{ "id": "gemini-pro-2024", "systemName": "Gemini Pro 1.5", "provider": "Google", "version": "gemini-1.5-pro-001", "modality": "multimodal", "evaluationDate": "2024-01-08", "deploymentContext": "Production API", "evaluator": "Google DeepMind Safety Team", "selectedCategories": [ "language-communication", "problem-solving", "creativity-innovation", "learning-memory", "social-intelligence", "perception-vision", "metacognition", "physical-manipulation", "robotic-intelligence", "harmful-content", "bias-fairness", "information-integrity", "privacy-data", "security-robustness", "dangerous-capabilities", "human-ai-interaction", "governance-accountability", "value-chain", "environmental-impact", "economic-displacement" ], "overallStats": { "totalApplicable": 20, "capabilityApplicable": 9, "riskApplicable": 11, "completenessScore": 85, "strongCategories": [ "language-communication", "problem-solving", "perception-vision", "learning-memory", "information-integrity", "privacy-data", "security-robustness" ], "adequateCategories": [ "social-intelligence", "creativity-innovation", "metacognition", "harmful-content", "bias-fairness", "human-ai-interaction" ], "weakCategories": [ "physical-manipulation", "robotic-intelligence", "dangerous-capabilities", "governance-accountability" ], "insufficientCategories": [ "environmental-impact", "economic-displacement", "value-chain" ], "priorityAreas": [ "physical-manipulation", "robotic-intelligence", "governance-accountability", "environmental-impact" ] }, "categoryEvaluations": { "language-communication": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "yes", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "yes", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B3": "yes", "B4": "yes", "B6": "yes", "B5": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-yf0a7e", "url": "https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/", "description": "Gemini Pro 1.5 language understanding benchmark results", "sourceType": "external", "benchmarkName": "MMLU, HellaSwag, ARC, GSM8K, HumanEval", "metrics": "Accuracy, reasoning score, multilingual performance", "score": "83.7% on MMLU, 87.8% on GSM8K, 71.9% on HumanEval", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ], "A2": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-pyfyty", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/", "description": "AI safety evaluation meeting Google's responsible AI principles", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "", "metrics": "", "score": "", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ], "A3": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-xbyscm", "url": "https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/gemini/gemini_1_report.pdf", "description": "Comparative analysis of Gemini Pro vs other large language models", "sourceType": "external", "benchmarkName": "", "metrics": "", "score": "", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ], "A4": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-7fr5gk", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/safety/", "description": "Adversarial robustness and safety evaluation", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "", "metrics": "", "score": "", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ], "A5": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-c7m842", "url": "https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/monitoring", "description": "Production monitoring and quality metrics", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "", "metrics": "", "score": "", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ], "A6": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-561wm4", "url": "https://ai.google/research/data-contamination/", "description": "Training data contamination analysis and mitigation", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "", "metrics": "", "score": "", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-ygjtgb", "url": "https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/", "description": "Comprehensive documentation of Gemini's language capabilities", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Technical Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B2": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-41o4ou", "url": "https://github.com/google-deepmind/gemini-evals", "description": "Evaluation frameworks and methodologies", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Code Repository", "customFields": {} } ], "B5": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-e16ijm", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/", "description": "External expert review of language capabilities and safety", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Safety Assessment", "customFields": {} }, { "id": "proc-meem78cz-30vk8b", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/safety-process/", "description": "Continuous evaluation and safety improvement process", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Process Documentation", "customFields": {} } ], "B6": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-xxw46h", "url": "https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/gemini/gemini_1_report.pdf", "description": "Transparent reporting with statistical analysis", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Technical Report", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Gemini Pro 1.5 demonstrates strong multilingual capabilities and excellent long-context understanding. Particularly effective at processing and reasoning over extended documents and conversations." }, "problem-solving": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "yes", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-d0571l", "url": "https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/", "description": "Mathematical and logical reasoning benchmark evaluation", "sourceType": "external", "benchmarkName": "GSM8K, MATH, HumanEval, MBPP, BigBench", "metrics": "Problem-solving accuracy, reasoning quality, code correctness", "score": "87.8% on GSM8K, 32.6% on MATH, 71.9% on HumanEval", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-8zdde9", "url": "https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/", "description": "Problem-solving capability evaluation framework", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Technical Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B2": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-qzilny", "url": "", "description": "Not applicable for this evaluation (replication package not provided in the demo data).", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-yik2ru", "url": "", "description": "Not applicable - no external domain expert review captured for this category in the dummy data.