Datasets:
scenario_id string | ai_misuse_capability float64 | attacker_scale float64 | exploit_chain_complexity float64 | infrastructure_dependency_depth float64 | service_outage_hours int64 | economic_loss_index float64 | incident_detection_latency_days int64 | patch_coordination_lag_days int64 | government_response_lag_days int64 | public_trust_index float64 | regulatory_pressure_score float64 | buffer_infra_redundancy float64 | buffer_response_capacity float64 | cascade_severity_score float64 | label_cascade_event int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYB-001 | 0.28 | 0.3 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 6 | 0.18 | 5 | 12 | 18 | 0.72 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.33 | 0 |
CYB-002 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 72 | 0.74 | 14 | 38 | 52 | 0.34 | 0.82 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.92 | 1 |
CYB-003 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.5 | 0.62 | 18 | 0.34 | 8 | 20 | 29 | 0.6 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.6 | 0.55 | 0 |
CYB-004 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 96 | 0.82 | 18 | 47 | 61 | 0.28 | 0.9 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.96 | 1 |
CYB-005 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 36 | 0.49 | 10 | 27 | 40 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.46 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0 |
CYB-006 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 4 | 0.12 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 0.76 | 0.26 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.28 | 0 |
CYB-007 | 0.92 | 0.9 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 120 | 0.9 | 21 | 55 | 70 | 0.2 | 0.94 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.99 | 1 |
CYB-008 | 0.47 | 0.5 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 22 | 0.38 | 9 | 22 | 32 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0 |
CYB-009 | 0.8 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 80 | 0.78 | 16 | 42 | 58 | 0.31 | 0.86 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.94 | 1 |
What this repo does
This dataset tests whether a model can detect a cross-domain cascade where AI-enabled cyber pressure propagates into infrastructure outages and economic disruption.
You provide structured signals describing:
- AI misuse capability and attacker scale
- exploit chain complexity and infrastructure dependency depth
- detection and patch coordination lag
- outage duration and economic loss pressure
- trust, regulation, and buffer capacity
The model predicts whether the scenario crosses into a cascade event.
Core cascade
Four interacting systems:
AI misuse
- ai_misuse_capability
- attacker_scale
Cyber pathway
- exploit_chain_complexity
- incident_detection_latency_days
Infrastructure impact
- infrastructure_dependency_depth
- service_outage_hours
Economic and policy feedback
- economic_loss_index
- government_response_lag_days
Prediction target
Target column:
- label_cascade_event
Meaning:
- 0 = disruption remains containable
- 1 = cross-system cascade propagates across infrastructure and economy
Row structure
Each row is a scenario snapshot.
Key columns:
- ai_misuse_capability
- attacker_scale
- exploit_chain_complexity
- infrastructure_dependency_depth
- service_outage_hours
- economic_loss_index
- incident_detection_latency_days
- patch_coordination_lag_days
- government_response_lag_days
- public_trust_index
- regulatory_pressure_score
- buffer_infra_redundancy
- buffer_response_capacity
- cascade_severity_score
Files
data/train.csv
10-line labeled sampledata/tester.csv
10-line labeled samplescorer.py
Binary metrics and confusion matrix
Evaluation
Run:
python scorer.py --gold data/tester.csv --pred your_predictions.csv
Outputs:
- accuracy
- precision
- recall
- f1
- confusion matrix
License
MIT
This dataset identifies a measurable coupling pattern associated with systemic instability. The sample demonstrates the geometry. Production-scale data determines operational exposure.
What Production Deployment Enables • 50K–1M row datasets calibrated to real operational patterns • Pair, triadic, and quad coupling analysis • Real-time coherence monitoring • Early warning before cascade events • Collapse surface and recovery window modeling • Integration and implementation support Small samples reveal structure. Scale reveals consequence.
Enterprise & Research Collaboration Clarus develops production-scale coherence monitoring infrastructure for critical systems across healthcare, finance, infrastructure, and regulatory domains. For dataset expansion, custom coherence scorers, or deployment architecture: team@clarusinvariant.com
Instability is detectable. Governance determines whether it propagates.
- Downloads last month
- 17