Instructions to use Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3 with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Local Apps Settings
- Unsloth Studio
How to use Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3 with Unsloth Studio:
Install Unsloth Studio (macOS, Linux, WSL)
curl -fsSL https://unsloth.ai/install.sh | sh # Run unsloth studio unsloth studio -H 0.0.0.0 -p 8888 # Then open http://localhost:8888 in your browser # Search for Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3 to start chatting
Install Unsloth Studio (Windows)
irm https://unsloth.ai/install.ps1 | iex # Run unsloth studio unsloth studio -H 0.0.0.0 -p 8888 # Then open http://localhost:8888 in your browser # Search for Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3 to start chatting
Using HuggingFace Spaces for Unsloth
# No setup required # Open https://huggingface.co/spaces/unsloth/studio in your browser # Search for Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3 to start chatting
Load model with FastModel
pip install unsloth from unsloth import FastModel model, tokenizer = FastModel.from_pretrained( model_name="Jackrong/Qwopus3.5-27B-v3", max_seq_length=2048, )
Anyone successfully reproduced this model with Jackrong's GitHub notebook? I'm getting results below baseline and wondering if it's just me.
The shared notebook (Jackrong's LLM Fine-tuning Guide) has been incredibly helpful for learning how to post-train an LLM for improved coding performance. I downloaded Jackrong's trained/reference model and confirmed it does outperform the baseline (Qwen3.5-27B).
However, when I followed the notebook (Qwopus3.5 27B SFT Google Colab) to train my own model, the results came in below baseline β so I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced the same issue.
Below is a comparison between the baseline, the model I trained using Jackrong's notebook, and Jackrong's published model.
My setup was nearly identical to the notebook, with one exception to avoid OOM: I used PER_DEV_BS=4, GRAD_ACCUM=9 instead of PER_DEV_BS=6, GRAD_ACCUM=6. My understanding is that this should only affect training speed (since the effective batch size remains the same) without significantly impacting model quality.
