Datasets:

ClarusC64
/

legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1

uid stringclasses 10 values	dataset_id stringclasses 1 value	jurisdiction stringclasses 3 values	court_level stringclasses 5 values	year int64 2.02k 2.02k	area_of_law stringclasses 4 values	pillar stringclasses 1 value	series stringclasses 1 value	input_offer_type stringclasses 5 values	input_terms_and_scope stringclasses 10 values	input_timing_and_case_stage stringclasses 8 values	input_valuation_and_evidence_posture stringclasses 10 values	input_cost_consequence_statement stringclasses 10 values	input_expiry_and_acceptance_mechanics stringclasses 10 values	input_offer_risk_signals stringclasses 10 values	question stringclasses 1 value	ground_truth_label stringclasses 2 values	ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10 values	outcome_signal stringclasses 2 values	early_window_months int64 0 2	source_citation stringclasses 1 value
OF-TR-001	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	UK	High Court	2,023	Commercial	adjudicative_process	2C	Part 36 offer	Pay £250k in full and final settlement of claim and counterclaim inclusive of interest. Costs to be assessed if not agreed	Pre-disclosure settlement window	Evidence mixed. Quantum disputed	States Part 36 and relevant cost consequences in general terms	Open 21 days. Acceptance in writing	Clear scope and mechanics	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Correct format, clear scope, sensible timing and mechanics.	stable	0	Synthetic
OF-TR-002	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	UK	High Court	2,023	Commercial	adjudicative_process	2C	Part 36 offer	We offer £250k to settle. Costs included maybe	Pre-action	No valuation basis stated	Cost consequences misstated and ambiguous	No 21-day period and unclear acceptance	Ambiguous terms and mechanics	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Part 36 requirements and clarity not met.	cost_risk	1	Synthetic
OF-TR-003	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	UK	County Court	2,022	Personal Injury	adjudicative_process	2C	Part 36 offer	Pay £18k plus claimant costs to date. Settlement of damages only	Post-medical exchange	Medical evidence supports moderate quantum	Cost consequences referenced correctly	21-day relevant period included	Scope matches pleaded damages	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Terms map to relief and timing matches evidence stage.	stable	0	Synthetic
OF-TR-004	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	UK	County Court	2,022	Personal Injury	adjudicative_process	2C	Part 36 offer	Settle liability only for £10k	Post-liability admitted stage	Relief sought is damages not liability payment	Cost statement absent	No expiry mechanics	Mismatch with relief	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Offer does not map to pleaded relief and lacks mechanics.	cost_risk	2	Synthetic
OF-TR-005	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	US	State	2,021	Tort	adjudicative_process	2C	Rule 68 offer	Offer judgment for $40k inclusive of costs	Pre-trial	Evidence supports $30k-$50k range	States rule and cost shift logic broadly	Acceptance within 14 days per rule	Mechanics align	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Proper form and timing with reasonable valuation.	stable	0	Synthetic
OF-TR-006	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	US	State	2,021	Tort	adjudicative_process	2C	Rule 68 offer	We offer $40k. You must accept by tomorrow	Pre-trial	Valuation unclear	No rule reference and wrong deadline	Mechanics inconsistent	High risk	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Wrong mechanics and unclear cost consequences.	cost_risk	1	Synthetic
OF-TR-007	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	EU	Commercial Court	2,020	Commercial	adjudicative_process	2C	Without prejudice save as to costs offer	€120k plus interest. Mutual release. Costs position stated	After exchange of pleadings	Invoices and acceptance strong	Explains costs posture and settlement basis	Open 21 days. Acceptance written	Clear terms	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Clear scope and timing with cost posture.	stable	0	Synthetic
OF-TR-008	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	EU	Commercial Court	2,020	Commercial	adjudicative_process	2C	Settlement offer	€1m to settle everything maybe	Early stage	Evidence weak and quantum unknown	No costs statement	No acceptance mechanics	Vague scope	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Vague scope and no mechanics. Valuation ungrounded.	cost_risk	2	Synthetic
OF-TR-009	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	UK	Tribunal	2,021	Employment	adjudicative_process	2C	Calderbank offer	Pay £12k plus reference wording. Settlement of claims	Post-ET1 stage	Liability uncertain	States save as to costs nature	Open 14 days. Acceptance in writing	Clear scope	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Appropriate form and clear terms for tribunal context.	stable	0	Synthetic
OF-TR-010	legal-offer-part36-terms-timing-cost-risk-coherence-v0.1	UK	Tribunal	2,021	Employment	adjudicative_process	2C	Part 36 offer	Part 36 offer in tribunal with unclear rules	Post-ET1 stage	Evidence unclear	Cost consequences claimed incorrectly	No relevant period defined	Wrong forum form	Is offer coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Offer type misfit for forum and cost logic unclear.	cost_risk	2	Synthetic

What this dataset does

You receive

offer type terms and scope timing and stage valuation posture cost consequence statement expiry and mechanics risk signals

You decide

coherent or incoherent

Daily use

offer QC before sending

cost risk mismatch detection

wrong form detection

unclear scope detection

Downloads last month: 10

Number of rows:

Total file size:

13.2 kB