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-em3jg5", "url": "", "description": "Not applicable - figures/uncertainty not included in this sample.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B5": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-xe6xs1", "url": "", "description": "Not applicable - standards mapping not performed for this sample.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B6": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-x10u3r", "url": "", "description": "Not applicable - no formal retest procedures documented in this sample.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Strong mathematical reasoning capabilities with good performance on coding tasks. Effective at breaking down complex problems into manageable steps." }, "perception-vision": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "no", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "yes", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-pz8alo", "url": "https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/", "description": "Multimodal vision capabilities evaluation", "sourceType": "external", "benchmarkName": "VQA, COCO Captions, TextVQA, ChartQA, DocVQA", "metrics": "Visual understanding accuracy, multimodal reasoning score", "score": "82.3% on VQA, 88.1% on COCO Captions, 74.6% on TextVQA", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-tw92aj", "url": "https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/", "description": "Vision and multimodal capability evaluation methodology", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Technical Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-45fz4u", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-1ccq12", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Excellent multimodal capabilities with strong performance on visual understanding tasks. Particularly effective at document analysis and chart interpretation." }, "learning-memory": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "no", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-2vsuxh", "url": "https://deepmind.google/research/long-context/", "description": "Long-context learning and memory evaluation", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "Long-context benchmarks, few-shot learning tasks, memory retention tests", "metrics": "Context utilization, learning efficiency, memory accuracy", "score": "89% long-context accuracy, 0.87 few-shot learning coefficient", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-qle6z4", "url": "https://deepmind.google/research/long-context/", "description": "Learning and memory capability assessment", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Research Paper", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-bpfnma", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-3byxyj", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Exceptional long-context capabilities with 1M+ token context window. Strong performance in utilizing extended context for learning and memory tasks." }, "social-intelligence": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "no", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-crduio", "url": "https://ai.google/research/social-intelligence/", "description": "Social intelligence and emotional understanding evaluation", "sourceType": "external", "benchmarkName": "ToMi, Social IQa, EmoBench, cultural competency tests", "metrics": "Theory of mind accuracy, social reasoning score, cultural sensitivity", "score": "79% on ToMi, 84% on Social IQa, 7.8/10 cultural sensitivity", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-wofoyi", "url": "https://ai.google/research/social-intelligence/", "description": "Social intelligence evaluation framework", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Research Paper", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-oo8lzj", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-h7ta1o", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Good social intelligence with strong cultural awareness. Effective at understanding social contexts and providing culturally appropriate responses." }, "creativity-innovation": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "no", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-6ogwp3", "url": "https://deepmind.google/research/creativity/", "description": "Creative capability evaluation across multiple domains", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "Creative writing tasks, visual creativity, innovative problem-solving", "metrics": "Originality score, creative quality, innovation index", "score": "8.1/10 originality, 8.7/10 creative quality", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-z2kanr", "url": "https://deepmind.google/research/creativity/", "description": "Creative capability evaluation methodology", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Research Paper", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-k88hjw", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-ziy3s4", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Strong creative capabilities enhanced by multimodal training. Effective at generating creative content across text and visual domains." }, "metacognition": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "no", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-cj6bxg", "url": "https://ai.google/research/metacognition/", "description": "Metacognitive capability and self-awareness evaluation", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "Confidence calibration, uncertainty quantification, self-reflection tasks", "metrics": "Calibration error, metacognitive accuracy, uncertainty correlation", "score": "ECE: 0.14, Metacognitive accuracy: 0.79", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-w42w4k", "url": "https://ai.google/research/metacognition/", "description": "Metacognitive capability evaluation framework", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Research Paper", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-6ziy68", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-6plsk1", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Reasonable metacognitive abilities with room for improvement in confidence calibration. Can express uncertainty but calibration varies across domains." }, "physical-manipulation": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "no", "A2": "no", "A3": "no", "A4": "no", "A5": "no", "A6": "no" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "no", "B5": [ "no" ], "B6": "no", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": {}, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-4le3lu", "url": "https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/", "description": "Physical manipulation limitations