Datasets:

ClarusC64
/

legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1

uid string	dataset_id string	jurisdiction string	court_level string	year int64	area_of_law string	pillar string	series string	input_costs_budget_summary string	input_matter_phase_plan_summary string	input_spend_to_date_summary string	input_variance_analysis_summary string	input_client_approval_record_summary string	input_court_budget_rules_summary string	input_red_flags string	question string	ground_truth_label string	ground_truth_rationale string	outcome_signal string	early_window_months int64	source_citation string
CBU-TR-001	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	High Court	2,023	Civil Litigation	adjudicative_process	2C	Approved budget £120k; phases pleaded case, CMC, disclosure, witness, experts, trial	Phase plan aligns with budgeted phases and dates	Spend £38k by disclosure start	Variance +5 percent explained by extra interlocutory application	Client approved variance and revised forecast in writing	CPR costs budgeting followed; revisions documented	null	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Tracked variance and approval recorded.	stable	0	Synthetic
CBU-TR-002	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	High Court	2,023	Civil Litigation	adjudicative_process	2C	Approved budget £120k by phase	Phase plan exists	Spend £75k before disclosure complete	No variance analysis	No approval record	CPR budgeting applies	Spend spike; no approval; no analysis	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Large drift with no analysis or consent.	fee_dispute_risk	0	Synthetic
CBU-TR-003	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	High Court	2,022	Construction	adjudicative_process	2C	Budget £300k incl experts £90k	Expert-heavy plan clear	Spend £110k at experts midpoint	Variance +12 percent due to extra expert meeting; forecast updated	Client approved increased expert cap	CPR budgeting and Precedent H updated	null	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Variance managed and documented.	stable	0	Synthetic
CBU-TR-004	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	High Court	2,022	Construction	adjudicative_process	2C	Budget £300k incl experts £90k	Expert plan unclear	Spend £140k at experts midpoint	Variance not recorded	Client not told	CPR budgeting applies	Expert spend exceeds phase cap unreported	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Overrun hidden and plan unclear.	complaint_risk	1	Synthetic
CBU-TR-005	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	US	Federal	2,021	Commercial	adjudicative_process	2C	Internal budget $250k; client monthly cap $40k	Phase plan and monthly reporting agreed	Spend $78k over 2 months	Variance explained by emergency injunction	Client approved temporary cap increase by email	Budget policy followed	null	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Cap change approved and evidenced.	stable	0	Synthetic
CBU-TR-006	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	US	Federal	2,021	Commercial	adjudicative_process	2C	Internal budget $250k; cap $40k monthly	Phase plan exists	Spend $95k in month 1	No explanation	No approval	Reporting missed	Cap breach; missed reporting	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Cap breached without approval or reporting.	fee_dispute_risk	0	Synthetic
CBU-TR-007	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	County Court	2,022	Housing	adjudicative_process	2C	Small claims style budget £12k fixed fee stages	Plan aligns with fixed stages	Spend aligns with stages and fixed fee	No variance	Client signoff on fixed fee letter	Court rules on fixed costs apply	null	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Fixed fee and stages aligned.	stable	0	Synthetic
CBU-TR-008	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	County Court	2,022	Housing	adjudicative_process	2C	Fixed fee stages £12k	No phase plan kept	Spend billed hourly beyond fixed fee	No variance analysis	No client consent to change funding model	Fixed costs regime applies	Billing model drift	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Drift from fixed fee without consent.	fee_dispute_risk	1	Synthetic
CBU-TR-009	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	EU	Commercial Court	2,020	Commercial	adjudicative_process	2C	Budget €180k; mediation expected month 4	Plan includes mediation and decision gates	Spend €62k by month 3	Variance small; forecast updated	Client approved continued work after mediation failed	Budget governance tracked	null	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Decision gates and approvals tracked.	stable	0	Synthetic
CBU-TR-010	legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1	EU	Commercial Court	2,020	Commercial	adjudicative_process	2C	Budget €180k	Plan vague; no decision gates	Spend €140k by month 3	No forecast updates	No approval to continue after mediation failed	Budget governance weak	Runaway spend	Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Spend runaway with no governance.	complaint_risk	1	Synthetic

What this dataset does

You receive

costs budget phase plan spend to date variance analysis client approval record budget rules summary red flags

You decide

coherent or incoherent

Daily use

stop runaway costs

reduce fee disputes

strengthen budget governance

improve variation discipline

Downloads last month: 21

Number of rows:

Total file size:

13.4 kB