ProCreations's picture
Map exact current anchored claims to existing independent evidence
ed2a4b0 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
1.71 kB
<!doctype html><html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1"><title>Fair calibrated-score decisions reproduction poster</title><style>body{margin:0;background:#18122b;color:#faf5ff;font:16px/1.45 ui-sans-serif,system-ui,sans-serif}main{max-width:1180px;margin:auto;padding:34px}.ey{color:#d8b4fe;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.08em;text-transform:uppercase}h1{font-size:38px;line-height:1.12;margin:.2em 0}.cards{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);gap:14px;margin:26px 0}.card{background:#2e2250;border:1px solid #5b4b7f;border-radius:14px;padding:18px}.n{font-size:30px;font-weight:850;color:#fb7185}img{width:100%;background:white;border-radius:14px}.foot{color:#e9d5ff;font-size:13px;margin-top:16px}@media(max-width:800px){.cards{grid-template-columns:1fr 1fr}h1{font-size:30px}}</style></head><body><main><div class="ey">Independent ICML 2026 reproduction</div><h1>Calibrated Scores Do Not Stay Fair After Thresholding</h1><p>Exact population counterexamples, randomized sufficient optima, and a separate multistart optimizer audit of the geometric solution.</p><div class="cards"><div class="card"><div class="n">6/6</div>threshold counterexamples</div><div class="card"><div class="n">0.272</div>largest parity gap</div><div class="card"><div class="n">3.7e-15</div>sufficient-rule gap</div><div class="card"><div class="n">8.1e-10</div>max optimizer objective gap</div></div><img src="outputs/fair_calibrated/fair_calibrated_audit.png" alt="Calibrated-score fairness audit"><div class="foot">ProCreations · OpenReview XiD5RhcEDK · complete rules, constraints, and SHA-256 manifest included</div></main></body></html>