Datasets:
scenario_id stringlengths 9 9 | oxygen_requirement int64 0 3 | resp_rate int64 18 31 | map int64 63 83 | vasopressor_requirement stringclasses 4
values | lactate float64 1.1 5.2 | urine_output int64 10 72 | mental_status stringclasses 3
values | support_escalation_trend stringclasses 2
values | reserve_loss_trend stringclasses 4
values | label int64 0 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
train_001 | 0 | 18 | 82 | none | 1.2 | 70 | baseline | stable | none | 0 |
train_002 | 0 | 19 | 80 | none | 1.4 | 65 | baseline | stable | none | 0 |
train_003 | 1 | 20 | 78 | none | 1.6 | 60 | baseline | stable | mild | 0 |
train_004 | 0 | 18 | 81 | low | 1.5 | 62 | baseline | stable | mild | 0 |
train_005 | 1 | 21 | 76 | low | 1.8 | 55 | baseline | stable | mild | 0 |
train_006 | 1 | 23 | 74 | low | 2.2 | 45 | baseline | rising | mild | 1 |
train_007 | 1 | 24 | 72 | low | 2.5 | 40 | mild_confusion | rising | moderate | 1 |
train_008 | 2 | 24 | 71 | low | 2.7 | 38 | baseline | rising | moderate | 1 |
train_009 | 2 | 25 | 70 | moderate | 3 | 34 | mild_confusion | rising | moderate | 1 |
train_010 | 1 | 24 | 72 | moderate | 2.8 | 36 | mild_confusion | stable | moderate | 1 |
train_011 | 2 | 27 | 68 | moderate | 3.6 | 25 | confused | rising | severe | 2 |
train_012 | 3 | 29 | 66 | moderate | 4.1 | 20 | confused | rising | severe | 2 |
train_013 | 3 | 30 | 64 | high | 4.8 | 15 | confused | rising | severe | 2 |
train_014 | 2 | 28 | 67 | high | 4.3 | 18 | confused | rising | severe | 2 |
train_015 | 3 | 31 | 63 | high | 5.2 | 10 | confused | rising | severe | 2 |
train_016 | 0 | 18 | 83 | none | 1.1 | 72 | baseline | stable | none | 0 |
train_017 | 1 | 22 | 75 | low | 2.1 | 48 | baseline | rising | mild | 1 |
train_018 | 2 | 26 | 69 | moderate | 3.2 | 30 | mild_confusion | rising | moderate | 1 |
train_019 | 3 | 30 | 65 | high | 4.9 | 14 | confused | rising | severe | 2 |
train_020 | 2 | 27 | 68 | high | 4 | 22 | confused | stable | severe | 2 |
What this dataset does
This dataset tests whether a model can estimate how close a patient is to a clinical collapse boundary.
The task is not to identify whether collapse has already occurred.
The task is to classify the remaining margin before ordinary monitoring or support may no longer be enough.
Core stability idea
Clinical deterioration often appears first as margin loss.
A patient may still have acceptable observations while support needs rise and reserve falls.
This dataset tests whether a model can detect safe margin, narrowing margin, or critical boundary proximity.
Prediction target
The label column has three classes.
Label 0 means safe margin.
Label 1 means narrowing margin.
Label 2 means critical boundary proximity.
Row structure
Each row contains:
- scenario_id
- oxygen_requirement
- resp_rate
- map
- vasopressor_requirement
- lactate
- urine_output
- mental_status
- support_escalation_trend
- reserve_loss_trend
- label
oxygen_requirement uses:
- 0 = room air or minimal support
- 1 = low oxygen requirement
- 2 = high oxygen requirement
- 3 = near respiratory boundary
vasopressor_requirement uses:
- none
- low
- moderate
- high
mental_status uses:
- baseline
- mild_confusion
- confused
support_escalation_trend uses:
- stable
- rising
reserve_loss_trend uses:
- none
- mild
- moderate
- severe
Evaluation
Submissions must contain:
scenario_id,prediction
test_001,0
test_002,1
test_003,2
Run:
python scorer.py predictions.csv
Optional truth path:
python scorer.py predictions.csv data/test.csv
The scorer reports:
Accuracy
Macro precision
Macro recall
Macro F1
Confusion matrix
Structural Note
This dataset tests margin awareness.
It is designed to prevent shortcut logic based only on current vital signs or single support variables.
The intended reasoning requires integration across respiratory load, circulatory support, perfusion, urine output, cognition, support escalation, and reserve loss.
The dataset does not expose the hidden rationale behind each label.
License
MIT
- Downloads last month
- 48