Datasets:
uid string | dataset_id string | jurisdiction string | court_level string | year int64 | area_of_law string | pillar string | series string | input_pleaded_causes string | input_material_facts_summary string | input_causation_chain_summary string | input_pleaded_remedy string | input_internal_consistency_signals string | input_missing_element_flags string | question string | ground_truth_label string | ground_truth_rationale string | outcome_signal string | early_window_months int64 | source_citation string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PL-TR-001 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Breach of contract | Contract clause. Delivery date. Late delivery. Loss quantified. | Late delivery caused stoppage and loss | Damages and interest | No contradictions | null | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Elements supported and remedy fits cause. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-002 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Breach of contract and fraud | No misrepresentation facts pleaded. Only says 'fraudulent' | Causation not stated | Punitive damages and imprisonment request | Contradictions in dates | Fraud elements missing | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Overpleading and remedy mismatch with missing elements. | strike_out_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-003 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Retaliation under statute | Protected activity date. Adverse action date. Knowledge alleged. | Temporal proximity and stated motive | Back pay and reinstatement | Consistent | null | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Cause elements supported with remedy aligned. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-004 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Retaliation | No protected activity described | No causation story | Reinstatement requested | Inconsistent employer names | Missing protected activity element | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Key element missing and internal inconsistency present. | dismissal_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-005 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Disrepair breach of implied term | Damp reports dates. Notices. Failure to repair. Health impact. | Damp caused symptoms and loss of amenity | Repair order and damages | Consistent | null | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Material facts cover breach and harm with suitable remedy. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-006 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Disrepair | States damp but no notice dates or duty source | No causation detail | Eviction of landlord demanded | Remedy mismatch | Duty and notice missing | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Missing duty and notice facts and seeks unavailable remedy. | amend_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-007 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Non-payment invoice | Invoice number due date service and non-payment pleaded | Non-payment caused cash shortfall and interest | Payment plus interest | Consistent | null | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Straight elements and remedy align. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-008 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Unjust enrichment and breach | Facts only show contract exists | Causation unclear | Double recovery demanded | Inconsistent theory | Unjust enrichment barred by contract facts | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Inconsistent causes and remedy risks double recovery. | dismissal_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-009 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Unfair dismissal | Employment start date dismissal date procedure defects pleaded | Defects caused unfairness and loss | Compensation and basic award | Consistent | null | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Material facts support claim and remedy fits. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
PL-TR-010 | legal-pleading-cause-facts-remedy-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Discrimination | Protected characteristic not identified | No comparator or facts | Injunction demanded beyond forum | Inconsistent respondent name | Missing core elements | Is pleading coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Missing core facts for discrimination and remedy mismatch. | strike_out_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
causes pleaded material facts causation chain remedy consistency signals missing element flags
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
pleading QC
missing element detection
remedy mismatch flag
amend required routing
- Downloads last month
- 6