Has anyone tested tool calls and is this more instruction-tuned driven?

#5
by Mk2Oracle - opened

Has anyone given a gander to this model with tool calls? qwen goes into a loop once it fails a tool call.

Is this model more instruction tuned or is it just purely saving tokens (which is good)

I used opencode-cli/kilcode-cli, and the tool calling seems to be working properly. What agent are you using (and is it up to date?)

Upon reflection, this awesome finetuning does indeed yield fewer tokens per thought. Sometimes the thought process reaches the 8192 limit I set in llama.cpp, but this is relatively rare. It happened about twice in 8 hours of coding.

I personally set presence penalty of 0.2 since qwen 3.5 27b and even if they removed the recommendation for 3.6 27b I still used it after having a few loops issues, and always stuck to it since then, I never had any more loop for months now, maybe worth giving a try for this model too? (I still didn't try it (thinkingcap) in agentic context though)

Sign up or log in to comment