File size: 14,807 Bytes
70650b7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
# HearthNet Phase 3 β€” Spec Set Overview

**Phase 3 scope:** research-shaped, 6–12 months. This is where HearthNet stops being a product and starts being a protocol. Each module here is an investment in a long-term capability where the engineering is the easy part β€” the hard part is establishing trust, governance, and standards.

**Stance:** Phase 3 specs are **roadmaps**, not contracts. Where a Phase-1/2 spec answers "what does this *do*?", a Phase-3 spec answers "what would we *build* if we were ready to commit?". Concrete enough to start, loose enough to be wrong about details without invalidating the direction.

---

## 0. Reading these specs

Phase 3 specs deviate from the Phase 1 / 2 template in three respects:

1. **Stability tag is `experimental` for new capabilities** unless explicitly promoted later. Mesh nodes ignore experimental capabilities unless the operator opts in via `policy.research.enable = true`.
2. **Each module carries an "Open research questions" section** that is longer than the spec itself, by design. Phase 3 modules answer *some* of their open questions before shipping; the rest stay open.
3. **Acceptance criteria are described, not enumerated**. The point isn't to grade an implementation against a checklist; it's to say "we'll know this is working when…"

If you read a Phase 3 spec and feel uncertain about how something works, that uncertainty is faithful to the state of the work. The spec is doing its job by being honest about that.

---

## 1. Module map (Phase 3)

### New numbered modules

| ID  | Module                       | Spec file                                       | Concern                                                              |
|-----|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| M26 | Distributed Inference        | `modules/M26-distributed-inference.md`          | Layer-sharded LLMs across nodes (Petals-style), small models only    |
| M27 | MoE Expert Routing           | `modules/M27-moe-routing.md`                    | Route queries to the right expert (machine or human) via learned scorer |
| M28 | Federated Learning           | `modules/M28-fedlearn.md`                       | FedAvg on LoRA layers; per-community fine-tuning without sharing data |
| M29 | LoRA Long-Distance Beacons   | `modules/M29-lora-beacons.md`                   | 868MHz "community alive" beacons; no AI traffic; emergency-only       |
| M30 | Evidence / EBKH              | `modules/M30-evidence-ebkh.md`                  | Claim graph alongside the event log; provenance + verifiability       |
| M31 | Civil Defence Pilot          | `modules/M31-civil-defense.md`                  | THW / DRK / KatS bridge; compliance profile; audit trail              |
| M32 | Protocol Standardisation     | `modules/M32-protocol-standard.md`              | Reference implementation, conformance suite, governance for the spec |

### New cross-cutting modules

| ID  | Module                | Spec file                                         | Concern                                              |
|-----|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| X08 | Tensor Transport      | `cross-cutting/X08-tensor-transport.md`           | High-throughput chunked tensor passing for M26       |
| X09 | Conformance Suite     | `cross-cutting/X09-conformance-suite.md`          | Black-box tests defining what "HearthNet-compliant" means |

### Modifications to earlier modules

| Phase 1/2 module | Phase 3 extension |
|------------------|-------------------|
| M03 Bus          | Optional MoE routing layer between dispatcher and handler (M27) |
| M04 LLM          | Optional `experimental.distributed_llm.chat@1.0` backend (M26) |
| X02 Event log    | Optional `evidence.*` claim records side-by-side with events (M30) |
| M14 Federation   | Federated learning rounds use federation as the trust substrate (M28) |
| X03 Observability | Per-call expert-routing trace; per-shard tensor-transport metrics (M27, X08) |

