pratimassaravanan commited on
Commit
35390f8
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): abc49bc

Update README with real training evidence

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +79 -177
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,210 +1,112 @@
1
  ---
2
- base_model: unsloth/Qwen3-4B-unsloth-bnb-4bit
3
  library_name: peft
4
  pipeline_tag: text-generation
5
  tags:
6
- - base_model:adapter:unsloth/Qwen3-4B-unsloth-bnb-4bit
 
 
7
  - lora
8
- - sft
9
- - transformers
10
- - trl
11
- - unsloth
 
12
  ---
13
 
14
- # Model Card for Model ID
15
 
16
- <!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
17
 
 
18
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19
 
20
- ## Model Details
21
 
22
- ### Model Description
 
 
 
 
23
 
24
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
 
 
 
25
 
 
26
 
 
 
 
 
 
27
 
28
- - **Developed by:** [More Information Needed]
29
- - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
30
- - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
31
- - **Model type:** [More Information Needed]
32
- - **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
33
- - **License:** [More Information Needed]
34
- - **Finetuned from model [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
35
 
36
- ### Model Sources [optional]
 
 
37
 
38
- <!-- Provide the basic links for the model. -->
39
 
40
- - **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
41
- - **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
42
- - **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
43
 
44
- ## Uses
45
 
46
- <!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
47
 
48
- ### Direct Use
49
 
50
- <!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
51
 
52
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
53
 
54
- ### Downstream Use [optional]
55
 
56
- <!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
 
 
57
 
58
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
59
 
60
- ### Out-of-Scope Use
61
 
62
- <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
 
 
 
63
 
64
- [More Information Needed]
65
 
66
- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
 
 
 
 
 
67
 
68
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
69
 
70
- [More Information Needed]
71
-
72
- ### Recommendations
73
-
74
- <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
75
-
76
- Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
77
-
78
- ## How to Get Started with the Model
79
-
80
- Use the code below to get started with the model.
81
-
82
- [More Information Needed]
83
-
84
- ## Training Details
85
-
86
- ### Training Data
87
-
88
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
89
-
90
- [More Information Needed]
91
-
92
- ### Training Procedure
93
-
94
- <!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
95
-
96
- #### Preprocessing [optional]
97
-
98
- [More Information Needed]
99
-
100
-
101
- #### Training Hyperparameters
102
-
103
- - **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
104
-
105
- #### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
106
-
107
- <!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
108
-
109
- [More Information Needed]
110
-
111
- ## Evaluation
112
-
113
- <!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
114
-
115
- ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
116
-
117
- #### Testing Data
118
-
119
- <!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
120
-
121
- [More Information Needed]
122
-
123
- #### Factors
124
-
125
- <!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
126
-
127
- [More Information Needed]
128
-
129
- #### Metrics
130
-
131
- <!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
132
-
133
- [More Information Needed]
134
-
135
- ### Results
136
-
137
- [More Information Needed]
138
-
139
- #### Summary
140
-
141
-
142
-
143
- ## Model Examination [optional]
144
-
145
- <!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
146
-
147
- [More Information Needed]
148
-
149
- ## Environmental Impact
150
-
151
- <!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
152
-
153
- Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
154
-
155
- - **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
156
- - **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
157
- - **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
158
- - **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
159
- - **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
160
-
161
- ## Technical Specifications [optional]
162
-
163
- ### Model Architecture and Objective
164
-
165
- [More Information Needed]
166
-
167
- ### Compute Infrastructure
168
-
169
- [More Information Needed]
170
-
171
- #### Hardware
172
-
173
- [More Information Needed]
174
-
175
- #### Software
176
-
177
- [More Information Needed]
178
-
179
- ## Citation [optional]
180
-
181
- <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
182
-
183
- **BibTeX:**
184
-
185
- [More Information Needed]
186
-
187
- **APA:**
188
-
189
- [More Information Needed]
190
-
191
- ## Glossary [optional]
192
-
193
- <!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the model or model card. -->
194
-
195
- [More Information Needed]
196
-
197
- ## More Information [optional]
198
-
199
- [More Information Needed]
200
-
201
- ## Model Card Authors [optional]
202
-
203
- [More Information Needed]
204
-
205
- ## Model Card Contact
206
-
207
- [More Information Needed]
208
- ### Framework versions
209
-
210
- - PEFT 0.19.1
 
1
  ---
2
+ base_model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B
3
  library_name: peft
4
  pipeline_tag: text-generation
5
  tags:
6
+ - clinical-trial
7
+ - reinforcement-learning
8
+ - REINFORCE
9
  - lora
10
+ - qwen3
11
+ - openenv
12
+ - hackathon
13
+ - theme-2
14
+ license: mit
15
  ---
16
 
17
+ # Clinical Trial Recruitment Agent — Qwen3-4B + RL
18
 
19
+ A clinical trial recruitment agent trained with **REINFORCE** on a 180-step long-horizon environment. Theme 2 submission for the OpenEnv Hackathon.
20
 
21
+ ## Overview
22
 
23
+ | Component | Detail |
24
+ |---|---|
25
+ | **Base Model** | Qwen/Qwen3-4B (4-bit quantized) |
26
+ | **Method** | Fresh LoRA (r=16, alpha=32) + REINFORCE policy gradient |
27
+ | **Environment** | Clinical Recruitment Env (8 action types, 37 observation features, 180-step horizon) |
28
+ | **Training GPU** | NVIDIA L40S (48GB) on Lightning AI |
29
+ | **HF Space** | [pratimassaravanan/clinical-recruitment](https://huggingface.co/spaces/pratimassaravanan/clinical-recruitment) |
30
 
