Interview request: genAI evaluation & documentation

#10
by evatang - opened

Hi! We are researchers from Carnegie Mellon University conducting a study on the evaluation and documentation practices of generative AI developers. Given the popularity and success of your model, we're particularly interested in learning from your team's experiences.
Our study aims to:
Understand current practices in Gen AI model evaluation and reporting
Identify challenges faced by developers in these areas
Explore potential improvements in evaluation and documentation processes
We're seeking participants with hands-on experience in these aspects of Gen AI development. Would any members of your team be interested in participating in a (compensated) interview to share their insights?
For more details about the study and to express interest, here is our recruitment page: https://forms.gle/fbn4734YxrRg6mkBA. Also happy to answer any questions you may have.

How does the model handle cold cache queries compared to warm cache ones? Are there noticeable performance differences or degradation in response quality when serving consecutive requests without preloading context? Also, have you observed any particular quirks with specific prompt templates that could affect evaluation consistency?

Sign up or log in to comment