uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 5
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 3
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_time_entry_narrative stringclasses 10
values | input_time_hours float64 2 12 | input_case_stage stringclasses 7
values | input_task_category stringclasses 10
values | input_value_delivered_signal stringclasses 10
values | input_duplication_or_bloat_signals stringclasses 6
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 3
values | early_window_months int64 0 0 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BL-TR-001 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Drafted particulars of claim and reviewed key contract clauses | 4.5 | Pleadings | Drafting | High. Filing-ready pleading produced | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clear task, reasonable time, clear value at case stage. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-002 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Worked on case | 6 | Pleadings | General | Unclear value | Vague narrative | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Narrative too vague to justify time or value. | write_down_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-003 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Reviewed disclosure set for relevance and privilege and prepared privilege log | 5 | Disclosure | Disclosure review | Medium-high. Privilege log delivered | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Task and output clear, time plausible. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-004 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Email exchange with client re status | 3.5 | Pre-action | Client comms | Low. Routine update | Excessive time | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Time disproportionate to task value. | write_down_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-005 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Prepared witness statement outline and reviewed prior statements for consistency | 2.8 | Witness prep | Witness work | Medium. Draft outline produced | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Aligned with stage and clear deliverable. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-006 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Reviewed documents | 7 | Disclosure | Review | Unclear. No scope stated | Bloat. No custodian or issue link | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | No scope or issue linkage makes entry non-defensible. | write_down_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-007 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Attended case management conference and drafted note with action plan | 2 | Case management | Hearing | Medium. Decisions captured and tasks assigned | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clear task and outcome for short time. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-008 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Research | 8 | Pleadings | Research | Unclear. No issue identified | Duplication. Same research billed by two fee earners | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Vague and duplicative research appears excessive. | costs_cut_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-009 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | US | State | 2,019 | Tort | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Analysed medical records and drafted schedule of loss | 3.2 | Quantum | Damages | High. Schedule drafted | No duplication | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Clear output and proportional time. | recoverable | 0 | Synthetic |
BL-TR-010 | legal-billing-narrative-task-value-coherence-v0.1 | US | State | 2,019 | Tort | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Prepare for trial | 12 | Pre-trial | Preparation | Unclear. No tasks listed | Bloat. Multiple similar entries same day | Is billing entry coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Non-specific and likely duplicative at high time volume. | costs_cut_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.