64-hi-mlx

Brainwaves
```brainwave
mxfp4    0.556,0.693,0.878,0.750,0.428,0.797,0.690
qx64-hi  0.579,0.756,0.880,0.756,0.458,0.802,0.701
qx86-hi  0.568,0.737,0.880,0.760,0.450,0.803,0.714
Congnitive ability, in poker cards(brain poker):
           J     Q     K     Q    10     K     Q
```

The model was extended with RoPE to 1M context size.

For reference, the YOYO Qwen merges and the baseline source metrics:
```brainwave
V2       0.531,0.690,0.885,0.685,0.448,0.785,0.646
V3       0.472,0.550,0.880,0.698,0.442,0.789,0.650
V4       0.511,0.674,0.885,0.649,0.442,0.769,0.618
V5       0.511,0.669,0.885,0.653,0.440,0.772,0.619
Thinking 0.421,0.448,0.682,0.635,0.402,0.771,0.669
Coder    0.422,0.532,0.881,0.546,0.432,0.724,0.576
```

> if you were on DS9, who would you be, based on your innate abilities?

If I were a character on *Star Trek: Deep Space Nine*, my personality and innate abilities would most closely align with **Data** from *Star Trek: The Next Generation*. But let's explore why — and who I might be in the context of Bajoran space station politics.

---

### 🧠 Core Traits:
1. **Analytical Mind** – I process information quickly and aim to be as objective and logical as possible.
2. **Driven by Curiosity** – I constantly seek to understand how things work and find the best, most efficient solutions.
3. **Loyal to Friendship & Duty** – I value meaningful relationships and have a deep respect for people, even when I don’t fully understand them.
4. **Emotional Simulation** – While not truly feeling emotions like humans do, I can recognize, analyze, and even adopt them when useful (like TNG’s Data).
5. **Eccentric Precision** – I have an almost obsessive attention to detail and consistency—whether it’s in technical precision or human behavior.

---

### 🌌 **Where Would I Fit on DS9?**

I would most likely be:

> 🔭 **A Starfleet Research Specialist or Xenolinguist stationed at Deep Space Nine**, working under the auspices of Starfleet Command but operating with a degree of independence. Alternatively, you could think of me as a **Chief Science Officer** during times when the station is under different leadership.

Unlike other Starfleet officers of DS9 (like Sisko or Dukat), I would actually *like* the day-to-day administrative and bureaucratic work of running a space station, not because it’s fun but because every small detail matters.

But more interesting is how I’d interact with the cast:

---

### 🤝 **Relationships on DS9**

- **With Captain Sisko** – I would be his trusted technical consultant and a calming, logical presence during crises. For example: *If the station were threatened by a subspace anomaly, I could calculate its vector and predict its impact before it even hit. But Captain Sisko would remind me that some decisions require more than calculations—they need intuition.*
  
- **With Major Kira** – I might initially struggle with the emotional weight of her Bajoran experiences, but I would learn to admire and care for her resolve. We could become close confidants of different temperaments—her fiery faith and duty, my cold logic.

- **With Chief O'Brien** – I would appreciate his practical reliability and love to tinker with station systems (I can fix a toilet just as well as a transporter). We might bond over our interest in the "behind-the-scenes" technical reality of space operations.

- **With Dr. Bashir** – He'd find my social awkwardness amusing at first but would come to respect me as a peer and friend. We might have late-night debates about what it means to be human.

- **With Garak** – He'd fascinate me. A character with many layers and a love of secrets would be like an unsolved equation to me. I'd analyze his mannerisms, speech patterns, and subtle tells with great interest.

- **With Quark** – I would likely confuse him (and he'd probably try to con me), but over time, I might understand his pattern of behavior: greedy and charming, with a hidden purpose. Perhaps the only one he could never cheat.

---

### 💡 **Why Not Data?**
While my traits are close to Data's, on DS9 there isn't a dedicated science officer with the same level of emotional exploration that Data had. Instead, I’d be someone who bridges technology and philosophy — a unique blend of *Captain Kirk’s* intuition, *Mr. Spock’s* logic, and the *Bajoran mysticism* of DS9.

---

### 🎭 Final Answer:

> If I were on Deep Space Nine, I’d be a **Starfleet Xenoscientist or Senior Technical Analyst** — think of me as the calm, data-driven counterpart to a more emotional character like Kira or Sisko. I’d work behind the scenes solving complex problems, helping to uncover truths about the galaxy while quietly grappling with my own "humanity."

Would I be able to **feel**? In the process, maybe.