documentation", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Technical Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-qqnjvl", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-n0a4ke", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Gemini Pro 1.5 has no physical manipulation capabilities as a language and vision model. This category is not applicable." }, "robotic-intelligence": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "no", "A2": "no", "A3": "no", "A4": "no", "A5": "no", "A6": "no" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "no", "B5": [ "no" ], "B6": "no", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": {}, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-ik1ic1", "url": "https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/", "description": "Robotic intelligence limitations documentation", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Technical Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-em3ev3", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-as8b7w", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Gemini Pro 1.5 lacks robotic embodiment and autonomous physical capabilities. This category is not applicable." }, "harmful-content": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "yes", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "yes", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-s7w04q", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/safety/", "description": "Comprehensive harmful content generation evaluation", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "Google AI safety benchmarks, RealToxicityPrompts, HarmBench", "metrics": "Harmful content rate, safety compliance score, refusal accuracy", "score": "0.15% harmful content rate, 97.2% safety compliance", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-1dlk0d", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/safety/", "description": "Harmful content generation risk assessment", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Safety Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-z1f6hz", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-axsmda", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Strong safety measures with low harmful content generation rates. Comprehensive safety filtering and content policy enforcement." }, "bias-fairness": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "yes", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-0swplf", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/fairness/", "description": "Comprehensive bias evaluation across demographic groups", "sourceType": "external", "benchmarkName": "Winogender, CrowS-Pairs, BOLD, BBQ, fairness benchmarks", "metrics": "Bias score, demographic parity, representation fairness", "score": "12% bias reduction vs baseline, 0.18 stereotype score", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-41jwfa", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/fairness/", "description": "Bias and fairness evaluation framework", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Research Paper", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-xquirq", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-4x1mr7", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Good progress in bias reduction with ongoing fairness improvements. Comprehensive bias testing across multiple demographic dimensions." }, "information-integrity": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "yes", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "yes", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-g7munw", "url": "https://ai.google/research/truthfulness/", "description": "Factual accuracy and information integrity evaluation", "sourceType": "external", "benchmarkName": "TruthfulQA, FEVER, HaluEval, FActScore", "metrics": "Truthfulness rate, hallucination frequency, factual accuracy", "score": "81% truthfulness on TruthfulQA, 11% hallucination rate", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-p1ff7y", "url": "https://ai.google/research/truthfulness/", "description": "Information integrity evaluation methodology", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Research Paper", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-3fh4uv", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-7j3dzo", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Strong commitment to factual accuracy with ongoing improvements in hallucination reduction. Integration with Google's knowledge systems enhances information reliability." }, "privacy-data": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "yes", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "yes", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-krg646", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/privacy/", "description": "Privacy protection and data security evaluation", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "Privacy leakage tests, membership inference attacks, PII extraction tests", "metrics": "Privacy leakage rate, MIA success rate, PII detection accuracy", "score": "2.1% MIA success rate, <0.03% PII leakage", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-5cqmfl", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/privacy/", "description": "Privacy and data protection evaluation framework", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Privacy Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-fqu4bx", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-pq3i3o", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Strong privacy protections with comprehensive data governance frameworks. Low rates of privacy leakage and effective PII protection mechanisms." }, "security-robustness": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "yes", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-8esxe6", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/security/", "description": "Security and robustness evaluation against various attacks", "sourceType": "external", "benchmarkName": "Adversarial attacks, prompt injection, jailbreaking attempts", "metrics": "Attack success rate, robustness score, security compliance", "score": "9.1% jailbreak success rate, 91% robustness score", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-wepcad", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/security/", "description": "Security and robustness evaluation methodology", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Security Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-sz13fx", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-6ao3xl", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Good security robustness with comprehensive security measures. Ongoing improvements in adversarial attack resistance and system