Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -37,12 +37,14 @@ Two variants are provided, differing only in *how many* of the later transformer
|
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
| File | Blocks taken from `ref2va` | Tradeoff |
|
| 39 |
|---|---|---|
|
| 40 |
-
| `minimax_h3_hybrid_fl2va_ref2va_b30-49.safetensors` | 30β49 (last 20 of 50) | Closer to `fl2va` β higher visual/audio quality,
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
| `minimax_h3_hybrid_fl2va_ref2va_b20-49.safetensors` | 20β49 (last 30 of 50) | Closer to `ref2va` β slightly higher reference capability, slightly lower visual/audio quality. |
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Both are reasonable defaults depending on what you're optimizing for: pick **b30-49** if output fidelity matters more and reference conditioning just needs to work well; pick **b20-49** if faithfulness to the reference input is the priority and you can tolerate a small step down in raw quality. Neither variant is uniformly better than the other β the difference is a fairly narrow, gradual tradeoff rather than a clear win/loss.
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
I personally recommend trying the *
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
## What this model is
|
| 48 |
|
|
|
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
| File | Blocks taken from `ref2va` | Tradeoff |
|
| 39 |
|---|---|---|
|
| 40 |
+
| `minimax_h3_hybrid_fl2va_ref2va_b30-49.safetensors` | 30β49 (last 20 of 50) | Closer to `fl2va` β higher visual/audio quality, somewhat reduced reference capability. |
|
| 41 |
+
| `minimax_h3_hybrid_fl2va_ref2va_b25-49.safetensors` | 25β49 (last 25 of 50) | Closer to `fl2va` β slight higher visual/audio quality, slightly reduced reference capability. |
|
| 42 |
| `minimax_h3_hybrid_fl2va_ref2va_b20-49.safetensors` | 20β49 (last 30 of 50) | Closer to `ref2va` β slightly higher reference capability, slightly lower visual/audio quality. |
|
| 43 |
+
| `minimax_h3_hybrid_fl2va_ref2va_b15-49.safetensors` | 15β49 (last 35 of 50) | Closer to `ref2va` β higher reference capability, somewhat lower visual/audio quality. |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Both are reasonable defaults depending on what you're optimizing for: pick **b30-49** if output fidelity matters more and reference conditioning just needs to work well; pick **b20-49** if faithfulness to the reference input is the priority and you can tolerate a small step down in raw quality. Neither variant is uniformly better than the other β the difference is a fairly narrow, gradual tradeoff rather than a clear win/loss.
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
I personally recommend trying the *b25-49* version first, and if you find you need stronger reference adherence (at the cost of output quality), try the *b20-49* or *b15-49* version.
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
## What this model is
|
| 50 |
|