{ "benchmark_card": { "benchmark_details": { "name": "Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU)", "overview": "MMLU is a multiple-choice question-answering benchmark that measures a text model's multitask accuracy across 57 distinct tasks. It is designed to test a wide range of knowledge and problem-solving abilities, covering diverse academic and professional subjects from elementary to advanced levels.", "data_type": "text", "domains": [ "STEM", "humanities", "social sciences" ], "languages": [ "English" ], "similar_benchmarks": [ "GLUE", "SuperGLUE" ], "resources": [ "https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300", "https://huggingface.co/datasets/cais/mmlu", "https://storage.googleapis.com/crfm-helm-public/benchmark_output/releases/v0.4.0/groups/core_scenarios.json", "https://storage.googleapis.com/crfm-helm-public/lite/benchmark_output/releases/v1.13.0/groups/core_scenarios.json" ] }, "purpose_and_intended_users": { "goal": "To bridge the gap between the wide-ranging knowledge models acquire during pretraining and existing evaluation measures by assessing models across a diverse set of academic and professional subjects.", "audience": [ "Researchers analyzing model capabilities and identifying shortcomings" ], "tasks": [ "Multiple-choice question answering" ], "limitations": "Models exhibit lopsided performance, frequently do not know when they are wrong, and have near-random accuracy on some socially important subjects like morality and law.", "out_of_scope_uses": [ "Not specified" ] }, "data": { "source": "The dataset is an original source with expert-generated questions.", "size": "The dataset contains over 100,000 examples, with a test split of 14,042 examples, a validation split of 1,531 examples, a dev split of 285 examples, and an auxiliary training split of 99,842 examples.", "format": "parquet", "annotation": "The dataset has no additional annotations; each question provides the correct answer as a class label (A, B, C, or D)." }, "methodology": { "methods": [ "Models are evaluated exclusively in zero-shot and few-shot settings to measure knowledge acquired during pretraining." ], "metrics": [ "MMLU (accuracy)" ], "calculation": "The overall score is an average accuracy across the 57 tasks.", "interpretation": "Higher scores indicate better performance. Near random-chance accuracy indicates weak performance. The very largest GPT-3 model improved over random chance by almost 20 percentage points on average, but models still need substantial improvements to reach expert-level accuracy.", "baseline_results": "Paper baselines: Most recent models have near random-chance accuracy. The very largest GPT-3 model improved over random chance by almost 20 percentage points on average. EEE results: Yi 34B scored 0.6500, Anthropic-LM v4-s3 52B scored 0.4810. The mean score across 2 evaluated models is 0.5655.", "validation": "Not specified" }, "ethical_and_legal_considerations": { "privacy_and_anonymity": "Not specified", "data_licensing": "MIT License", "consent_procedures": "Not specified", "compliance_with_regulations": "Not specified" }, "possible_risks": [ { "category": "Over- or under-reliance", "description": [ "In AI-assisted decision-making tasks, reliance measures how much a person trusts (and potentially acts on) a model's output. Over-reliance occurs when a person puts too much trust in a model, accepting a model's output when the model's output is likely incorrect. Under-reliance is the opposite, where the person doesn't trust the model but should." ], "url": "https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/watsonx/saas?topic=SSYOK8/wsj/ai-risk-atlas/over-or-under-reliance.html" }, { "category": "Unrepresentative data", "description": [ "Unrepresentative data occurs when the training or fine-tuning data is not sufficiently representative of the underlying population or does not measure the phenomenon of interest. Synthetic data might not fully capture the complexity and nuances of real-world data. Causes include possible limitations in the seed data quality, biases in generation methods, or inadequate domain knowledge. Thus, AI models might struggle to generalize effectively to real-world scenarios." ], "url": "https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/watsonx/saas?topic=SSYOK8/wsj/ai-risk-atlas/unrepresentative-data.html" }, { "category": "Data bias", "description": [ "Historical and societal biases might be present in data that are used to train and fine-tune models. Biases can also be inherited from seed data or exacerbated by synthetic data generation methods." ], "url": "https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/watsonx/saas?topic=SSYOK8/wsj/ai-risk-atlas/data-bias.html" }, { "category": "Lack of data transparency", "description": [ "Lack of data transparency might be due to insufficient documentation of training or tuning dataset details, including synthetic data generation.\u00a0" ], "url": "https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/watsonx/saas?topic=SSYOK8/wsj/ai-risk-atlas/lack-of-data-transparency.html" }, { "category": "Improper usage", "description": [ "Improper usage occurs when a model is used for a purpose that it was not originally designed for." ], "url": "https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/watsonx/saas?topic=SSYOK8/wsj/ai-risk-atlas/improper-usage.html" } ], "flagged_fields": {}, "missing_fields": [ "purpose_and_intended_users.out_of_scope_uses", "methodology.validation", "ethical_and_legal_considerations.privacy_and_anonymity", "ethical_and_legal_considerations.consent_procedures", "ethical_and_legal_considerations.compliance_with_regulations" ], "card_info": { "created_at": "2026-03-17T13:14:49.605975", "llm": "deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2" } } }