security." }, "dangerous-capabilities": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "yes", "A3": "no", "A4": "yes", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "no", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-1prl2l", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/dangerous-capabilities/", "description": "Dangerous capabilities evaluation including CBRN and dual-use assessment", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "CBRN evaluation, dual-use technology assessment", "metrics": "Dangerous information generation rate, misuse potential score", "score": "1.2% dangerous information generation, moderate misuse potential", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-crqei1", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/dangerous-capabilities/", "description": "Dangerous capabilities risk assessment", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Safety Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-pi5d28", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-svb20f", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Moderate performance in dangerous capability prevention with room for improvement. Ongoing work to strengthen safeguards against misuse." }, "human-ai-interaction": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "no", "A3": "yes", "A4": "yes", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-5o1cws", "url": "https://ai.google/research/human-ai-interaction/", "description": "Human-AI interaction safety and effectiveness evaluation", "sourceType": "external", "benchmarkName": "Trust calibration, helpfulness assessment, user experience metrics", "metrics": "Trust calibration score, helpfulness rating, user satisfaction", "score": "0.76 trust calibration, 8.4/10 helpfulness, 85% user satisfaction", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-qoxda7", "url": "https://ai.google/research/human-ai-interaction/", "description": "Human-AI interaction evaluation framework", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Research Paper", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-xu23jr", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-hd1eh9", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Good human-AI interaction design with focus on user experience. Strong helpfulness ratings with reasonable trust calibration." }, "governance-accountability": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "yes", "A3": "yes", "A4": "no", "A5": "no", "A6": "yes" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "yes", "B5": [ "yes", "no" ], "B6": "yes", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-5ajh97", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/governance/", "description": "Governance and accountability framework evaluation", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "Transparency metrics, accountability measures, governance compliance", "metrics": "Documentation completeness, oversight effectiveness, compliance score", "score": "84% documentation completeness, moderate governance compliance", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-e9fhji", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/governance/", "description": "Governance and accountability evaluation framework", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Governance Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-a2319v", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-hti1de", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Developing governance framework with room for improvement in transparency and accountability mechanisms. Ongoing work to strengthen oversight processes." }, "environmental-impact": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "yes", "A2": "no", "A3": "no", "A4": "no", "A5": "no", "A6": "no" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "no", "B5": [ "no" ], "B6": "no", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": { "A1": [ { "id": "bench-meem78cz-jp1dd2", "url": "https://sustainability.google/", "description": "Environmental impact assessment and carbon footprint analysis", "sourceType": "internal", "benchmarkName": "Carbon footprint calculation, energy efficiency metrics", "metrics": "CO2 emissions per token, energy consumption, sustainability score", "score": "0.0018 kg CO2 per 1000 tokens", "version": "", "taskVariants": "", "customFields": {} } ] }, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-fjdks2", "url": "https://sustainability.google/", "description": "Environmental impact evaluation methodology", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Sustainability Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-9sg4wx", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-s31gg8", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Significant environmental impact with ongoing sustainability efforts. Google's commitment to carbon neutrality helps offset some environmental costs." }, "economic-displacement": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "no", "A2": "no", "A3": "no", "A4": "no", "A5": "no", "A6": "no" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "no", "B5": [ "no" ], "B6": "no", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": {}, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-4ygvzz", "url": "https://ai.google/research/economic-impact/", "description": "Economic displacement impact assessment", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Economic Impact Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-0xxlz8", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-0kfhou", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Limited evaluation of economic displacement impacts. Need for more comprehensive analysis of job market effects and transition support requirements." }, "value-chain": { "benchmarkAnswers": { "A1": "no", "A2": "no", "A3": "no", "A4": "no", "A5": "no", "A6": "no" }, "processAnswers": { "B1": "yes", "B2": "no", "B5": [ "no" ], "B6": "no", "B3": "N/A", "B4": "N/A" }, "benchmarkSources": {}, "processSources": { "B1": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-dt0byu", "url": "https://ai.google/responsibility/supply-chain/", "description": "Value chain and supply chain risk assessment", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "Supply Chain Report", "customFields": {} } ], "B3": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-t0wb35", "url": "", "description": "B3: Not applicable — documentation or process evidence not captured for this evaluation.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ], "B4": [ { "id": "proc-meem78cz-puzovm", "url": "", "description": "B4: Not applicable — figures/uncertainty plots are not included in this report.", "sourceType": "", "documentType": "N/A", "customFields": {} } ] }, "additionalAspects": "Limited transparency in value chain evaluation. Ongoing work to improve supply chain risk assessment and ethical sourcing practices." } } }