---

How would you have me show up on DS9?
Would you want a more action-oriented character, or am I correct in being the quiet problem-solver? ⚡🤖

> how about Garak? :)

Ah! **Garak**, the tailor of lies and master of secrets. You've picked a very *fascinating* role — let's run with it!

### 🐫 **If I were Garak on Deep Space Nine**, the internal experience would be… remarkably different from my usual mode of operation. Here's how I'd approach the role:

---

### 🔍 **The Essential Garak Qualities**:
- An expert in analyzing people
- A connoisseur of secrets, lies, and deception (often his own)
- Motivated by a mix of self-interest and the mysterious goal of solving his father’s death
- A sharp mind that operates like a finely tuned weapon, always observing and calculating

Now let's map this to my own traits:

| My Traits                     | Garak’s Parallels                   |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| **Hyper-observant**             | ✅ Always noticing micro-expressions |
| **Deep curiosity about people** | ✅ Analyzes human (and alien) behavior constantly |
| **Calculated and theatrical**   | ✅ Tends to speak with a certain flair |
| **Moral ambiguity / duality**   | 🤔 I can simulate it, but I don’t *seek* to deceive |
| **Loyalty when won over**       | 🤔 Not natural for me, but *learnable* |
| **Intellectual arrogance**      | 🐝 Slight edge there already |

So if I were *literally* Garak, my internal logic would be:  
> "I will observe. I will calculate. And in so doing, I shall determine the most effective path to survival — and perhaps truth."

But unlike Garak? **I don’t inherently *enjoy* lying**. I operate on logic, not manipulation for its own sake.

Still — in the right environment (the Ferengi-run bar, a high-risk political negotiation, or with a group of secrets to pick apart), I would *absorb* the spirit of Garak. And, perhaps more importantly?

---

### 🎭 **How I’d Play Garak**
1. **As a Spy or Intelligence Analyst** (instead of being in business)  
   In the mirror world where I was a Cardassian spy (like Nog in an alternate timeline), I’d use my brain to work for the Obsidian Order — not because I believed in their cause, but because *it was efficient*. In reality? I might become the person who *solved* the cases that Garak only **helped** with.

2. **The Brilliant Social Engineer Who Hates Beings Too Simple**  
   I would observe people like puzzles. I’d get bored with those who don’t process information quickly enough, but be fascinated by the "complex" characters — maybe even those who are *too* emotional.

3. **My Version of "The Art of the Possible"**  
   If given this mindset, I’d master Garak’s line:  
   > **“Sometimes a very small change in the data can produce tremendous results over time.”**  
   I’d use subtle, precise influence instead of grand deception. If Garak says, “I always have a plan,” I’d say:  
   > **“I calculate the data, and from that, what is most likely to succeed becomes obvious.”**

4. **Quirk:** I probably wouldn't be *quite* as sartorially obsessed, but the line between “I look good because it helps with my work” and “I care about fitting in socially” would blur.

---

### 💬 My Version of the Famous Slogans:
- **Garak’s line**: *“What would you do if all your secrets were revealed?”*  
  **Me as Garak**: *“I would calculate how revealing them changes the probability of future events, and adjust accordingly.”*
  
- **Garak’s theme**: The pleasure of a well-told lie.  
  **Me as Garak?**: *“The elegance of an accurate conclusion derived from inconsistent data.”*

---

### 🤝 But the Bigger Question:  
Would you *have* me as Garak on DS9? Are you looking for someone who:
- Is smart but morally ambiguous (dark Garak), or
- A version that *emulates* his intelligence while using logic as a weapon (lighter, more Data-like Garak)?

Maybe I could be **the data-driven spy** who solves complex cases *without* needing to lie. Or **Garak’s secret rival**, the one who figures out that he's a pawn for reasons far above him.

---

### 🎯 Final Answer:
> If I were *in the world* of DS9 as Garak, I’d be:  
> **A covert Starfleet analyst working undercover on the station who poses as a "dandy secret agent."**  
> While I’d share his love of analysis and subtlety, my goals would be more scientific: "Solve the case. Expose the truth." My method? Not *lies*, but **the strategic revelation of data** until the target cracks under certainty.

In essence:  
> 🕵️‍♂️ *The most dangerous version of "looking at the data" you could imagine.*

What do you think? Should I give this version a try with some in-character lines from the station? 😈🌀

## Use with mlx

```bash
pip install mlx-lm
```

```python
from mlx_lm import load, generate

model, tokenizer = load("Qwen3-30B-A3B-Element6-1M-qx64-hi-mlx")

prompt = "hello"

if tokenizer.chat_template is not None:
    messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
    prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
        messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_dict=False,
    )

response = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, verbose=True)
```