Datasets:
uid string | dataset_id string | jurisdiction string | court_level string | year int64 | area_of_law string | pillar string | series string | input_document_and_rule_context string | input_required_service_method string | input_address_for_service string | input_actual_service_steps string | input_proof_of_service string | input_service_timing string | question string | ground_truth_label string | ground_truth_rationale string | outcome_signal string | early_window_months int64 | source_citation string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SV-TR-001 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Claim form CPR service rules apply | Personal service or permitted alternatives | Defendant solicitors address for service on record | Served by first class post to solicitors address | Certificate of service filed | Within 4 months | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Method permitted, correct address, proof and timing ok. | valid_service | 0 | Synthetic |
SV-TR-002 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,023 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Claim form service | Personal service required absent alternative order | No address for service confirmed | Sent by email to a generic inbox | No consent for email service and no certificate | Near deadline | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Wrong method and no consent or proof. | strike_out_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
SV-TR-003 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Summons and complaint under federal rules | Service by process server on registered agent | Registered agent address on filing | Process server served agent and filed return | Return of service filed | Within 90 days | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Matches rule method with proof filed in time. | valid_service | 0 | Synthetic |
SV-TR-004 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Summons and complaint | Serve registered agent | Agent address known | Mailed to CEO home address without waiver | No return of service | Late | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Wrong method, wrong address, proof missing and late. | dismissal_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
SV-TR-005 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | Tribunal application notice | Email permitted where address provided | Respondent representative email on record | Sent by email and copied tribunal | Email record retained | Within time | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Permitted method and record supports proof and timing. | valid_service | 0 | Synthetic |
SV-TR-006 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | adjudicative_process | 2C | Tribunal notice | Email permitted only to stated address | Respondent address for service is postal | Sent by email to HR general mailbox | No confirmation | In time | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Wrong address and consent not established. | service_challenge_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
SV-TR-007 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Statement of claim | Registered post to service address | Service address in contract clause | Sent registered post with tracking | Tracking and receipt saved | In time | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Matches contract service clause with proof and timing. | valid_service | 0 | Synthetic |
SV-TR-008 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Commercial Court | 2,020 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Statement of claim | Registered post | Service clause address exists | Sent ordinary post to different branch address | No receipt | In time | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Wrong address and method lacks proof. | service_challenge_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
SV-TR-009 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,022 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Application notice for injunction | Service on solicitors permitted | Solicitors address for service confirmed | Served by DX to address and receipt logged | Certificate filed | Within deadline | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Permitted method, correct address, proof and timing ok. | valid_service | 0 | Synthetic |
SV-TR-010 | legal-service-method-address-proof-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | High Court | 2,022 | Commercial | adjudicative_process | 2C | Application notice with 3-day deadline | Method permitted if served by 4pm | Address correct | Posted after 4pm on last day | Certificate filed | Late under rule timing | Is service record coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Timing fails rule even if method and address ok. | late_service_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
rule context required method address for service actual steps proof timing
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
service QC
re-serve trigger
timing breach flag
extension trigger
- Downloads last month
- 8