DotDot LoomR&D
Dot Loom Conductor 14B

Learned control for multi-model inference.

A Mistral 14B LoRA adapter trained to choose one, two, or three model calls under explicit quality, cost, latency, and verification constraints.

Held-out evaluation

What changed after training

The frozen test split contains 1,200 cases from eight task families absent from training and validation. Deterministic Loom is the operational baseline.

Exact-plan match
adapter + guard
90.8%
Lift over
deterministic Loom
+11.5 pp
Paired bootstrap
95% CI
9.4 to 13.7
Unsafe
under-escalation
0.0%
Budget violations
caught by guard
13 / 13
Held-out benchmark comparing deterministic Loom with the Dot-trained adapter plus runtime guard

The raw base checkpoint is a capacity control, not a comparison with an instruction-tuned assistant. Full lane results, raw predictions, and scoring receipts are linked below.

Reference policy

Inspect constrained routing

The scorer enumerates every valid writer, reviewer, and finalizer assignment, rejects over-budget plans, and ranks the remaining candidates using the disclosed utility function.

Edit the three worker profiles
Reference selection
Credits
P95 latency
Estimated quality
Estimated pass rate

Reason codes

Machine-readable plan

PolicyWriterReviewerFinalizerCreditsLatencyQualityPass rateUtility
Evidence package

Weights, data, raw predictions, receipts, checksums, and limitations are published together.

The study measures routing-plan generation. It does not establish universal model rankings or final code correctness.