31
+ ## Training Pipeline
32
 
33
+ ### Phase 1: SFT (Supervised Fine-Tuning)
34
+ - **Data**: 2,000 heuristic-generated traces (observation → JSON action pairs)
35
+ - **Result**: 100% JSON parse rate but **complete policy collapse** — model only outputs `adjust_strategy`
36
+ - **Loss**: 3.14 → 0.015 (perfect memorization, zero generalization)
37
+ - **Finding**: SFT teaches format but not observation-conditional behavior
38
 
39
+ ### Phase 2: REINFORCE (Policy Gradient RL)
40
+ - **Key fix**: Observation parsing bug (`result.get("observation")` → `result` — API returns flat dict)
41
+ - **Key fix**: Heuristic override prevents degenerate actions when candidates exist
42
+ - **Reward shaping**: +0.20 for allocate, +0.15 for recontact, +0.10 for screen, -0.10 for adjust_strategy when productive actions available
43
 
44
+ **Debug Trial Results (3 episodes, 15 steps each):**
45
 
46
+ | Episode | Task | Enrolled | Target | Reward | Action Distribution |
47
+ |---|---|---|---|---|---|
48
+ | 0 | easy_bench | **5** | 80 | 6.61 | screen=6, allocate=9 |
49
+ | 1 | easy_bench | **5** | 80 | 6.61 | screen=6, allocate=9 |
50
+ | 2 | easy_bench | **1** | 80 | 7.41 | screen=14, allocate=1 |
51
 
52
+ **Improvement over SFT**: 0 → 5 enrolled patients, diverse action distribution vs. 100% adjust_strategy collapse.
 
 
 
 
 
 
53
 
54
+ ### Phase 3: Full REINFORCE Run (30 episodes)
55
+ - 30 episodes across easy/medium/hard benchmarks
56
+ - Results uploading upon completion
57
 
58
+ ## Key Findings
59
 
60
+ 1. **SFT collapse is fundamental**: Two independent SFT runs (2K and 16K traces) both produced identical policy collapse. More data doesn't help — the model memorizes the most common action without learning observation-conditional behavior.
 
 
61
 
62
+ 2. **Observation parsing was the root cause of 0 enrollment**: The HF Space API returns a flat dict (not nested under `observation`), causing all candidate lists to appear empty.
63
 
64
+ 3. **Heuristic override + RL reward shaping enables real enrollment**: The combination of a smart fallback (allocate > recontact > screen > adjust) with REINFORCE reward shaping produces agents that actually progress through the recruitment funnel.
65
 
66
+ 4. **Fresh LoRA outperforms SFT LoRA**: Starting from base Qwen3-4B with a fresh LoRA adapter (instead of loading the collapsed SFT adapter) allows the model to explore and learn productive actions.
67
 
68
+ ## Repository Structure
69
 
70
+ ```
71
+ clinical-recruitment-env/
72
+ ├── env.py # 180-step clinical trial environment
73
+ ├── models.py # Action/Observation Pydantic models
74
+ ├── graders.py # Task-specific scoring (easy/medium/hard)
75
+ ├── app.py # FastAPI server
76
+ ├── openenv_adapter.py # OpenEnv protocol adapter
77
+ ├── train.py # SFT training script (local, uses Python API)
78
+ ├── _lightning_reinforce.py # REINFORCE v3 (Lightning AI, uses HTTP API)
79
+ ├── _reinforce_v4.py # REINFORCE v4 (gentler reward shaping)
80
+ └── _debug_trial.py # Debug trial (3 episodes, full logging)
81
+ ```
82
 
83
+ ## Usage
84
 
85
+ ```python
86
+ from peft import PeftModel
87
+ from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
88
 
89
+ base = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3-4B", load_in_4bit=True)
90
+ model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base, "pratimassaravanan/clinical-qwen3-4b-sft-lora/rl_v3_adapter")
91
+ tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3-4B")
92
+ ```
93
 
94
+ ## Environment Details
95
 
96
+ - **Actions**: screen_patient, recontact, allocate_to_site, adjust_strategy, plan_next_phase, summarize_and_index, retrieve_relevant_history, stop_recruitment
97
+ - **Observation**: 37 features including patient lists, site performance, funnel metrics, world_type
98
+ - **Reward**: Enrollment (+0.50), screening (+0.30), dropout (-0.35), milestone bonuses, hypothesis accuracy (+0.10)
99
+ - **Tasks**: easy_bench (80 target), medium_bench (100 target), hard_bench (150 target)
100
 
101
+ ## Compute & Cost
102
 
103
+ | Job | GPU | Duration | Cost |
104
+ |---|---|---|---|
105
+ | SFT v1 (2K traces) | L40S | ~30 min | ~$2.50 |
106
+ | SFT v2 (16K traces) | L40S | ~60 min | ~$5.00 |
107
+ | RL debug trial | L40S | ~5 min | $0.44 |
108
+ | RL v3-fixed (30 eps) | L40S | ~60 min | ~$5.00 |
109
 
110
+ ## License
111
 
112
+ MIT