uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 5
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 3
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_cause_of_action stringclasses 10
values | input_required_elements stringclasses 10
values | input_allegations_summary stringclasses 10
values | input_evidence_signposted stringclasses 10
values | input_remedy_pleaded stringclasses 10
values | input_internal_consistency_signals stringclasses 8
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 4
values | early_window_months int64 0 3 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL-TR-001 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Breach of contract | Contract formation breach loss causation | Signed contract late delivery loss quantified | Contract emails delivery records invoices | Damages £450k plus interest | No contradictions | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Elements pleaded with evidence signposts and consistent remedy. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-002 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Misrepresentation | False statement reliance causation loss | Alleges false statements but does not plead reliance | No evidence list | Rescission and £2m damages | Missing reliance element | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Key element missing and proof posture unclear. | strike_out_risk | 2 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-003 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Retaliation | Protected activity adverse action causation | Timeline complaint then termination | Complaint record HR emails | Backpay and reinstatement | Consistent chronology | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Elements covered with clear timeline and remedy fit. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-004 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Discrimination | Protected class adverse action inference | Alleges discrimination but facts contradict on comparator dates | No documents signposted | Punitive damages only | Internal contradictions | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Contradictory facts undermine element mapping and remedy posture. | dismissal_risk | 3 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-005 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Unfair dismissal | Dismissal potentially fair reason reasonableness procedure | Pleads procedural failures and appeal defect | Policies minutes appeal email | Compensation and reinstatement alternative | Consistent | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Matches elements and evidence with sensible remedies. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-006 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Constructive dismissal | Fundamental breach resignation causation | Pleads breach but omits resignation date | No timeline evidence | Compensation | Missing resignation fact | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Missing resignation fact breaks causation element. | strike_out_risk | 2 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-007 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Non-payment | Contract invoice due non-payment | Pleads invoices issued and accepted | Invoices acceptance emails ledger | Payment plus interest | Consistent | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Straight element mapping with proof signposts. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-008 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Unlawful termination | Contract breach by termination | Pleading ignores termination clause allowing termination | Contract clause contradicts | Injunction and €1m | Contradiction with contract terms | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Allegation conflicts with key contract term. | dismissal_risk | 2 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-009 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Civil | legal_actors | 3B | Negligence | Duty breach causation loss | Pleads hazard and injury with timeline | Photos incident report medical note | General damages and special damages | Consistent | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Elements present with evidence anchors. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-010 | legal-pleading-allegation-element-proof-coherence-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Fraud | False representation knowledge intent reliance loss | Pleads fraud but facts describe only breach | No fraud particulars | £5m damages | Overpleading signals | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Cause of action misfit and particulars missing. | cost_sanction_risk | 3 | Synthetic |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.