---

## 2. Dependency graph (Phase 3 additions on top of Phases 1–2)

```
                β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                β”‚       Phase 1 + Phase 2 (unchanged)         β”‚
                β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                     β”‚                β”‚              β”‚
                     β–Ό                β–Ό              β–Ό
              β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”      β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”    β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
              β”‚  X08     β”‚      β”‚  M27     β”‚    β”‚  M30     β”‚
              β”‚  Tensor  β”‚      β”‚  MoE     β”‚    β”‚  EBKH    β”‚
              β”‚  Transp. β”‚      β”‚  Routing β”‚    β”‚  Evidenceβ”‚
              β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜      β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜    β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                    β–Ό                 β”‚              β”‚
              β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”            β”‚              β”‚
              β”‚  M26     β”‚            β”‚              β”‚
              β”‚  Distrib.β”‚            β”‚              β”‚
              β”‚  Infer.  β”‚            β”‚              β”‚
              β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜            β”‚              β”‚
                                      β–Ό              β–Ό
                                β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”   β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                                β”‚  M28     β”‚   β”‚  M31     β”‚
                                β”‚  FedLearnβ”‚   β”‚  CivDef. β”‚
                                β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜   β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

       Standalone (no software deps, governance / hardware):
                                β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                                β”‚  M29     β”‚   (hardware)
                                β”‚  LoRa    β”‚
                                β”‚  Beacons β”‚
                                β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                                β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                                β”‚  X09     β”‚   (process)
                                β”‚  Conform.β”‚
                                β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
                                β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
                                β”‚  M32     β”‚   (governance)
                                β”‚  Standardβ”‚
                                β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
```

Most Phase 3 modules are independent of each other. The exceptions:
- M26 depends on X08
- M27 informs M26 (MoE routing picks which expert/shard)
- M28 reuses M14 federation for cross-community rounds
- M31 reuses M30 for evidence-grade emergency claims

---

## 3. File tree additions

```
hearthnet/
β”œβ”€β”€ distributed_inference/       # M26
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ shard.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ pipeline.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ routing.py
β”‚   └── backends/
β”‚       β”œβ”€β”€ petals_like.py
β”‚       └── small_model_layered.py
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€ moe/                         # M27
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ router.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ scorer.py
β”‚   └── human_in_the_loop.py
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€ fedlearn/                    # M28
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ coordinator.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ round.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ lora_diff.py
β”‚   └── aggregation.py
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€ lora_beacons/                # M29 β€” hardware integration; tiny Python surface
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ beacon_bridge.py         # serial protocol to a LoRa USB stick
β”‚   └── policy.py
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€ evidence/                    # M30
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ claim.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ claim_graph.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ provenance.py
β”‚   └── ebkh_bridge.py           # bridge to Christof's EBKH v3+
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€ civil_defense/               # M31
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ profile.py               # THW / DRK / KatS member types
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ audit.py
β”‚   └── nrw_katastrophenschutz.py
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€ transport/
β”‚   └── tensor.py                # X08
β”‚
└── conformance/                 # X09
    β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py
    β”œβ”€β”€ runner.py
    β”œβ”€β”€ suites/
    β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ identity.py
    β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ transport.py
    β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ bus.py
    β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ services.py
    β”‚   └── federation.py
    └── report.py

protocol/                        # M32 β€” separate top-level dir at repo root
β”œβ”€β”€ README.md
β”œβ”€β”€ spec/                        # the protocol spec, decoupled from the impl
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ 00-overview.md           # mirror of CAPABILITY_CONTRACT but
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ 01-identity.md           # implementation-agnostic
β”‚   └── ...
└── governance/
    β”œβ”€β”€ CHANGELOG.md
    β”œβ”€β”€ CONTRIBUTING.md
    └── ROADMAP.md
```

---

## 4. Conventions delta from Phase 2

### 4.1 New `experimental` namespace

A Phase-3 capability MAY be advertised as `experimental.<name>@<ver>`. Mesh nodes default to **not registering** experimental capabilities; the operator must opt in via:

```toml
[policy.research]
enable                = true
enabled_capabilities  = ["experimental.distributed_llm.chat@1.0", "experimental.fedlearn.round.*"]
```

Once a capability is sufficiently proven, it is promoted out of the `experimental.` prefix in a contract bump.

### 4.2 New type aliases

```python
# additions to hearthnet/types.py

ShardID         = str        # "<model_id>:<layer_range>"
ExpertID        = str        # opaque, refers to a routable subsystem
ClaimID         = str        # ULID
RoundID         = str        # fedlearn round identifier (ULID)
LoraBeaconID    = str        # 8-byte hex, hardware-issued
EvidenceLevel   = Literal["unverified","cited","cross_referenced","attested","disputed"]
ExpertKind      = Literal["model","human","service","external"]
```

