Create data/train.csv

data/train.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+uid,dataset_id,jurisdiction,court_level,year,area_of_law,pillar,series,input_costs_budget_summary,input_matter_phase_plan_summary,input_spend_to_date_summary,input_variance_analysis_summary,input_client_approval_record_summary,input_court_budget_rules_summary,input_red_flags,question,ground_truth_label,ground_truth_rationale,outcome_signal,early_window_months,source_citation
+CBU-TR-001,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,UK,High Court,2023,Civil Litigation,adjudicative_process,2C,"Approved budget £120k; phases pleaded case, CMC, disclosure, witness, experts, trial","Phase plan aligns with budgeted phases and dates","Spend £38k by disclosure start","Variance +5 percent explained by extra interlocutory application","Client approved variance and revised forecast in writing","CPR costs budgeting followed; revisions documented","None","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",coherent,"Tracked variance and approval recorded.",stable,0,"Synthetic"
+CBU-TR-002,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,UK,High Court,2023,Civil Litigation,adjudicative_process,2C,"Approved budget £120k by phase","Phase plan exists","Spend £75k before disclosure complete","No variance analysis","No approval record","CPR budgeting applies","Spend spike; no approval; no analysis","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",incoherent,"Large drift with no analysis or consent.",fee_dispute_risk,0,"Synthetic"
+CBU-TR-003,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,UK,High Court,2022,Construction,adjudicative_process,2C,"Budget £300k incl experts £90k","Expert-heavy plan clear","Spend £110k at experts midpoint","Variance +12 percent due to extra expert meeting; forecast updated","Client approved increased expert cap","CPR budgeting and Precedent H updated","None","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",coherent,"Variance managed and documented.",stable,0,"Synthetic"
+CBU-TR-004,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,UK,High Court,2022,Construction,adjudicative_process,2C,"Budget £300k incl experts £90k","Expert plan unclear","Spend £140k at experts midpoint","Variance not recorded","Client not told","CPR budgeting applies","Expert spend exceeds phase cap unreported","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",incoherent,"Overrun hidden and plan unclear.",complaint_risk,1,"Synthetic"
+CBU-TR-005,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,US,Federal,2021,Commercial,adjudicative_process,2C,"Internal budget $250k; client monthly cap $40k","Phase plan and monthly reporting agreed","Spend $78k over 2 months","Variance explained by emergency injunction","Client approved temporary cap increase by email","Budget policy followed","None","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",coherent,"Cap change approved and evidenced.",stable,0,"Synthetic"
+CBU-TR-006,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,US,Federal,2021,Commercial,adjudicative_process,2C,"Internal budget $250k; cap $40k monthly","Phase plan exists","Spend $95k in month 1","No explanation","No approval","Reporting missed","Cap breach; missed reporting","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",incoherent,"Cap breached without approval or reporting.",fee_dispute_risk,0,"Synthetic"
+CBU-TR-007,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,UK,County Court,2022,Housing,adjudicative_process,2C,"Small claims style budget £12k fixed fee stages","Plan aligns with fixed stages","Spend aligns with stages and fixed fee","No variance","Client signoff on fixed fee letter","Court rules on fixed costs apply","None","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",coherent,"Fixed fee and stages aligned.",stable,0,"Synthetic"
+CBU-TR-008,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,UK,County Court,2022,Housing,adjudicative_process,2C,"Fixed fee stages £12k","No phase plan kept","Spend billed hourly beyond fixed fee","No variance analysis","No client consent to change funding model","Fixed costs regime applies","Billing model drift","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",incoherent,"Drift from fixed fee without consent.",fee_dispute_risk,1,"Synthetic"
+CBU-TR-009,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,EU,Commercial Court,2020,Commercial,adjudicative_process,2C,"Budget €180k; mediation expected month 4","Plan includes mediation and decision gates","Spend €62k by month 3","Variance small; forecast updated","Client approved continued work after mediation failed","Budget governance tracked","None","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",coherent,"Decision gates and approvals tracked.",stable,0,"Synthetic"
+CBU-TR-010,legal-costs-budget-spend-approval-coherence-risk-v0.1,EU,Commercial Court,2020,Commercial,adjudicative_process,2C,"Budget €180k","Plan vague; no decision gates","Spend €140k by month 3","No forecast updates","No approval to continue after mediation failed","Budget governance weak","Runaway spend","Is costs budget coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.",incoherent,"Spend runaway with no governance.",complaint_risk,1,"Synthetic"