Ctrl+K
Add the missing Claim 5 page: rerun the COMPAS case study on real ProPublica data; optimal fair thresholds differ by 0.08-0.13 across groups and forcing a single threshold costs 52-341 utility
0690c42 verified - claim-0-current-anchored-claim-map
- claim-1-group-calibrated-scores-including-true-class-probabilities-violate-predictive-parity-after-thresholding
- claim-2-presents-exact-solution-for-optimal-binary-randomized-classification-under-sufficiency-with-finite-group-calibrated-scores
- claim-3-geometric-characterization-identifies-optimal-classifier-minimizing-deviation-from-separation-subject-to-sufficiency
- claim-5-compas-thresholds
- conclusion
- executive-summary
- 1.02 kB