### 4.3 New constants

```python
# additions to hearthnet/constants.py β€” Phase 3

# Distributed inference (M26)
DISTRIBUTED_MAX_SHARDS_PER_REQUEST  = 16
DISTRIBUTED_SHARD_HEALTH_TIMEOUT_S  = 30
DISTRIBUTED_FALLBACK_TO_LOCAL_AFTER_FAILURES = 2

# MoE routing (M27)
MOE_ROUTER_TOP_K                    = 3
MOE_ROUTER_TRAIN_MIN_EXAMPLES       = 200
MOE_ROUTER_RETRAIN_EVERY_HOURS      = 24

# Federated learning (M28)
FEDLEARN_MAX_ROUND_MINUTES          = 120
FEDLEARN_MIN_PARTICIPANTS           = 3
FEDLEARN_MAX_LORA_RANK              = 64
FEDLEARN_GRAD_CLIP                  = 1.0
FEDLEARN_DP_NOISE_SCALE_DEFAULT     = 0.0    # off by default; off-by-default differential privacy

# Evidence (M30)
EVIDENCE_CLAIM_TTL_DAYS_DEFAULT     = 365
EVIDENCE_MAX_PROVENANCE_DEPTH       = 16

# Civil defence (M31)
CIVDEF_AUDIT_RETENTION_YEARS        = 10
CIVDEF_HEARTBEAT_SECONDS            = 60

# Tensor transport (X08)
TENSOR_CHUNK_BYTES                  = 1_048_576   # 1 MB
TENSOR_FLOW_CONTROL_WINDOW          = 16          # chunks
TENSOR_COMPRESSION_THRESHOLD_BYTES  = 65_536

# LoRa beacons (M29)
LORA_BEACON_PERIOD_SECONDS_DEFAULT  = 600          # 10 minutes
LORA_BEACON_MAX_PAYLOAD_BYTES       = 32
```

---

## 5. Build order (Phase 3)

Phase 3 is not a release; it is a set of long-running tracks. Suggested ordering by independence + value:

| Track | Modules                          | Outcome                                                                       |
|-------|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| A     | X09 Conformance + M32 Standard   | Other people can build HearthNet-compliant nodes                              |
| B     | M30 Evidence / EBKH              | Marketplace claims and emergency posts carry provenance                        |
| C     | M27 MoE Routing (machines only)  | Better answers for free; routes RAG queries to best-suited backend             |
| D     | M27 + M28 (human routing)        | Neighbour gets pinged when their expertise matches                            |
| E     | M28 FedLearn                     | Communities co-train a small LoRA without sharing source data                  |
| F     | X08 + M26 Distributed Inference  | Two anchors jointly serve a 7B model; large models become feasible LAN-wide   |
| G     | M29 LoRa Beacons                 | Resilient "I am alive" pings during regional internet outages                  |
| H     | M31 Civil Defence Pilot          | A real Niederrhein THW Ortsverband uses HearthNet for an exercise              |

Tracks can run in parallel. None of them block the existing Phase-2 system.

---

## 6. Spec versioning

- Capability Contract bumps to **v3.0** but the bump is *additive*. v2 nodes coexist with v3 nodes; experimental capabilities simply aren't seen by v2 nodes.
- The first concrete deliverable of Track A (M32) is to **decouple** the protocol spec from the implementation. After that, the contract has its own version track separate from the Python implementation's version.

---

## 7. Out-of-band documents (Phase 3)

- **RESEARCH_AGENDA.md** β€” the deeper "why" for each module; intended audience: PhD students and grant reviewers
- **GOVERNANCE.md** β€” how spec changes are proposed, reviewed, and accepted; ties into M32
- **ETHICS_REVIEW.md** β€” the framework for evaluating MoE-driven routing-to-humans (M27) and fedlearn-on-personal-data (M28)
- **CIVDEF_AGREEMENT_TEMPLATE.md** β€” the MoU template for a civil-defence pilot

---

## 8. What is NOT in Phase 3

Even with all of Phase 3 done, the following remain explicit non-goals:

- A central directory of communities. There is no "HearthNet.com" listing all communities. Discovery is via word of mouth + DHT + federation. Pushed indefinitely.
- An app store for capabilities. Capabilities are code in the source tree, reviewed by maintainers. Not pluggable at runtime by untrusted code.
- A consensus protocol (Paxos, Raft). Communities do not vote on shared state beyond event-log gossip. Federation does not imply consensus.
- A cryptocurrency / token economy. Not even for fedlearn incentives. Reputational signals only.
- AGI. Even the distributed inference module targets at-most-mid-sized models (7B-class). The thesis is "small models close to people are more useful than large models far away", and Phase 3 doesn't change that.